www.geologicacarpathica.com
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
, FEBRUARY 2015, 66, 1, 51—67 doi: 10.1515/geoca-2015-0010
Biostratigraphy, sedimentology and paleoenvironments of
the northern Danube Basin: Ratkovce 1 well case study
SAMUEL RYBÁR
1
, EVA HALÁSOVÁ
1
, NATÁLIA HUDÁČKOVÁ
1
, MICHAL KOVÁČ
1
,
MARIANNA KOVÁČOVÁ
1
,
KATARÍNA ŠARINOVÁ
2
and MICHAL ŠUJAN
1
1
Department of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina G, 842 15 Bratislava,
Slovak Republic; samuelrybar3@gmail.com; halasova@fns.uniba.sk; hudackova@fns.uniba.sk; kovacm@fns.uniba.sk; kovacova@fns.uniba.sk
2
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina G, 842 15 Bratislava,
Slovak Republic; sarinova@fns.uniba.sk
(Manuscript received April 24, 2014; accepted in revised form December 10, 2014)
Abstract: The Ratkovce 1 well, drilled in the Blatné depocenter of the northern Danube Basin penetrated the Miocene
sedimentary record with a total thickness of 2000 m. Biostratigraphically, the NN4, NN5 and NN6 Zones of calcareous
nannoplankton were documented; CPN7 and CPN8 foraminifer Zones (N9, 10, 11 of the global foraminiferal zonation;
and MMi4a; MMi5 and MMi6 of the Mediterranean foraminiferal zonation were recognized. Sedimentology was based
on description of well core material, and together with SP and RT logs, used to characterize paleoenvironmental condi-
tions of the deposition. Five sedimentary facies were reconstructed: (1) fan-delta to onshore environment which devel-
oped during the Lower Badenian; (2) followed by the Lower Badenian proximal slope gravity currents sediments;
(3) distal slope turbidites were deposited in the Lower and Upper Badenian; (4) at the very end of the Upper Badenian
and during the Sarmatian a coastal plain of normal marine to brackish environment developed; (5) sedimentation fin-
ished with the Pannonian—Pliocene shallow lacustrine to alluvial plain deposits. The provenance analysis records that
the sediment of the well-cores was derived from crystalline basement granitoides and gneisses and from the Permian to
Lower Cretaceous sedimentary cover and nappe units of the Western Carpathians and the Eastern Alps. Moreover, the
Lower Badenian volcanism was an important source of sediments in the lower part of the sequence.
Key words: Danube Basin, Blatné depression, Middle and Upper Miocene, biostratigraphy, sedimentology, sedimentary
petrology, depositional systems.
Introduction
The Danube Basin, located at the junction of the Eastern Al-
pine, Western Carpathian and Transdanubian Range, repre-
sents an important depocenter of the Pannonian Basin
System on its north-western margin (Kováč 2000). The basin
is divided into finger like bays situated between the Western
Carpathian core mountains (Malé Karpaty, Považský Inovec,
and Tríbeč Mts), and from W to E known as the Blatné,
Rišňovce and Komjatice depressions (Vass 2002). In the
Blatné Depression, the Ratkovce 1 well (Lat: 48° 29’4.2216”
Lon: 17° 55’48.3528”) penetrates the Middle and Upper
Miocene sedimentary record (Fig. 1). The studied well,
along with multiple other wells was drilled for petroleum
prospecting in the late 1960s and 1970s, and was technically
documented in a drilling report (Imrichová 1969). Litho-
stratigraphy, biostratigraphy and geophysical measurements
were compiled adequate to current knowledge and methods.
Isopach maps of the basin sedimentary fill were worked out
by Adam & Dlabač (1969), and later the available well data
were summarized by Biela (1978), without revision of sedi-
mentology, and only with scarce refining of existing bio-
stratigraphy. Reinterpretations of the older geophysical
data in the 1990s were carried out by Hrušecký et al. (1993,
1996). Complex studies of the paleogeography, geodynamic
evolution, and sequence stratigraphy of the Carpathian-
Pannonian region during the Miocene were published by
Kováč et al. (1999), and Kováč (2000). Paleoflora, paleocli-
mate and Miocene landscape was analysed in the papers of
Kvaček et al. (2006), Kováč et al. (2006, 2011) and
Kováčová et al. (2011). Andreyeva Grigorovich et al. (2003),
Harzhauser et al. (2007), Harzhauser & Mandič (2008), and
Hohenegger et al. (2014) enriched the integrated stratigraphy
of the Central Paratethys, with possible implications for the
Danube Basin.
Revision and re-evaluation of the well-core material from
the Ratkovce 1 borehole after more than 45 years, using ad-
vanced methods of biostratigraphy, sedimentology and geo-
physics should contribute not only to clarify the models of
basin evolution, but also the paleogeography and geodyna-
mics of adjacent area (the works were carried out in the scope
of the SRDA Project 0099-11 Danube).
Geological setting
Opening of the Danube Basin was caused by Badenian
rifting over an asthenospheric upwelling, like in the whole
Danube Basin area (Lankreier et al. 1995; Konečný et al.
2002). A NW-SE orientated transtensional regime was active
during the entire Middle Miocene. In the latest Miocene ther-
mal subsidence set in and subsequently deltaic and alluvial
sediments filled the depocenter (Tari et al. 1992; Tari & Hor-
váth 1995; Kováč 2000; Horváth et al. 2006).
52
RYBÁR, HALÁSOVÁ, HUDÁČKOVÁ, KOVÁČ, KOVÁČOVÁ, ŠARINOVÁ and ŠUJAN
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Fig. 1. Geological maps of (A) the Danube Basin, (B) Western Slovakia and (C) the Blatné Depression and its surroundings, with the position of
the Ratkovce 1 well marked. Explanatory notes to A and B: 1 – Inner Alpine-Carpathian-Dinaride Units, 2 – Pieniny Klippen Belt, 3 – Neo-
gene volcanic fields, 4 – Alpine and Outer Carpathian Flysch Belt, 5 – Neogene basins (modified from Kováč et al. 2011). Explanatory
notes to C: a – mostly clays, silts, sands, gravels and rare lignite seams (Late Miocene—Pliocene); b – clays, claystones, siltstones, sands,
sandstones, gravels, conglomerates, subordinate evaporites, algal limestones, coal seams and andesite tuffites and epiclastic volcanic rocks
(Middle Miocene); c – claystones, siltstones, sands, sandstones, gravels, conglomerates, subordinate evaporites, organodetritic limestones,
coal seams and rhyolite tuffs and tuffites (Early Miocene); d – conglomerates, sandstones, limestones, breccias (Paleocene—Eocene); e – marls,
limestones, sandstones, conglomerates (Late Cretaceous); f – shales, marls, sandstones, conglomerates – mostly flysch (Late Cretaceous—
Eocene); f-a – klippen of Jurassic—Early Cretaceous radiolarites and limestones; g – limestones, marly limestones, marlstones, shales, sand-
stones (Early Cretaceous); h – sandy, crinoid, mottled, radiolarian and nodular limestones, cherts, shales (Jurassic); i – limestones,
dolomites, locally shales and sandstones (Middle—Upper Triassic); j – calcareous shales, shales, sandstones and quartzites (Early Triassic);
k – variegated conglomerates, sandstones and shales, locally evaporites and volcanic rocks (Permian); l – phyllites and mica shists with
metavolcanite horizons (Proterozoic?—Early Paleozoic); m – paragneisses, mica shists and migmatitic gneisses (Proterozoic?—Early Paleozoic);
n – orthogneisses and migmatites with amphibolites and paragneiss layers (Proterozoic?—Early Paleozoic); o – granitoids, granites, grano-
diorites, tonalites (Late Devonian?); p – geological boundaries; r – faults: a – assumed, s – nappe and overthrust lines, t – areas where depth
to basement exceeds 2000 m, u – areas where depth to basement exceeds 4000 m. Modified from Biely et al. (1996) and Kováč et al. (2011).
53
STRATIGRAPHY, SEDIMENTOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTS OF N DANUBE BASIN (SLOVAKIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
The sedimentary sequence of the Ratkovce 1 well in the
Blatné depression begins with the earliest Badenian strata,
deposited unconformably above the pre Neogene basement.
After the latest Karpatian/earliest Badenian terrestrial depo-
sition, the whole area was flooded by a transgression, which
led to the shallow to deep marine environment of the
Špačince and Báhoň formations, which persisted during the
whole Early and Late Badenian (Vass 2002; Kováč et al.
2007). During the Sarmatian, the marine environment gradu-
ally changed to brackish and the Vráble Formation was de-
posited (Vass 2002; Kováč et al. 2007). The Upper Miocene
succession is built up by the lacustrine Ivánka Formation,
which passes into the shallow water to swamp environment
of the Beladice Formation (Kováč et al. 2010). Sediments of
the delta to alluvial plain are represented by the Volkovce
Formation (Upper Miocene to Pliocene) and in some places
are overlain by the Pliocene to Pleistocene deluvial to alluvial
Kolárovo Formation (Kováč et al. 2011).
Material and methods
Well core material was obtained from the well repository of
Nafta a.s. situated in the town of Gbely. For the micropaleon-
tological analysis, 45 rock samples were collected and pro-
cessed by standard preparation methods (described in
Kováčová & Hudáčková 2009). Calcareous nannofossils were
analysed quantitatively in smear slides prepared from all
lithologies by the standard techniques (e.g. described in
Švábenická 2002; Jamrich & Halásová 2011). Slides were
studied under an Olympus BX 50 polarizing microscope
(magnification 1250
×). For biostratigraphic interpretations
nannoplankton and foraminiferal associations were used, in
the sense of the standard zonation of Grill (1941) and Cicha et
al. (1975), the stratigraphic ranges of foraminifers follow
Cicha et al. (1998), Wade (2011), Iaccarino et al. (2011),
Turco et al. 2011 and Gradstein et al. (2012). Calcareous nan-
noplankton was compared with the standard NN zones after
Martini (1971). The current status of the Miocene Central
Paratethys stratigraphy correlation between the Central Para-
tethys regional stages and the Mediterranean scale summa-
rized by Piller et al. (2007), Kováč et al. (2007) and
Hohenegger (2014) was used to range stratigraphically impor-
tant taxa found in the Ratkovce 1 well cores (Fig. 2). Paleo-
ecological parameters were evaluated for samples containing
at least 200 individuals of benthic foraminifers on the pres-
ence and dominance of taxa, exhibiting special environmental
significance. Species with similar environmental importance
were grouped to enable better interpretation of their distribu-
tional patterns. In order to identify and characterize changes in
the assemblage structures and to relate these to changing envi-
ronmental conditions for general interpretation, the data was
treated statistically using the PAST software (Hammer et al.
2001). Assemblage structures and environmental stress of
the foraminifers were investigated through diversity indices
(Simpson, Shannon-Wiener – H’ and Evenness – J’).
Taphonomic analysis of the foraminiferal assemblage in the
studied samples was done and evaluated according to the
methods described by Holcová (1997, 1999).
The preparation of palynological samples followed stan-
dard laboratory methods (e.g. Erdtman 1943; Faegri & Iversen
1989; Moore et al. 1991). During the procedure 20 g of dry
sediment was treated with cold HCl (35%) and HF (70%) to
remove carbonates and silica and by using ZnCl
2
(heavy liq-
uid with density = 2 g/cm
3
); palynomorphs were extracted in
a centrifuge.
For provenance determination, coarse grained samples
were selected and studied under a polarization microscope.
Heavy mineral analysis was done using the 0.25—0.10 mm
fraction, which was studied under a binocular microscope,
and confirmed by an EDAX analysis. Garnets were analysed
by a WDS quantitative analysis, with the microprobe Camera
SX-100 at the Geological Institute of Dionýz Štúr, Bratislava,
Slovak Republic. Measurement conditions: 15 keV 20 nA.
Standards: LiF (F K
α), albite (Na Kα), orthoclase (Si Kα),
Al
2
O
3
(Al K
α), forsterite (Mg Kα), NaCl (Cl Kα), orthoclase
(K K
α), wollastonite (Ca Kα), TiO
2
(Ti K
α), fayalite (Fe Kα),
rodonite (Mn K
α), Cr (Cr Kα). Garnet analysis was calculated
based on 8 cations. The Fe
2+
and Fe
3+
charge balance was cal-
culated to ideal stechiometry. Photo-documentation of the
separated clasts was done by a trinocular stereomicroscope
(Olympus KL 1500 LCD) and the QuickPHOTO MICRO 3.0
software was used.
For the purposes of the sedimentological analysis 31 well
core samples were collected, all available cores and their
sampler cards were photographed. Then the samples were
cut in half perpendicular to the bedding plane, washed, and
treated for preservation with dispersive glue (WURSTOL
and HERKULES), scanned, digitalized and finally the sedi-
mentary textures and structures were documented, mainly in
the sense of Miall (2010). Further, the evaluation of a well
was based on spontaneous potential (SP) and resistivity (RT)
core logs. The curves originally constructed by Moravské
naftové doly, n.p. (Imrichová 1969) were interpreted based
on Rider (1986), Emery & Myers (1996) and Catuneanu et
al. (2011).
Biostratigraphy and paleoecology of the Ratkovce 1 well
core record
The first biostratigraphical ranking of the well cores was
done by Jandová (in Imrichová 1969). Thanks to a very well
preserved and rich assemblage of planktonic foraminifera,
yielding Globigerina (Zeaglobigerina) decoraperta (Takay-
anagi & Saito) and Globigerina (Zeaglobigerina) druryi
(Akers) in the upper part of well core 6 – Cicha et al. (1975)
established this material as the “holotype” of the Middle
Badenian planktonic foraminiferal Zone CPN8 Globigerina
druryi—Globigerina decoraperta. This zone was correlated by
Cicha et al. (1975) with the NN5 nannoplankton Zone; al-
though the calcareous nanoplankton assemblage was never
studied in the well.
The re-evaluation of cores brought new data: the NN4
Zone of calcareous nannoplankton was detected from the
base up to the well core 18 (1667—1670 m) based on the co-
occurrence of the Sphenolithus heteromorphus, Heli-
cosphaera scissura and rare H. ampliaperta. This zone
represents the Karpatian—lowermost Badenian stage of the
54
RYBÁR, HALÁSOVÁ, HUDÁČKOVÁ, KOVÁČ, KOVÁČOVÁ, ŠARINOVÁ and ŠUJAN
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
55
STRATIGRAPHY, SEDIMENTOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTS OF N DANUBE BASIN (SLOVAKIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Fig. 2. Passport of the Ratkovce 1 well. Biostratigraphy column shows first occurrences (FO) and last occurrences (LO) of important index
foraminifers and nannoplankton, as well as nannoplankton biozones (with black arrows) as were identified in the studied material. Correla-
tions between Central Paratethys and standard chronostratigraphy modified from (Kováč et al. 2000, 2007, 2011; Hohenegger et al. 2014).
Fig. 3. 1 – Globigerinoides quadrilobatus (d’Orbigny), Rat1/11A/1/10; 2 – Globigerinoides quadrilobatus (d’Orbigny), Rat1/2/1/30;
3 – Globigerinoides quadrilobatus (d’Orbigny), Rat1/19/2/20; 4 – Orbulina suturalis Brönnimann, Rat1/12/1/10; 5 – Globigerinoides
cf. sicanus De Stefani, Rat1/12/1/10; 6 – Catapsydrax sp. cf. parvulus Bolli, Loeblich & Tappan; 7 – Globigerina regularis d’Orbigny;
8 – Globorotalia partimlabiata Ruggieri & Sprovieri, Rat1/6/3/25; 9 – Globorotalia sp., Rat1/6/3/50 (not in WFD); 10 – Globigerina
woodi decoraperta Takayanagi & Saito, Rat1/6/3/25; 11 – Globigerina druyi Akers, Rat1/6/3/25; 12 – Turborotalita quinqueloba (Natland),
Rat1/19/2/20; 13 – Helicosphaera ampliaperta (Bramlette & Wilcoxon), Rat1/19/2/70; 14 – Sphenolithus heteromorphus (Deflandre),
Rat1/19/2/70; 15 – Helicosphaera mediterrannea (Müller), Rat1/19/2/20; 16 – Helicosphaera scissura (Miller), Rat1/19/2/20; 17 – Heli-
cosphaera scissura (Miller), Rat1/23/2/43; 18 – Sphenolithus heteromorphus (Deflandre), Rat1/23/2/43; 19 – Reticulofenestra pseudoumbi-
licus 7 µm (Gartner) Gartner, Rat1/6/3/25; 20 – Reticulofenestra haqii (Backman), Rat1/6/3/25; 21 – Calcidiscus premacintyrei
(Theodoridis), Rat1/6/3/25; 22 – Umbilicosphaera rotula (Kamptner), Varol, Rat1/6/3/25; 23 – Sphenolithus heteromorphus Deflandre,
Rat1/18/2/35; 24 – Discoaster variabilis (Martini & Bramlette), Rat1/6/3/25; 25 – Helicosphaera walbersdorfensis Müller, Rat1/6/6/75.
56
RYBÁR, HALÁSOVÁ, HUDÁČKOVÁ, KOVÁČ, KOVÁČOVÁ, ŠARINOVÁ and ŠUJAN
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Fig. 4. Diversity and percentages of Foraminifera and calcareous nannoplankton. A – Diversity ratio diagram, B – Dominance diagram.
Percentages of significant groups of Foraminifera and calcareous nannoplankton.
Central Paratethys scale (Figs. 2, 3). In the core 19 Globigeri-
noides sicanus de Stefani (3 apertures) and Globigerina
regularis (d’Orbigny) were identified. From the well core 18
up to core 6, the NN5 Zone was identified (sensu Cicha et al.
1975), and at present is assigned to the Lower Badenian
(Kováč et al. 2007; Hohenegger et al. 2014). Moreover, the
NN5a Zone (sensu Andreyeva-Grigorovich et al. 2001) was
identified, but the NN5b and NN5c zones of calcareous nan-
noplankton were not identified. The foraminiferal assem-
blage of the cores 18 to 6 yielded planktonic foraminifera
Globigerinoides quadrilobatulus (d’Orbigny). The Lower
Badenian biozone CPN7, based on the first occurrence (FO)
of Orbulina suturalis (Brönnimann) was linked to core 14,
where O. suturalis (Brönnimann) was first detected. Similar
events were identified in the Badenian parastratotype of the
Židlochovice site by Doláková et al. (2014). In well core 6
(1052—1055 m), the NN6 Zone documents the Upper Bade-
nian (Fig. 2) based on the acme event of Sphenolithus abies
(Andreyeva-Grigorovich et al. 2001) together with H. wal-
bersdorfensis and absence of S. heteromorphus (Figs. 2, 3).
57
STRATIGRAPHY, SEDIMENTOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTS OF N DANUBE BASIN (SLOVAKIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
The foraminiferal assemblage in these sediments is typical
for the CPN8 Zone, based on the FO of Globigerina druryi
(Akers) together with G. woodi decoraperta (Takayanagi &
Saito). In the sediments of core 5, the acme of Paragloboro-
talia siakensis LeRoy (?synonyme of Globorotalia partimla-
biata Ruggieri & Sprovieri) was detected.
Classical “lagenide” and “agglutinated” zones of the Lower
and Middle Badenian based on benthic foraminifera were
not identified in the studied well profile, in contrast to the
very well developed Bolivina/Bulimina Zone (sensu Grill
1941; Cicha et al. 1975). These zones were strongly linked
to changes of environmental conditions and do not appear to
be stratigraphically significant. In spite of the fact, that the
well core6 was formerly assigned to the Middle Badenian
(Wieliczkian) in the sense of our recent results these sedi-
ments represent the Upper Badenian age, associated with the
NN6 Zone (sensu Kováč et al. 2007; Hohenegger et al. 2014).
For paleoecological purposes, benthic foraminifera domi-
nance, diversity and similarity diagrams were constructed,
moreover a diversity ratio graph was added (sensu Murray
2006 – Fig. 4). Samples from the well cores 25, 23, 21, 18,
17 cluster in brackish marsh to normal marine environments
and confirm the deltaic to onshore position of sedimentation.
Faunal associations from the well cores 12 and 14 appear in
shelf to offshore deep marine environments. Nevertheless
some associations are clustered in a shallow marine environ-
ment, mainly in the samples from well cores 13 and 11A,
therefore this mixture of shallow and deep marine elements
is interpreted as a re-deposition of foraminifera. Moreover,
this statement is based on signs of size sorting and abrasion
of the foraminiferal tests. The majority of associations from
cores 6, 5, 4, and 2 appear to be clustered in deep marine off-
shore to shelf conditions with low energy environment. But
on the other hand a couple of associations from these cores
are scattered in-between normal marine, hypersaline lagoons
and brackish march environments. This fact again confirms
re-deposition from a shallow water environment, also docu-
mented by the colour and bad preservation of tests (Fig. 3).
A palynological record from the Lower Badenian sedi-
mentary fill shows rare palynomorphs, poor in quality of
preservation, probably due to the higher oxidation rates. Ob-
tained pollen, spores and algae assemblages have been char-
acterized by rare occurrence and a high degree of corrosion.
They include: Ulmus, Carya, Pinus, Pterocarya, Cathaya,
Myrica, Castanopsis, Quercus, Sapotaceae, Polypodiaceae,
Dinoflagellata and Acritarcha. The samples contain a high
amount of diverse palyno-debris including reworked ones,
pointing to dynamic transport conditions into the accumula-
tion space.
The Upper Badenian sediments contained very well pre-
served and diversified palynomorph associations. Azonal
(coastal and swamp) vegetation was represented by Myrici-
pites bituides, M. myricoides Sparganium, Glyptostrobus,
Nyssa, and Cyperaceae. Zonal vegetation was documented
by the fern spores Polypodiaceae, pollen Pterocarya, Sym-
plocos, Cercidiphyllum, Carya, Carpinus, Quercus, Engel-
hardia, Castanopsis, Sapotaceae and a high amount of
Pinus. Extrazonal mountain related vegetation is presented
by Picea, Abies, Cathaya and Tsuga. The character of the
palynomorphs’ preservation, together with the high ratio of
dinoflagelates, acritarchs, foraminiferal test linings and fungi
spores confirm their fast burial without damage in the basi-
nal environment.
Sedimentology and depositional environments of the Rat-
kovce 1 well record
The sedimentary textures, structures and the shape of the
SP and RT logs were described from bottom to top (Figs. 2,
5 and 6). The basal part of the well sequence is composed of
conglomerates with intercalations of sandstones, siltstone
and claystones, resembling the Jablonica Formation (e.g.
Kováč et al. 1989). Sediments are composed of a matrix sup-
ported conglomerate with fine to coarse grained, subangular
to well rounded pebbles, including carbonate, quartzite,
granitoid and volcanic pebbles (some clasts reach up to 5 cm
in diameter). The matrix is represented by coarse to fine
grained sand. Some samples of the well core contain indis-
tinct 5—15 cm thick fining upwards conglomerate layers,
cross-bedding and clay intraclasts – armoured mud balls
(Fig. 5). The lower cores (26—24; Fig. 2), in contrast to the
upper cores (23—19; Fig. 2) do not contain Miocene volcanic
admixture (Jablonica Formation s.s.). Occasionally, the con-
glomerates of upper cores pass into coarse grained lithic
sandstone and brown claystone. This fabric points to high
density gravitational flows during the high order cyclicity of
relative sea level changes (parasequence sets). Heterolithic
sediments composed of claystone and sandstone with possi-
ble ripple cross lamination indicate onshore environments
(Fig. 5). In claystones abundant mica, macrofauna fragments
(echinoids) and carbonized plate fragments were observed.
The 70—90° dip of the bedding in rhythmically layered clay-
stone and siltstone might have been caused by syn-sedimen-
tary tectonics due to transtensional faulting during opening
of the Blatné Depression (1753—1758 m); or by normal fault-
ing in the delta front environment. The SP log shape is charac-
terized by 3 funnel shape trends changing from a positive to a
negative anomaly with a sharp border at the top of cycles. We
interpret them as coarse grained deltaic facies with prograda-
tional parasequence sets and minor deepening in-between
(Fig. 2). The first (oldest) cycle appears at 1990—1900 m; the
second cycle at 1900—1750 m and the third at 1750—1680 m.
The RT log confirms tight coarse clastic material in the first
cycle, while the second and third cycles are not visible in the
shape of RT curve. This fact can also be explained by the
composition of well cores, which are no longer built up pre-
dominantly from conglomerate and sandstone but also contain
claystone and siltstone (Fig. 5). The onshore sedimentary en-
vironment of the deposition of conglomerate and sandstone is
also confirmed by the foraminiferal assemblage diversity ratio
belonging to a marsh—brackish environment, as well as by
pollen analysis with pollen mean dissemination values (sensu
Dyakowska 1959) and character of preservation of their exine,
pointing out dynamic transport conditions.
The overlying sequence can by divided into two parts. The
lower part (1680—1300 m) is composed of pale brown to
grey, bioturbated claystone and siltstone which contains
mica, carbonized plant fragments, macrofauna (bivalves and
58
RYBÁR, HALÁSOVÁ, HUDÁČKOVÁ, KOVÁČ, KOVÁČOVÁ, ŠARINOVÁ and ŠUJAN
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
59
STRATIGRAPHY, SEDIMENTOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTS OF N DANUBE BASIN (SLOVAKIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
echinoid fragments) and scarce ripples. Layered diamictite
(pebbly claystone) in the depth 1503—1508 m is poorly sorted
(clasts reach up to 5 cm in diameter) and we interpret it
as debris flows on the basin proximal slope (Fig. 6). The
overlying sediments pass into turbidite sequences with hori-
zontal – ripple cross – lamination and flame structures. On
some lithoclasts CaCO
3
encrustation growth rings (pisoide)
were observed, and this validates re-deposition of the grains
from high energy shallow water conditions into a deeper low
energy environment.
The upper (1300—670 m), predominantly mudstone se-
quence is composed of pale brown to grey claystone and silt-
stone; rare layers of fine grained sandstone are present, as
well. The sedimentary succession contains occasional part-
ing lineation indicating upper flow regime and distal thin
bedded turbidity current transport in the offshore environ-
ment. Parting lineation could be confused with traction
marks (Fig. 6).
The SP and RT logs from 1680 to 670 m show a serrated
shape which represents alterations of thin layers of sandstone
and claystone, indicating frequent changes of depositional
conditions confirming interpreted turbidity current transport.
Moreover, influence of strong storm activity cannot be ex-
cluded here (tempestites). The excursion of the RT log at
around 1500 m correlates well with the diamictite recog-
nized in the well core material (core 14, Fig. 6). Nevertheless
this excursion on the RT log could also by explained by satu-
ration with salt waters. Sedimentology and interpretations of
the log’s pattern (1680—670 m) correspond well with fora-
minifers’ diversity ratio (Fig. 3) referring to an onshore shelf
environment with gradual passage to the offshore deep marine
environment. The foraminiferal associations display a reduc-
tion of the shallow water species towards the upper part of the
sequence, which is confirmed additionally by pollen data
pointing to their fast burial without damage on the basin floor.
The top part of the existing well cores is built up by con-
glomerate composed of angular fragments (possibly intrafor-
mational) of laminated sandstone and siltstone in siltstone to
claystone matrix (Fig. 6); carbonized plate fragments are
abundant. These sedimentary structures may be interpreted
as coastal plain or tidal lag deposits (sense Mial 2010). On
the SP log cylindrical and bell -shaped excursions were re-
corded (670—400 m). The basal cylindrical excursion can be
interpreted as a channel fill. The fining upwards trend of the
curved upper part refers to a shoreline – shelf system
(Fig. 2), and documents a change from dynamic to calm en-
vironment (sensu Emery & Myers 1996). The RT log shows
gradual increase in resistivity, possibly caused by increasing
saturation of the sediment with ground water.
The uppermost part of the well belongs to the latest Mid-
dle and Upper Miocene (without well core material) and was
interpreted only with the help of available data from the
study area, as a brackish lake depositional environment (e.g.
Kováč et al. 2006, 2011).
Sedimentary petrology and provenance of sediment in the
Ratkovce 1 well record
The Ratkovce 1 well penetrates down to the basement rocks
recognized already in the original drilling report as Triassic
rocks formed by dark grey, dolomitized limestone cut by cal-
cite veins and intercalated by dark grey graphitic shale (Gaža
in Imrichová 1969; Biela 1978). Nevertheless, our results
from the pre Neogene basement samples determined dark grey
to black limestone (wackestone) and calcareous shale. Poorly
recrystallized limestones (biomicrite) containing: abundant
calcificated porifera spicules, filaments, ostracods, detritic
quartz and pyrite alochems, all together indicating Jurassic
age which is in contrast to the original determination.
Furthermore, petrological study of clasts from the Mio-
cene sedimentary fill show that material was derived from
the crystalline basement of the neighbouring Eastern Al-
pine—Western Carpathian complexes, covered by the Meso-
zoic and Paleogene sediments.
Granitoid lithoclasts contain quartz, plagioclase, micro-
cline, perthitized feldspars and biotite crystals, plagioclase
with zonal structures, as well as a lesser amount of fragments
of mica schist to gneisses composed of mica and quartz
which were derived from crystalline complexes (Fig. 7).
They most closely correspond in character to the granitoids at
Fig. 5. Sedimentary textures and structures: Core 27, Sampler-card 1 – Dark grey, tectonically disturbed, layered limestone cut by abun-
dant calcite veins; Core 25, Sampler-card 1 – (58—64 cm from the bottom): Brown to dark blue carbonate conglomerate, (clasts reach up
to 5 cm in diameter); Core 25, Sampler-card 1 – (30—34 cm from the bottom): Pale brown to grey pebbly claystone with armoured clay
intraclasts; Core 24, Sampler-card 2 – (30—51 cm from the bottom): Pale yellow to grey, coarse grained lithic, pebbly sandstone to con-
glomerate. Clasts reach up to 4 cm in diameter; Core 23, Sampler-card 1 – (60—65 cm from the bottom): Brown claystone, and pale yel-
low, lithic, sandstone with possible ripples (interpretation: heterolithic sediment indicating deposition in the neritic zone); Core 23,
Sampler-card 1 – (0—10 cm from the bottom): Pale grey coarse grained sandstone and fine grained conglomerate with possible cross bed-
ding (interpretation: slight change in velocity or depth of flow); Core 23, sampler-card 2 – laminated siltstone and claystone; Core 21,
sampler-card 1 – (50—62 cm from the bottom): Pale brown carbonate conglomerate (clasts up to 4 cm in diameter). The sandy matrix is
poorly sorted; Core 20, Sampler-card 2 – (25—40 cm from the bottom): Pale yellow, laminated siltstone and claystone. Layers dipping at
a 60°—70° angle (nearby fault?); Core 19, Sampler-card 4 – (0—1 cm from the bottom): Pale brown to grey claystone, abundant mica and
macrofauna fragments (echinoids) visible on the bedding planes; Core 18, sampler-card 1 – (35—37 cm from the bottom): Pale brown to
grey claystone, with ripple cross lamination and flame structures, abundant occurrence of mica; Core 17, Sampler-card 1 – (30—38 cm
from the bottom): Brown and pale yellow lithic sandstone and brown claystone with carbonized plant fragments; Core 17, Sampler-
card 1 – (40—50 cm from the bottom): Brown and pale yellow medium grained sandstone and grey claystone with carbonized plant frag-
ments, containing flame structures; Core 17, Sampler-card 1 – (50—55 cm from the bottom): Pale grey sandstone and grey claystone with
carbonized plant fragments and leniticular bedding. Used scale 1 cm.
!
60
RYBÁR, HALÁSOVÁ, HUDÁČKOVÁ, KOVÁČ, KOVÁČOVÁ, ŠARINOVÁ and ŠUJAN
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Fig. 6. Sedimentary textures and structures: Core 14, sampler-card 2 – (75—80 cm from the bottom): Grey to green polymict conglomerate
with claystone intraclasts reaching up to 5 cm in diameter (interpretation: gravity flow deposits); Core 14, Sampler-card 3 – (90—95 cm
from the bottom): Grey to brown bioturbated siltstone and sandstone with carbonized plant fragments. Contains parallel lamination, ripple
cross lamination and flame structures; Core 14, Sampler-card 4 – (0—8 cm from the bottom): Grey conglomerate with large claystone in-
traclasts (more than 8 cm in diameter); Core 14, Sampler-card 2 – (50—58 cm from the bottom): Brown layered claystone and sandstone
with flame structures at the base of the core; Core 11a, Sampler-card 2 – (90—95 cm from the bottom): Grey pebbly claystone with car-
bonized plant fragments (interpretation: debry flow deposit); Core 9, Sampler-card 2 – (5—7 cm from the bottom): Grey siltstone and fine
grained sandstones with parting lineation on the bedding planes; Core 8, Sampler-card 2 – (35—38 cm from the bottom): Grey to brown lay-
ered claystone; Core 4, Sampler-card 4 – (35—51 cm from the bottom): Grey layered claystone; Core 4, Sampler-card 4 – (75—90 cm
from the bottom): Grey layered claystone; Core 3, Sampler-card 2 – (5—8 cm from the bottom): Grey layered claystone to siltstone;
Core 1, Sampler-card 1 – (90—96 cm from the bottom): Possible intraformational conglomerate with sandstone clasts in siltstone to clay-
stone matrix. Carbonized plate fragments are abundant (interpretation: lag deposit). Used scale 1 cm.
61
STRATIGRAPHY, SEDIMENTOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTS OF N DANUBE BASIN (SLOVAKIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Fig. 7. A—D – Carbonate debris (plane – polarized light): A – biomicrite with fragment of Echinodermata and pyrite, B – recrystallized
limestone with phosphatized fragments of vertebrates, C – biomicrite with styloliths, D – Calpionella biomicrite; E – Spongolite
(plane – polarized light); F – Lithic arenitite composed of schist, volcanic debris, quartz, carbonate bioclast and calcareous cement
(X micols); G – Zonated feldspar in granitoide pebble (core 24); H – Granitoide debris composed of quartz and sericitized feldspar
(X nicols, core 25).
62
RYBÁR, HALÁSOVÁ, HUDÁČKOVÁ, KOVÁČ, KOVÁČOVÁ, ŠARINOVÁ and ŠUJAN
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Fig. 8. A—B – Recrystalized acid volcanic debris – Permian: A – plane – polarized light, B – X nicols; C—D – Volcanic debris with
fresh biotite and pseudomorphosis after plagioclase filling secondary minerals and calcite: C – plane – polarized light, D – X nicols;
E—H – Volcanic debris with fresh plagioclase and pseudomorphosis after dark minerals filling secondary minerals: E+G – plane – polar-
ized light, F – X nicols, G – lithic arenite composed mainly of volcanic debris (X nicols).
63
STRATIGRAPHY, SEDIMENTOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTS OF N DANUBE BASIN (SLOVAKIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
present outcropping in the Hlohovec block of the Považský
Inovec Mts, and in the Tríbeč Mts (Broska & Uher 1988).
The Triassic source material is documented by fragments
of poorly recrystallized mudstone with stylolites (Fig. 7), do-
lomitized mudstone, oolitic grainstone, quartzites and dark
partly phylitized silica rich shales (lydite). The Jurassic
rocks are represented by spongolites and wackstones (Fig. 7)
with abundant porifera spicules, brachiopods, bivalves, echi-
noderm fragments, sparite with phosphatized skeletons of
vertebrates, a high amount of pyrite and carbonate siltstones
(composed of detritic quartz in carbonate matrix). The Lower
Cretaceous age of source material is proven by the Berias-
sian Calpionella limestone fragments (Fig. 7). Some of the
carbonate clasts are sparitic. Carbonate breccia clasts and
sedimentary cherts with no internal structure are also
present, but the age of such source material is unknown.
Volcanic debris is an important part of the source material
and may be divided into several categories: 1) rather rare,
significantly altered fragments of acidic volcanic rocks,
which take on the character of the quartzite greywacke and
felsites (Fig. 8), and can clearly be associated with the Per-
mian sediments of the Malužiná Formation of the Ipoltica
Group (Vozárová & Vozár 1988); 2) volcanic fragments of
andesite composition are subdivided into: a) rare highly al-
tered volcanic clasts found from 1858 m to 1639 m depth in-
cluding recrystallized glassy matter. Phenocrysts of biotite
are preserved and plagioclase phenocrysts are completely re-
placed by calcite (Fig. 8). The high level of alteration sug-
gests that they originate from the Permian sediments, but
their affinity to the Miocene volcanic rocks cannot be ex-
cluded; b) volcanic fragments composed of very well pre-
served phenocrysts of the zonal plagioclase in poorly
recrystallized glass matter (appearing from the depth of 1801
to 1353 m) with abundant pseudomorphs of amphibole
shape, filled with secondary minerals (Fig. 8). Based on the
degree of glassy matrix recrystallization in lithoclasts and
absence of quartz phenocrysts, we believe that these volca-
nic epiclastic fragments (dacite/andesite composition) are
certainly of the Miocene age. The epiclastic origin of this
volcanic material is supported by different stages of alteration
and recrystallization of lithoclasts. Moreover their rounded-
ness and absence of heavy minerals (amphibole and pyroxene)
supports this claim. The overlying strata (up from core 9) were
not used for determination of the provenance of sediments, be-
cause of the very fine grain size (clay to silt deposits).
Miocene paleogeography and geodynamic aspects
of the north-western Danube Basin’s evolution
The opening of the Danube Basin – Blatné depocenter
can be dated to the end of NN4 Zone accompanied by a
lowermost Badenian fan delta development at its southern
margin (LO of H. ampliaperta ~ below 14.91 Ma). The ba-
sin’s development followed after strong changes of tectonic
pattern and paleogeography of the Western Carpathians do-
main. The Early Badenian (Langhian) subsidence is docu-
mented in the sedimentary record by gradual change from near
shore environment to rapid tectonically controlled deepening
of the basin. The development of the distal shore – slope
depositional system with gravity currents and turbidite deposi-
tion took place during the NN5 nannoplankton Zone (LO of
H. ampliaperta ~ abowe 14.91 Ma). The gradual transition
from onshore – proximal slope to offshore environment is
marked by the last occurrence of coarse grained sediments
above the base of the Špačince Formation (Fig. 2). In these
cores the presence of O. suturalis was detected for the first
time (core 14), and continued in the deep water deposits up
to the Upper Badenian sediments of the Báhoň Formation
(up to core 5). The Lower Badenian deep water environ-
ment’s continuation up to the lower part of the Late Bade-
nian NN6 Zone is not supported by the presence of
S. heteromorphus (LO 13.53 Ma – sensu Kováč et al. 2007;
Hohenegger et al. 2014), because its last occurrence was
documented in the middle of the Lower Badenian sedimentary
record (in core 12). In the Upper Badenian (Early Serraval-
ian), dated by the FO of Globigerina druryi, Sphenolitus
abies and Helicosphaera walbersdorfensis (Fig. 2), the off-
shore deep water facies development gradually changed to a
shallow water environment during the NN6 nannoplankton
Zone ( ~ 13.82—12.83 Ma – sensu Hohenegger et al. 2014),
which confirms the assumed calming of tectonic activity and
filling of the basin. During the Sarmatian and Pannonian
(Upper Seravalian—Tortonian), a shallow water coastal plain,
brackish to lacustrine environments were followed by devel-
opment of an alluvial plain ( ~ 12.8—11.6—8.9 Ma) – sensu
Kováč et al. (2011).
As already mentioned, the provenance analysis of the clastic
material suggests sources in granitoids and mica shists/gneis-
ses. This can be additionally confirmed by the composition of
the heavy mineral fraction, which is relatively poor and con-
sists of: Gt, St, Ap, Tur, Rt, Zr, Py, Ilm, Bt, Cl, Glt. Among
the transparent heavy minerals, garnets of almandine compo-
sition are dominant (Fig. 9, Table 1) and they contain inclu-
sions of titanite, turmaline, rutile and ilmenite. In addition the
crystallo-chemical composition corresponds to garnets occur-
ring in granitoids and schist. Nevertheless a small amount of
garnets might have been derived from the Miocene volcanic
rocks or recycled from dissolved Mesozoic carbonate rocks.
Fig. 9. Composition of garnets.
64
RYBÁR, HALÁSOVÁ, HUDÁČKOVÁ, KOVÁČ, KOVÁČOVÁ, ŠARINOVÁ and ŠUJAN
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Defining the precise provenance area of the basal conglom-
erates (Jablonica Formation) in the Ratkovce 1 well, we as-
sume sources in a part of the pre-Neogene basement of the
Danube Basin central zone, which were uplifted during the
Oligocene—Early Miocene. In the early Lower Badenian, the
pebbles were transported from here toward the north. The up-
lifted mountain chains around the basin not only contained
crystalline complexes (similar to the granitoids in the Hlo-
hovec block) and the Mesozoic nappe-stack, but were also
covered by younger sediments, which were completely ex-
humed, eroded and transported by river systems toward the
Blatné Depression. The presence of strata which formed the
paleo-surface of the provenance area up to the beginning of
the Middle Miocene is documented by redeposits of the Upper
Cretaceous to Paleogene microfossils in the well core samples.
Extensional rifting of the basin (Blatné Depression) led to
deposition of a sedimentary sequence about 300 m thick de-
rived from volcanic epiclastic material (Figs. 2, 8 and 10).
A marine sedimentary environment is confirmed by the pres-
ence of framboidal pyrite, glauconite, pisoides and bioclasts
(Fig. 10). Nevertheless individual volcanoes must have
reached above sea level and are today buried below the sedi-
mentary fill of the northern Danube Basin. Their existence is
supported by the interpretation of seismic lines (line: 558—86
and MXS2-93 – Hrušecký 1999), as well as by the lithology
of cores in surrounding wells (Biela 1978).
Conclusions
! Re-evaluation of the Ratkovce 1 well core using ad-
vanced methods of biostratigraphy, paleoecology, sedimen-
tology and geophysics helped us to understand the
development of depositional systems in the northern Danube
Basin, as well as bringing important data affecting “state of
art” models of Central Paratethys paleogeography;
! In contrast to previous studies, the biostratigraphical
results confirmed the presence of the NN4, NN5 and NN6
calcareous nannoplankton Zones and local CPN7 a CPN8
Table 1: Chemical composition of garnet calculated on the 8 cations base. Fe
3+
was calculated to ideal stoichiometry.
Ratkovce
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SiO
2
37.31
36.85
37.74
37.82
37.57
38.34
37.13
37.21
38.49
37.25
Al
2
O
3
20.88
20.71
21.42
20.92
20.81
21.63
20.84
20.69
21.22
20.64
Cr
2
O
3
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.00
TiO
2
0.18
0.03
0.04
0.38
0.30
0.08
0.35
0.10
0.36
0.37
MgO
0.82
1.50
2.76
3.74
3.84
3.90
3.45
0.81
6.64
3.51
FeO
27.47
31.47
29.99
31.18
29.76
24.25
31.27
30.96
26.72
31.46
MnO
4.52
2.54
1.31
1.62
3.42
0.55
1.74
3.42
2.00
1.67
CaO
9.31
6.51
7.60
5.68
5.08
11.44
5.52
7.37
5.20
5.50
Total
100.50
99.65
100.85
101.34
100.78
100.18
100.29
100.60
100.66
100.41
Si
2.983 2.978 2.976 2.970 2.968 2.987 2.952 2.989 2.980 2.959
Al
T
0.017 0.022 0.024 0.030 0.032 0.013 0.048 0.011 0.020 0.041
Al
1.951 1.951 1.967 1.906 1.905 1.972 1.905 1.948 1.917 1.891
Ti
0.011 0.002 0.002 0.023 0.018 0.004 0.021 0.006 0.021 0.022
Cr
0.001 0.003 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.002 0.001 0.000
Fe
3+
0.038 0.045 0.031 0.071 0.077 0.023 0.075 0.044 0.060 0.086
Fe
2+
1.799 2.082 1.946 1.977 1.889 1.556 2.004 2.036 1.670 2.003
Mg
0.098 0.181 0.324 0.438 0.452 0.452 0.409 0.097 0.767 0.416
Mn
0.306 0.174 0.087 0.108 0.229 0.036 0.117 0.233 0.131 0.113
Ca
0.797 0.564 0.642 0.478 0.430 0.955 0.470 0.634 0.431 0.468
Zones of planktonic foraminifera correlated with N9, 10, 11
of the global foraminiferal zonation; MMi4a, MMi5 and
MMi6 of Mediterranean foraminiferal zonation. The Medi-
terranean Langhian Stage (Lower Badenian of the Central
Paratethys) is dated by the NN4 Zone, which is dated by the
presence and LO of H. ampliaperta and H scissura. The
NN5 Zone was detected by the FO of the planktonic fora-
minifera Globigerinoides quadrilobatulus (d’Orbigny) and
Globigerina regularis (d’Orbigny), later by the FO of Orbu-
lina suturalis (Brönnimann) of CPN7. The Early Serraval-
lian (Upper Badenian) is dated by the NN6 Zone and by the
FO of Globigerina druryi (Akers) together with G. woodi
decoraperta (Takayanagi & Saito) correlated with the CPN8
biozone;
! The obtained palynomorph assemblages confirm sub-
tropical and humid climatic conditions during the Middle
Miocene time span. Mountain vegetation taxa indicate altitu-
dinal zonation;
! A fandelta proximal to the distal basin slope and off-
shore deep water basin environment was documented in the
Lower Badenian. The Upper Badenian deep water dysoxic
environment changed gradually to the Sarmatian and Pan-
nonian coastal to alluvial plain depositional systems in the
northern Danube Basin. Sedimentary analysis of revised core
material led to recognition of the various gravity transport
mechanisms, including debris-flows and turbibity currents;
! Sedimentary facies described from the base to the top of
the 2000 m deep well together with the results of paleoecology
helped with a more precise determination of the depositional
environments of formations: 1) The Jablonica Formation
conglomerates deposited in fandelta to onshore shallow ma-
rine environment during the earliest Badenian (formerly
included in the Karpatian stage); 2) Lower Badenian sedi-
ments of the gravitational currents in a proximal slope set-
ting belong to the Špačince Formation lower part; 3) The
upper part of the Špačince Formation is represented by the
Lower Badenian distal slope gravitational deposits namely
turbidites; 4) The Upper Badenian Báhoň Formation is rep-
resented by the deep water basinal dysoxic mudstones;
65
STRATIGRAPHY, SEDIMENTOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTS OF N DANUBE BASIN (SLOVAKIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Fig. 10. A—B – Separated volcanic debris: A – core 21 (1796—1801 m), B – core 11A (1353—1357 m), C – pisolite (3 mm):
nucleus = epiclastic carbonate (plane – polarized light); D – Redeposited bioclast Amphistegina sp. (plane – polarized light); E—F – Dif-
ferent type of framboidal pyrite (bacterial origin).
5) Sarmatian coastal plain marine to brackish sediments de-
posited in littoral to neritic zone belong to the Vráble Forma-
tion; 6) Pannonian to Pliocene shallow brackish to lacustrine
and finally alluvial plain sediments form the Ivanka and Vol-
kovce formations;
The sources of the early Lower Badenian clastic material
in the Ratkovce 1 well cores provide evidence of an uplifted
mountain chain in the hinterland of the basin (present pre
Neogene basement of the Danube Basin central part). Peb-
bles were derived from granitoids and gneisses of crystalline
rock complexes with similarity to the Hlohovec Unit of the
Považský Inovec Mts. Permian, Lower Cretaceous and Pa-
leogene sediments were also a part of the catchment area at
that time. This statement is supported by frequent occurrence
of re-deposited Cretaceous and Paleogene microfossils;
Permian volcanic rocks and more importantly the synrift
volcanic rocks of the Early Badenian age are an inherent
component of the sedimentary record.
66
RYBÁR, HALÁSOVÁ, HUDÁČKOVÁ, KOVÁČ, KOVÁČOVÁ, ŠARINOVÁ and ŠUJAN
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by the Slovak
Research and Development Agency under the contracts
APVV-0099-11, APVV-0625-11 and Grant UK/325/2014.
We also express gratitude to APVV LPP 0120-06, ESF-EC-
0006-07, ESF-EC-0009-07 and VEGA 2/0042/12. Addition-
ally our acknowledgments go to …. Sliva (Nafta a.s.) for
granting access to the well repositories and to I. Broska
(Geological Institute at Slovak Academy of Sciences) for
consulting on the issue of granitoid rocks. Special thanks go
to Mr. Hronkovič (Comenius University, Bratislava) for help
with well core material and thin section assembly. Above all
we greatly appreciate all questions and comments from our
reviewers O. Sztanó and K. Holcová which significantly en-
riched and improved the manuscript.
References
Adam Z. & Dlabač M. 1969: Erklärungen zur Mächtigkeitskarte
und zur lithofaziellen Entwicklung der Donau—Niederung. Zá-
pad. Karpaty 11, 156—171.
Akers W.H. 1955: Some planktonic foraminifers of the American
gulf coast and suggested correlations with the Caribbean Ter-
tiary. J. Paleontology 29, 4, 647—664.
Andreyeva-Grigorovich A.S., Kováč M., Halásová E. & Hudáčková
N. 2001: Litho- and biostratigraphy of the Lower and Middle
Miocene sediments of the Vienna basin (NE part) on the basis
of calcareous nannoplankton and foraminifers. Scr. Fac. Sci.
Natur. Univ. Masaryk. Brun., Geol. 30, 27—40.
Andreyeva-Grigorovich A.S., Kováč M., Halásová E., Hudáčková N.
& Zlinská A. 2003: Middle, Upper Miocene zonation of Ukraine
and Slovak sediments based on calcareous nannoplankton and
foraminifera. Theoretical and practical aspects of modern bio-
stratigraphy of Ukraine Phanerozoic. [Rasclenenie srede-verch-
nemiocenovych (Badenij—Panon) otlozenij Ukrajiny i Slovakii
po Nannoplanktonu i Foraminiferam. Teoreticny ta prikladni
aspekti sucasnoi biostratigrafii Fanerozoja ukrainy.] UDK, Kiiv,
1—7 (in Russian).
Biela A. 1978: Deep wells in Western Carpathians: Vienna basin,
Danube basin. [Hlboké vrty v zakrytých oblastiach Západných
Karpát: Záhorská nížina, Podunajská nížina.] Regionálna Geol.
Západ. Karpát 10, 1—224 (in Slovak).
Biely A. (Ed.), Bezák V., Elečko M., Gross P., Kaličiak M.,
Konečný V., Lexa J., Mello J., Nemčok J., Potfaj M., Rakús
M., Vass D., Vozár J. & Vozárová A. 1996: Geological map of
Slovak Republic, 1 : 500,000. Ministry of Environment, Slovak
Geological Survey, ( in Slovak).
Broska I. & Uher P. 1988: Accessory minerals of granitoid rocks of
Bojná and Hlohovec blocks, The Považský Inovec Mts. Geol.
Zbor., Geol. Carpath. 39, 4, 505—520.
Catuneanu O., Galloway W.E., Kendall C.G. St .C., Miall A.D.,
Posamentier H.W., Strasser A. & Tucker M.E. 2011: Sequence
stratigraphy: Methodology and nomenclature. Newsllett. Stratigr.
44, 3, 173—245.
Cicha I., Čtyroká J., Jiříček R. & Zapletalová I. 1975: Principal bio-
zones of the Late Tertiary in Eastern Alps and West Car-
pathians. In: Cicha I. (Ed.): Biozonal division of the Upper
Tertiary Basins of the Eastern Alps and West-Carpathians.
IUGS, Proc. of the VI. Congress, Bratislava, 19—34.
Cicha I., Roegl F., Rupp Ch. & Čtyroká J. 1998: Oligocene-Mio-
cene Foraminifera of the Central Paratethys. Abh. Sencken-
berg. Naturforsch. Gessell. 549, 1—325.
Doláková N., Holcová K., Hladilová Š., Brzobohatý R., Zágoršek
K., Hrabovský J., Seko M. & Utescher T. 2014: The Badenian
parastratotype at Židlochovice from the perspective of the mul-
tiproxy study. Neu. Jb. Geol. Paläont., Abh. 271, 2, 169—201.
Dyakowska J. 1959: Palynological manual; methods and problems.
[Podrecznik Palynologii; Metody i Problemy.] Wydaw. Geol.,
Warsawa, 1—325 (in Polish).
Emery D. & Myers K.J. 1996: Sequence stratigraphy. Blackwell,
Oxford, UK, 1—297.
Erdtman G. 1943: An introduction to pollen analysis. Chronica Bo-
tanica, Waltham, Mass., 1—238.
Faegri K. & Iversen J. 1989: Textbook of pollen analysis. IV edi-
tion. The Blackburn Press., 1—328.
Gradstein F.M., Ogg J.G., Schmitz M.D. & Ogg G.M. (Eds.) 2012:
The Geologic Time Scale 2012. Elsevier, Boston, USA, 1—1144.
Grill R. 1941: Stratigraphische Untersuchungen mit Hilfe von Mikro-
faunen im Wiener Becken und den benachbarten Molasse—An-
teilen. Oel u. Kohle, Berlin 37, 595—602.
Hammer Ř., Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. 2001: PAST: Paleontolog-
ical statistics software package for education and data analysis.
Palaeont. Eletronica 4, 1—9.
Harzhauser M. & Mandic O. 2008: Neogene lake systems of Cen-
tral and South-Eastern Europe: Faunal diversity, gradients and
interrelations. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 260,
417—434.
Harzhauser M. & Piller W.E. 2007: Benchmark data of a changing
sea – palaeogeography, palaeobiogeography and events in the
central Paratethys during the Miocene. Palaeogeogr. Palaeo-
climatol. Palaeoecol. 253, 8—31.
Hohenegger J., Ćorić S. & Wagreich M. 2014: Timing of the Mid-
dle Miocene Badenian Stage of the Central Paratethys. Geol.
Carpathica 65, 1, 55–66.
Holcová K. 1997: Can detailed sampling and taphonomical analysis
of foraminiferal assemblages offer new data for paleoecologi-
cal interpretations? Rev. Micropaleont. 40, 4, 313—329.
Holcová K. 1999: Postmortem transport and resedimentation of for-
aminiferal tests: relations to cyclical changes of foraminiferal
assemblages. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 145, 1,
157—182.
Horváth F., Bada G., Szafián P., Tari G., Ádám A. & Cloetingh S.
2006: Formation and deformation of the Pannnian basin: con-
straints from observational data. In: Gee D.G. & Stephenson R.
(Eds.): Europian lithosphere dynamics. Geol. Soc. London,
Mem. 32, 191—206.
Hrušecký 1999: Central part of the Danube Basin in Slovakia: Geo-
physical and geological model in regard to hydrocarbon
prospection. EGRSE, Spec. Issue 6, 1, 2—55.
Hrušecký I., Šefara J., Masaryk P. & Lintnerová O. 1996: The struc-
tural and facies development and exploration potential of the
Slovak part of the Danube Basin. In: Wessely G. & Liebl W.
(Eds.): Oil and gas in Alpidic Thrustbelts and Basins of Central
and Eastern Europe. EAGE, Spec. Publ. 5, 417—429.
Hrušecký I., Pereslényi M., Hók J., Šefara J. & Vass D. 1993: The
Danube Basin geological pattern in the light of new and rein-
terpretation of old geophysical data. In: Rakús M. & Vozár J.
(Eds.): Geodynamical model and deep structure of the Western
Carpathians. GÚDŠ, Bratislava, 291—296 (in Slovak).
Iaccarino S.M., Di Stefano A., Foresi L.M., Turco E., Baldassini N.,
Cascella A., Da Prato S., Ferraro L., Gennari R., Hilgen F.J.,
Lirer F., Maniscalco R., Mazzei R., Riforgiato F., Russo B.,
Sagnotti L., Salvatorini G., Speranza F. & Verducci M. 2011:
High-resolution integrated stratigraphy of the upper Burdiga-
lian—lower Langhian in the Mediterranean: the Langhian his-
torical stratotype and new candidate section for defining its
GSSP. Stratigraphy 8, 199—215.
Imrichová E. 1969: Drilling report form the Ratkovce 1 well site.
[Složka pionýrské vrtby Ratkovce-1.] MND, MS, Hodonín,
1—113 (in Czech).
67
STRATIGRAPHY, SEDIMENTOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTS OF N DANUBE BASIN (SLOVAKIA)
G
G
G
G
GEOL
EOL
EOL
EOL
EOLOGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPA
OGICA CARPATHICA
THICA
THICA
THICA
THICA, 2015, 66, 1, 51—67
Jamrich M. & Halásová E. 2010: The evolution of the Late
Badenian calcareous nannofossil assemblages as a reflexion
of the palaeoenvironmental changes of the Vienna Basin
(Devínska Nová Ves clay pit). Acta Geol. Slovaca 2, 2, 123—140
(in Slovak, with English summary).
Konečný V., Kováč M., Lexa J. & Šefara J. 2002: Neogene evolu-
tion of the Carpatho-Pannonian Region: an interplay of sub-
duction and back-arc diapiric uprise in the mantle. EGS
Stephan Mueller Spec. Publ., Ser. 1, 105—123.
Kováč M. 2000: Geodynamics, paleogeography and structureal evo-
lution of the Karpato-Pannonian region in the Miocene: New
view at the Neogene. [Geodynamický, paleogeografický
a štruktúrny vývoj karpatsko-panónskeho regiónu v miocéne:
Nový pohŽad na neogénne panvy Slovenska.] VEDA, Bratislava,
1—202 (in Slovak).
Kováč M., Holcová K. & Nagymarosy A. 1999: Paleogeography,
paleobathymetry and relative sea-level changes in the Danube
Basin and adjacent areas. Geol. Carpathica 50, 4, 325—338.
Kováč M., Synak R., Fordinál K. & Joniak P. 2010: Dominant
events in the northern Danube Basin palaeogeography – a tool
for specification of the Upper Miocene and Pliocene stratigraphy.
Acta Geol. Slovaca 2, 1, 23—36.
Kováč M., Baráth I., Holický I., Marko F. & Túnyi I. 1989: Basin
opening in the Lower Miocene strike-slip zone in the SW part of
the Western Carpathians. Geol. Carpathica 40, 1, 37—62.
Kováč M., Synak R., Fordinál K., Joniak P., Tóth C., Vojtko R.,
Nagy A., Baráth I., Maglay J. & Minár J. 2011: Late Miocene
and Pliocene history of the Danube Basin: inferred from devel-
opment of depositional systems and timing of sedimentary fa-
cies changes. Geol. Carpathica 62, 6, 519—534.
Kováč M., Baráth I., Fordinál K., Grigorovich A.S., Halásová E.,
Hudáčková N., Joniak P., Sabol M., Slamková M., Sliva ….,
Töröková I. & Vojtko R. 2006: Late Miocene to Early Pliocene
sedimentary environments and climatic changes in the Alpine-
Carpathian-Pannonian junction area: a case study from the
Danube Basin northern margin (Slovakia). Palaeogeogr.
Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 238, 1—4, 29, 32—52.
Kováč M., Andreyeva-Grigorovich A., Bajraktarević Z., Brzobo-
hatý R., Filipescu S., Fodor L., Harzhauser M., Nagymarosy
A., Oszczypko N., Pavelić D., Rögl F., Saftić B., Sliva …. &
Studencka B. 2007: Badenian evolution of the Central Para-
tethys Sea: paleogeography, climate and eustatic sea-level
changes. Geol. Carpathica 58, 6, 579—606.
Kováčová P. & Hudáčková N. 2009: Late Badenian foraminifers
from the Vienna Basin (Central Paratethys): Stable isotope study
and paleoecological implications. Geol. Carpathica 60, 1, 59—70.
Kováčová M., Doláková N. & Kováč M. 2011: Miocene vegetation
pattern and climate change in the northwestern Central Para-
tethys domain (Czech and Slovak Republic). Geol. Carpathica
62, 3, 251—266.
Kvaček Z., Kováč M., Kovar-Eder J., Doláková N., Jechorek H.,
Parashiv V., Kováčová M. & Sliva …. 2006: Miocene evolution
of landscape and vegetation in the Central Paratethys. Geol.
Carpathica 57, 4, 295—310.
Lankreijer A., Kováč M., Cloetingh S., Pitoňák P., Hlôška M. &
Biermann C. 1995: Quantitative subsidence analysis and for-
ward modelling of the Vienna and Danube Basins: thin skinned
versus thick skinned extension. Tectonophysics 252, 433—451.
Martini E. 1971: Standard Tertiary and Quaternary calcareous nan-
noplankton zonation. Proc. of 2nd Planktonic Conference, Roma
1970, 739—785.
Márton E., Vass D. & Túnyi I. 1995: Early Tertiary rotations of the
Pelso megaunit and neighbouring Central West Carpathians.
In: Hamršníd E. (Ed.): New results in Tertiary of West Car-
pathians. II. MND, KZPN, Hodonín 16, 97—108.
Miall A.D. 2010: The geology of stratigraphic sequences. 1st Edi-
tion. Springer, Heidelberg, 1—544.
Moore P.D., Webb J.A. & Collinson M.E. 1991: Pollen analysis.
Blackwell Sci., 1—216.
Murray J.W. 2006: Ecology and applications of benthic foramin-
ifera. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1—426.
Piller W.E., Harzhauser M. & Mandic O. 2007: Miocene Central
Paratethys stratigraphy: Current status and future directions of
stratigraphy. Stratigraphy 4, 2/3, 151—168.
Rider M. 1986: Geological interpretation of Well Logs. Rider
French Consulting Ltd., Aberdeen and Sutherland, 1—288.
Švábenická L. 2002: Calcareous nannofossils of the Upper Karpa-
tian and Lower Badenian deposits in the Carpathian Foredeep,
Moravia (Czech Republic). Geol. Carpathica 53, 197—210.
Takayanagi Y. & Saito T. 1962: Planktonic foraminifers from the
Nobori Formation, Shikoku, Japan. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ.,
Ser. 2 (Geol.), Spec. V. 5, 67—106.
Tari G. & Horváth F. 1995: Middle Miocene extensional collapse in
the Alpine-Pannonian transitional zone. In: Horváth F., Tari G.
& Bokor K. (Eds.): Extensional collapse of the Alpine orogene
and hydrocarbon prospects in the basement and fill of the west-
ern Pannonian Basin. AAPG Inter. Conf. Exhib., Nice, France,
Guidebook to fieldtrip No. 6, 75—105.
Tari G., Horváth F. & Rumpler J. 1992: Styles of extension in the
Pannonian Basin. Tectonophysics 208, 203—219.
Turco E., Iaccarino S.M., Foresi L.M., Salvatorini G., Riforgiato F.
& Verducci M. 2011: Revisiting the taxonomy of the interme-
diate stages in Globigerinoides—Praeorbulina lineage. Strati-
graphy 8, 163—187.
Vass D. 2002: Lithostratigraphy of Western Carpathians: Neogene
and Buda Paleogene. [Litostratigrafia Západných Karpát:
neogén a budínsky paleogén.] ŠGÚDŠ, Bratislava, 2—202 (in
Slovak).
Vozárová A. & Vozár J. 1988: Late Paleozoic in West Carpathians.
GÚDŠ, Bratislava, 1—314.
Wade B.S., Pearson P.N., Berggren W.A. & Pälike H. 2011: Re-
view and revision of Cenozoic tropical planktonic foraminiferal
biostratigraphy and calibration to the geomagnetic polarity and
astronomical time scale. Earth Sci. Rev. 104, 111—142.