www.geologicacarpathica.com
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
, DECEMBER 2015, 66, 6, 443—454 doi: 10.1515/geoca-2015-0037
Introduction
Variscan fragments are recognized all over the Alpine Belt
of Europe (Dallmeyer et al. 1998; Neubauer & Handler
1999; Franke et al. 2000; Kroner et al. 2008; Froitzheim et
al. 2008; Schulmann et al. 2014 and references therein). Al-
though in the Balkans high-grade metamorphic rocks from
the deep structural levels of the European Variscan Belt are
well-exposed (Ivanov 1988; Kräutner & Kristic 2002; Iancu
et al. 2005; Yanev et al. 2006; Kounov et al. 2012; Gerdjikov
et al. 2013) (Fig. 1b), their Variscan and pre-Variscan history
is still not well understood, thus hindering correlations with
similar units in Central and Western Europe.
In Bulgaria, for a long time, the high-grade metamorphic
complexes were considered as Precambrian (see the review
of Zagorchev 2008). However, in the last twenty years num-
erous detailed studies from the Rhodope massif revealed
their Alpine tectonic evolution (e.g. Burg et al. 1996, 2012;
Kaiser-Rohrmeier et al. 2004; Liati 2005; Bosse et al. 2009;
Turpaud & Reischmann 2010). Furthermore, Ivanov (1988)
and Velichkova et al. (2004) suggested the Variscan age of
high-grade metamorphic rocks north of the Alpine Rhodopes
(Fig. 1b). Quite recently, three Variscan complexes have
been distinguished in Bulgaria based on the common Middle
Carboniferous age of the amphibolite facies metamorphic
Cambrian magmatism, Variscan high-grade metamorphism
and imposed greenschist facies shearing in the Central
Sredna Gora basement units (Bulgaria)
ANNA LAZAROVA, KALIN NAYDENOV, NIKOLAI PETROV and VALENTIN GROZDEV
Geological Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Acad. Georgy Bonchev str. 24, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria;
alazarova@geology.bas.bg; k.naidenov@gmail.com; npetrov@geology.bas.bg; val.grozdev@abv.bg
(Manuscript received April 20, 2015; accepted in revised form October 1, 2015)
Abstract: Gneisses from the deep structural levels of the European Variscan Belt are well exposed in the Central
Sredna Gora in Bulgaria. In general, migmatites predominate, but unmigmatized domains (or domains with incipient
migmatization) are also documented in this area. This paper presents new structural, petrographic and U-Pb isotope
geochronological data from such an unmigmatized part of the Variscan high-grade metamorphic basement (the
Koprivshtitsa Unit). A predominant part of this unit represents an alternation of metagranitoids and metabasites. The
protolith crystallization age of the metagranitoids is constrained at 491.5 ± 7.6 Ma by U-Pb laser ablation method
on zircons. This age coincides with the previously available Late Cambrian protolith ages of metabasic rocks that crop
out within the adjacent migmatitic unit. The Korpivshtitsa Unit comprises also lesser orthogneisses with Late
Neoproterozoic protoliths. Based on the available local and regional paleogeographic reconstruction schemes, we sug-
gest that the Upper Cambrian magmatic rocks intruded Upper Neoproterozoic crust during the initial opening stages of
the Rheic Ocean or a related basin. Subsequently, both were involved in the Variscan high-grade deformation. The
contact of the Koprivshitsa Unit with the migmatitic part of the metamorphic complex coincides with a north-vergent
greenschist facies thrust zone – the Chuminska Shear Zone. The exact time of the shearing is still not well constrained
but it clearly postdates the Variscan high-temperature metamorphism of the gneisses.
Key words: Variscan high-grade basement, Central Sredna Gora Complex in Bulgaria, Late Cambrian magmatism,
greenschist facies mylonitization.
overprint – the Central Sredna Gora, the Ograzhden-Vertiskos
and the Strandja Complexes (Gerdjikov et al. 2013).
The Central Sredna Gora Complex, which represents a
basement unit within the Alpine Sredna Gora Zone of the
Balkan Thrust Belt (e.g. Dabovski et al. 2002), is a well-ex-
posed but poorly studied part of the Variscan Orogen in Bul-
garia. At a regional scale, it has been correlated with the
Getic-Supragetic basement units of the South Carpathians
(Neubauer 2002; Velichkova et al. 2004; Iancu et al. 2005;
Schmid et al. 2008). Only limited data about the protoliths of
the metamorphic rocks from the Central Sredna Gora Com-
plex, as well as about their ages and tectonic evolution are
available (Velichkova et al. 2004; Peytcheva & von Quadt
2004; Carrigan et al. 2006; Gaggero et al. 2009). We carried
out our research in the northern part of the complex (Fig. 2a)
where high-grade basement rocks form a strip which extends
along several tens of kilometers in an E-W direction. The
metamorphic section comprises migmatitic gneisses and un-
migmatized domains (Dabovski et al. 1966; Dabovski 1988;
Zagorchev 2008; Antonov et al. 2010).
In this paper, we present details for the unmigmatitic part
known as the Koprivshtitsa Unit (Dabovski 1988; Zagorchev
2008; Antonov et al. 2010). Our research provides new data in
several aspects: i) the lithological and structural characteristics
of the unit; ii) its contact with the migmatitic unit; iii) U-Pb
444
LAZAROVA, NAYDENOV, PETROV and GROZDEV
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
zircon geochronological data. On this ground, we suggest a
possible scenario for the origin of the studied rocks in the con-
text of the Paleozoic evolution of the area. This will help us to
better understand the important features of the Variscan Belt
in the Balkans and will contribute to further regional correla-
tions with other fragments of the orogen in Europe.
Geological setting
The Variscan Central Sredna Gora Complex is exposed
south and southeast of Sofia (Fig. 1b). Two high-grade meta-
morphic units have been distinguished in its northern part
(Fig. 2a,b) – the migmatitic Pirdop Unit and the unmigma-
tized Koprivshtitsa Unit (Dabovski 1988; Zagorchev 2008;
Antonov et al. 2010) where the rocks of the former dominate
the metamorphic complex. Most widespread are migmatitic
paragneisses (biotite and two-mica banded migmatites, and
minor garnet-, kyanite- and sillimanite-bearing gneisses) and
subordinate amphibole-biotite orthogneisses, amphibolites,
metaserpentinites, and mafic eclogites (Dabovski et al. 1966;
Dabovski 1988; Zagorchev 2008; Antonov et al. 2010).
Mixed protoliths of continental and oceanic-crust affinities
have been assumed for these rocks (Zagorchev 2008). A com-
mon feature of the unit is the intense post-migmatization
greenschist to lower amphibolite facies retrogression related
to Mid and/or Late Variscan shearing (Velichkova et al. 2004;
Lazarova et al. 2010; Gerdjikov et al. 2010 and references
therein) during which the migmatites obtained specific “au-
gen”-gneiss texture. The Koprivshtitsa Unit occupies a limited
area in the surroundings of Koprivshtitsa town (Fig. 2b). Up to
now, it was regarded as derived from a Precambrian silici-
clastic suit intruded by basic volcanic rocks (Zagorchev
2008). The described lithologies include mainly amphibolites
and biotite gneisses, and minor biotite and two-mica schists,
sillimanite-biotite and garnet-sillimanite-biotite schists, quart-
zites, marbles, garnet-pyroxene and garnet amphibolites, as
well as orthogneiss bodies (Dabovski et al. 1966; Dabovski
1988; Zagorchev 2008; Antonov et al. 2010). One of the me-
tagranitoids, the so called Bobevitsa Orthogneiss (Zagorchev
et al. 1973), was dated to 616.9 ± 9.5 and 595 ± 23 Ma (Fig. 2a;
HR-SIMS U-Th-Pb zircon age – Carrigan et al. 2006).
The high-grade metamorphic fabric of both the Pirdop and
the Koprivshtitsa unit is sealed by the undeformed Late
Variscan Koprivshtitsa Granite (Fig. 2) dated at 304.8±0.8 Ma
(U-Pb monazite age – von Quadt et al. 2004) and at
312.0 ± 5.4 Ma (HR-SIMS U-Th-Pb zircon age – Carrigan
et al. 2005). On the other hand, the contact between the units
north of Koprivshtitsa (Fig. 2b) was described as a steeply
dipping, north-vergent reverse fault related to the Late Alpine
thrust system (Stara Planina thrust system – Dabovski et al.
1966). During the last regional-scale mapping of the area
Fig. 1. Regional sketch map of the European Variscan terranes (a) with close-up view on high-grade basement in the western part of the
Balkan Peninsula (b). Modified after Kounov et al. (2012) and Balintoni et al. (2014).
Fig. 2. a – simplified geological map of a part of the Central Sredna Gora area with published geochronological data (modified after Iliev
& Katskov 1990a,b); b – geological map of Koprivshtitsa area (modified after Dabovski et al. 1966; Zagorchev et al. 1973; Iliev & Katskov
1990a,b; Cheshitev et al. 1994) with a cross-section A—A’along the Topolnitsa River and stereographic projections (equal area; lower
hemisphere) of foliations (density contours) and lineations (points) in the Pirdop (sp1) and Koprivshtitsa (sp2) Units. Location of sample
SG-8-2 is indicated.
!
445
CAMBRIAN MAGMATISM AND VARISCAN METAMORPHISM IN SREDNA GORA (BULGARIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
446
LAZAROVA, NAYDENOV, PETROV and GROZDEV
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
(Antonov et al. 2010), it was interpreted as a Variscan duc-
tile shear zone, the Chuminska Shear Zone.
In the studied area, data for the protolith ages of the high-
grade metamorphic rocks are still scanty. Besides the Cado-
mian age of the Bobevitsa orthogneiss, two late Cambrian
U-Pb zircon protolith ages are available for the Pirdop Unit
(Fig. 2b): 493.8 ± 9.8 Ma for a metagabbro sample (Antonov
et al. 2010) and a poorly constrained age of 502.8 ± 3.2 Ma
for a hornblende-biotite gneiss (Fig. 2a – Peytcheva & von
Quadt 2004).
The Variscan metamorphic evolution is constrained by
U-Pb and
40
Ar/
39
Ar data (Fig. 2a): i) an
40
Ar/
39
Ar amphibole
age of 398 ± 5.2 Ma obtained from a garnet-biotite-ilmenite-
bearing amphibolite east of Ihtiman was interpreted as the
time of an early amphibolite facies re-equilibration shortly
after an eclogite facies metamorphic peak (Cortesogno et al.
2005; Gaggero et al. 2009); ii) the age of the high-tempera-
ture metamorphism and migmatization is estimated at
336.5 ± 5.4 Ma (HR-SIMS U-Pb zircon data on leucosome in
migmatitic gneisses – Carrigan et al. 2006); iii) the intense
greenschist to lower amphibolite facies regional-scale retro-
gression of migmatites of the Pirdop Unit and contempora-
neous emplacement of muscovite-bearing granites is dated to
333.9 ± 0.2 Ma (
40
Ar/
39
Ar of muscovite – Gerdjikov et al.
2010); iv) the post-metamorphic cooling ages of the gneisses
west and south of the studied area range between 317 and
305 Ma (
40
Ar/
39
Ar of muscovite and biotite – Velichkova et
al. 2004). These data coincide with the time of a voluminous
magmatism since the crystallization ages of the Late
Variscan granitoids in this part of the Sredna Gora Complex
are between 312 and 290 Ma (Carrigan et al. 2003, 2005;
von Quadt et al. 2004; Velichkova et al. 2004).
The age constraints of several greenschist facies shear
zones indicate that the high-grade rocks from the southern
part of the Central Sredna Gora Complex were affected by Al-
pine tectono-thermal events ca. 140 Ma and ca. 106—100 Ma
(
40
Ar/
39
Ar of muscovite and biotite – Velichkova et al. 2004).
Analytical methods
U-Th-Pb isotope zircon analyses were carried out by a la-
ser ablation (LA) technique using a New Wave Research
(NWR) 193 nm excimer laser UP-193FX attached to a Per-
kin-Elmer ELAN DRC-e quadrupole inductively coupled
plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) at the Geological Insti-
tute of the Bulgarian Academy of Science in Sofia, Bulgaria.
In-laboratory designed ablation cell with lowered position
effects, energy density on sample ca. 8.8 J/cm
—2
and repetition
rate of 8 Hz are used. The ablation craters are ca. 35 µm in dia-
meter. The analyses were carried out in blocks of 22, using the
GJ1 zircon standard (Jackson et al. 2004) for fractionation
corrections (2 analyses at the beginning, 2 in the middle and
2 at the end of the block) and Plešovice (Sláma et al. 2008)
as “unknown” standard (to control the correct data reduction).
The results were calculated off-line using GLITTER 4.0
(Macquarie University). All concordant zircons were used
to calculate a mean
238
U/
206
Pb age, or a concordia age. Con-
cordia plots, ages and averaging were processed using
ISOPLOT 3.0 (Ludwig 2003).
Results
Structural characteristics of the Koprivshtitsa Unit
The unmigmatized Koprivshtitsa Unit is exposed as a nar-
row E-W trending and ca. 30 km long strip between the Pir-
dop Unit to the north and the Late Variscan Koprivshtitsa
Granite to the south and southeast (Fig. 2b). Our field obser-
vations were carried out along several N-S profiles across
the unit generally normal to the orientation of the regional
foliation. The unit represents an alternation of metamorphic
rocks with felsic and mafic protoliths (Fig. 3a,b), both in ap-
proximately equal proportions. The sillimanite-biotite schists,
garnet-sillimanite-biotite schists, quartzites and marbles, re-
ported before (Dabovski et al. 1966; Dabovski 1988;
Zagorchev 2008), were not observed in the studied area.
The felsic part of the Koprivshtitsa unit consists of two-
mica metagranites, which form up to several meters wide,
sheet-like bodies with sharp contacts with the metabasic
rocks (Fig. 3a,b). Generally, the contacts are parallel to the
foliation fabric, but locally, slightly oblique contacts have
been preserved as well. The thinner metagranite sheets are
penetratively foliated (Fig. 3c), while in the thicker ones, the
foliation is well developed only near the contacts. The folia-
tion and mineral lineation are defined by the preferred orien-
tation of micas, quartz and feldspars. The main rock-forming
minerals are quartz, K-feldspar, and plagioclase with subor-
dinate white mica and biotite and accessory titanite, zircon,
and apatite. Under the microscope, the metamorphic folia-
tion of the metagranites is defined by the preferred orienta-
tion of small (up to 1—2 mm along the long axis), elongated
quartz and feldspar grains as well as unevenly distributed
white mica flakes or two-mica aggregates (Fig. 3d).
The mafic part of the metamorphic section (Fig. 3a,b,e) is
dominated by biotite-amphibole and amphibole-biotite gneisses
and less abundant amphibolites. These rocks are derived
Fig. 3. Field and microscale characteristics of the Koprivshtitsa Unit. a – alternation between centimeter-thick sheet-like bodies of meta-
granitoids (mgr) and metabasic (mb) rocks (Topolnitsa River Valley north of Koprivshtitsa); b – a detailed view of the same relationships;
c – well-foliated metagranitoid body with a foliation-parallel contact (Topolnitsa River Valley north of Koprivshtitsa); d – photomicro-
graph (cross-polarized light) of a metagranite with a weak metamorphic foliation defined by the preferred orientation of small, elongated
quartz (qz) and feldspar (kfs, pl) grains as well as unevenly distributed white mica (wm) and biotite (bt) flakes (sample SG-8-2, location in
Fig. 2b); e – amphibolites and a thin metagranitoid sheet-like body (Topolnitsa River Valley north of Koprivshtitsa); f – photomicro-
graph (plane-polarized light) of a biotite-amphibole gneiss with a distinct metamorphic foliation defined by the preferred orientation of
elongated amphibole (hb), biotite (bt) and quartz-feldspar aggregates (same location as for d).
!
447
CAMBRIAN MAGMATISM AND VARISCAN METAMORPHISM IN SREDNA GORA (BULGARIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
448
LAZAROVA, NAYDENOV, PETROV and GROZDEV
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
from mafic to intermediate igneous protoliths. The gneisses
are medium-grained, with distinct foliation defined by the
preferred orientation of amphibole-biotite aggregates and
thin quartz-feldspar lenses. The lineation is defined by am-
phibole-biotite aggregates. The main rock-forming minerals
are amphibole and biotite in varying proportions, but reach-
ing up to 80 % of the rocks. Subordinate phases are plagio-
clase, quartz, ± K-feldspar; accessory phases are apatite,
zircon, ± titanite, ± magnetite. Amphibole and biotite com-
monly form elongated domains, while quartz and feldspars
are present as isolated grains or lens-shaped aggregates
aligned parallel to the metamorphic foliation (Fig. 3f).
A common feature of the Koprivshtitsa Unit is a distinct
E-W striking and steeply-dipping (60—80°) predominantly to
the south foliation fabric (Fig. 2, sp2). The mineral lineation
is weakly developed, plunging gently to the west-southwest
or east-northeast.
Locally, bodies of coarse-grained, K-feldspar porphyro-
clastic biotite metagranites and metagranodiorites crop out.
They show similar south-dipping foliation, but the coarser
texture as well as the presence of well-preserved K-feldspar
porphyroclasts allows us to distinguish them from the fine-to
medium-grained two-mica metagranitoid sheets.
Contacts
The Koprivshtitsa Unit has a tectonic contact with the
migmatitic Pirdop Unit and intrusive relations with the Ko-
privshtitsa Granite. South of the granite, the high-grade
metamorphic basement is dominated again by migmatitic
gneisses, which are structurally above the unmigmatized Ko-
privshtitsa Unit (Fig. 2, cross-section A—A’). During our re-
search we focused on a characterization of the tectonic contact
(Fig. 2b), the Chuminska Shear Zone (ChSZ).
The ChSZ is a generally narrow (up to 100—120 m), E-W
trending and south-dipping structure, exposed along strike
for nearly 15 km (Fig. 2b). It has sharp boundaries with the
host gneisses. The footwall is built up by migmatitic two-
mica paragneisses (Fig. 4a) and subordinate orthogneisses of
the Pirdop Unit. In the hanging wall, the Koprivstitsa Unit
consists of unmigmatized orthometamorphic rocks. The
shear zone is better developed in the footwall migmatitic
paragneisses, although several sub-parallel zones splay north
and south from the main zone into both metamorphic units.
Along the ChSZ and its splays, the gneisses are transformed
to greenschist facies mylonites with well-developed mylonitic
foliation and C’shear bands (Fig. 4c). The mylonitic folia-
tion (S
my
) trends E—W to NE—SW and dips moderately to
steeply (45—80°) to the south. It is generally parallel to the
high-grade metamorphic fabric of the host gneisses (Fig. 2,
sp1 and sp2). S
my
is defined by a subparallel arrangement of
dark, fine-grained phyllosilicate aggregates and quartz rib-
bons. In a number of outcrops an unequivocal lineation fab-
ric did not form. Where the lineation is well developed it is
defined by the alignment of elongated aggregates of white
mica and chlorite or by fibrous quartz striae. The lineation
has a moderate to steep down-dip plunge. The quartz linear
fabric has the characteristics of a low-temperature stretching
lineation. The C’shear bands are defined by synkinematic
white mica and chlorite (Fig. 4c) as well as by trails of mica
fragments and by deflected strain-shadows of large feldspar
grains. The acute angles with the mylonitic foliation are in
the range of 20 to 30°.
The microscale observations of the sheared two-mica
gneisses of the Pirdop Unit give important information about
deformation mechanisms and metamorphic conditions. Less
deformed migmatitic gneisses (Fig. 4b) are medium-grained
rocks composed of plagioclase, K-feldspar, synmetamorphic
quartz, muscovite, biotite, ± garnet, and accessory apatite,
zircon and rutile. They have a distinct high-temperature
metamorphic foliation defined by the preferred orientation of
feldspars and elongated large mica flakes (Fig. 4b). The ret-
rograde shearing within the ChSZ led to the formation of
chlorite-white mica-quartz (syndeformational) mylonites
(Fig. 4d,e). Their distinct mylonitic foliation is generally
subparallel to the initial high-grade planar metamorphic fab-
ric of the gneisses. The mylonites are characterized by vari-
ably sized and often fragmented porphyroclasts of feldspar,
synmetamorphic quartz and mica, surrounded by a fine-
grained synmylonitic white mica-chlorite-quartz matrix
(Fig. 4d,e,f). The porphyroclasts are brittlely deformed and
rotated by a cataclastic flow along the mylonitic foliation or
C’shear bands (Fig. 4d,e). Most of them show strong undu-
lose extinction (Fig. 4e,f) and have tails (“strain shadows”)
of very fine-grained recrystallized material of sericite-quartz
composition (Fig. 4d). A common feature of the large quartz
fragments is the development of deformation bands (Fig. 4f).
The synkinematic fine-grained quartz forms thin bands
along the S
my
(Fig. 4d) or occurs along grain boundaries and
micro-fractures of the large quartz porphyroclasts (Fig. 4f).
Recrystallized, synkinematic and very fine-grained mica is gen-
erally observed along both the intragranular micro-fractures
and mylonitic planar fabrics. A high fluid activity during my-
lonitization is indicated by the advanced replacement of feld-
spars by secondary minerals (clays, fine-grained white mica
and quartz) as well as by the phyllosilicates and fibrous quartz
in “strain shadows” and overgrowths around porphyroclasts.
Shear sense criteria such as S—C’fabric, strain shadows
(Fig. 4d), synthetic domino fragmentation of muscovite and
feldspars, etc. consistently indicate top-to-the-north and north-
west direction of the tectonic transport, namely north-ver-
gent reverse-fault kinematics.
LA-ICP-MS geochronology
We sampled a metagranite sheet-like body from the felsic
part of the Koprivshtitsa Unit. Our aim was to constrain the
time of emplacement of this abundant rock variety within the
section as well as to compare the results with the recently ob-
tained ages of 502.8 ± 3.2 Ma for a hornblende-biotite gneiss
of the Pirdop Unit north of Koprivshtitsa (Peytcheva & von
Quadt 2004) and 493.8 ± 9.8 Ma for a metagabbro west of
Pirdop (Antonov et al. 2010). More than 30 zircons were re-
covered from the metagranite sample SG-8-2 (sample locality
in Fig. 2b). Grains with lengths between 100 and 250 µm
were selected for analysis. Most of them are slightly rounded
but still have preserved prismatic and bi-pyramidal morpho-
logies, characteristic for a magmatic population. On the
449
CAMBRIAN MAGMATISM AND VARISCAN METAMORPHISM IN SREDNA GORA (BULGARIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
Fig. 4. Field and microscale characteristics of the Pirdop Unit. a – two-mica migmatitic gneiss with leucosome material along the metamor-
phic foliation planes, and within the hinges and along axial planes of small-scaled folds; pavement outcrop; ca. 7.5 km northwest of Ko-
privshtitsa; b – photomicrograph of a two-mica gneiss with a distinct high-grade metamorphic foliation defined by a preferred orientation of
main rock-forming minerals – biotite (bt), white mica (wm), plagioclase (pl), K-feldspar (kfs) and quartz (qz); c – greenschist facies
S—C’mylonite in the ChSZ; the white arrow points to a lens of a sheared leucosome from the parental migmatitic gneiss; d – photomicro-
graph of a fine-grained mylonite with a distinct “banding” defined by an alternation between thin phyllosilicate-rich domains and thicker bands
of fine-grained synkinematic quartz; porphyroclasts of white mica and synmetamorphic quartz are common; strain shadows (white arrow) of
the porphyroclasts point to a sinistral (top to the NW) shearing; e – photomicrograph demonstrating the brittle deformation behaviour of feld-
spars, quartz and mica porphyroclasts and abundant microfractures parallel to the mylonitic foliation; f – fragmented quartz porphyroclast
with strong, undulose extinction and deformation bands; the large microfracture separating the porphyroclast into two parts is filled with fine-
grained aggregate of synkinematic phyllosilicates and quartz; weak bulging recrystallization is revealed along the boundaries of the quartz
fragments and along fine microfractures. All photomicrographs are with crossed polarizers. Mineral abbreviations as in Fig. 3.
450
LAZAROVA, NAYDENOV, PETROV and GROZDEV
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
backscattered electron (BSE) images (Fig. 5a), fractures are
visible in almost all of the zircon grains. Cathodolumines-
cence (CL) images (Fig. 5a) reveal a preserved magmatic os-
cillatory zoning and fine metamorphic rims. The magmatic
origin of the grains is further confirmed by the Th/U ratio
> 0.5 (Table 1). The solid-state recrystallization and fractur-
ing of the zircon grains most probably reflect the high-grade
metamorphic overprint. This event is clearly indicated by the
consistently younger ages of the rims (Pb-loss).
The U-Pb isotope ages (Table 1) are summarized in Fig. 5b.
The obtained age data range between 400 and 700 Ma. Two
analyses concordant at ca. 600 and another two at ca. 700 Ma
correspond to inherited zircon cores (e.g. grain 1, Fig. 5a) and
point to a Neoproterozoic source contribution. CL images re-
veal that a group of several concordant to slightly discordant
analyses yielding ages between ca. 400 and ca. 470 Ma corre-
spond to zones of recrystallization and certain Pb-loss or reju-
venation (e.g. grain 3, Fig. 5a). The main group of 11 concor-
dant analyses corresponding to zircon grains with fine
magmatic oscillation (e.g. grain 2, Fig. 5a) were used to calcu-
late a concordia age of 491.5 ± 7.6 Ma (Fig. 5c). This date is
considered the best approximation of the crystallization age of
the granite.
Discussion
The Koprivshtitsa Unit – structure and ages
Field data show that the Koprivshtitsa Unit represents a
small but from a geodynamic point of view important, un-
migmatized domain of the Central Sredna Gora Complex.
Fig. 5. LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology results for metagranite sample SG-8-2 (sample location in Fig. 2). a – selected cathodolumines-
cence (CL) images (upper row) and backscattered electron (BSE) images (lower row) of analysed zircon grains with position of the laser
ablation craters (circles) and corresponding ages. Grain 1 – inherited Neoproterozoic magmatic core, grain 2 – large grain with fine oscil-
latory zonation (analysed area) and thin metamorphic rim (black on the CL image), grain 3 – fractured and largely recrystallized zircon
with analysed metamorphic rim; b – concordia plot of all LA-ICP-MS analyses; c – concordia crystallization age excluding inherited
cores and metamorphic rims. Data calculations and plots were carried out in ISOPLOT 3.0 (Ludwig 2003).
451
CAMBRIAN MAGMATISM AND VARISCAN METAMORPHISM IN SREDNA GORA (BULGARIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
A considerable part of the unit repre-
sents an alternation of metagranitoid
and metabasic rocks. Their initial re-
lationships were obliterated during
the high-grade metamorphic over-
print, but the sheet-like geometry of
the metagranitoids and their small
thickness suggest dyke- or sill-like
emplacement within the mafic host
rocks. The new U-Pb geochrono-
logical data indicate a Late Cambrian
(491. 5 ± 7.6 Ma) crystallization age
of the metagranites (Fig. 5). The re-
sults overlap within the analytical
error with the protolith crystalliza-
tion age of 493.8 ± 9.8 Ma reported
for a metagabbro lens within the
migmatitic gneisses of the Pirdop
Unit (Antonov et al. 2010) (Fig. 2a).
Similar, although not very precise
due to large discordance of the
analyses, is the lower intercept age
of 502.8 ± 3.2 Ma of a hornblende-
biotite gneiss from the Pirdop Unit
(Fig. 2a) north of Koprivshtitsa
(Peytcheva & von Quadt 2004).
These data suggest an approximately
contemporaneous Late Cambrian
emplacement of the mafic and fel-
sic melts within the Central Sredna
Gora Complex.
Considering the amphibolite fa-
cies overprint of the Koprivshtitsa
Unit, concordant ages obtained
from some of the zircons (mainly
from rims but also from inner zones
with fractures) which cluster around
400 Ma are important (Table 1).
These ages probably reflect the time
of a high-grade metamorphic event.
They correlate well with the age of
398 ± 5.2 Ma interpreted as an am-
phibolite facies re-equilibration of
mafic eclogites south of the studied
area (Gaggero et al. 2009). There is a
substantial difference with the time
of the migmatization in the Pirdop
Unit, estimated by Carrigan et al.
(2006) at 336.5 ± 5.4 Ma, but at this
stage of research our results and pre-
viously published data are insuffi-
cient to thoroughly address this
issue. Although scattered and in-
complete, the geochronological data
for the Central Sredna Gora Complex
(Velichkova et al. 2004; Carrigan et
al. 2006; Gaggero et al. 2009) are in
agreement with the prolonged and
complicated metamorphic evolu-
Table 1:
Results
of
U-Pb
LA-ICP-MS
zircon
geochronological
analyses
on
sample
SG-08-2.
Abbreviations:
c
–
zircon
core,
r
–
zircon
rim,
Rho
–
correlation
coefficient,
1SE
–
1
sigma
error, 2SE – 2 sigma error.
452
LAZAROVA, NAYDENOV, PETROV and GROZDEV
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
tion suggested for the Variscan Belt in Central and Western
Europe. It is generally characterized by an Early Variscan
subduction and high-pressure metamorphism at ca. 400 Ma,
a Mid to Late Variscan high-temperature event at ca. 340—330
and late-to-post-tectonic granitoids emplacement between
ca. 330—300 Ma (e.g. Kroner et al. 2008; Kroner & Romer
2013 and references therein).
The mylonitic contact of the Koprivshtitsa Unit
The Chuminska Shear Zone represents a mylonitic bound-
ary between the Koprivshtitsa and Pirdop units. The synde-
formational mineral assemblage of quartz, chlorite and white
mica, the generally brittle behaviour of the feldspar porphy-
roclasts as well as the quartz recrystallization fabrics within
the mylonites suggest a greenschist facies fluid-assisted de-
formation along the zone at temperatures most probably in
the range of 300—350 °C. The observed sense-of-shear crite-
ria indicate reverse kinematics along the north vergent zone
thus supporting the earlier interpretation of Dabovski et al.
(1966) and Iliev & Katskov (1990).
Initially, a Late Alpine time of shearing was suggested
(Dabovski et al. 1966), whereas Antonov et al. (2010) as-
sumed a Variscan deformation. The sole indirect age indica-
tor is the fact that the Chuminska Shear Zone cuts the
migmatitic gneisses of the Pirdop Unit in which the leuco-
some has been dated to 336.5 ± 5.4 Ma (Carrigan et al. 2006).
Thus, the deformation clearly postdated the ca. 336 Ma high-
temperature metamorphic event. In regional scale, similari-
ties in terms of geometry, deformation style and kinematics
are found between the Chuminska Shear Zone and several
Early Alpine north-vergent thrusts in the Stara Planina
Mountain area adjacent to the north (for details see Gerdjikov
et al. 2007; Lazarova & Gerdjikov 2008 and references therein).
Therefore, a kinematic and temporal correlation with these
structures can be made. Furthermore, south of the Koprivsh-
titsa area, low-temperature (greenschist facies) shear zones
deforming the high-grade Variscan metamorphic rocks have
been dated at 105—100 Ma (
40
Ar/
39
Ar mica ages – Velichkova
et al. 2004). However, at this stage of research an unequivo-
cal time constraint of the activities along the Chuminska
Shear Zone cannot be given.
Correlations and tectonic context
Southwest of the studied area, the Central Sredna Gora
Complex is similarly subdivided into two high-grade meta-
morphic units (Kouzhoukharov et al. 1980; Dabovski 1988;
Zagorchev 2008) – one is dominated by migmatitic gneisses
(the Plana Unit) and the other is composed of partially mig-
matized or non-migmatized biotite gneisses, amphibolites
and eclogite lenses (the Garvanitsa Unit). They lack a direct
connection with the Pirdop and Koprivshtitsa units, being
separated by a several kilometers wide strip of Mesozoic and
Cenozoic sedimentary and magmatic rocks (Fig. 2a). Never-
theless, based on the similar lithology and the grade of the
metamorphic overprint a correlation between the Pirdop and
Plana units and between the Koprivshtitsa and Garvanitsa
units might be suggested.
In the context of the Paleozoic geodynamic evolution of
the Balkans, a number of crustal “pieces” now composing
the Variscan high-grade metamorphic complexes belonged
to the northern peri-Gondwanan realm most probably until
the Devonian and Early Carboniferous (Yanev 1993, 1997,
2000; Lakova 1995; Gutierrez-Marco et al. 2003; Boncheva
et al. 2010 and references therein). The most recent regional
(Nance & Linnemann 2008; Nance et al. 2010, 2012; Stampfli
et al. 2011, 2013; von Raumer et al. 2013) and local
(Kounov et al. 2012; Balintoni et al. 2014; Antic et al. 2014)
geodynamic reconstructions suggest that during the time
span between the Late Neoproterozoic and mid Paleozoic,
several events of an enhanced magmatic activity took place:
i) late Ediacaran—early (to mid?) Cambrian subduction, accre-
tion and arc magmatism linked to the evolution of the Proto-
tethys Ocean; ii) late Cambrian—Early Ordovician rifting
related to the opening of the Rheic Ocean; iii) Mid Ordovi-
cian—Early Devonian magmatic arc magmatism. According
to this scheme, and considering the newly obtained ca.
500 Ma protolith ages for both metagranitoids (this study)
and metamafic rocks (Peytcheva & von Quadt 2004; Antonov
et al. 2010), we could suggest that the mafic and the felsic
igneous rocks in the northern flank of the Central Sredna
Gora Complex are most probably related to the initial open-
ing stages of the Rheic Ocean or a related basin in the late
Cambrian. They intruded a Late Neoproterozoic (Carrigan et
al. 2006) crust, which in the studied area is presented by the
Bobevitsa-type orthogneisses.
Conclusions
The Koprivshtitsa Unit is an unmigmatized, orthogneiss-
dominated part of the Variscan high-grade section of the Cen-
tral Sredna Gora Complex in Bulgaria. The unit represents a
fragment of a metamorphosed magmatic complex that in-
cludes metagranitoids and metabasites. The newly obtained
crystallization age for the protoliths of the metagranites is
491.5 ± 7.6 Ma. The similar ages of 493.8 ± 9.8 Ma from a
metagabbro (Antonov et al. 2010) and of 502.8 ± 3.2 Ma
from a hornblende-biotite gneiss (Peytcheva & von Quadt
2004) from the migmatitic Pirdop Unit suggest a contempo-
raneous Late Cambrian emplacement of mafic and felsic
melts. They intruded a Cadomian crustal fragment (the
Bobevitsa-type orthogneisses) dated to ca. 616.9 ± 9.5 and
595 ± 23 Ma (Carrigan et al. 2006).
The age of ca. 400 Ma obtained from zircon rims shows
that most probably an Early Devonian high-grade metamor-
phic event affected these basement rocks. A similar age is
obtained from eclogites southwest of the studied area. These
data are an important contribution to the further reconstruc-
tions of the P-T-t metamorphic evolution of the Balkan part
of the Variscan belt.
The contact of the Koprivshtitsa Unit with the migmatitic
Pirdop Unit is a greenschist facies mylonitic zone, postdating
the high-temperature metamorphic overprint of the gneiss sec-
tion. An Alpine age of the shearing or reactivation of preexist-
ing structure could be assumed based on structural similarities
with shear zones from the terranes adjacent to the study area.
453
CAMBRIAN MAGMATISM AND VARISCAN METAMORPHISM IN SREDNA GORA (BULGARIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
According to published Paleozoic geodynamic schemes,
we can suggest that the igneous rocks from the northern
flank of the Sredna Gora Complex intruded Ediacaran crustal
fragments most probably during the initial opening stages of
the Rheic Ocean in the late Cambrian.
Acknowledgments: This study was funded by the Geological
Institute of the Bulgarian Academy of Science. We thank
Kamelia Nedkova for her help during U-Pb dating as well as
Irena Peytcheva, Zlatka Cherneva and Ianko Gerdjikov for
the helpful discussions during our work. Alexandre Kounov,
Marian Janák and two anonymous reviewers are highly
thanked for their constructive reviews of the manuscript.
References
Antić M., Peytcheva I., von Quadt A., Kounov A., Trivić B., Serafi-
movski T., Tasev G. & Gerdjikov I. 2014: Geochronological
and geochemical studies on crystalline rocks from the central
Serbo-Macedonian massif with implications on its pre-Alpine
evolution. In: Proceedings of XX CBGA Congress. Bul. Shk.
Gjeol., Spec. Iss. 1, 195.
Antonov M., Gerdjikov S., Metodiev L., Kiselinov Ch., Sirakov V. &
Valev V. 2010: Explanatory note to the Geological Map of the
Republic of Bulgaria in scale 1 : 50,000. Map Sheet K-35-37-B
(Pirdop). Geocomplex, Sofia, 1—99.
Arnaudov V., Amov B., Bartnitskii E. & Pavlova M. 1989: Isotopic
geochronology of igneous and metamorphic rocks in Bal-
kanides and Rhodope Massif. XIV Congr. CBGA, Abstract
Vol., Sofia, 1154—1157 (in Russian).
Balintoni I., Balica C., Ducea M.N. & Hann H.-P. 2014: Peri-Gond-
wanan terranes in the Romanian Carpathians: A review of their
spatial distribution, origin, provenance, and evolution. Geosci.
Frontiers 5, 395—411.
Boncheva I., Lakova I., Sachanski V. & Koenigshof P. 2010: Devo-
nian stratigraphy, correlations and basin development in the Bal-
kan Terrane, western Bulgaria. Gondwana Res. 17, 573—582.
Bosse V., Boulvais P., Gautier P., Tiepolo M., Ruffet G., Devidal
J.L., Cherneva Z., Gerdjikov I. & Paquette J.-L. 2009: Fluid-
induced disturbance of the monazite Th-Pb chronometer: In
situ dating and element mapping in pegmatites from the
Rhodope (Greece, Bulgaria). Chem. Geol. 261, 3—4, 286—302.
Burg J.-P. 2012: Rhodope: From Mesozoic convergence to Cenozoic
extension. Review of petro-structural data in the geochrono-
logical frame. In: Skourtsos E. & Lister G.S. (Eds.): The geol-
ogy of Greece. J. Virt. Explorer 39, paper 1.
Burg J.-P., Ricou L.-E., Ivanov Z., Godfriaux I., Dimov D. & Klain
L. 1996: Syn-metamorphic nappe complex in the Rhodope
Massif. Structure and kinematics. Terra Nova 8, 1, 6—15.
Carrigan C., Mukasa S., Haydoutov I. & Kolcheva K. 2003: Ion mi-
croprobe U-Pb zircon ages of pre-Alpine rocks in Balkan,
Sredna Gora, and Rhodope terrains of Bulgaria: Constrains of
Neoproterozoic and Variscan tectonic evolution. J. Geosci. 48,
1—2, 32.
Carrigan C., Mukasa S., Haydoutov I. & Kolcheva K. 2005: Age of
Variscan magmatism from the Balkan sector of the orogen,
central Bulgaria. Lithos 82, 125—147.
Carrigan C., Mukasa S., Haydoutov I. & Kolcheva K. 2006:
Neoproterozoic magmatism and Carboniferous high-grade
metamorphism in the Sredna Gora Zone, Bulgaria: An exten-
sion of the Gondwana-derived Avalonian-Cadomian belt? Pre-
cambrian Res. 147, 3—4, 404—416.
Cortesogno L., Gaggero L., Haydoutov I. & Buzzi L. 2005: The
eclogite to amphibolite metamorphic path from the Sredna
Gora terrane in the Variscan orogenic segment of Bulgaria (SE
Europe). Geophys. Res. Abstract Vol., 7, 01802.
Dabovski Ch. 1988: Precambrian blocks in the Srednogorie Zone.
In: Zoubek V., Cogné J., Kozhoukharov D. & Krautner H.G.
(Eds.): Precambrian in younger fold belts. John Wiley & Sons,
Chichester, 841—847.
Dabovski Ch., Zagorchev I., Ruseva M. & Chunev D. 1966: The Pa-
leozoic granitoids of the Sashtinska Sredna Gora. Ann. Direc-
tion Géol. 16, 57—96 (in Bulgarian).
Dabovski Ch., Boyanov I., Christchev. C., Nikolov T., Sapunov I.,
Yanev Y. & Zagorchev I. 2002: Structure and Alpine evolution
of Bulgaria. Geol. Balcanica 32, 2—4, 9—15.
Dallmeyer R., Neubauer F., Fritz H. & Mocanu V. 1998: Variscan
vs. Apline tectonothermal evolution of the Southern Car-
pathian orogen: constrains from
40
Ar/
39
Ar ages. Tectonophysics
290, 111—135.
Franke W., Haak V., Oncken O. & Tanner D. (Eds.) 2000: Orogenic
processes: Quantification and modelling in the Variscan Belt.
Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 179, 1—463.
Froitzheim N., Plašienka D. & Schuster R. 2008: Alpine tectonics of
the Alps and Western Carpathians. In: McCann T. (Ed.): The
geology of Central Europe. Geol. Soc., London, 1141—1232.
Gaggero L., Buzzi L., Haydoutov I. & Cortesogno L. 2009: Eclogite
relics in the Variscan orogenic belt of Bulgaria (SE Europe).
Int. J. Earth Sci. 98, 8, 1853—1877.
Gerdjikov I., Georgiev N., Dimov D. & Lazarova A. 2007: The dif-
ferent faces of supposedly single thrust: a reevaluation of the
Vezhen thrust, Central Balkanides. In: Proceeding of National
conference “Geosciences 2008”. Bulg. Geol. Soc., Sofia,
24—26.
Gerdjikov I., Lazarova A., Kounov A. & Vangelov D. 2013: High-
grade metamorphic complexes in Bulgaria. Part I. Geology and
geophysics. Ann. Univ. Min. Geol. “St. Ivan Rilski” 56, 47—52
(in Bulgarian with English summary).
Gerdjikov I., Ruffet G., Lazarova A., Vangelov D., Balkanska E. &
Bonev K. 2010:
40
Ar/
39
Ar geochronologic constrains of a
Variscan transpression in Central Stara planina Mountain. In:
Proceeding of National conference “Geosciences 2010”. Bulg.
Geol. Soc., 109-110.
Gutierrez-Marco J.C., Yanev S., Sachanski V., Rabano I., Lakova
I., San Jose Lancha M.A., Diez Martinez E., Boncheva I. &
Sarmiento G. 2003: New biostratigraphical data from the Or-
dovician of Bulgaria. In: Albanesi G.L., Beresi M.S. & Peralta
S.H. (Eds.): Ordocivian of the Andes. INSUGEO, Ser. Correl.
Geol. 17, 79—85.
Iancu V., Berza T., Seghedi A. & Marunyiu M. 2005: Paleozoic rock
assemblages incorporated in the South Carpathian Alpine Thrust
Belt (Romania and Serbia): A review. Geol. Belg. 8, 4, 48—68.
Iliev K. & Katskov N. 1990: Geological map of Bulgaria in scale
1 : 100,000. Map sheet Panagyurishte. Geol. and Geophys.
JS Co., Sofia.
Ivanov Z. 1988: Apercu general sur l’evolution geologique et struc-
turale du massif des Rhodopes dans le card des Balkanides.
Bull. Soc. Geol. France 8, 227—240.
Jackson S.E., Pearson N.J., Griffin W.L. & Belousova E.A. 2004:
The application of laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-
mass spectrometry to in situ U-Pb zircon geochronology.
Chem. Geol. 211, 1—2, 47—69.
Kaiser-Rohrmeier M., Handler R., von Quadt A. & Heinrich C.
2004: Hydrothermal Pb-Zn ore formation in the central Rhodo-
pian dome, south Bulgaria: review and new time constraints
from Ar-Ar geochronology. Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt.
84, 1, 37—58.
Kounov A., Graf J., von Quadt A., Bernoulli D., Burg J.P., Seward
D., Ivanov Z. & Fanning M. 2012: Evidence for a “Cadomian”
454
LAZAROVA, NAYDENOV, PETROV and GROZDEV
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 6, 443—454
ophiolite and magmatic-arc complex in SW Bulgaria. Precam-
brian Res. 212—213, 275—295.
Kouzhoukharov D., Kouzhoukharova E. & Christov S. 1980: The
Precambrian in the northern parts of Plana Mountains and
Vakarel Hills. Rev. Bul. Geol. Soc. 41, 3, 211—222 (in Bulgarian
with English summary).
Kroner U. & Romer R. 2013: Two plates – Many subduction
zones: The Variscan orogeny reconsidered. Gondwana Res. 24,
298—329.
Kroner U., Mansy J.L., Mazur S., Aleksandrowski P., Hann H.P.,
Huckriede H., Lacquement F., Lamarche J., Ledru P., Pharaoh
T.C., Zedler H., Zeh A. & Zulauf G. 2008: Variscan tectonics.
In: McCann T. (Ed.): The geology of Central Europe. Geol.
Soc., London, 599—664.
Lakova I. 1995: Palaeobiogeographical affinities of Pridolian and
Lochkovian chitinozoans from North Bulgaria. Geol. Balcanica
26, 5—6, 23—28.
Lazarova A. & Gerdjikov I. 2008: Structures of sheared granitoids
from the Zlatishka Stara Planina Mountain: indicators for the
deformation at frictional-viscous transition. Rev. Bul. Geol.
Soc. 69, 1—3, 7—20 (in Bulgarian with English summary).
Lazarova A., Gerdjikov I., Vangelov D. & Georgiev N. 2010:
Variscan transpression and related voluminous magmatism in
Central Strara Planina Mountain, Bulgaria. Geol. Balcanica
38, 1—2, 226—227.
Liati A. 2005: Identification of repeated Alpine (ultra) high-pres-
sure metamorphic events by U-Pb SHRIMP geochronology
and REE geochemistry of zircon: the Rhodope zone of Northern
Greece. Contr. Mineral. Petrology 150, 608—630.
Ludwig K.R. 2003: User’s manual for Isoplot/Ex, version 3.0, a
geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geo-
chronology Center, Spec. Publ., Berkeley, CA 4, 1—74.
Nance R.D. & Linnemann U. 2008: The Rheic Ocean: Origin, evo-
lution, and significance. GSA Today 18, 12, 4—12.
Nance R.D., Gutiérrez-Alonso G., Keppie J.D., Linnemann U.,
Murphy J.B., Quesada C., Strachan R.A. & Woodcock N.H.
2010: Evolution of the Rheic Ocean. Gondwana Res. 17,
194—222.
Nance R.D., Gutierrez-Alonso G., Keppie J.D., Linnemann U.,
Murphy J.B., Quesada C., Strachan R.A. & Woodcock N.H.
2012: A brief history of the Rheic Ocean. Geosci. Frontiers 3,
2, 125—135.
Neubauer F. & Handler R. 1999: Variscan orogeny in the Eastern
Alps and Bohemian Massif: How do these units correlate?.
Mitt. Österr. Geol. Gesell. 92, 35—59.
Peytcheva I. & von Quadt A. 2004: The Palaeozoic protoliths of
Central Srednogorie, Bulgaria: records in zircons from base-
ment rocks and Cretaceous magmatites. 5th International Sym-
posium on Eastern Mediterranean Geology, Thessaloniki,
Greece, Conf. Vol., Extended abstract, T11-9.
Schmid S.M., Bernoulli D., Fügenschuh B., Matenco L., Schefer S.,
Schuster R., Tischler M. & Ustaszewski K. 2008: The Alpine-
Carpathian-Dinaridic orogenic system: correlation and evolu-
tion of tectonic units. Swiss J. Geosci. 101, 139—183.
Schulmann K., Martinez Catalan K., Lardeaux J., Janoušek J. &
Oggiano J. (Eds.) 2014: The Variscan Orogeny: extent, times-
cale and the formation of the European Crust. Geol. Soc. Lon-
don, Spec. Publ. 405, 1—400.
Sláma J., Košler J., Condon D.J., Crowley J.L., Gerdes A., Hanchar
J.M. & Whitehouse J. 2008: Plešovice zircon – A new natural
reference material for U—Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis.
Chem. Geol. 249, 1—2, 1—35.
Stampfli G.M., von Raumer J. & Wilhem C. 2011: The distribution of
Gondwana-derived terranes in the Early Paleozoic. In: Gutiérrez-
Marco J.C., Rábano I. & García-Bellido D. (Eds.): The Ordovi-
cian of the World. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero Instituto
Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid 14, 567—574.
Stampfli G.M., Hochard C., Vérard C., Wilhem C. & von Raumer J.
2013: The formation of Pangea. Tectonophysics 593, 1—19.
Turpaud P. & Reischmann T. 2010: Characterisation of igneous ter-
ranes by zircon dating: implications for UHP occurrences and
suture identification in the Central Rhodope, northern Greece.
Int. J. Earth. Sci. 99, 3, 567—591.
Velichkova S., Handler R., Neubauer F. & Ivanov Z. 2004:
Variscan to Alpine tectonothermal volution of the Central
Srednogorie unit, Bulgaria: constraints from
40
Ar/
39
Ar analy-
sis. Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt. 84, 133—151.
von Quadt A., Peytcheva I., Frank M., Nedyalkov R., Kamenov B. &
Heinrich C. 2004: Subduction related rocks in Medet Cu-por-
phyry deposit: Sources and magma evolution. Goldschmidt
Conf. Abs., 626.
von Raumer J.F., Bussy F., Schaltegger U., Schulz B. & Stampfli
G.M. 2013: Pre-Mesozoic Alpine basements – their place in
the European Paleozoic framework. GSA Bulletin 125, 1—2,
89—108.
Yanev S. 1993: Gondwana Paleozoic terranes in the Alpine collage
system of the Balkans. Hymalaian Geology 4, 2, 257—270.
Yanev S. 1997: Paleozoic migration of terranes from the basement
of the eastern part of the Balkan peninsula from peri-Gondwa-
na to Laurussia. Turkish Assoc. Petrol. Geol., Spec. Publ. 3,
89—100.
Yanev S. 2000: Palaeozoic terranes of the Balkan Peninsula in the
framework of Pangea assembly. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol.
Palaeoecol. 161, 151—177.
Zagorchev I. 2008: Amphibolite-facies metamorphic complexes in
Bulgaria and Precambrian geodynamics: controversies and
“state of the art”. Geol. Balcanica 37, 1—2, 33—46.
Zagorchev I., Dabovsky Ch. & Tchunev D. 1973: Tectonics of west-
ern part of the Sredna Gora metamorphic block (Sashtinska
Sredna Gora). Rev. Bul. Geol. Sci. 37, 1, 1—10 (in Bulgarian).