www.geologicacarpathica.sk
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, FEBRUARY 2013, 64, 1, 23—38 doi: 10.2478/geoca-2013-0002
Introduction
Sandstone geochemistry has a number of important applica-
tions (e.g. Potter 1978; Bhatia 1983, 1985; Roser & Korsch
1988; Floyd et al. 1991; McLennan et al. 1993; Dinelli et al.
1999; Getaneh 2002; Lacassie et al. 2004; Rahman & Suzuki
2007; Dey et al. 2009). For instance, major-element chemistry
can provide information about the tectonic setting of sedimen-
tary basins, allowing distinction between sandstones derived
from oceanic island arc, continental island arc, active conti-
nental margin, and passive margin settings (Bhatia 1983;
Roser & Korsch 1986; Kroonenberg 1994). Major- and trace-
element chemistry have been used to evaluate sedimentation
rates and depositional environments in orogenic belts (Sugisaki
1984). Moreover, major-element chemistry has been utilized
to infer the original clastic assemblages in deeply buried and
altered sedimentary rocks and to help clarify the processes that
produced the sediments (Argast & Donnelly 1987). Trace ele-
ments also have value in some kinds of provenance studies.
(See Boggs 2009, Ch. 7, for discussion of this subject.)
Provenance of the Permian sandstones from the Malužiná
Formation in the Malé Karpaty Mts has not as yet been anal-
ysed with the geochemical approach. Forasmuch as the
Malužiná Formation is a part of the rootless nappe Hronic
Unit, we decided to unravel the source-area weathering, prov-
enance, and tectonic setting of the putative source area of the
Malužiná Formation sandstones. To this end, we evaluated the
major- and trace-element geochemistry of these sandstones, in
relation to their mineral composition. The present study sup-
plies new data not only on local geology but also important
material for various comparisons and correlations. Finally, our
detailed analysis may improve our understanding of the Per-
mian paleogeography and tectonic evolution.
Geological setting
The Late Paleozoic of the Hronicum, defined by Vozárová
& Vozár (1981, 1988) as the Ipoltica Group with two litho-
stratigraphic units of a lower order – the Nižná Boca and
the Malužiná Formations, is variably preserved and occurs
as tectonically reduced fragments in the basal part of the
multi-nappe structure in various regions of the Western Car-
pathians (Fig. 1a).
The Permian Malužiná Formation overlies the Pennsylva-
nian Nižná Boca Formation from which it develops gradually
without break of sedimentation. The Malužiná Formation
ranges from the Cisuralian to the Lopingian in age (Autunian—
Geochemistry of the Permian sandstones from the Malužiná
Formation in the Malé Karpaty Mts (Hronic Unit, Western
Carpathians, Slovakia): implications for source-area
weathering, provenance and tectonic setting
MAREK VĎAČNÝ
1
, ANNA VOZÁROVÁ
1
and JOZEF VOZÁR
2
1
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Mlynská dolina G,
842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic; vdacnym@fns.uniba.sk; vozarova@fns.uniba.sk
2
Geological Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, P.O. Box 106, 840 05 Bratislava, Slovak Republic;
jozef.vozar@savba.sk
(Manuscript received January 19, 2012; accepted in revised form June 13, 2012)
Abstract: The Permian sandstones of the Malužiná Formation in the northern part of the Malé Karpaty Mts are domi-
nantly quartzofeldspathic and quartzolithic in composition with abundant feldspars and volcanic, plutonic igneous and
less metasedimentary lithic fragments, indicating the sand grains were derived from a basement uplift and recycled
orogen. The Malužiná Formation sandstones have moderate to high SiO
2
contents (68—85 wt. %; on average 76 wt. %),
TiO
2
concentrations averaging 0.3 wt. %, Al
2
O
3
contents of about 12 wt. %, and Fe
2
O
3
(total Fe as Fe
2
O
3
) + MgO
contents of around 2.9 wt. %. The Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) values for the Permian Malužiná Formation
sandstones vary from 45 to 68 with an average of 55, indicating low to moderate weathering of the source area. The bulk
chemical composition and selected trace elements preserve the signatures of a felsic and intermediate igneous prov-
enance, and suggest mostly an active continental margin tectonic setting of the source area for the Malužiná Formation
sandstones. The Eu/Eu* ( ~ 0.78), La/Sc ( ~ 7.28), Th/Sc ( ~ 2.10), La/Co ( ~ 6.67), Th/Co ( ~ 1.85), and Cr/Th ( ~ 6.57)
ratios as well as the chondrite-normalized REE patterns with flat HREE, LREE enrichment, and negative Eu anomalies
indicate derivation of the Malužiná Formation sandstones from felsic rock sources. The deposition of the Malužiná
Formation sandstones took place in a rifted continental margin environment supplied from collision orogen on a thick
continental crust composed of rocks of older fold belts.
Key words: Permian, Western Carpathians, sandstone geochemistry, provenance, tectonic setting.
24
VĎAČNÝ, VOZÁROVÁ and VOZÁR
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
Saxonian—Thuringian according to the Central European local
stratigraphic scale) (e.g. Planderová 1973; Planderová &
Vozárová 1982; Rojkovič et al. 1992; Vozárová et al. 2005).
Lithologically, the Malužiná Formation is characterized by a
dominance of siliciclastic sedimentary rocks (polymict con-
glomerates, sandstones, siltstones, shales) with sporadic
chemogenic sediment interbeds (caliches and evaporites) of
a variable thickness. There is a significant inner cyclic struc-
ture of the sedimentary sequences which are arranged into
three regional megacycles. An important phenomenon is the
polyphasic synsedimentary andesite-basalt volcanism, repre-
sented by rift-related continental tholeiites, in the 1st and 3rd
megacycles, comprising huge lava flows generated during
two eruption phases (Vozár 1997; Dostal et al. 2003). As es-
timated from the surface occurrences in the Nízke Tatry Mts
and drilling data, the maximum thickness of the Malužiná
Formation is 2200—2400
m (Vozárová & Vozár 1988). Volca-
nics and sediments in the Malužiná Formation are generally
very low-grade metamorphosed. The grade of metamorphism
did not exceed the diagenesis/anchizone boundary, which is
characterized by the pumpellyite-prehnite-quartz mineral as-
sociation (Vrána & Vozár 1969) and by the illite crystallinity
indices from pelites (Plašienka et al. 1989; Šucha 1989; Šucha
& Eberl 1992). Lithofacies analyses of the Malužiná Forma-
tion sequences, the character of volcanism and the structural
arrangement of sediments in the entire megasequence suggest
Fig. 1. a – Distribution of the Ipoltica Group in the Western Carpathians (after Vozárová & Vozár 1988). Explanations: 1 – surface oc-
currences, 2 – established and inferred distribution of the Hronic nappes, 3 – overthrust lines of the Hronic nappes, significant faults and
boundaries delimitating distribution of the Ipoltica Group, 4 – significant lines in the Alpine structure of the Western Carpathians:
a – ubeník-Margecany line, b – Čertovica line, c – Peripieninian lineament. b – Late Paleozoic of the Hronicum in the Malé Karpaty Mts
(after Vozárová & Vozár 1988). Explanations: 1 – Quaternary sediments, 2 – Tertiary sediments. Hronicum—Šturec Nappe: 3 – Mid-
dle and Upper Triassic – carbonates, undivided, 4 – Lower Triassic – quartz sandstones, shales, 5 – Late Paleozoic—Permian – andes-
ites, basalts and volcanoclastics (Malužiná Formation), 6 – Late Paleozoic—Permian – conglomerates, sandstones, shales with
volcanogenic material admixture (Malužiná Formation), 7 – Late Paleozoic—Stephanian – grey conglomerates, sandstones, shales (Nižná
Boca Formation). Krížna Nappe: 8 – Mesozoic, undivided. Others: 9 – foliation cleavage, 10 – faults, 11 – overthrusts, 12 – over-
thrust line of nappes, 13 – sample location.
25
GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE PERMIAN SANDSTONES FROM THE MALUŽINÁ FORMATION (SLOVAKIA)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
an intracontinental, rift-related type of the original deposi-
tional basin. Thus, the depositional environment was conti-
nental and was characterized by deltaic-lacustrine and alluvial
sub-environments, including micro-environments controlled
by arid to semiarid climate (Vozárová & Vozár 1988).
In the northern part of the Malé Karpaty Mts, the Ipoltica
Group occupies the area to the SW of Smolenice and Lošonec
in a belt 1.5—2.5
km wide, 15
km long, NE—SW-oriented, and
extends to the western margin of the mountain range to the
S of Sološnica (Fig.
1b). The Mesozoic of the Krížna Nappe
is the direct tectonic basement of the Ipoltica Group in the
whole area. From the east and west sides of the Malé Kar-
paty Mts, the geological units are tectonically bordered by
the Tertiary faults of NE—SW direction. As a consequence of
this tectonic phenomenon, we can interpret the continuation
of all geological units (including the Ipoltica Group) into the
pre-Neogene basement of the Vienna (western part) and
Danube (eastern part) Basins.
Sampling and methods
Twenty-five representative samples of sandstones were col-
lected within the Malužiná Formation in the Malé Karpaty
Mts. Sampling spatially covered the whole regional occur-
rence of the studied lithostratigraphic unit, including its lower
and upper parts. The exact locations of sampling sites are
shown in Fig.
1b. Medium-grained sandstones were preferen-
tially selected for petrographic and geochemical analyses.
Thin sections of collected samples were prepared and exam-
ined by a petrographic microscope. The modal composition of
the Malužiná Formation sandstones was reviewed. The petro-
graphic examination and modal analyses of the sandstone
samples were carried out following the method of Dickinson
(1970). Modal analyses were performed on the thin sections
by counting 500 points on each slide using the Gazzi-Dickin-
son point-counting method. Various types of lithic grains were
distinguished on the basis of textural and mineralogical char-
acteristics. Only aphanitic polycrystalline grains were classi-
fied as lithic fragments and quartz/feldspar grains larger than
0.06 mm, when occurring within lithic fragments, were
counted with the discrete quartz or feldspar component.
In all thin sections, the heavy minerals constitute less than
1 % of the total framework clasts. In order to facilitate the
present study, we conducted conventional heavy mineral
analysis for ten medium-grained sandstone samples. The
0.063—0.250
mm fraction of the dried samples was sieved
out for the heavy mineral analysis. The heavy fraction was
separated from the light fraction with the gravity separation
method using a heavy liquid (bromoform with a measured
specific gravity of 2.8). We point-counted 350 grains in each
heavy mineral mount. Problematic opaque and non-opaque
heavy minerals were embedded in polished sections and mi-
croanalytically determined (EDS). The ZTR index, which is
a measure of mineralogical maturity of heavy-mineral as-
semblages in sandstones, was calculated as a percentage of
the combined zircon, tourmaline, and rutile grains among the
transparent, non-micaceous, detrital heavy minerals for each
sample (Hubert 1962).
Twenty-five sandstone samples of the Permian Malužiná
Formation were analysed for major and trace elements by
Acme Analytical Laboratories (Vancouver) Ltd., Vancouver,
Canada. Major elements were analysed by inductively cou-
pled plasma emission spectrometry (ICP) and trace and rare
earth elements (REE) by inductively coupled plasma mass
spectrometry (ICP-MS). Loss on ignition (LOI) was deter-
mined by heating the samples at 1000
°C for two hours.
Sample digestion procedures are similar for both ICP and
ICP-MS. Two hundred milligrams of pulverized sample
were mixed with 1.5
g of a flux of lithium metaborate and
lithium tetraborate in a graphite crucible. Subsequently, the
crucible was placed in a muffle furnace and heated to
1050
°C for 15
min. The molten mixture was dissolved in
100
ml of 5% HNO
3
(ACS grade nitric acid diluted in dem-
ineralized water). International reference samples (standards)
and reagent blanks were added to the sample sequence. At
the second stage (sample analysis), sample solutions were
aspirated into an ICP emission spectrometer (Jarrel Ash
AtomComb 975) or an ICP mass spectrometer (Perkin-Elmer
Elan 6000) for the determination of element content. Major
elements were determined with accuracy better than 2
% and
trace elements with accuracy better than 10
%.
Results
Petrography and mineral composition
A part of the Malužiná Formation sandstones is coloured
violet or red owing to the presence of finely disseminated he-
matite pigment, which occurs as a very thin coating around
grains or is infiltrated within the matrix; others are light grey
to beige. The sedimentary structure of the Malužiná Forma-
tion sandstones is mostly massive and horizontal current
laminated, occasionally cross-bedded. Destructive activity is
represented by washouts and erosive channel structures asso-
ciated with a swarm of intraformational claystone- and silt-
stone clasts. The deformation structures, such as load casts,
are frequent.
The sandstones of the Malužiná Formation are typically
medium- to coarse-grained and contain high percentages of
subangular to angular grains. Sorting of the framework
grains ranges from moderately well sorted to poorly sorted
( = 0.50 to 2.00) (after Folk 1974; textural comparison chart
showing degree of sorting is after Jerram 2001). Thus, the
Malužiná Formation sandstones are texturally immature or
submature.
The Malužiná Formation sandstones have dominantly
quartzofeldspathic composition with predominance of quartz.
On the quartz-feldspar-rock fragment (QFR) plot of McBride
(1963), these sandstones can be classified as arkose, subar-
kose, lithic subarkose, and feldspathic litharenite (Fig. 2).
Thus, the petrographic classification indicates a group of arko-
sic sediments for the Malužiná Formation sandstones.
Quartz is the dominant framework grain, constituting an
average of 57 % of the rock volume, and occurring as
monocrystalline (mean 39.4 %; range 18—64.2 %) and poly-
crystalline (mean 17.6 %; range 7—29.4 %) grains. Some
26
VĎAČNÝ, VOZÁROVÁ and VOZÁR
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
polycrystalline quartz grains display sutured internal bound-
aries between composite crystals, indicating a probable early
stage in development of metamorphic polycrystalline quartz.
Feldspars (orthoclase, microcline, microperthite, plagio-
clases) constitute around 24.5 % of the total framework
grains of the sandstones. Both potassium feldspar (mean
13.3 %; range 6—26 %) and plagioclase (mean 11.2 %; range
3.2—24.4 %) are present in almost equal amounts. Microcline
grains have well-developed grid twinning. Many plagioclase
grains are characterized by distinctive albite twinning, with
twin lamellae that are straight and parallel. The feldspars in
the studied sandstones are predominantly fresh and unal-
tered, but there are a few grains showing some weak degrees
of alteration to sericite or kaolinite.
Next in abundance to feldspar, lithic grains make up to
14.4 % of the total framework constituents. Specifically,
there are some volcanic (mean 6.8 %; range 0—20.4 %), low-
grade metamorphic (mean 3.8 %; range 0—16.4 %), and sedi-
mentary (mean 3.8 %; range 0—16.8 %) rock fragments.
Volcanic rock fragments include felsic, intermediate microli-
thic, basic lathwork, and vitric to vitrophyric grains. Meta-
morphic rock fragments are grains with tectonite and
nonfoliated fabric. The grains with tectonite fabric include
metasedimentary fragments of schist, sericite- and quartzose
phyllite, paragneiss, and mica schist. The grains with nonfo-
liated fabric comprise metaquartzite clasts composed mainly
of quartz with strongly sutured contacts. Sedimentary rock
fragments involve fine-grained sandstone, siltstone, shale or
mudstone, and chert.
White mica is generally more abundant than biotite, both
constituting on average 1.4 % (range 0—9.6 %) of the total
framework grains in the studied sandstones. Biotite grains
are usually baueritized.
The sandstones of the Malužiná Formation have very low
matrix contents (mean 2.7 %; range 0—10.4 %). These low
contents indicate that it is a primary depositional matrix, and
not a diagenetic clay. The matrix of the sandstones is slightly
recrystallized, changed into a sericite and scarce chlorite ag-
gregate. Quartzose, calcite and ferruginous cements are pre-
served, but only in a negligible content.
The heavy mineral assemblage in the Malužiná Formation
sandstones is characterized by the presence of opaque and
non-opaque minerals. The following opaque heavy minerals
occur in the studied sandstones: magnetite, ilmenite and he-
matite (mainly diagenetic in origin). The non-opaque heavy
minerals are represented here by three groups: ultrastable
(zircon, tourmaline and rutile), stable (apatite and biotite),
and moderately stable (titanite and garnet). The average pro-
portion of observed heavy minerals in the studied sandstones
is as follows (listed in the decreasing percentage): biotite
(29.55 %), magnetite, ilmenite and hematite (27.58 %), ti-
tanite (13.86 %), tourmaline (10.21 %), garnet (8.68 %), ap-
atite (5.78 %), zircon (3.93 %), and rutile (0.39 %). The ZTR
index varies widely (19.57—59.68 %) among the Malužiná
Formation sandstones, but its average value is comparatively
low (33.21 %), showing their mineralogical immaturity.
We found only little petrographic evidence of diagenetic
features, such as dissolution of feldspar and rock fragments,
compaction, reduction of the existing pore space through re-
arrangements, and rotation and fragmentation of grains re-
sulting in dissolution of quartz grains and cementation. Our
observations of only weak diagenetic alterations of feld-
spars, for example, inconspicuous albitization and other pro-
cesses, document that the original composition of the
Malužiná Formation sandstones was only insignificantly
modified. Thus, we exclude considerable diagenetic over-
print which could influence the mineral and chemical com-
position of the studied sandstones.
Chemical composition
The individual major and trace element analyses of the
sandstones of the Malužiná Formation from the Malé Kar-
paty Mts are presented in Table 1.
Major elements
The Malužiná Formation sandstones have moderate to
high SiO
2
contents (on average 76 wt. %; range 68—
85 wt. %), TiO
2
concentrations averaging 0.3 wt. % (range
0.05—0.63 wt. %), Al
2
O
3
contents of about 12 wt. % (range
7.88—14.98 wt. %), and Fe
2
O
3
(total Fe as Fe
2
O
3
) + MgO
contents of around 2.9 wt. % (range 0.69—4.67 wt. %). The
samples show no marked differences in their major element
chemical composition (for details, see Table 1). Variations
in the major element geochemistry of the Malužiná Forma-
tion sandstones are shown on Harker diagrams (Fig. 3). The
linear relationship of TiO
2
, Al
2
O
3
, Fe
2
O
3
, MnO, CaO, MgO,
Na
2
O, and K
2
O with SiO
2
in the Malužiná Formation sand-
stones is conspicuous in these Harker variation diagrams. In
general, SiO
2
increases and TiO
2
, Al
2
O
3
, Fe
2
O
3
, MnO, CaO,
MgO, Na
2
O, and K
2
O decrease in the Malužiná Formation
Fig. 2. Classification of the Malužiná Formation sandstones accord-
ing to McBride (1963). Points within the triangle represent relative
proportions of Q (quartz), F (feldspar), and R (rock fragments) end
members.
27
GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE PERMIAN SANDSTONES FROM THE MALUŽINÁ FORMATION (SLOVAKIA)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
Fig. 3. Harker variation diagrams for the Malužiná Formation sandstones. The increase in SiO
2
re-
flects an increased mineralogical maturity, i.e. a greater quartz content and a smaller proportion of
other detrital grains.
sandstones due to the increase in
mineralogical maturity (Fig. 3).
This mineralogical maturity is
characterized by an increase in
the quartz content and a decrease
in unstable detrital grains (e.g.
feldspar and volcanic rock frag-
ments) in the Malužiná Forma-
tion sandstones, which also
reflects a stratigraphic trend. The
negative correlation of SiO
2
with
the other major elements is due to
most of the silica being seques-
tered in quartz, as indicated by
Osman (1996). In the present
samples, TiO
2
concentrations in-
crease with Al
2
O
3
, suggesting
that TiO
2
is probably associated
with phyllosilicates especially
with
illite
(Dabard
1990);
Fe
2
O
3
+ MgO are also well corre-
lated with Al
2
O
3
. The latter corre-
lation implies that these oxides
are associated with phyllosili-
cates, particularly in matrix chlo-
rites (Dabard 1990).
Trace elements
The processes controlling the
trace element composition of sed-
imentary rocks may be investigated
using
normalization
diagrams
(spider diagrams). Trace element
concentrations of the Malužiná
Formation sandstones are in con-
currence with the average upper
continental crust (UCC) with the
exception of Ba, Nb, Sr and Tb
contents (Fig. 4). In the present
samples, Ba (78—3185 ppm) is
strongly enriched in three sam-
ples, slightly depleted in most of
the samples and strongly depleted
only in one sample. The Ba en-
richment of the three samples is
related to the presence of K-feld-
spar and barite, occurrence of
which was also confirmed by our
petrographic observations. Nb
(1.7—12.1 ppm) and Tb (0.13—
0.97 ppm) are depleted in all stud-
ied samples. The Sr content
(25.3—460.4 ppm) of the studied
sandstones is variable, as there are
some slightly enriched, depleted
and also strongly depleted sam-
ples. This variability is caused by
many influences on Sr in low
28
VĎAČNÝ, VOZÁROVÁ and VOZÁR
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
temperature depositional environments (Fairbridge 1972). For
instance, the distribution of Sr can be affected by the presence
of Ca, fractionation of Sr can result from the weathering of feld-
spars, particularly plagioclase, and additional Sr can be incor-
porated in diagenetic carbonate, as also noticed in the Malužiná
Formation sandstones. K and Rb have a trend comparable to
that of Nb (Fig. 4). The two former elements are mainly hosted
in micas and K-feldspar (Heier & Billings 1970); thus, alter-
ation of these minerals will dominate the fractionation of these
elements. The high field strength elements (e.g. Hf, Zr, Y)
generally show consistent interrelationships, as do the large ion
lithophile elements (Th and U) and selected rare earth ele-
ments (La, Ce, Nd, Sm, Tm, and Yb), though clear relationships
are sometimes not completely obvious between them (Fig. 4).
Table 1: ICP-determined major, trace and rare earth element abundances for the Malužiná Formation sandstones.
Sample
10-VD 11-VD 12-VD 13-VD 16-VD 17-VD 18-VD 19-VD 20-VD 21-VD 22-VD 23-VD
Major elements (wt. %)
SiO
2
82.73
71.32
75.54
76.94
69.08
72.32
84.02
85.03 77.34
79.57
80.29
79.53
TiO
2
0.08
0.39
0.39
0.3
0.61
0.34
0.16
0.05 0.06
0.12
0.36
0.32
Al
2
O
3
9.55
14.98
12.62
12.02
13.94
12.21
7.88
8.11 10.65
11.01
10.01
10.24
Fe
2
O
3
1.27
2.41
2.56
1.9
2.57
2.04
1.96
0.9
0.73
0.97
2.47
2.94
MnO
0.02
0.06
0.04
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.02
0.02 0.05
0.09
0.04
0.05
MgO
0.16
1.26
0.58
0.43
0.73
0.53
1.58
0.7
0.21
0.54
0.76
0.67
CaO
0.35
0.77
1.08
1.29
3.1
3.09
0.09
0.21 2.31
0.92
0.18
0.29
Na
2
O
4.18
4.83
4.61
4.64
3.88
3.97
1.73
2.22 4.7
3.98
3.89
3.85
K
2
O
0.79
1.41
1
0.88
2.12
1.72
0.64
1.76 0.79
1.19
0.41
0.64
P
2
O
5
0.05
0.09
0.1
0.08
0.16
0.09
0.04
0.03 0.04
0.05
0.06
0.06
LOI
0.5
2.3
1.3
1.3
3.6
3.5
1.8
0.9
2.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
Total
99.68
99.82
99.82
99.83
99.83
99.85
99.92
99.93 99.28
99.84
99.87
99.89
Na
2
O/K
2
O
5.29
3.43
4.61
5.27
1.83
2.31
2.70
1.26 5.95
3.34
9.49
6.02
K
2
O/Na
2
O
0.19
0.29
0.22
0.19
0.55
0.43
0.37
0.79 0.17
0.30
0.11
0.17
Fe
2
O
3
+ MgO 1.43
3.67
3.14
2.33
3.30
2.57
3.54
1.60 0.94
1.51
3.23
3.61
Al
2
O
3
/SiO
2
0.12
0.21
0.17
0.16
0.20
0.17
0.09
0.10 0.14
0.14
0.12
0.13
CIA
53
58
54
52
49
47
68
58
45
54
58
58
Trace elements (ppm)
Sc
1
4
4
4
7
5
2
1
1
1
5
6
V
11
37
42
37
54
38
24
16
8
12
40
38
Co
1.4
9.8
4
2.9
5.6
3.5
4.9
1.8
1.6
2.6
5
4.8
Ni
9.4
13.4
8.2
11.3
10.2
6.3
6.3
7.1
5.6
9.7
10.1
9.3
Cu
14.7
3.5
4.5
12
7.2
38.1
3.7
13.2
2293.7
5.8
33.9
4
Zn
12
80
28
26
34
27
17
15
23
32
27
39
Ga
7
13.7
10.5
10.2
13.6
11.5
6.9
6.9
7.9
9.5
8.5
9.7
Rb
20.5
53
40.9
32.3
77.4
62
22.1
44.6
22.3
33
17.7
28.4
Sr
176
252.2
417.6
460.4
222.1
221.5
25.3
66.7
107.4
116.7
128.8
107.5
Y
7.2
19.9
14.7
15.1
25
18.8
4.5
4.8
8.6
11.4
8.2
14.7
Zr
49.9
252.6
162.7
109.6
342.9
158.4
76.7
43.7
58.7
71.3
90.4
86.2
Nb
1.8
7.4
7
6.3
10.6
6.9
2.7
2
1.7
2.5
6.9
6.1
Cs
0.4
2.1
2.2
1.9
3.6
2.6
1.5
1.5
0.4
0.9
0.8
1.4
Ba
1999
433
266
268
320
441
78
415
3185
541
292
221
Be
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
Hf
1.6
7.7
5.1
3.6
10.3
4.7
2.3
1
2.1
2.2
2.5
2.6
Ta
0.2
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.9
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.5
W
0.5
0.8
0.9
0.8
1.6
1
1.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
2
0.7
Pb
32.5
5.8
7.8
10.1
3.7
4.8
3.1
5.9
166.9
2.6
8.7
4.6
Th
3.4
10.5
7
6.4
12.2
8.2
4
2.4
3.4
4.1
8.8
7.9
U
0.5
2.2
1.7
1.4
2.9
1.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
1.4
1
Rare earth elements (ppm)
La
12.9
46.9
31.4
32.5
40
35.6
10.9
7.4
7.5
13.7
20.3
22.8
Ce
24.8
93.3
57.8
56.4
79
63.9
21.5
16.8
16.7
26.7
43.8
49.4
Pr
3.11 10.09
6.53
6.61
8.95
7.31
2.31
2.02 2.34
3.59
4.36
5.84
Nd
11.8
37.3
24.2
24
33.4
27.8
7.8
7.6
10.1
15.1
15.4
22.4
Sm
2.17 5.68
3.86
4.16
5.98
4.53
1.03
1.47 2.31
2.88
2.36
3.82
Eu
0.52 1.09
0.94
1.02
1.38
1.03
0.19
0.32 0.58
0.83
0.61
0.93
Gd
1.71 4.24
3.02
3.27
5.14
3.66
0.68
1.11 2
2.44
1.66
3.27
Tb
0.27 0.65
0.48
0.55
0.8
0.57
0.13
0.18 0.32
0.4
0.29
0.52
Dy
1.37 3.66
2.77
2.89
4.38
2.96
0.86
0.95 1.57
1.99
1.52
2.73
Ho
0.24 0.7
0.52
0.55
0.83
0.6
0.16
0.17 0.3
0.38
0.29
0.51
Er
0.61 2.03
1.49
1.54
2.39
1.72
0.51
0.44 0.8
0.98
0.81
1.33
Tm
0.09 0.31
0.22
0.23
0.37
0.24
0.08
0.07 0.11
0.15
0.13
0.21
Yb
0.59 2.02
1.46
1.41
2.32
1.64
0.58
0.44 0.69
0.86
0.86
1.33
Lu
0.08 0.29
0.21
0.2
0.35
0.24
0.09
0.07 0.1
0.13
0.13
0.2
Σ
REE
60.26 208.26
134.9
135.33
185.29
151.8
46.82
39.04 45.42
70.13
92.52
115.29
29
GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE PERMIAN SANDSTONES FROM THE MALUŽINÁ FORMATION (SLOVAKIA)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
Table 1: Continued from previous page.
Sample
26-VD 27-VD 30-VD 31-VD 32-VD 33-VD 34-VD 36-VD 38-VD 39-VD 40-VD 42-VD 43-VD
Major elements (wt. %)
SiO
2
74.22 67.83 72.71 72.97 75.25 75.85 74.03 72.52 74.29 76.6
75.14 77.52 80.11
TiO
2
0.37 0.63 0.44 0.44 0.22 0.35 0.3
0.54 0.38 0.33 0.4
0.3
0.11
Al
2
O
3
12.51 13.31 13.73 13.3
13.48 12.46 12.31 13.74 13.19 12.18 13.08 11.89 11.47
Fe
2
O
3
2.15 3.66 2.75 2.89 1.71 2.99 2.71 2.6
2.42 2.15 2.14 1.86 0.61
MnO
0.06 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.01
MgO
1.09 1.01 1.03 1.36 0.8
0.81 0.88 1.8
0.48 0.41 0.68 0.49 0.08
CaO
1.47 3.3
0.75 0.74 0.42 0.5
1.57 0.83 1.23 0.75 1.36 0.72 0.42
Na
2
O
3.4
2.97 5.29 4.86 4.41 3.27 3.45 3.5
5.08 5.03 4.41 4.4
5.66
K
2
O
1.4
2.08 1.16 1.15 1.71 1.45 1.53 0.97 0.92 0.85 1.2
1.01 0.46
P
2
O
5
0.09 0.16 0.1
0.1
0.06 0.09 0.09 0.06 0.1
0.09 0.11 0.07 0.04
LOI
3.1
4.8
1.9
2
1.8
2.2
3
3.3
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.6
0.9
Total
99.86 99.83 99.9
99.85 99.88 100
99.91 99.93 99.93 99.92 99.87 99.89 99.87
Na
2
O/K
2
O
2.43 1.43 4.56 4.23 2.58 2.26 2.25 3.61 5.52 5.92 3.68 4.36 12.30
K
2
O/Na
2
O
0.41 0.70 0.22 0.24 0.39 0.44 0.44 0.28 0.18 0.17 0.27 0.23 0.08
Fe
2
O
3
+ MgO 3.24 4.67 3.78 4.25 2.51 3.80 3.59 4.40 2.90 2.56 2.82 2.35 0.69
Al
2
O
3
/SiO
2
0.17 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.19 0.18 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14
CIA
56
50
55
56
58
61
55
62
53
54
54
55
52
Trace elements (ppm)
Sc
5
8
6
6
3
4
5
9
5
4
5
3
1
V
45
54
57
49
28
36
28
48
36
28
28
18
8
Co
8
8.5
6.4
8.6
4.3
4.3
4
12
4.2
2.9
4.1
3.8
0.8
Ni
8
15.1
12
18.7
14.2
13.1
13.2
15.9
9.4
7
8.2
7.8
5.4
Cu
3.3
2.7
3.6
3.8
2.5
5.7
5
1.6
5.1
3.3
5.9
2
3.2
Zn
33
37
59
84
16
22
28
62
28
23
39
20
5
Ga
11.8
13.7
14
12.8
12.4
11.5
11.9
13.8
11.6
10.5
12.2
10.1
8.2
Rb
51.4
86.4
43.4
43.1
49.4
44.9
46.8
45
33.7
32.4
43.8
37.5
12.6
Sr
102.2 126 217.8 223.3 109 110.8 126.2 152.7 438.6 242.1 370.2 268.3
252.3
Y
19
30.7
16.1
15.7
11.3
11.5
18
17.8
14.7
15
16.5
12.6
7.5
Zr
198.4 354.8 179.9 213.4 136.8 132.5
96.6 169.8 129.9 118.4 159.9 134.7
83.6
Nb
7.6
12.1
8.6
8.3
4.7
5.9
5
12.1
7.2
7.3
7.5
6.8
2.4
Cs
4
7.9
2.4
2.6
1.9
1.4
1.7
4.2
1.5
1.4
2.3
1.7
0.6
Ba
245 316 328 226 492 257 544 338 228 390 328 212
1175
Be
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Hf
6.3
10.5
4.9
5.9
3.8
3.3
2.7
4.6
3.6
3.7
4.7
3.7
2.2
Ta
0.6
1
0.6
0.7
0.4
0.5
0.5
1
0.7
0.9
0.7
0.7
0.2
W
1.5
2.3
1.2
1.1
0.6
0.9
0.8
1.4
1
1.1
1
0.9
0.5
Pb
6.7
15.3
7.9
5.1
2.2
10.2
12.9
7.9
7
5
4.7
4.2
4.3
Th
8
14.5
7.8
8.9
6.9
6
4.9
8.9
6.7
7
8.7
6.3
5.9
U
2.2
2.5
2.7
1.9
1
1.2
1.1
2.1
1.9
1.5
1.9
1.4
0.9
Rare earth elements (ppm)
La
22.6
30.6
21.2
24.6
23.2
15.3
21
28.5
39
39.1
37.8
21
19.7
Ce
46.4
66.6
44.2
53.4
51.7
32.7
33.6
53.6
63.2
70.3
67.3
42.6
38.5
Pr
5.31 7.61 5.19 5.92 5.73
3.72
4.66 6.4
6.97
7.69
7.61
4.97 4.53
Nd
20.3
29.6
20.4
23.1
21.6
14.8
17.7
24.8
23.4
28.6
28.1
17.6
17.1
Sm
4.09 6.33 3.67
4.15 3.28
2.56
3.35
4.09
3.78
4.29
4.46
3.28 2.68
Eu
0.93 1.29 0.82
0.95 0.75
0.62
1.05
0.92 1
0.98
1.04
0.79 0.67
Gd
3.63 5.78
3
3.39 2.39
2.22 3.2
3.41
3.07
3.36
3.47
2.63 2.02
Tb
0.61 0.97
0.5
0.56 0.36
0.34
0.49
0.54
0.45
0.49
0.52
0.42 0.27
Dy
3.16 5.16
2.61
2.81
2.01 2
2.73
3.03
2.44
2.42
2.82
2.32 1.37
Ho
0.69 1.03
0.57
0.55
0.37
0.43
0.54
0.58
0.48 0.5
0.6
0.44 0.24
Er
1.94 3.05
1.68
1.57
1.15
1.39
1.59
1.75
1.46
1.43
1.72
1.31 0.63
Tm
0.31 0.44
0.27
0.25
0.17
0.21
0.25
0.27
0.22
0.22
0.27 0.2
0.1
Yb
1.98 2.9
1.69
1.55
1.11
1.31
1.46
1.85
1.38
1.39
1.65
1.12 0.53
Lu
0.29 0.41
0.25
0.24
0.16 0.2
0.23
0.27
0.21
0.2
0.25
0.17 0.09
Σ
REE
112.24 161.77 106.05 123.04 113.98 77.8
91.85 130.01 147.06 160.97 157.61 98.85 88.43
The trace element relationships illustrate the chemical coher-
ence and uniformity of the Malužiná Formation sandstones.
Rare earth elements
The rare earth elements (REE) concentrations of the
Malužiná Formation sandstones are shown as chondrite-nor-
malized patterns in Fig. 5. The sandstones have REE contents,
ranging between 39—208 ppm with an average of 114 ppm,
comparable to average UCC (143 ppm; Taylor & McLennan
1985). The chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns
are about the same for all Malužiná Formation sandstones and
are similar to that of the average Post-Archean Australian
Shale (PAAS; Taylor & McLennan 1985). The sandstones
30
VĎAČNÝ, VOZÁROVÁ and VOZÁR
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
show slight LREE-enriched and relatively flat HREE patterns
with negative Eu anomalies (Fig. 5). Negative Eu anomalies
are only very slightly marked.
Discussion
Sorting and weathering effects
The Th/U ratio in most upper crustal rocks is typically about
3.5 to 4.0 (McLennan et al. 1993). During sedimentation, U is
readily oxidized to the soluble U
6+
state and may be lost to ore
deposits, leading to an elevation in the Th/U ratio. Thus, Th/U
ratios may be useful in interpreting sedimentary recycling his-
tories (McLennan et al. 1990). In sedimentary rocks, Th/U
values higher than 4.0 may indicate intense weathering in
source areas or sediment recycling, meaning derivation from
older sedimentary rocks (Asiedu et al. 2000; Rahman & Suzuki
2007). Th/U ratios in the Malužiná Formation sandstones
range from 2.9 to 7.9, with an average of 4.9, indicating the
derivation of these sediments from unequally weathered frag-
ments of the upper crust. The Th/U versus Th plot for the
Malužiná Formation sandstones (Fig. 6) shows a typical dis-
tribution similar to the average values of fine-grained sedi-
mentary rocks reported by Taylor & McLennan (1985) and
follows the normal weathering trend (McLennan et al. 1993).
The trend of depleted mantle sources in a few samples is de-
rived from the addition of detrital material from the eroded
synsedimentary continental tholeiites. This is also docu-
mented by the presence of basic volcanic rock fragments in
our samples and by the occurrences of the Malužiná Forma-
tion sandstones along with basic volcanics and their tuffs
which have a tholeiite magmatic trend (Fig. 1b; Vozár 1997;
Dostal et al. 2003).
Since a number of heavy minerals are dominated by ele-
ments that are trace elements in most sedimentary rocks (e.g.
Zr in zircon, REE in monazite and allanite), it is possible to
evaluate the role of heavy mineral concentration during sedi-
mentary sorting (McLennan 1989). The sedimentary sorting
and recycling can be monitored by a plot of Th/Sc against
Zr/Sc (McLennan et al. 1993). A simple positive correlation
between Th/Sc and Zr/Sc ratios is exhibited by first-cycle
sediments, whereas there is a substantial increase in Zr/Sc
with far less increase in Th/Sc in recycled sediments (Asiedu
et al. 2000; Rahman & Suzuki 2007). However, if first-cycle
sediments are derived from largely plutonic sources, they
could also show a trend of increased Zr/Sc and almost con-
stant Th/Sc (Roser & Korsch 1999). On the Th/Sc versus Zr/Sc
diagram, the Malužiná Formation sandstones follow a general
trend which is consistent with that of first-cycle sediments
(Fig. 7). This suggests their direct derivation from igneous
and, according to our thin-section observations, also from
metamorphic rocks. From Figs. 6 and 7 it can be, therefore,
Fig. 4. Multi-element diagram of the Malužiná Formation sandstones
normalized to the composition of the average upper continental crust
(UCC). The elements are arranged from left to right in order of in-
creasing compatibility in a small fraction melt of the mantle. The
average UCC data are from Taylor & McLennan (1981).
Fig. 5. Chondrite-normalized REE diagram for sandstone samples
from the Malužiná Formation. Note the similarity in the patterns
with LREE enrichment, flat HREE distributions and the ubiquitous
negative Eu-anomaly. REE chondrite-normalizing factors are from
Boynton (1984). Post-Archean Average Australian Shale values
from Taylor & McLennan (1985).
Fig. 6. Plot of Th/U versus Th for the Malužiná Formation sand-
stones (after McLennan et al. 1993).
31
GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE PERMIAN SANDSTONES FROM THE MALUŽINÁ FORMATION (SLOVAKIA)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
inferred that the bulk of the Malužiná Formation sandstones
were directly derived from igneous and metamorphic rocks
that had undergone some degree of weathering.
Nesbitt & Young (1982, 1984, 1989) introduced a chemical
index of alteration (CIA), which provides a means of quanti-
fying the degree of weathering (chemical alteration) to which
silicate materials have been subjected. The CIA is calculated
according to CIA=[(Al
2
O
3
)/(CaO*+Na
2
O+K
2
O+Al
2
O
3
)] 100,
where the oxides are expressed as molar proportions and
CaO* is CaO in silicates only (as opposed to that in phos-
phates or carbonates). However, if CaO < Na
2
O, then the
molecular CaO is accepted as approximate CaO* (McLennan
1993). This applies to all studied Malužiná Formation sand-
stones. To calculate a reliable CIA, a rock needs to contain
less than 75 wt. % SiO
2
and less than 1 wt. % CaO. Both these
conditions are met for the majority of the studied sandstones
(Table 1), making our interpretation of the CIA values reli-
able. High CIA values (i.e. 76—100) indicate intensive chemi-
cal weathering in the source areas. Conversely, low CIA
values (i.e. 50 or less) indicate the near absence of chemical
alteration or unweathered source areas, and consequently
might reflect cool and / or arid conditions (Fedo et al. 1995).
Low CIA values can also be interpreted as a result of an ex-
tremely high erosion rate. The CIA values for the Malužiná
Formation sandstones vary from 45 to 68, with an average of
55, indicating low to moderate chemical weathering of the
source area. Consequently, they reflect arid conditions and
an extremely high erosion rate. The average CIA value (55)
of the Malužiná Formation sandstones is comparable to
those of feldspar (50), unweathered felsic plutonic and vol-
canic rocks (45—55) as well as the UCC (50) (Fedo et al.
1995). The CIA values of the studied sandstones are also
plotted in the Al
2
O
3
—(CaO* + Na
2
O)—K
2
O (A—CN—K) dia-
gram (Fig. 8), which may express much of the chemical varia-
tion resulting from weathering. Unweathered rocks cluster
along the left-hand side of the plagioclase-K-feldspar join line
in the A—CN—K system (Nesbitt & Young 1984). The weath-
ered material moves away from the source rocks along a line
subparallel to the Al
2
O
3
—(CaO* + Na
2
O) join due to prior re-
moval of Ca and Na in preference to Al and K (Fig. 8). The
composition of the source rocks can also be predicted back
along the trend. All the samples studied here plot a little away
from the plagioclase-K-feldspar join line and parallel to the
Al
2
O
3
—(CaO* + Na
2
O) edge, supporting the conclusion that
the Malužiná Formation sandstones were derived from an in-
termediate igneous source terrain in general. Although the ef-
fect of post-depositional processes in altering the mineralogy
and chemistry cannot be completely neglected, both the tex-
tural and the chemical immaturity of the investigated sand-
stones strongly suggest that their bulk chemistry, including the
Na
2
O enrichment (Table 1), was inherited from the source area.
The Rb/Sr ratios of sediments also monitor the degree of
source-rock weathering (McLennan et al. 1993). During
weathering (and in many cases, diagenesis), there is
a substantial increase in the Rb/Sr ratio of most rocks. This is
because Rb
+
, a large alkali trace element (1.72
for 12-fold
Fig. 7. Plot of Th/Sc versus Zr/Sc for the Malužiná Formation sand-
stones (after McLennan et al. 1993). Analysed sandstone samples,
which are less affected by sedimentary sorting and recycling, show
a simple correlation for these ratios. This relationship is interpreted
as due to the compositional variations of the provenance.
Fig. 8. The Malužiná Formation sandstones plotted on the Al
2
O
3
—
(CaO* + Na
2
O)—K
2
O diagram (A—CN—K) after Nesbitt & Young
(1984, 1989) and Fedo et al. (1995). The relation between the CIA
scale (Nesbitt & Young 1982) and the triangle is shown on the right
side of the diagram. The A—CN—K diagram shows the weathering
trends for average granite and average gabbro. The advanced weath-
ering trend for granite is also shown. The solid line linking crosses is
the compositional trend in pristine average igneous rocks (data of
Le Maitre 1976). B – basalt, Ga – gabbro, Di – diorite, Da – dac-
ite, G – granite, Rh – rhyolite. The horizontal solid line is the pla-
gioclase-K-feldspar join. The data are plotted as molar proportions and
the compositions of plagioclase, K-feldspar, muscovite, illite, kaolinite
and smectite are shown. Modal carbonate cement is trivial, however,
and the calculated proportions are thus close to actual values. CaO*
represents the CaO associated with the silicate fraction of the sample.
Å
32
VĎAČNÝ, VOZÁROVÁ and VOZÁR
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
coordination), is more readily retained on exchange sites of
clays than the smaller Sr
2+
(1.26
for eight fold coordina-
tion). The Malužiná Formation sandstones have an average
Rb/Sr ratio of 0.29, and this value is close to that of the aver-
age upper continental crust (0.32) but significantly lower than
the average Post-Archean Australian Shale (0.80; McLennan
et al. 1983). This suggests that the degree of source area weath-
ering was most probably low to moderate rather than intense.
The Al—Ti—Zr ternary diagram monitors the effects of sort-
ing processes (Garcia et al. 1994). On this diagram, mature
sediments consisting of both sandstones and shales show
a wide range of TiO
2
/Zr variations, whereas immature sedi-
ments of sandstones and shales show a more limited range of
TiO
2
/Zr variations (Asiedu et al. 2000). On the Al—Ti—Zr dia-
gram, the Malužiná Formation sandstones are confined in
the centre with a limited range of TiO
2
/Zr variations, sug-
gesting poor sorting and rapid deposition of the studied
sandstones (Fig. 9). This is completely corroborated by their
sedimentary structures and mineral composition.
(Fig. 10). These petrographical features imply a source area
in which granitic and gneissic rocks plus sedimentary and
metasedimentary rocks dominated, while andesitic to basaltic
volcanic rocks were much less abundant.
The Malužiná Formation sandstones have high K
2
O and Rb
concentrations and a uniform K/Rb ratio of 242 that lies close
to a typical differentiated magmatic suite or “main trend” with
a ratio of 230 (Fig. 11; Shaw 1968). This feature emphasizes
Fig. 9. Al—Ti—Zr plot for the Malužiná Formation sandstones. The
solid contour refers to the observed range of compositions in clastic
sediments. CAS refers to the fields of calc-alkaline suites and SPG
refers to fields of strongly peraluminous granites (after Garcia et al.
1994).
Fig. 10. Triangular QFL plot showing framework modes for the Per-
mian Malužiná Formation sandstones: Q is total quartzose grains, in-
cluding monocrystalline Qm and polycrystalline Qp varieties; F is
total feldspar grains; L is total unstable lithic fragments. Provenance
fields from Dickinson & Suczek (1979).
Fig. 11. Distribution of K and Rb in the Malužiná Formation sand-
stones relative to a K/Rb ratio of 230 ( = main trend of Shaw 1968).
Average upper and lower continental crust from Taylor & McLennan
(1985).
Source-rock compositions and provenance
As apparent from the Results section and the previous
chapter, the mineral and chemical composition of the
Malužiná Formation sandstones is a record of characteristics
of the source area. Therefore, whole-rock geochemistry of
the investigated sandstones can be used as a suitable tool for
unravelling their provenance. Our following interpretations
based on chemical composition are in agreement with petro-
graphic analysis which indicates that the detrital constituents
of the Malužiná Formation sandstones were derived from
a basement uplift and recycled orogen tectonic provenance
Å
33
GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE PERMIAN SANDSTONES FROM THE MALUŽINÁ FORMATION (SLOVAKIA)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
Fig. 12. Plot of La/Th versus Hf for the Malužiná Formation sand-
stones (compositional fields are after Floyd & Leveridge 1987).
the chemically coherent nature of the sandstones and deriva-
tion mainly from acid to intermediate magmatic rocks. As
mentioned above, the original material of the Malužiná For-
mation sandstones was only slightly weathered and was de-
posited rapidly. Therefore, there was no further redistribution
in or component removal from the original material. The uni-
form K/Rb ratio indicates that diagenesis and very low-grade
metamorphism was isochemical in the Malužiná Formation,
and there was no or very little elemental redistribution.
A plot of La/Th against Hf (Fig. 12) provides a useful tool
for bulk rock discrimination between different arc composi-
tions and sources (see also Asiedu et al. 2000). Felsic compo-
sition-dominated arcs have low and uniform La/Th ratios (less
than 5) and Hf contents of about 3—7 ppm. With the progres-
sive unroofing of the arc and/or incorporation of sedimentary
basement rocks, the Hf content increases via the release of zir-
con (Floyd & Leveridge 1987). The compositions of the
Malužiná Formation sandstones suggest derivation mainly
from felsic igneous rocks with minor mafic input (Fig. 12).
This minor mafic input is also documented by the scarce oc-
currences of basic lathwork rock fragments in the framework
of the studied sandstones. Only two samples have Hf concen-
trations above 10 ppm, which is much higher than considered
to be typical of felsic rocks. This may be indicative of a pas-
sive margin tectonic setting and a sedimentary source, which
is well-documented by our observations of sedimentary rock
fragments in thin sections from these sandstones.
The ferromagnesian trace elements Cr, Ni, Co, and V show
a generally similar behaviour in magmatic processes, but they
may be fractionated during weathering (Feng & Kerrich
1990). Very high levels of Cr and Ni have been used by vari-
ous authors (e.g. Hiscott 1984; Wrafter & Graham 1989) to in-
fer an ultramafic provenance for sediments. The elevated
values of Cr ( > 150 ppm) and Ni ( > 100 ppm) and a ratio of
Cr/Ni between 1.3—1.5 are diagnostic of ultramafic rocks in
the source region (Garver et al. 1996). Higher Cr/Ni ratios
probably indicate derivation of these elements from mafic vol-
canic rocks (Garver & Scott 1995). The Malužiná Formation
sandstones have low levels of Cr (14—109 ppm; on average
43 ppm) and Ni (5—19 ppm; on average 10 ppm), and Cr/Ni
ratio of 4.61. This may suggest either a minor amount of ma-
fic input into the depositional system or else that trace ele-
ments could have travelled into the depositional basin as
adsorbed ions on clays (McCann 1991). Vanadium concentra-
tions (8—57 ppm; on average 33 ppm) of the Malužiná Forma-
tion sandstones are relatively higher than the levels commonly
recorded in sediments (about 20 ppm), and given that V is
concentrated in mafic rocks, they suggest some mafic input
into the depositional system (McCann 1991). On the other
hand, the slightly higher content of vanadium in our samples
may also be a result of concentration of heavy minerals.
The high field strength elements (HFSE) such as Zr, Nb, Hf,
Y, Th are preferentially partitioned into melts during crystalli-
zation (Feng & Kerrich 1990), and as a result these elements
are enriched in felsic rather than mafic sources. These ele-
ments are thought to reflect provenance compositions as a
consequence of their generally immobile behaviour (Taylor &
McLennan 1985). The REE and Sc also give an indication of
source compositions because of their relatively low mobility
during sedimentation (Bhatia & Crook 1986). REE and Th
abundances are higher in felsic than in mafic igneous source
rocks and in their weathered products, whereas Co, Sc, and Cr
are more concentrated in mafic than in felsic igneous rocks
and in their weathered products. Mafic and felsic source rocks
differ significantly in their ratios of Eu/Eu*, La/Sc, Th/Sc,
La/Co, Th/Co, and Cr/Th and hence provide useful informa-
tion about the provenance of sedimentary rocks (e.g. Cullers
Table 2: Range of elemental ratios of the Permian Malužiná Formation sandstones compared to elemental ratios in sediments derived from
felsic rocks, mafic rocks, and in the upper continental crust.
1
– After Cullers et al. (1988), Cullers (1994, 2000), and Cullers & Podkovyrov (2000).
2
– After Taylor & McLennan (1985) and McLennan (2001).
Elemental ratio
Maluziná Formation
sandstones (n = 25)
Ranges in sediments
from felsic sources
1
Ranges in sediments
from mafic sources
1
Upper continental
crust
2
Eu/Eu*
0.64–0.97 0.40–0.94 0.71–0.95
0.63
La/Sc
3.17–19.70 2.50–16.3 0.43–0.86
2.21
Th/Sc
0.98–5.90 0.84–20.5 0.05–0.22
0.79
La/Co
2.22–24.63 1.80–13.8 0.14–0.38
1.76
Th/Co
0.74–7.38 0.04–3.25 0.04–1.40
0.63
Cr/Th
1.67–15.86
4.00–15.0
25.00–500
7.76
ˇ
34
VĎAČNÝ, VOZÁROVÁ and VOZÁR
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
et al. 1988; Cullers 1994, 2000; Cullers & Podkovyrov
2000). In this study, the Eu/Eu*, La/Sc, Th/Sc, La/Co, Th/Co,
and Cr/Th values of the Permian Malužiná Formation sand-
stones are more similar to values for sediments derived from
felsic source rocks than to those for mafic source rocks (Ta-
ble 2), suggesting prevalent derivation from felsic source
rocks. The higher LREE/HREE ratios and negative Eu anoma-
lies (0.64—0.97) of the Malužiná Formation sandstones also
bear the characteristics of felsic source rocks (after Taylor &
McLennan 1985; Wronkiewicz & Condie 1989).
A discriminant function diagram has been proposed by
Roser & Korsch (1988) to distinguish between sediments
whose provenance is primarily mafic (first-cycle basaltic and
lesser andesitic detritus), intermediate (dominantly andesitic
with subordinate rhyolitic and dacitic detritus) or felsic igne-
ous (acid plutonic and volcanic detritus) and quartzose sedi-
mentary (mature polycyclic quartzose detritus). Their study
was based upon 248 chemical analyses in which Al
2
O
3
/SiO
2
,
K
2
O/Na
2
O and Fe
2
O
3(tot)
+ MgO proved the most valuable dis-
criminants. A plot of the first two discriminant functions
based upon the oxides of Ti, Al, Fe, Mg, Ca, Na and K most
effectively differentiates between the four provenances
(Fig. 13). In this diagram, the majority of the Malužiná For-
mation sandstones plot on the felsic igneous provenance field
suggesting that the source area for the Malužiná Formation
sandstones had an average felsic composition. Using the ratio
discrimination diagram in which discriminant functions are
based upon the ratios of TiO
2
, Fe
2
O
3(tot)
, MgO, Na
2
O and K
2
O
all to Al
2
O
3
(Fig. 14), the Malužiná Formation sandstones plot
in the felsic and intermediate igneous provenance fields. This
distribution may indicate a significant contribution of detritus
Fig. 13. Discriminant function diagram using major elements for the
provenance signatures of the Malužiná Formation sandstones (dia-
gram after Roser & Korsch 1988). Fields for predominantly mafic,
intermediate and felsic igneous provenances are shown with the field
for a quartzose sedimentary provenance. The Malužiná Formation
sandstones plot in the felsic igneous provenance field demonstrating
that they are derived from a silicic crystalline (plutonic-metamor-
phic) terrain with a lesser intermediate-acid volcanic component.
from continental transform boundaries or rifted continental
margins. Both these tectonic settings expose deep-seated plu-
tonic rocks with dominant feldspathic detrital material.
Figure 4 shows a multi-element diagram of the Malužiná
Formation sandstones normalized to the average UCC (Taylor
& McLennan 1981). The figure shows that, with the excep-
tion of the high Ba values and low Nb, Sr and Tb values, the
Malužiná Formation sandstones have compositions similar
to those of the average UCC and PAAS. This feature indi-
cates that the sandstones were derived mainly from the upper
continental crust, for which granitic composition is charac-
teristic. As discussed earlier, the high Ba values for the
Malužiná Formation sandstones reflect a significant pres-
ence of K-feldspar.
Tectonic setting of source area
The mineralogy of the Malužiná Formation sandstones
clearly indicates their derivation from predominantly acid ig-
neous rocks, with less admixture of clastic detritus from
synsedimentary acid to intermediate/basic volcanic rocks and
from low-grade metasedimentary rocks. According to the in-
terpretations of Dickinson & Suczek (1979), Dickinson et al.
(1983) and Ingersoll (1990), these types of clastic detritus
may be derived from uplifted basement blocks or a rifted
continental margin (Fig. 10). The latter tectonic setting and
rapid erosion and transport are also well-documented by the
compositional diagnostic features of the Malužiná Formation
sandstones, which include the lowest polycrystalline/mono-
crystalline quartz ratios, the lowest content of lithic fragments,
and nearly equal amounts of plagioclase and alkali feldspars.
Although most studies of tectonic setting of the source
area have relied on interpretations based upon sandstone
mineralogy, several studies have shown that major- and
Fig. 14. Discriminant function diagram using major element ratios
for the provenance signatures of the Malužiná Formation sand-
stones (diagram after Roser & Korsch 1988). Fields for dominantly
mafic, intermediate and felsic igneous provenances are shown with
the field for a quartzose sedimentary provenance.
35
GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE PERMIAN SANDSTONES FROM THE MALUŽINÁ FORMATION (SLOVAKIA)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
Fig. 15. Tectonic discrimination diagram of Roser & Korsch (1986)
for the Permian Malužiná Formation sandstones.
Fig. 16. Major element composition plots of the Malužiná Formation sandstones for tectonic setting discrimination (after Bhatia 1983). Plot
of TiO
2
and Al
2
O
3
/SiO
2
versus Fe
2
O
3
+ MgO. (Fe
2
O
3
represents total iron as Fe
2
O
3
.) Dashed lines mark the major fields representing various
tectonic settings.
trace-element geochemistry also reflect provenance differ-
ences that depend upon tectonic setting (e.g. Bhatia 1983;
Bhatia & Crook 1986; Roser & Korsch 1986; Skilbeck &
Cawood 1994). Both trace elements (particularly relatively
immobile elements such as La, Y, Th, Zr, Hf, Nb, Ti, and Sc)
and major elements have proved to be useful in studies of the
tectonic setting of the source area.
The SiO
2
content and K
2
O/Na
2
O ratios in sandstones ap-
pear to be particularly sensitive indicators of geotectonic set-
ting of the source area. Roser & Korsch (1986) present
a chemical model, based on K
2
O/Na
2
O ratios and SiO
2
con-
tent, for discriminating the tectonic setting of the source area
(Fig. 15). By using these chemical parameters, they were
able to discriminate between samples from three major tec-
tonic settings: passive margin (PM), active continental mar-
gin (ACM), and oceanic island arc margin (ARC). Some
overlaps occur between the composition fields shown in
Fig. 15, but overall the discriminating power of the tech-
nique appears to be reasonably good (Armstrong-Altrin &
Verma 2005; Boggs 2009). On a K
2
O/Na
2
O versus SiO
2
dia-
gram, the Malužiná Formation sandstones may be classified
as having an active continental margin provenance (Fig. 15).
Hence the Malužiná Formation sandstones may represent
quartz-intermediate sediments derived from a tectonically ac-
tive continental margin adjacent to active plate boundaries.
Sandstones from oceanic island arc, continental island arc,
active continental margin, and passive margin settings are
variable in composition, particularly in their Fe
2
O
3(tot)
+ MgO,
Al
2
O
3
/SiO
2
, K
2
O/Na
2
O and Al
2
O
3
/(CaO + Na
2
O) contents.
Bhatia (1983) used this chemical variability to discriminate
between the different tectonic settings on a series of bivariate
plots, two of which are shown in Fig. 16. On these plots, most
of the Malužiná Formation sandstones fall in the general area
of active continental margin field (Fig. 16).
Bhatia & Crook (1986) identified the elements La, Th, Zr,
Nb, Y, Sc, Co and Ti as the most useful in discriminating be-
tween sandstones from different tectonic environments. Dis-
tinctive fields for four environments – oceanic island arc,
continental island arc, active continental margin and passive
margin – are recognized on bivariate plots of La vs. Th, La/Y
vs. Sc/Cr, Ti/Zr vs. La/Sc and the trivariate plots La—Th—Sc,
Th—Sc—Zr/10 and Th—Co—Zr/10. On a Ti/Zr vs. La/Sc plot
(Fig. 17), the Malužiná Formation sandstones again plot mainly
in the field of active continental margin sediments. This distri-
bution suggests that substantial amounts of detritus were de-
rived from acid igneous rocks of a dissected magmatic arc and
from granite-gneisses and siliceous volcanics of an uplifted
36
VĎAČNÝ, VOZÁROVÁ and VOZÁR
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
basement. The original depositional basin of the Malužiná
Formation sandstones was probably developed on a rifted
thick continental crust behind an active continental margin.
This tectonic setting can also comprise rocks of older fold
belts. The present interpretation is in good agreement with
previous studies (Vozárová & Vozár 1988; Vozár 1997;
Dostal et al. 2003).
Paleogeographical reconstruction
The Permian sedimentary basin of the Malužiná Formation
originated as a consequence of post-Variscan extensional tec-
tonics. It was a part of a large geodynamic zone connected
with the internal part of the Variscan orogenic domain, in
which rift-related and strike-slip continental post-orogenic ba-
sins were developed during the Pennsylvanian-Permian period
(Vozárová et al. 2009). Relics of the volcano-sedimentary
Malužiná Formation sequences are present in the Western
Carpathians within the basal part of the Hronicum rootless
nappe system. The mineral composition and geochemistry of
the Malužiná Formation sandstones permitted us to interpret
the character of the original basement rocks. With respect to
our results, the Malužiná rift system originated on a high-
grade crystalline core complex penetrated with huge masses of
syn- and late-orogenic igneous rocks, what is characteristic for
the Variscan terranes of the Central Western Carpathians
(Biely et al. 1996; Vozárová et al. 2009 and references therein).
The axial part of the former rift-trough is designated by the
occurrences of continental tholeiites, from which a variable
amount of clastic grains were derived into the former sedi-
mentary basin. The small admixture of low-grade metasedi-
mentary lithic fragments could be derived from the Variscan
orogenic zone. Based on these facts we suppose that the
Hronicum rift-related basin originated on the continental crust
parallel to the Variscan orogenic belt.
Fig. 17. Ti/Zr versus La/Sc plot of the Malužiná Formation sand-
stones for tectonic setting discrimination (after Bhatia & Crook 1986).
Conclusions
The geochemistry of the Permian sandstones from the
Malužiná Formation in the Malé Karpaty Mts was studied to
determine their source-area weathering, provenance, and the
tectonic setting of the source area.
The Permian Malužiná Formation sandstones have domi-
nantly quartzofeldspathic and quartzolithic composition with
predominance of quartz. They are classified as arkose, subar-
kose, lithic subarkose, and feldspathic litharenite. The Malužiná
Formation sandstones contain abundant feldspars, volcanic,
fine-grained igneous (aplitic) and metasedimentary lithic grains,
indicating that the detrital constituents were derived from
a basement uplift and recycled orogen tectonic provenance.
The CIA values for the Permian Malužiná Formation sand-
stones vary from 45 to 68 with an average of 55, indicating
low to moderate chemical weathering of their source area.
Consequently, they reflect arid conditions and an extremely
high erosion rate. The average CIA value (55) is a little above
than that of the CIA value (50) of the upper continental crust.
Eu/Eu*, La/Sc, Th/Sc, La/Co, Th/Co and Cr/Th ratios in-
dicate derivation of these sandstones from felsic source
rocks. In the same way, the predominantly felsic composi-
tion of the Malužiná Formation sandstones is supported by
the REE plots. Thus, the existence of huge complexes of ma-
fic/ultramafic rocks in the source region is most unlikely.
The geochemical characteristics preserve the signatures of
a felsic and intermediate igneous provenance for the Permian
Malužiná Formation sandstones. This is in good agreement
with framework mineralogy. Tectonic discrimination dia-
grams suggest mostly an active continental margin setting
for the Malužiná Formation sandstones.
The Malužiná Formation sandstones were derived espe-
cially from fault-bounded, uplifted basement areas in conti-
nental-block provenances, where high relief and rapid
erosion of uplifted sources gave rise to quartzofeldspathic
sands of classic arkosic character. The Malužiná Formation
sandstones could have been accumulated in basins related to
transform ruptures of continental blocks, incipient rift blocks,
or zones of wrench tectonism within continental interiors.
The Malužiná rift system originated on a high-grade crys-
talline core complex penetrated with huge masses of syn-
and late-orogenic igneous rocks, as characteristic for the
Variscan terranes of the Central Western Carpathians. A
variable amount of clastic grains were derived from the con-
tinental tholeiites into the former sedimentary basin. The
small admixture of low-grade metasedimentary lithic frag-
ments could be derived from the Variscan orogenic zone. We
suppose that the Hronicum rift-related basin originated on
the continental crust parallel to the Variscan orogenic belt.
Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to two anony-
mous reviewers for their positive criticism that helped im-
prove the manuscript. This work was supported by the
Slovak Research and Development Agency under the Con-
tract No. APVV-0438-06 and APVV-0546-11, the Slovak
Scientific Grant Agency (Grant No. VEGA-2/0100/11 and
VEGA-1/0095/12), and Comenius University in Bratislava
(Grant No. UK/236/2010).
37
GEOCHEMISTRY OF THE PERMIAN SANDSTONES FROM THE MALUŽINÁ FORMATION (SLOVAKIA)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
References
Argast S. & Donnelly T.W. 1987: The chemical discrimination of
clastic sedimentary components. J. Sed. Petrology 57, 813—823.
Armstrong-Altrin J.S. & Verma S.P. 2005: Critical evaluation of
six tectonic setting discrimination diagrams using geochemical
data of Neogene sediments from known tectonic settings. Sed.
Geol. 177, 115—129.
Asiedu D.K., Suzuki S., Nogami K. & Shibata T. 2000: Geochemis-
try of Lower Cretaceous sediments, Inner Zone of Southwest
Japan: Constraints on provenance and tectonic environment.
Geochemical J. 34, 155—173.
Bhatia M.R. 1983: Plate tectonics and geochemical composition of
sandstones. J. Geol. 91, 6, 611—627.
Bhatia M.R. 1985: Rare earth element geochemistry of Australian
Paleozoic graywackes and mudrocks: Provenance and tectonic
control. Sed. Geol. 45, 97—113.
Bhatia M.R. & Crook K.A.W. 1986: Trace element characteristics
of graywackes and tectonic setting discrimination of sedimen-
tary basins. Contr. Mineral. Petrology 92, 181—193.
Biely A. (Ed.), Bezák V., Elečko M., Gross P., Kaličiak M.,
Konečný V., Lexa J., Mello J., Nemčok J., Potfaj M., Rakús
M., Vass D., Vozár J. & Vozárová A. 1996: Explanations to
the Geological Map of Slovakia 1 : 500,000. D. Štúr Inst. Geol.,
Bratislava, 1—77 (in Slovak).
Boggs S. Jr. 2009: Petrology of sedimentary rocks. 2nd edn. Cam-
bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1—600.
Boynton W.V. 1984: Geochemistry of the rare earth elements: me-
teorite studies. In: Henderson P. (Ed.): Rare earth element
geochemistry. Elsevier, 63—114.
Cullers R.L. 1994: The controls on the major and trace element
variation of shales, siltstones, and sandstones of Pennsylva-
nian—Permian age from uplifted continental blocks in Colorado
to platform sediment in Kansas, USA. Geochim. Cosmochim.
Acta 58, 4955—4972.
Cullers R.L. 2000: The geochemistry of shales, siltstones and sand-
stones of Pennsylvanian—Permian age, Colorado, USA: Impli-
cations for provenance and metamorphic studies. Lithos 51,
181—203.
Cullers R.L. & Podkovyrov V.N. 2000: Geochemistry of the Meso-
proterozoic Lakhanda shales in southeastern Yakutia, Russia:
Implications for mineralogical and provenance control, and re-
cycling. Precamb. Res. 104, 77—93.
Cullers R.L., Basu A. & Suttner L.J. 1988: Geochemical signature
of provenance in sand-size material in soils and stream sedi-
ments near the Tobacco Root Batholith, Montana, USA. Chem.
Geol. 70, 335—348.
Dabard M.P. 1990: Lower Brioverian formations (Upper Proterozoic)
of the Armorican Massif (France): Geodynamic evolution of
source areas revealed by sandstone petrography and geochem-
istry. Sed. Geol. 69, 45—58.
Dey S., Rai A.K. & Chaki A. 2009: Palaeoweathering, composition
and tectonics of provenance of the Proterozoic intracratonic
Kaladgi—Badami basin, Karnataka, southern India: Evidence
from sandstone petrography and geochemistry. J. Asian Earth
Sci. 34, 703—715.
Dickinson W.R. 1970: Interpreting detrital modes of graywacke and
arkose. J. Sed. Petrology 40, 695—707.
Dickinson W.R. & Suczek C.A. 1979: Plate tectonics and sand-
stone compositions. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol. Bull. 63, 12,
2164—2182.
Dickinson W.R., Beard L.S., Brakenridge G.R., Erjavec J.L., Fergu-
son R.C., Inman K.F., Knepp R.A., Lindberg F.A. & Ryberg P.T.
1983: Provenance of North American Phanerozoic sandstones in
relation to tectonic setting. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 94, 222—235.
Dinelli E., Lucchini F., Mordenti A. & Paganelli L. 1999: Geochem-
istry of Oligocene—Miocene sandstones of the northern Apen-
nines (Italy) and evolution of chemical features in relation to
provenance changes. Sed. Geol. 127, 193—207.
Dostal J., Vozár J., Keppie J.D. & Hovorka D. 2003: Permian vol-
canism in the Central Western Carpathians (Slovakia): Basin-
and-Range type rifting in the southern Laurussian margin. Int.
J. Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.) 92, 27—35.
Fairbridge R.W. (Ed.) 1972: The Encyclopedia of geochemistry and
environmental sciences. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New
York, 1—1344.
Fedo C.M., Nesbitt H.W. & Young G.M. 1995: Unraveling the ef-
fects of potassium metasomatism in sedimentary rocks and pa-
leosols, with implications for paleoweathering conditions and
provenance. Geology 23, 10, 921—924.
Feng R. & Kerrich R. 1990: Geochemistry of fine-grained clastic
sediments in the Archean Abitibi greenstone belt, Canada: Im-
plications for provenance and tectonic setting. Geochim. Cos-
mochim. Acta 54, 1061—1081.
Floyd P.A. & Leveridge B.E. 1987: Tectonic environment of the
Devonian mode and geochemical evidence from turbiditic
sandstones. J. Geol. Soc., London 144, 531—542.
Floyd P.A., Shail R., Leveridge B.E. & Franke W. 1991: Geochemis-
try and provenance of Rhenohercynian synorogenic sandstones:
implications for tectonic environment discrimination. In: Mor-
ton A.C., Todd S.P. & Haughton P.D.W. (Eds.): Developments
in sedimentary provenance. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. 57, 173—188.
Folk R.L. 1974: Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill Publishing
Co., Austin, Texas, 1—184.
Garcia D., Fonteilles M. & Moutte J. 1994: Sedimentary fraction-
ations between Al, Ti, and Zr and the genesis of strongly pera-
luminous granites. J. Geol. 102, 411—422.
Garver J.I. & Scott T.J. 1995: Trace elements in shale as indicators
of crustal provenance and terrane accretion in the southern Ca-
nadian Cordillera. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 107, 440—453.
Garver J.I., Royce P.R. & Smick T.A. 1996: Chromium and nickel
in shale of the Taconic foreland: a case study for the prove-
nance of fine-grained sediments with an ultramafic source. J.
Sed. Res. 100, 100—106.
Getaneh W. 2002: Geochemistry provenance and depositional tec-
tonic setting of the Adigrat Sandstone northern Ethiopia. J.
Afr. Earth Sci. 35, 185—198.
Heier K.S. & Billings G.K. 1970: Rubidium. In: Wedepohl K.H.
(Ed.): Handbook of geochemistry. Springer, Berlin, 37B1—37N1.
Hiscott R.N. 1984: Ophiolitic source rocks for Taconic-age flysch:
Trace element evidence. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull. 95, 1261—1267.
Hubert J.F. 1962: A zircon-tourmaline-rutile maturity index and the
interdependence of the composition of heavy mineral assem-
blages with the gross composition and texture of sandstones. J.
Sed. Petrology 32, 3, 440—450.
Ingersoll R.V. 1990: Actualistic sandstone petrofacies: discriminat-
ing modern and ancient source rocks. Geology 18, 733—736.
Jerram D.A. 2001: Visual comparators for degree of grain-size sort-
ing in two and three dimensions. Comput. Geosci. 27, 485—492.
Kroonenberg S.B. 1994: Effects of provenance, sorting and weath-
ering on the geochemistry of fluvial sands from different tec-
tonic and climatic environments. Proceedings of the 29
th
International Geological Congress, Part A, 69—81.
Lacassie J.P., Roser B., Solar J.R.D. & Hervé F. 2004: Discovering
geochemical patterns using self-organizing neural networks:
a new perspective for sedimentary provenance analysis. Sed.
Geol. 165, 175—191.
Le Maitre R.W. 1976: The chemical variability of some common
igneous rocks. J. Petrology 17, 589—637.
McBride E.F. 1963: A classification of common sandstones. J. Sed.
Petrology 33, 664—669.
38
VĎAČNÝ, VOZÁROVÁ and VOZÁR
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2013, 64, 1, 23—38
McCann T. 1991: Petrological and geochemical determination of
provenance in the southern Welsh Basin. In: Morton A.C.,
Todd S.P. & Haughton P.D.W. (Eds.): Developments in sedi-
mentary provenance. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. 57, 215—230.
McLennan S.M. 1989: Rare earth elements in sedimentary rocks: In-
fluence of provenance and sedimentary processes. In: Lipin B.R.
& McKay G.A. (Eds.): Geochemistry and mineralogy of rare
earth elements. Miner. Soc. Amer. Rev. Mineral. 21, 169—200.
McLennan S.M. 1993: Weathering and global denudation. J. Geol.
101, 295—303.
McLennan S.M. 2001: Relationships between the trace element
composition of sedimentary rocks and upper continental crust.
Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2, 4, 1021—1045.
McLennan S.M., Taylor S.R. & Eriksson K.A. 1983: Geochemistry
of Archean shales from the Pilbara Supergroup, Western Aus-
tralia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47, 1211—1222.
McLennan S.M., Taylor S.R., McCulloch M.T. & Maynard J.B.
1990: Geochemical and Nd-Sr isotopic composition of deep-
sea turbidites: Crustal evolution and plate tectonic associa-
tions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 54, 2015—2050.
McLennan S.M., Hemming S., McDaniel D.K. & Hanson G.N.
1993: Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance,
and tectonics. In: Johnsson M.J. & Basu A. (Eds.): Processes
controlling the composition of clastic sediments. Geol. Soc.
Amer., Spec. Paper 284, 21—40.
Nesbitt H.W. & Young G.M. 1982: Early Proterozoic climates and
plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites.
Nature 299, 715—717.
Nesbitt H.W. & Young G.M. 1984: Prediction of some weathering
trends of plutonic and volcanic rocks based on thermodynamic
and kinetic considerations. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48,
1523—1534.
Nesbitt H.W. & Young G.M. 1989: Formation and diagenesis of
weathering profiles. J. Geol. 97, 2, 129—147.
Osman M. 1996: Recent to quaternary River Nile sediments:
A sedimentological characterization on samples from Aswan to
Naga-Hammadi, Egypt. Unpub. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Vienna,
Vienna, 1—162.
Planderová E. 1973: Palynological research in the melaphyre serie
of the Choč Unit in the NE part of the Nízke Tatry Mts. be-
tween Spišský Štiavnik and Vikartovce. Geol. Práce, Spr. 60,
143—168.
Planderová E. & Vozárová A. 1982: Biostratigraphical correlation of
Late Paleozoic Formations in the West Carpathians. In: Sassi
F.P. & Varga I. (Eds.): Newsletter 4, IGCP Pr. No. 5, Košice—
Padova, 67—71.
Plašienka D., Janák M., Hacura A. & Vrbatovič P. 1989: First illite
crystallinity data from the Veporicum Alpine metamorphic
rocks. Miner. Slovaca 21, 43—51 (in Slovak).
Potter P.E. 1978: Petrology and chemistry of modern big river
sands. J. Geol., Chicago 86, 423—449.
Rahman M.J.J. & Suzuki S. 2007: Geochemistry of sandstones from
the Miocene Surma Group, Bengal Basin, Bangladesh: Impli-
cations for provenance, tectonic setting and weathering.
Geochem. J. 41, 415—428.
Rojkovič I., Franců J. & Časlavský J. 1992: Association of organic
matter with uranium mineralization in the Permian sandstones
of the Western Carpathians. Geol. Carpathica 43, 27—34.
Roser B.P. & Korsch R.J. 1986: Determination of tectonic setting of
sandstone-mudstone suites using SiO
2
content and K
2
O/Na
2
O
ratio. J. Geol. 94, 5, 635—650.
Roser B.P. & Korsch R.J. 1988: Provenance signatures of sand-
stone—mudstone suites determined using discriminant function
analysis of major-element data. Chem. Geol. 67, 119—139.
Roser B.P. & Korsch R.J. 1999: Geochemical characterization, evo-
lution and source of a Mesozoic accretionary wedge: the
Torlesse terrane, New Zealand. Geol. Mag. 136, 5, 493—512.
Shaw D.M. 1968: A review of K-Rb fractionation trends by covari-
ance analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 32, 573—602.
Skilbeck C.G. & Cawood P.A. 1994: Provenance history of
a Carboniferous Gondwana margin forearc basin, New En-
gland Fold Belt, eastern Australia: modal and geochemical
constraints. Sed. Geol. 93, 107—133.
Sugisaki R. 1984: Relation between chemical composition and sedi-
mentation rate of Pacific ocean-floor sediments deposited
since the middle Cretaceous: Basic evidence for chemical con-
straints on depositional environments of ancient sediments. J.
Geol. 92, 235—260.
Šucha V. 1989: Burial metamorphism of clay minerals in Permian
pelites of the Choč Nappe, Western Carpathians. In: Metallo-
geny and anoxic sediments. Meeting of Czechoslovak working
group IGCP 254, Charles University, Prague, 43—44.
Šucha V. & Eberl D.D. 1992: Burial metamorphism of Permian
sediments in the Northern Gemeric and Hronic units, West
Carpathians. Miner. Slovaca 24, 5—6, 399—405 (in Slovak with
English summary).
Taylor S.R. & McLennan S.M. 1981: The composition and evolu-
tion of the continental crust: rare earth element evidence from
sedimentary rocks. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. A 301,
381—399.
Taylor S.R. & McLennan S.M. 1985: The continental crust: Its
composition and evolution. Blackwell, London, 1—312.
Vozár J. 1997: Rift-related volcanism in the Permian of the Western
Carpathians. In: Grecula P., Hovorka D. & Putiš M. (Eds.):
Geological evolution of the Western Carpathians. Miner. Slo-
vaca — Monograph, Bratislava, 225—234.
Vozárová A. & Vozár J. 1981: Lithostratigraphical subdivision of
Late Paleozoic sequences in the Hronic unit. Miner. Slovaca
13, 5, 385—403 (in Slovak with English summary).
Vozárová A. & Vozár J. 1988: Late Paleozoic in West Carpathians.
D. Štúr Inst. Geol., Bratislava, 1—314.
Vozárová A., Frank W., Krá J. & Vozár J. 2005:
40
Ar/
39
Ar dating of
detrital mica from the Upper Paleozoic sandstones in the West-
ern Carpathians (Slovakia). Geol. Carpathica 56, 6, 463—472.
Vozárová A., Ebner F., Kovács S., Kräutner H.-G., Szederkenyi T.,
Krstić B., Sremac J., Aljinovič D., Novak M. & Skaberne D.
2009: Late Variscan (Carboniferous to Permian) environments in
the Circum Pannonian Region. Geol. Carpathica 60, 1, 71—104.
Vrána S. & Vozár J. 1969: Über die Mineralgemeinschaft der
Pumpellyit-Prehnit-Quarzfazies in der Niederen Tatra. Geol.
Práce, Spr. 49, 91—100 (in Slovak).
Wrafter J.P. & Graham J.R. 1989: Ophiolitic detritus in the Ordovi-
cian sediments of South Mayo, Ireland. J. Geol. Soc., London
146, 213—215.
Wronkiewicz D.J. & Condie K.C. 1989: Geochemistry and prove-
nance of sediments from the Pongola Supergroup, South Africa:
Evidence for a 3.0-Ga-old continental craton. Geochim. Cos-
mochim. Acta 53, 1537—1549.