GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, FEBRUARY 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
doi: 10.1515/geoca-2017-0001
www.geologicacarpathica.com
Pliocene –Pleistocene geomorphological evolution
of the Adriatic side of Central Italy
BERNARDINO GENTILI
1
, GILBERTO PAMBIANCHI
2
, DOMENICO ARINGOLI
2
,
MARCO MATERAZZI
2
and MARCO GIACOPETTI
2
1
School of Architecture and Design, University of Camerino, Italy
2
School of Science and Technology, University of Camerino, Italy;
marco.materazzi@unicam.it
(Manuscript received December 10, 2015; accepted in revised form November 30, 2016)
Abstract: This work is a significant contribution to knowledge of the Quaternary and pre-Quaternary morphogenesis of
a wide sector of central Italy, from the Apennine chain to the Adriatic Sea. The goal is achieved through a careful analysis
and interpretation of stratigraphic and tectonic data relating to marine and continental sediments and, mostly, through the
study of relict limbs of ancient landscapes (erosional surfaces shaped by prevailing planation processes). The most important
scientific datum is the definition of the time span in which the modelling of the oldest morphological element (the “summit
relict surface”) occurred: it started during Messinian in the westernmost portion and after a significant phase during
middle-late Pliocene, ended in the early Pleistocene. During the middle and late Pleistocene, the rapid tectonic uplift of
the area and the climate fluctuations favoured the deepening of the hydrographic network and the genesis of three orders
of fluvial terraces, thus completing the fundamental features of the landscape. The subsequent Holocene evolution
reshaped the minor elements, but not the basic ones.
Keywords: planation surfaces, marine sediments, continental deposits, Pliocene –Pleistocene, central Apennines,
Peri-Adriatic belt.
Introduction
This paper describes the landscape geomorphological evolu-
tion of the Apennine and the Peri-Adriatic belt of the Marche
region, through the analysis and interpretation of past and new
data from recent and detailed geological and geomorphologi-
cal analyses. This geomorphological “model” can be extended,
despite local and at times marked differences, even to the
neighbouring central-northern Abruzzi region sector (Fig. 1).
The study is focused to the Plio–Pleistocene geomorpho-
logical evolution, when the structuring of the fundamental fea-
tures of the present landscape took place. In fact, during the
Holocene, the origin and evolution of a rural and urban land-
scape, which represent the most important human impact on
the territory, did not change the fundamental features but only
the minor landforms.
The Umbria-Marche sector of the central Apennine ridge
represents, because of its unique and continuous lithostrati-
graphic sequences and the particular “exposures” of tectonic
elements, a territorial unit of great scientific interest. Analysis
and interpretation of the geological setting, mostly carried out
in the last forty years, reached a high level of detail. Neverthe-
less, Quaternary and pre-Quaternary morphogenesis, espe-
cially for the Pliocene–Pleistocene period, is still poorly
known, mostly concerning time and manner of the main
morpho-evolutive stages as well as the role played by the
various control factors.
The oldest geomorphological elements in the study area
consist of several generations of low-relief erosion surfaces:
the most ancient ones, generally pre-Quaternary in age,
characterize the mountain ridges, while the hilly reliefs are the
youngest. These elements, whose genesis and evolution has
been attributed to different planation processes, have been
recognized by several authors in all parts of the Italian penin-
sula (Demangeot 1965; Bernini et al. 1977; Bartolini 1980;
Sestini 1981; Calamita et al. 1982; Ciccacci et al. 1985;
Brancaccio et al. 1991; Dramis et al. 1991; Veneri et al. 1991;
Dramis 1992; Nesci et al. 1992; Calamita et al. 1994; Bosi et
al. 1996; Chiarini et al. 1997; Amato & Cinque 1999; Calamita
et al. 1999; Gentili & Pambianchi 1999; Coltorti & Pieruccini
2000; Schiattarella et al. 2003; Della Seta et al. 2008).
During the Quaternary this “smooth” landscape underwent
deep changes as a result of a strong tectonic uplift. The associa-
ted tectonic elements with prevalent extensional kinematics
(mainly NW–SE and WSW–ENE oriented) created tectonic
basins, slope deformations and hydrographic network setup.
The coeval and marked climatic oscillations and the alterna-
tion of fluvial and marine erosion /sedimentation phases,
induced several processes (Calamita et al. 1982; Gentili &
Pambianchi 1987; Coltorti et al. 1991; Nesci & Savelli 1991;
Calamita et al. 1994; Coltorti & Farabollini1995; Coltorti et al.
1996; Fanucci et al. 1996; Cello et al. 1997; Calamita et al.
1999; Nesci et al. 2002; Aringoli et al. 2007, 2008, 2010;
Materazzi et al. 2010; Nesci et al. 2012; Aringoli et al. 2014):
• the partial filling of the tectonic basins due to the deposi-
tion of powerful lacustrine and fluvial-lacustrine sedi-
ments, including clays and gravels, sometimes alternating
with thin layers of volcanic ash;
7
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE ADRIATIC SIDE OF CENTRAL ITALY
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
• opening and deepening of river valleys, characterized by
the presence of four main orders of alluvial terraces;
• genesis of a shoreline characterized by alternating
wide sandy-gravelly beaches and mostly inactive
sea-cliffs.
Moreover, the main rivers which transversally cut the region
from the Apennine chain to the Adriatic Sea, created (Calamita
et al. 1994; Gentili & Pambianchi 1994; Gentili et al. 1995 and
1998; Dramis et al. 1995; Aringoli et al. 1996; Fanucci et al.
1996; Di Bucci et al. 2003; Aringoli et al. 2010):
• narrow and deep valleys within the Apennine ridge;
• gentle landforms with marked isolated reliefs (insel-
bergs), in the pedemountain belt;
• cuesta morphologies in the hilly Peri-Adriatic belt.
Fig.
1.
a
— Geological
sketch of the
study
area;
b
—
schematic
geological
cross-section
from the
Apennine
chain
to the
Adriatic sea.
8
GENTILI, PAMBIANCHI, ARINGOLI, MATERAZZI and GIACOPETTI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
The following are associated with the intense deepening of
the hydrographic network:
• wide and deep phenomena (even though without clear
diagnostic elements) induced by gravitational tectonics;
• deep-seated gravitational slope deformations (DSGSD)
and landslides..
The chronology of the initial phase of landscape modelling,
as well as subsequent ones, is difficult using only geomorpho-
logical data; integrating and comparing data from tectonic-
sedimentary studies is therefore fundamental.
Geological and geomorphological setting
The Umbria-Marche Apennines consist of two different
ridges that merge to the south, creating the Sibillini Mountains
massif (Fig. 1); a short description of the stratigraphic type
sequence, mainly based on the stratigraphic schemes worked
out by M. Chiocchini, P. Didaskalou, A. Micarelli and M.
Potetti as part of the projects aimed at compiling the Geo-
logical Map of the Marche Region (Centamore et al. 1986;
Regione Marche 2001; Pierantoni et al. 2013) will be given
next.
The base is given by the “Calcare massiccio” formation
(Early Jurassic), a thick calcareous complex, approximately
700 m thick, disarticulated into a “horst and graben” system
by the Jurassic extensional tectonics. The “Corniola”, “Bosso”
and “Calcari diasprigni” formations (Early Jurassic–Late
Jurassic) are visible above, corresponding to the deepest sec-
tors, with an overall thickness of more than 500 m. On the
other hand, a condensed succession of variable thickness (less
than 50 m) corresponds to the structural “highs”. It is mainly
composed of nodular and marly limestones belonging to the
“Bugarone” formation (Early Jurassic). The “Maiolica” for-
mation (Early Jurassic–Late Cretaceous), present on the top of
both sequences and composed of prevalently micritic lime-
stones, filled the seabed, followed by the “Marne a fucoidi”
(Late Cretaceous) and the “Scaglia group” (Palaeocene–
Eocene) calcareous and marly calcareous formations, with
a total thickness often exceeding 300 metres. The “Scaglia
cinerea”, “Bisciaro”, “Schlier”, “Marne con Cerrogna” and
“Marne a Pteropodi
”
marly formations with interbedded calc-
arenites (Eocene–Miocene), are present above, with a total
thickness of about 200 metres.
Associations of turbiditic and pelitic-sandstones (Messi-
nian), outcrop between the two calcareous ridges and along
the eastern flank of the Marchean ridge.
The Peri-Adriatic belt, more to the east, is instead characte-
rized by pelitic and sandy-conglomeratic turbidites, belonging
to the marine “Pliocene–Pleistocene sedimentary cycle”
(Fig. 1) (Cantalamessa et al. 1986).
On a regional scale the structural setting is constituted by:
• anticline folds involving Mesozoic–Miocene units;
• syncline folds in the turbiditic sediments;
• east-verging monoclinalic structures involving the
Peri-Adriatic turbidites.
This “schematic” structural setting is complicated by the
presence of several east-verging thrusts which caused the
overlapping of various levels of the sedimentary succession
and the resulting genesis of the Umbria-Marche Apennine
(Calamita & Deiana 1988; Mazzoli et al. 2005; Pierantoni et
al. 2013). The genesis is associated with the intense Oligo-
cene–Miocene compressive tectonics (active until the Plio-
cene), in the outermost sector (Bally et al. 1986; Deiana &
Pialli 1994; Calamita et al. 2012; Di Domenica et al. 2012)
and to wide-ranging vertical movements, not related to the
structural setting of bedrock (Dufaure et al. 1989; Dramis
1992). Normal faults with NW–SE trend, connected to a gene-
ralized tectonic uplift and the associated extensional phase
(with maximum during the early and mid-Pleistocene)
(Demangeot 1965; Ambrosetti et al. 1982; Coltorti et al. 1991;
Mazzoli et al. 2005) are mainly superimposed on the previous
compressive structures: as a consequence, they generated,
along the chain and its Tyrrhenian side, wide tectonic basins,
tiered lowering of the relict surface, and tectonic-gravitational
phenomena (Calamita et al. 1994; Gentili & Pambianchi 1994;
Materazzi et al. 2014). Less frequent SSW–NNE faults, on the
other hand, generated topographic “undulations” (Dramis et
al. 1991) outlining three main transversal “ridges” (Fig. 2).
The physical landscape is therefore characterized by a strict
conformity between the main geomorphological elements and
the overall geological setting. In fact, structural “highs” corre-
spond to morphological highs (i.e. reliefs with maximum ele-
vation around 2500 m a.s.l.), while structural “lows” (i.e.
tectonic basins) correspond to elongated depressions; the
Peri-Adriatic monocline, incised by the main river valleys,
corresponds to typical triangular hilly reliefs with the top facing
west. On a larger scale such conformity is complicated by the
aforementioned transversal “ridges” (which give rise to cliffs
along the coast) and by scarps and benches along the valley
floors created by the emplacement of four main orders of flu-
vial terraces (Middle Pleistocene–Holocene) (Coltorti et al.
1991; Gentili & Pambianchi 1987; Nesci et al. 2012).
Results and discussion
Geological and geomorphological data
Geological data related to the Miocene–Pliocene tectonic
and sedimentary evolution are fundamental for the reconstruc-
tion of the evolutional stages of the continental landscape of
central Italy (Centamore & Deiana 1986; Boccaletti et al.
1986; Centamore & Micarelli 1991; Cantalamessa & Di
Celma 2004). During the Messinian the westernmost areas,
Tuscany and Umbria, emerge progressively, according to a
thrust belt mechanism (Fig. 3).
In the foredeep area, placed immediately to the east (Marche
sector), the turbiditic sedimentation, occurred in narrow
basins, elongated in a NW–SE direction.
During the Middle and Late Messinian, simultaneously with
the “salinity crisis” of the Mediterranean (Cita 1976;
9
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE ADRIATIC SIDE OF CENTRAL ITALY
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
Centamore & Deiana 1986; Wezel 1994; Butler et al. 1995),
continental areas have grown at the edges of the primordial
Tuscany-Umbria Apennines. The intense compressional tec-
tonics, as well as producing a general seabed uplifting, locally
created narrow and shallow basins and structural highs, bor-
dered by NW–SE and SSW–NNE faults: the latter, affecting
the morphology of the seabed (with the formation of subma-
rine valleys), generated preferential pathways for turbiditic
flows coming from the west. These flows filled the above
mentioned basins, where coarse materials (arenaceous peb-
bles) produced after the initial dismantling of the calcareous
ridge were deposited. Contributions to such deposition also
came from local fluvial sediments produced by the erosion of
the Bisciaro and Schlier marly formations, which were out-
cropping on the first emerged areas of the Umbria-Marche
ridge (Fig. 3). During this period continental erosion became
particularly intense in relation to the intense compressional
tectonics and to the humid climate conditions connected with
the volcanic activity of the period (Centamore & Micarelli
1991; Wezel 1994).
The subsequent Plio–Pleistocene marine sedimentation is
very complex and variable in time and space in relation to tec-
tonic events that influenced morphology and sedimentation.
At the beginning of the Pliocene the Apennine chain continued
its progressively eastward structuring, forming the Umbria-
Marche and Marche ridges and the depression in between
(Fig. 1).
In the northern sector, the depositional sequence within
basins articulated by the synsedimentary tectonics, is given
by clays, passing upwards to sandy turbidites. The “Val
Fig. 2. DEM of the study area with indication of the main transversal ridges, and corresponding sea-cliffs and drainages.
10
GENTILI, PAMBIANCHI, ARINGOLI, MATERAZZI and GIACOPETTI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
Marecchia gravitational flow” (varicoloured clays, Ligurides)
fills one of these basins; on the top fan-delta pebbles, coming
from the flow itself and referring to end of the lower Pliocene/
beginning of the middle Pliocene time span and to a 500m-deep
environment, are deposited. In other cases, the sequence top is
characterized by conglomerates conveyed in the basin depres-
sions and resulting from fan-delta deposit remobilization of
the Po river domain (Veneri 1986). The sediments of the mid-
dle-late Pliocene are mainly clayey and generally of limited
extension.
Likewise, in the central sector, the Pliocene deposits have
limited overall extension and exhibit clayey facies of a bathyal
environment.
In the southern area (between the Tenna and Tesino rivers),
arenaceous-conglomeratic beach deposits, related to the mid-
dle Pliocene transgression, overlap the pelitic-arenaceous
facies of the Laga formation (Messinian). This contact is
marked by a sharp erosion surface that truncates the Messinian
sediments and, more in detail, it is tilted eastward by 15–20°
as a result of the aforementioned upper Pliocene compressive
tectonics and the subsequent uplifting. This surface is still
present and observable 10–12 km eastward of the Apennine
ridge, where it is “protected” by the transgressive sediments.
Originally it extended to the ridge, where it probably cut the
Miocene sediments of the Umbria-Marche Succession (cur-
rently absent at the top of the relief), and had a sub-horizontal
trend: in fact, the strata of the overlying transgressive sedi-
ments are approximately parallel to the surface itself; even the
original extension to the west of these sediments would be
much greater than today (Fig. 4) (Gentili et al. 1995).
The genesis of such stratigraphic discontinuities is to be
associated with the intense Pliocene compressive tectonics
(which completed the emergence of the Apennine chain and of
the Messinian turbidites), and the concomitant arid-warm or
subtropical-humid climatic conditions, both favourable to
peneplanation processes (Denny 1967; Butzer 1976; Centamore
& Deiana 1986). Marine erosion, significantly contributed to
the genesis of this surface: this period, in fact, corresponds to
the highest level reached by the sea between the Messinian
and the Holocene, as a consequence of ice caps thawing (Cen-
tamore & Deiana 1986; Haq et al. 1987; Bigi et al. 1995).
Because no traces of mid-Pliocene sediments and surface ero-
sion have been observed along the Apennine ridge it can be
assumed that they have been “erased” during the subsequent
phase of erosion.
The middle and upper Pliocene sedimentation continues
with shelf-to-bathial clays, thicker eastward, with interspersed
conglomeratic levels (submarine fans), mainly consisting of
calcarenitic clasts; marly calcareous and arenaceous pebbles
are in fact very rare (Cantalamessa et al. 1986; Centamore &
Deiana 1986; Coltorti et al. 1991). Pebbly deposits of clearly
fluvial origin, originated from the Apennines or, subordinately,
from neighbouring ridges (“Montagna dei Fiori” and Gran
Sasso massifs) and were transported within the basin through
transversal channels already active in earlier times (Cantala-
messa et al. 1986; Bigi et al. 1995; Gentili et al. 1998).
Areal differences also occur in marine Pleistocene sedi-
ments. In the northern and central sectors the base of the early
Pleistocene, is given by clays and sands deposited in a 500m-
deep environment, on which Sicilian conglomeratic lenses are
Fig. 3. Palaeogeographic reconstruction of central Italy during Messinian, with first emerged areas of the Umbria-Marche ridge.
11
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE ADRIATIC SIDE OF CENTRAL ITALY
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
deposited in discordance. In the southern sector, on the con-
trary, the Pleistocene succession is more powerful and conti-
nuous and it starts with a pelitic complex containing numerous
conglomeratic and sandy-conglomeratic bodies deposited in
a shelf environment characterized by storm deposits (end of
early Pleistocene). A marked erosional surface is present
between these deposits and the mainly gravelly sediments
of Sicilian age: moreover numerous evidences of synsedi-
mentary extensional tectonics are found. Sicilian deposits,
currently present up to about 10 km from the Adriatic Sea,
show eastern dip: this is due partly to depositional conditions
(clinostratigraphy) and partly to the tilting connected with
vertical uplifting and the compressive tectonics which are still
active along the Adriatic coast (Riguzzi et al. 1989; Di Bucci
et al. 2003).
The tectonic and sedimentary history above described is
fundamental for the reconstruction of the continental land-
scape; clastic contributions from the formations of the
Fig. 4. a — Transgressive sedimentary sequence and tectonic-sedimentary evolution of study area during the middle Pliocene; b — detail of
the erosional surface at Monte San Martino.
12
GENTILI, PAMBIANCHI, ARINGOLI, MATERAZZI and GIACOPETTI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
Umbria-Marche Apennines, are absent in the whole Peri-
Adriatic belt, up to the base of the middle Pliocene. Later,
during the middle Pliocene and mainly in the late Pliocene, the
deposition of conglomeratic bodies mainly constituted by cal-
careous pebbles occurred only in the southern Marche region.
In this area, which is the most tectonically uplifted, and for
the time span considered it can be assumed that erosion pro-
cesses mainly involved the marly-calcarenitic units (Scaglia
cinerea, Bisciaro, Schlier, Marne con Cerrogna and Marne a
Pteropodi formations), that were still covering most of the
Apennine ridges. The Pliocene sedimentation, in fact, in
agreement with the lithological composition of the above
mentioned units, is mostly constituted by a prevailing pelitic
component, while the clastic deposits represent not more than
10 %. The volumes are also certainly comparable. The marly-
calcarenitic units could provide about 4/5 of the middle-upper
Pliocene sediments. The remaining fraction is attributable to
contributions from erosion of the oldest units (“Scaglia” for-
mations), by river valleys probably set on ancient turbiditic
flowlines which can be associated with the reduced presence
of marly-calcareous clasts within conglomeratic levels.
The erosion of the Laga Formation, outcropping between the
basin and the chain, is linked to the deposition of the arena-
ceous bodies of the early middle Pliocene, of the sandy levels
and of the rare arenaceous pebbles within the conglomeratic
pebbles.
The early Pleistocene is marked by a strong marine regres-
sion, similar to that of the middle Messinian and probably
associa ted with the same arid-cold clima tic conditions (Denny
1967; Butzer 1976; Haq et al. 1987; Bull 1992). The associa-
ted intense areal erosion processes produced: i) the removal of
the westernmost transgressive sediments, the further dismant-
ling of the Laga Formation below, down to the pre-eva poritic
levels in the innermost areas; ii) the final dismantling of the
marly-calcarenitic units and part of the “Scaglia” formations:
in the Sibillini Mountains, but also in the most elevated areas
of the ridge, the erosion reached the base of the Scaglia rosata
or, sometimes, the top of the Maiolica; iii) planation surfaces
close to the tops of the highest hilly relief in the Peri-Adriatic
belt, while further east, along the coast, marine sedimentation
was ending (Gentili et al. 1998), (Fig. 5).
Continental landforms
When the tectonic-sedimentary evolution described above
ended (Messinian–early Pleistocene), the fundamental mor-
phostructural fea tures of the landscape were already realized.
Subsequently, the sub-aerial model
ling processes, in
associa tion with the increasing tectonic activity, produced the
re-shaping of the landscape. The oldest traces are placed at or
near the top of the calcareous ridges and of the arena ceous
reliefs of the Apennines and consist of residual limbs of an
extensive wavy (locally flat) surface: the “summit relict sur-
face”. Younger limbs of smaller extent and belonging to other
two generations of surfaces are embedded in it: they also occur
in the hilly area, where they are also placed at the top of the
relief while in the coastal sector only the newer generation can
be detected (Fig. 6).
All these surfaces constituted a low-relief landscape charac-
terized by wide valleys, which later became home to important
subaerial depositional processes. Looking at the pedemoun-
tain areas in more detail, the deposition of wide alluvial fans
took place, giving rise to a process of relief inversion with
interfluves often very different from the current ones. The topo-
graphical location of the different planation surfaces, placed at
elevations higher than the alluvial deposits, allows us to date
back to prior of the Middle Pleistocene the last phase of
modelling of this landscape.
This “palaeotopography” was deformed by the tectonic
uplift of the area and by the transversal tectonic elements
(SSW–NNE faults) which have acted before, during and after
the construction of the Apennine chain (Boccaletti et al. 1986;
Fig. 5. Tectonic-sedimentary evolution during the Sicilian (early Pleistocene).
13
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE ADRIATIC SIDE OF CENTRAL ITALY
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
Calamita & Deiana 1988; Dramis et al. 1991; Calamita et al.
1999). During the Quaternary the tectonic elements, by means
of differentiated vertical movements, created several trans-
versal morphostructures, indicated by clear N–S undulations
of the planation surfaces that are more accentuated in the older
ones. Same undulations can also be recognized in the oldest
alluvial deposits (early middle Pliocene) and in the Sicilian-
Crotonian sediments which closed the Pliocene–Pleistocene
cycle of deposition.
Three main SSW–NNE “ridges”, from the Apennine chain to
the Adriatic Sea, can be recognized: Mount Nerone–Pesaro, to
the north; Mount Penna–Cingoli–Mount Conero, in the centre;
Sibillini Mountains–Mount Ascensione–Porto San Giorgio, to
the south. The corresponding coastal sectors are characterized
by substantial cliffs, two of them active (Pesaro and Mount
Conero). The above “ridges” are separated by two “depres-
sions” incised by the centripetal hydrographic networks of Misa
and Nevola rivers in the central-northern sector and of Potenza
and Chienti rivers in the central-southern sector (Fig. 2).
The effects produced by the SSW–NNE faults on the “sum-
mit relict surface” located west of the culmination of the
ridge, are more evident. Stepwise benches with considerable
displacements (up to 1000 m) have been created: the same
areas are characterized by the presence of wide tectonic basins
(Colfiorito, Castelluccio, Norcia, Cascia), where the oldest
deposits date back to the beginning of the early Pleistocene
(Ficcarelli & Mazza 1990) (Fig. 7).
At the end of the Early Pliocene the “summit relict surface”
was probably articulated in two levels: It is therefore reaso-
nable to assume, for the end of the early Pleistocene, a “sum-
mit relict surface “ on two levels: the higher one, nearly the top
of the calcareous and marly-calcareous ridges of the Apen-
nines, with N–S altitudinal variations (Dramis et al. 1991 and
Dramis 1992); the lower one, carved in the marly-calcareous
lithotypes where wide primordial valleys formed and corre-
spond to the pre-evaporitic arenaceous facies of the Laga for-
mation and of the Pliocene–Pleistocene deposits. According to
Dramis (1992), despite the general prevalence of planation
processes, the landscape could have been modelled, under
favourable climate conditions, also by fluvial erosion.
The end of morphogenesis of the “summit relict surface”
due to areal erosion processes, was associated with the intense
tectonic uplift, which started at the end of the early Pleistocene
and continued during the Middle Pleistocene. The consequent
rapid deepening of the hydrographic network reached the
oldest calcareous formations. The combined action of tectonic
uplift and climate conditions favourable to areal erosion (Haq
et al. 1987; Bull 1992), produced wide valleys, which have left
evidence in the form of residual limbs of two generations of
“surfaces” encasing each other.
Moreover, starting from the middle of the Middle Pleisto-
cene, the interference between tectonic uplift and glacial and
interglacial phases has also produced three main orders of flu-
vial terraces attributed to the middle of the Middle Pleistocene,
Fig. 6. Block diagram showing the relationship among the different
continental landforms described in the text.
14
GENTILI, PAMBIANCHI, ARINGOLI, MATERAZZI and GIACOPETTI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
end of Middle Pleistocene and Late Pleisto-
cene respectively (Coltorti et al. 1991; Nesci
& Savelli 1991; Cilla et al. 1996). The depo-
sition of these fluvial terraces marks the final
structuring of the landscape on a regional
scale (Fig. 8).
A further generation of fluvial deposits
(fourth order), mainly related to the intense
slope dynamics, can be recognized along the
valley floors: it is connected to intense agri-
cultural practices on the slopes themselves
carried out with alternate phases since
Roman times. These processes have also had
an impact on the river mouths (systemati-
cally transformed from modest estuaries to
limited deltas) and on the genesis of sandy-
pebbly beaches (Gentili & Pambianchi 1987;
Aringoli et al. 2007; Materazzi et al. 2010).
Conclusions
The data presented, allow us to draw syn-
thetic conclusions, also shown in Figs 3, 9
and 10.
Fig. 7. Sketch of the development of tectonic
basins described in the text (modified after
Calamita et al. 1982); a — relict surface; b — ini-
tial phase of extensional tectonics (early Pleisto-
cene); c — horst-graben morphology (middle
Pleistocene); d — sketch of the tectonic basins
and traces of cross-sections (see Fig. 2 for the
location).
Fig. 8. Type cross-sections along some Marchean rivers with the relationship between different orders of alluvial terraces.
15
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE ADRIATIC SIDE OF CENTRAL ITALY
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
• The Middle and Late Messinian (Fig. 3) is
characterized by the uplifting of the conti-
nental areas of Tuscany and Umbria and the
initial outcrop chain Umbria-Marche.
• The end of the Early Pliocene (Fig. 9a) is
characterized by intense areal erosion pro-
cesses which produced planation surfaces
both in the Messinian and in the calcareous
marls of the Apennine chain. It is recogni-
zable only in the southern area, because it is
buried by the middle Pliocene sediments
(Fig. 4).
• During the Middle Pliocene (Fig. 9b) the
marine transgression favoured the reduc-
tion of continental areas while the planation
processes still affected the same lithotypes
of the previous phase; in the northern sector
the link between the Adriatic and Tuscan-
Umbria areas persists.
• In the Late Pliocene (Fig. 9c) areal erosion
reached calcareous and marly-calcareous
formations even though their outcrops are
limi ted. The beginning of the “summit
relict surface” modelling can be ascribed to
this period.
• In the Early Pleistocene (Fig. 9d), climate
conditions favourable to areal erosion led to
the final structuring of the “summit relict
surface”. The tectonic uplift caused the
deepe ning of the hydrographic network,
isolating the relict surface itself and gene-
rating secon dary “surfaces”. During this
phase, waves and dislocations of the “sum-
mit relict surface” and in particular the
opening of intramountain tectonic basins
occurred (Fig. 7).
• In the Middle-Late Pleistocene (Fig. 10)
the persistent tectonic uplift and intense
climate variations caused the definitive
deepening of the hydrographic network and
the genesis of several orders of fluvial
terraces.
References
Amato A. & Cinque A. 1999: Erosional land sur-
faces of the Campano-Lucano Apennines (S.
Italy): genesis, evolution, and tectonic implica-
tion. Tectonophysics 315, 251–267.
Ambrosetti P., Carraro F., Deiana G. & Dramis F.
1982: The uplift of central Italy between early
Pleistocene and middle Pleistocene. Contributi
conclusivi per la realizzazione della Carta Neotet-
tonica d’Italia. Pubbl.n°513 del P.F. Geodinami-
ca-CNR (in Italian).
Aringoli D., Gentili B. & Pambianchi G. 1996: The
role of recent tectonics in controlling the
Fig. 9. Palaeogeographic reconstruction from the early Pliocene to early Pleistocene (not
in scale): 1 — clays, sands and conglomerates (Pliocene–Pleistocene); 2 — arenaceous,
arenaceous-pelitic and pelitic-arenaceous turbidites (Messinian); 3 — calcarenitic marls
(Middle Eocene–Messinian); 4 — limestones and marly limestones (Early Jurassic–
Middle Eocene); 5 — areas with calcareous outcrops; 6 — alluvial fans.
16
GENTILI, PAMBIANCHI, ARINGOLI, MATERAZZI and GIACOPETTI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
deep-seated gravitational deformation of Mount Frascare (Cen-
tral Apennine). Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 19, 281–286.
Aringoli D., Gentili B., Pambianchi G. & Piscitelli A.M. 2007: The
contribution of “Sibilla appenninica” legend to karst knowledge
in the Sibillini mountains (Central apennines, Italy). In: Piccardi
L. & Masse W.B. (Eds.): Myth and Geology. Geol. Soc. London,
Spec. Publ. 273, 329–340.
Aringoli D., Calista M., Gentili B., Pambianchi G. & Sciarra N. 2008:
Geomorphological features and 3D modelling of Montelparo
mass movement (Central Italy). Engineering Geology 99, 70–84.
Aringoli D., Gentili B., Materazzi M., & Pambianchi G. 2010: Mass
movements in Adriatic central Italy: activation and evolutive
control factors. In: Ernest D. Werner & Hugh P. Friedman (Eds.):
Landslides: Causes, Types and Effects. Nova Science Publish-
ers, Inc., New York, 1–71.
Aringoli D., Cavitolo P., Farabollini P., Galindo-Zaldivar J., Gentili
B., Giano S.I., Lopez-Garrido A.C., Materazzi M., Nibbi L.,
Pedrera A., Pambianchi G., Ruano P., Ruiz-Constan A., Sanz de
Galdeano C., Savelli D., Tondi E. & Troiani F. 2014: Morphotec-
tonic characterization of the Quaternary intermontane basins in
the Umbria-Marche Apennines (Italy). Rend. Fis. Acc. Lincei 25,
Suppl. 2, 111–128.
Bally A.W., Burbi L., Cooper C. & Ghelardoni P. 1986: Balanced sec-
tions and seismic reflections profiles across the Central Apen-
nines. Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital. 35, 257–310.
Bartolini C. 1980: About some summital surfaces of the northern
Apennine. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 3, 42–60 (in Italian).
Bernini M., Clerici A., Papani G., & Sgavetti M. 1977: Analysis of the
plane-altimetric distribution of western Emilian Apennine paleo-
surfaces. L’Ateneo Parmense, Acta Naturalia 13, 145–156 (in
Italian).
Bigi, S., Cantalamessa, G., Centamore, E., Didaskalou, P., Dramis, F.,
Farabollini, P., Gentili, B., Invernizzi, C., Micarelli, A., Nisio, S.,
Pambianchi, G. & Potetti, M. 1995: The Marchean-Abruzzi peri-
Adriatic belt from middle Pliocene to modern times: tectonic,
sedimentary and geomorphological evolution. Studi Geol.
Camerti. Vol. Spec. 1991/2, 21–26 (in Italian).
Boccaletti M., Calamita F., Centamore E., Deiana G. & Dramis F.
1983: The Umbria-Marche Apennine: an example of thrust and
wrenching tectonics in a model of ensialic Neogenic-Quaternary
deformation. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 102, 581–592.
Boccaletti M., Calamita F., Centamore E., Chiocchini U., Deiana G.,
Moratti G., Micarelli A. & Potetti M. 1986: Evolution of the Tus-
can-Umbro Apennine during Neogene. Giorn. Geol. 48, 227–
233 (in Italian).
Bosi c., Caiazzo C., Cinque A. & Messina P. 1996: Relict surfaces of
the Fucens region, central Apennine and their significance in the
reconstruction of the geological evolution. Il Quaternario 9,
381–386 (in Italian).
Brancaccio L., Cinque A., Romano P., Rosskopf C., Russo F., Santan-
gelo N. & Santo A. 1991: Geomorphology and neotectonic evo-
lution of a sector of the Tyrrenian flank of the souther Apennines
(Region of Naples, Italy). Z. Geomorphol. Suppl. 82, 47–58.
Bull, W.A. 1992: Geomorphic response to climatic change. John
Wiley & Sons, New York.
Butler R.W.H., Lickorish W.H., Grasso M., Pedley H.M. & Ramberti
L. 1995: Tectonic and sequence stratigraphy in Messinian basin,
Sicily: constraints on the initiation and termination of the Medi-
terranean salinity crisis. GSA Bulletin 107, 425–439.
Butzer K.W. 1976: Geomorphology from the earth. Harper and Row,
1–463.
Calamita F. & Deiana G. 1988: The arcuate shape of the Umbria-
Marche-Sabine Apennines (Central Italy). Tectonophysics 146,
131–147.
Calamita F., Coltorti M., Deiana G., Dramis F. & Pambianchi G.
1982: Neotectonic evolution and geomorphology of the Cascia
and Norcia depressions (Umbria-Marche Apennine). Geogr. Fis.
Dinam. Quat. 5, 263–276.
Calamita F., Coltorti M., Farabollini P. & Pizzi A. 1994: Quaternary
normal faults in the Umbria-Marche Apennine ridge: proposal of
a model of inversion tectonics. Studi Geol. Camerti vol. spec.
1994/1, 211–225 (in Italian).
Calamita F., Coltorti M., Pieruccini P. & Pizzi A. 1999: Structural evo-
lution and plio-quaternary morphogenesis of the Umbria-Marche
Apennine. Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital. 118, 125–139 (in Italian).
Calamita F., Satolli S. & Turtù A. 2012: Analysis of thrusts shear
zones in curved shaped belts: Ddeformation mode and timing of
the Olevano-Antrodoco-Sibillini thrust (Central-Northern Apen-
nines of Italy). J. Struct. Geol. 44, 179–187.
Cantalamessa G. & Di Celma C. 2004: Sequence response to syndep-
ositional regional uplift: insights from high-resolution sequence
stratigraphy of late Early Pleistocene strata, Periadriatic Basin,
Fig. 10. Summary sketch of the relationships between different geomorphological elements: P = relict surface; PA = suspended palaeovalley;
S = planation surfaces below the “summit relict surface”; I = first order alluvial terrace (initial phase of Middle Pleistocene); II = second order
alluvial terrace (end of Middle Pleistocene); III = third order alluvial terrace (Late Pleistocene); IV = fourth order alluvial terraces (Holocene).
17
GEOMORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE ADRIATIC SIDE OF CENTRAL ITALY
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
Central Italy. Sediment. Geol. 164, 283–309.
Cantalamessa G., Centamore E., Chiocchini U., Colalongo M.L.,
Micarelli A., Nanni T., Pasini G., Potetti M. & Ricci Lucchi F.
con la collaborazione di Cristallini C. & Di Lorito L. 1986: The
Pliocene–Pleistocene in the Marche region (Il Plio–Pleistocene
delle Marche). Studi Geol. Camerti, vol. spec. “La Geologia
delle Marche”, 61–81 (in Italian).
Cello G., Mazzoli S., Tondi E. & Turco E. 1997: Active tectonics in
the Central Apennines and possible implications for seismic
hazard analysis in peninsular Italy. Tectonophysics 272, 43–68.
Centamore E., & Deiana G. 1986: The geology of the Marche region.
Studi Geol. Camerti, vol. spec., 1–145 (in Italian).
Centamore E. & Micarelli A. 1991: Stratigraphy. In: L’ambiente
fisico delle Marche. S.EL.CA. Firenze, 5–58 (in Italian).
Chiarini E., Messina P. & Papasodaro F. 1997: Plio–Quaternary geo-
logical and tectonic evolution of the high Salto valley – central
Italy: first results deriving from the analysis of relict surfaces
and continental deposits. Il Quaternario 10, 625–630 (in Italian
with English abstract).
Ciccacci S., D’Alessandro L., Dramis F., Fredi P. & Pambianchi G.
1985: Geomorphological and neotectonic evolution of the
Umbria-Marche Ridge, northern sector. Studi Geol. Camerti 10,
7–15.
Cilla G., Coltorti M., Farabollini P., Dramis F., Gentili B., & Pambi-
anchi 1996: Fluvial sedimentation during the early Holocene in
the Marchean valleys (central Italy). Il Quaternario, Ital. J.
Quat. Sci. 9, 2, 459–464.
Cita M.B. 1976: The geodynamic significance of the miocenic sali-
nity crisis in the Mediterranean. In: Show and Tell Messinian
Seminar, 2, 91 (in Italian).
Coltorti M. & Farabollini P. 1995: Quaternary evolution of the Castel-
luccio di Norcia basin (Umbro-Marchean Apennine, Italy). Il
Quaternario 8, 1, 149–166.
Coltorti M. & Pieruccini P. 2000: A Late Lower Pliocene planation
surface across the Italian Peninsula: a key tool in neotectonics
studies. J. Geodyn. 29, 323–328.
Coltorti M., Consoli M., Dramis F., Gentili B. & Pambianchi G. 1991:
Geomorphological evolution of the central-southern Marche
alluvial plains. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 14, I, 87–100 (in Italian
with English abstract).
Coltorti M., Farabollini P., Gentili B. & Pambianchi G. 1996: Geo-
morphological evidences for anti-Apennines faults in the
Umbro-Marchean Apennines and in the peri-Adriatic basin,
Italy. Geomorphology 15, 33–45.
Deiana G. & Pialli G. 1994: The structural provinces of the
Umbro-Marchean Apennines. Mem. Soc. Geol. It. 48, 473–484.
Della Seta M., Del Monte M., Fredi P., Miccadei E., Nesci O., Pambi-
anchi G., Piacentini T. & Troiani F. 2008: Morphotectonic evolu-
tion of the Adriatic piedmont of the Apennines: An advancement
in the knowledge of the Marche-Abruzzo border area. Geomor-
phology 102, 119–129.
Demangeot J. 1965: Géomorphologie des Abruzzes adriatiques. Col-
lection Mémoires et Documents. Editions, Paris, 1–403.
Denny C.S. 1967: Fans and pediments. Am. J. Science 265, 81–105.
Di Bucci D., Mazzoli S., Nesci O., Savelli, D., Tramontana, M., De
Donatis, M. & Borraccini F. 2003: Active deformation in the
frontal part of the Northern Apennines:insights from the lower
Metauro River basin area (northern Marche, Italy) and adjacent
Adriatic off-shore. J. Geodyn. 36, 213–238.
Di Domenica A., Turtu’ A., Satolli S. & Calamita F. 2012: Relation-
ship between thrusts and normal faults in curved belts: New
insight in the inversion tectonics of the Central-Northern Apen-
nine (Italy). J. Struct. Geol. 30, 1–14.
Dramis F. 1992: The role of wide-range tectonic uplift in the genesis
of the Apennine ridge. Studi Geol. Camerti, Vol. Spec. 1992/1,
9–15 (in Italian).
Dramis F., Pambianchi G., Nesci O. & Consoli M. 1991: The role of
transversal structural elements in the tectonic, sedimentary and
geomorphological evolution of the Marche region. Studi Geol.
Camerti Vol. Spec. 1991/2, CROP 11, 287–293 (in Italian).
Dramis F., Gentili B. & Pambianchi G. 1992: The morphostructural
depresion of Macerata (La depressione morfostrutturale di
Mace rata). Studi Geol. Camerti Vol. Spec.1993, 123–126 (in
Italian).
Dramis F., Farabollini P., Gentili B. & Pambianchi G. 1995: Neotec-
tonic and large-scale gravitational phenomena in the Umbria-
Marche Apennines, Italy. In: Slaymaker O. (Ed.): Steepland
Geomorfology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 199–217.
Dufaure J.J., Bossoyt D. & Rasse M. 1989: Critères géomor-
phologiques de néotectonique verticale dans l’Appennin central
adriatique. Bull. Afeq. 3, 151–160.
Fanucci F., Moretti E., Nesci O., Savelli D. & Veneri F. 1996: Typo-
logy of alluvial terraces and relief evolution in the Adriatic side
of central-northern Apennine Italy. Il Quaternario 9, 1, 255–258
(in Italian).
Ficcarelli G. & Mazza P. 1990: New fossil findings from the Col-
fiorito basin (Umbria-Marchean Apennine). Boll. Soc. Geol. Ital.
29, 2, 245–247.
Gentili B. & Pambianchi G. 1987: Fluvial morphogenesis and
anthropic activity in the central-southern Marche. Geogr. Fis.
Dinam. Quat. 10, 204–217 (in Italian with English abstract).
Gentili B. & Pambianchi G. 1994: Gravitational morphogenesis of the
Apennine chain in Central Italy. Proc. 7th Int. IAEG Congr.,
Sept. 1994, Lisboa (Portugal), vol. II, 1177–1186.
Gentili B. & Pambianchi G. 1999: Contribution to the reconstruction
of the geomorphological evolution of the Adriatic side of the
Umbria-Marche Apennine – central Italy. In: Orombelli G. (Ed.)
: Geographical and geological study in honor of Severino Bel-
loni. Glauco Brigati, Genova, 391–403 (in Italian).
Gentili B., Pambianchi G., Aringoli D., Cilla G., Farabollini P. & Mat-
erazzi M. 1995: Relationship between Plio-Quaternary brittle
deformations and gravitational morphogenesis in the high-hilly
belt of the central-southern Marche. Studi Geol. Camerti, Vol.
Spec. 1, 421–435 (in Italian with English abstract).
Gentili B., Materazzi M., Pambianchi G. & Scalella G. (in collabora-
tion with Aringoli D., Cilla G. & Farabollini P.) 1998: Slope
deposits at Mount Ascensione – southern Marche, Italy. Geogr.
Fis. Dinam. Quat. 21, 1–10 (in Italian witht English abstract).
Haq B.U., Hardenbol J. & Vail P.R. 1987: Chronology of fluctuating
sea levels since the Triassic. Science 235, 1156–1166.
Materazzi M., Gentili B., Aringoli D., Farabollini P. & Pambianchi G.
2010: Elements of slope and fluvial dynamics as evidence of
Late Holocene climatic fluctuations in the central Adriatic sec-
tor, Italy. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 33, 193–204.
Materazzi M., Aringoli D., Pambianchi G., Gentili B. & Giacopetti
M. 2014: Deep seated gravitational slope deformations and large
landslides interferring with fluvial dynamics; examples from
central Apennines (Italy). In: G. Lollino et al. (Eds.): Engineer-
ing Geology for Society and Territory – Vol. 2. Springer Interna-
tional Publishing Switzerland, 198–203.
Mazzoli S., Pierantoni P.P., Borraccini C., Paltrinieri W., & Deiana G.
2005: Geometry, segmentation pattern and displacement varia-
tions along a major Apennine thrust zone, Central Italy. J. Struct.
Geol. 27, 1940–1953.
Nesci O. & Savelli D. 1991: Terraced alluvial successions in the
northern Apennine. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 14, 149–162 (in
Italian with English abstract).
Nesci O., Savelli D. & Veneri F. 1992: Alluvial terraces and planation
surfaces in the relief evolution of the northern Apennine . Studi
Geol. Camerti. Vol. Spec. 1992/1, 175–180 (in Italian).
Nesci, O., Savelli, D., Tramontana, M., Veneri, F., De Donatis, M. &
Mazzoli, S., 2002: The evolution of alluvial fans in the
18
GENTILI, PAMBIANCHI, ARINGOLI, MATERAZZI and GIACOPETTI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, 2017, 68, 1, 6 – 18
Umbria-Marche-Romagna Apennines (Italy). Boll. Soc. Geol.
Ital. 1, 915–922.
Nesci O., Savelli D. & Troiani F. 2012: Types and development of
stream terraces in the Marche Apennines (central Italy): a review
and remarks on recent appraisals. Géomorphologie 2, 215–238.
Pierantoni P.P., Deiana G. & Galdenzi S. 2013: Stratigraphic and
structural features of the Sibillini Mountains (Umbria-Marche
Apennines, Italy). Ital. J. Geosci. 132, 3, 497–520.
Riguzzi F., Tertulliani A.Z. & Gasparini C. 1989: Study of seismic
sequence of Porto San Giorgio (Marche) – 3 July 1987. Il Nuovo
Cimento della Soc. Ital. di Fisica 12, 4.
Schiattarella M., Di Leo P., Beneduce P. & Giano SI 2003: Quaternary
uplift vs tectonic loading: a case-study from the Lucanian Apen-
nine, southern Italy. Quat. Int. 101/102, 293–251.
Sestini A. 1981: An ancient erosion surface on the Chianti Mountains.
Rivista Geografica Italiana 88, 214–220 (in Italian).
Veneri F. 1986: The Valmarecchia gravitational flow. In: Centamore
and Deiana, 1986: La geologia delle Marche, Studi
Geol. Camerti vol. spec., 83–87 (in Italian with English
abstract).
Veneri F., Nesci O. & Colantoni P. 1991: Reporting of continental
deposits in correspondence of limbs of ancient surfaces in the
northern Marche. Geogr. Fis. Dinam. Quat. 14, 247–250 (in Ita-
lian with English abstract).
Wezel F.C. 1994: From black to red: within the heartbeat of the earth.
Sperling & Kupfer, Milano, 1–315 (in Italian).