www.geologicacarpathica.sk
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
, DECEMBER 2012, 63, 6, 491—502 doi: 10.2478/v10096-012-0038-y
Introduction
Over the past two decades, a number of studies have empha-
sized the importance of wall structure and cement composi-
tion as important criteria for agglutinated foraminiferal
taxonomy, leading to recognition of four principal orders:
Textulariida, Astrorhiziida, Lituoliida and Loftusiida (e.g.
Desai & Banner 1987; Loeblich & Tappan 1987, 1989;
Brönnimann & Whittaker 1990; Hottinger et al. 1990; Banner
et al. 1991; Bertram & Cowen 1998; Kaminski 2004a and
references therein; Bartholdy et al. 2005). Currently, however,
there is less agreement regarding the taxonomic level at
which wall microstructure and cement composition ought to
be used (e.g. Mikhalevich 2004), even though modern re-
searchers do agree that modern microstructural and composi-
tional studies on agglutinating tests can be used for future
taxonomic and paleo-environmental studies.
The genus Colominella Popescu, 1998 was first described
from the Paratethyan Middle Miocene (Badenian) Kostej
(Costei) succession, outcropping in Transylvania (Popescu et
al. 1998; Kaminski 2004b), and is based on a species first de-
scribed by Cushman (1936) from the same locality (type spe-
Selective mineral composition, functional test morphology
and paleoecology of the agglutinated foraminiferal genus
Colominella
Popescu, 1998 in the Mediterranean Pliocene
(Liguria, Italy)
NICOLETTA MANCIN
1
, ELENA BASSO
2
, CAMILLA PIRINI
3
and MICHAEL A. KAMINSKI
4,5
1
Earth and Environment Sciences, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy; nicoletta.mancin@unipv.it
2
Arvedi Laboratory-CISRiC, University of Pavia, via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy
3
via Europa 28, 20097 San Donato (MI), Italy
4
Earth Sciences Department, Research Group of Reservoir Characterization, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,
P.O. Box 701 KFUPM, 31261 Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, U.K.
(Manuscript received February 7, 2012; accepted in revised form June 13, 2012)
Abstract: Specimens of Colominella (agglutinated Foraminifera) from a Pliocene Mediterranean succession were analysed
through a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDX) to docu-
ment their test microstructure. Colominella develops a complex large test with a mostly biserial chamber arrangement,
but with the internal chamber lumens partitioned by vertical and horizontal plates that form a labyrinthine structure of
alcoves. This internal partition occurs from the first chambers but is completely masked from the outside by the thick
wall. The test-wall microstructure is characterized by canaliculi (parapores) that are externally covered by a pavement
of agglutinated grains. The mineralogical characterization of the agglutinated grains and the secreted cement shows that
the grains are strongly selected as regards to size, arrangement and composition, with the coarse grains placed close to
the outer wall. Moreover, these coarse grains, forming a pavement, are made of monocrystalline quartz, whereas the
inner part of the skeleton is mostly composed of dolomite. The carbonate cement is less abundant and appears as cloudy
light grey areas among the detrital grains. These shell features can be interpreted as functional adaptations to perform
kleptoplastidy and/or to house functional photosymbionts, probably induced by stable environmental conditions as in
warm shallow waters characterized by low nutrient flux.
Key words: Mediterranean Pliocene, photosymbiont, SEM-EDX analysis, grain selectivity, functional morphology,
shell architecture, agglutinated Foraminifera.
cies Textulariella paalzowi). The same species was subse-
quently reported from the Miocene (Badenian) of the Rauch-
stallbrunngraben, Vienna Basin (Popescu et al. 1998). The
type species is characterized by a very large, elongated, mostly
biserial test, with the inner part subdivided by secondary septa
forming a typical labyrinthine structure and by its caniculate
test wall. Colominella likely evolved from the genus Matanzia
(which is also canaliculate) during the Oligocene to Middle
Miocene (Kaminski & Cetean 2011). Colominella and Ma-
tanzia have recently been placed in the subfamily Colomi-
nellinae Popescu, 1998 together with other two additional
closely-related genera: Colomita Gonzales-Donoso, 1968 and
Cubanina Palmer, 1936 (Kaminski & Cetean 2011).
In spite of this recent systematic review, not much is known
about the test wall microstructure of Colominella as regards
the arrangement and chemical-mineralogical composition of
the agglutinated grains and the occurrence of other functional
adaptive morphologies probably selected from the environ-
ment in which it lived. This work aims to provide new insights
into Colominella’s test features and to better clarify the rela-
tionship between such a complex test structure and its mode of
life. Moreover we report for the first time the occurrence of
492
MANCIN, BASSO, PIRINI and KAMINSKI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
Colominella in a Pliocene succession of the Mediterranean area,
thereby extending the known stratigraphical and geographical
range of the genus. Direct comparisons with the type species
from the Badenian of Transylvania were beyond the scope of
this study, therefore, we only tentatively assign the Mediterra-
nean specimens to the species C. paalzowi (Cushman) 1936.
Rationale and methods
The studied section, about 20 m thick, crops out along the
Torsero rivulet in the easternmost portion of the Albenga Ba-
sin (western Liguria) (Fig. 1). This Pliocene Mediterranean
outcrop has been well known since the end of the 19
th
century
because of its rich mollusc faunas (mainly gastropods) as doc-
umented by several papers (e.g. Bernasconi & Robba 1984,
1994; Solsona 1999; Solsona & Martinell 1999; Andri et al.
2005 and references therein; Harzhauser & Kronenberg 2008).
At its base, the Pliocene succession is composed of Lower
Pliocene light grey silty marls belonging to the upper part of
the “Argille di Ortovero” Formation (MPL3 foraminiferal
Biozone of the biostratigraphic scheme of Sprovieri 1992),
overlain by Middle—Lower Pliocene coarse-grained biogenic
sands, sandstones and conglomerates of the Monte Villa For-
mation (MPL4 Zone) (Violanti 1987). Analyses of both mol-
lusc and foraminiferal associations clarified the depositional
environment of the Argille di Ortovero, which was probably
represented by the deeper portion of the circalittoral zone,
close to the shelf edge (Violanti 1987; Bernasconi & Robba
1994). The Pliocene succession rests transgressively on a Me-
sozoic substratum belonging to the Monte Galero Formation,
a monogenic breccia mostly formed by dolostones and dolo-
mitic limestones (Fig. 1).
For the investigation of foraminiferal assemblages, stan-
dard analytical techniques were used. Six sediment samples,
gathered from the marly portions of the succession (Fig. 1),
were washed through sieves with mesh sizes of 425, 180 and
63 µm, respectively. The residue retained on each sieve was
analysed quantitatively under a stereo-microscope by count-
ing ca. 300 specimens from each fraction, as done in the
study by van Hinsbergen et al. (2005). About 50 individuals
(also including fragments) of Colominella from the > 425
and 425—180 µm fractions were isolated and prepared for
scanning electron microscope (SEM) observations.
In order to assess the internal morphological and composi-
tional features, SEM analyses were performed on the isolated
individuals that had been first embedded in epoxy resin. Resin
mountings were cut in order to obtain a longitudinal section of
the individual. The exposed test surfaces were mechanically
ground with silicon carbide papers and polished with diamond
pastes at 6, 3, 1 and 0.25 µm, in order to obtain a smooth sur-
face. Samples were then mounted on aluminium stubs using
carbon tapes and carbon-coated, using a Cressington 208HR
splutterer. Analyses were performed using a Tescan FE-SEM,
series Mira 3XMU, equipped with an EDAX energy disper-
sive spectrometer. Spot microanalyses for standardless ele-
mental composition were performed at 15 mm working
distance, using an accelerating voltage of 20 kV, with counts
of 100 s per analysis. X-ray mapping (stage mapping) for Sili-
con, Magnesium, and Calcium was also done on representative
portions of each individual. EDX elemental maps were acquired
at 20 kV, using a matrix of 256 200 with a DWELL TIME of
200 ms, 16 frames, 1 ADC and 3 ROIs. The EDX meas-
urements were processed with the EDAX Genesis software.
For each specimen, SEM-EDX analyses were focussed on:
1) documenting the internal morphological features of the
chambers;
2) measuring the shell thickness and the grain distribution;
3) emphasizing the presence of canaliculi penetrating the
test walls;
4) detecting the chemical composition of the grains and
the cement.
Paleoenvironmental interpretations were based on the char-
acteristics of foraminiferal assemblage composition recorded
in the Rio Torsero succession as proposed by Murray (2006)
and Jorissen et al. (2007). The utilized proxy methods were:
a) proxies of paleobathymetry: the ratio of planktonic to
benthic foraminiferal tests {P = (P/P + B)} as in van Hinsberg
Fig. 1. Location and stratigraphic log of the Pliocene Rio Torsero
section cropping out in the Albenga Basin (western Liguria). A geo-
logical sketch map of the Albenga Basin, with the Mesozoic sub-
stratum mostly formed by carbonate formations, is also reported
(redrawn and simplified by Dallagiovanna & Seno 1986).
493
COMPOSITION, MORPHOLOGY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF COLOMINELLA POPESCU, 1998 (LIGURIA, ITALY)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
Table 1: Synthesis of the bathymetric distribution and of the ecological and environmental preferences of some benthic foraminifera ob-
served in the modern Mediterranean Sea and used in this work as paleoenvironmental proxies (Jorissen et al. 1992, 1995, 2007; de Stigter et
al. 1998; de Rijk et al. 1999; Schmiedl et al. 2000; Donnici & Serandrei Barbero 2002; Murray 2006). The paleobathymetric subdivision
follows van Morkhoven et al. (1986).
494
MANCIN, BASSO, PIRINI and KAMINSKI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
et al. (2005), completed by the relative abundances of water-
depth benthic indexes;
b) proxies of food availability to the sea floor: Epifaunal/
Infaunal ratio (E/I) and relative abundance of deep and shal-
low infaunal taxa;
c) proxies of substrate: relative abundance of benthic species
indicative of the sediment type (muddy, sandy, mixed), hard
and vegetated surface (epifaunal and phytal taxa) integrated by
lithology and facies variations throughout the succession.
A synthesis of the ecological and environmental prefer-
ences of some benthic foraminifera observed in the Mediter-
ranean Sea and used in this work as paleoenvironmental
proxies (Jorissen et al. 1992, 1995, 2007; de Stigter et al.
1998; de Rijk et al. 1999; Schmiedl et al. 2000; Donnici &
Serandrei Barbero 2002; Murray 2006) are reported in Ta-
ble 1. The preservation, transport and reworking of benthic
foraminiferal tests in a mostly terrigenous succession were
also carefully evaluated in order to improve the ecological
interpretation.
Benthic foraminiferal taxonomic identifications were
mainly based on the Agip S.p.a.’s Atlas (1982), supplemented
by the works of Cimerman & Langer (1991) and Hottinger et
al. (1993). The benthic foraminiferal terminology used in
this work follows the glossary reported in Hottinger et al.
(1993). Foraminiferal species abundances are reported in
Table 2a,b (available in the data repository).
Fig. 2. Details of the test architecture of Colominella Popescu, 1998. 1 – Specimen of Colominella from the Rio Torsero section, sample
TOR1; magnification 36; a – apertural face, b – longitudinal view. Note that the internal chamber subdivision into alcoves and the pres-
ence of canaliculi are masked from the outside. Here they are made partly visible by the erosion of the external surface. 2—7 – Details of
the internal partition in alcoves. They are present from the first whorl (2—4) to the last chamber (7); magnification 50. Note that the num-
ber of the alcoves formed by the interposition of vertical plates increases with test growth. 8 – Details of the alcove structure, sample
TOR2; a – alcoves formed by the interposition of horizontal (x) and vertical (y) plates; b – enlargement of “a” showing an alcove with its
typical ovoidal shape. 9 – a – alcoves with trapezoidal shapes, sample TOR1; b – enlargement of “a”: note that also in this case alcoves
are formed by the interposition of two orthogonal plates (x and y, respectively).
495
COMPOSITION, MORPHOLOGY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF COLOMINELLA POPESCU, 1998 (LIGURIA, ITALY)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
Fig. 3. Detail of the wall microstructure in Colominella. Note that the test wall is crossed by canaliculi with the agglutinated grains selected
in size and distribution. 1 – Detail of the test wall crossed by canaliculi; note that they are externally covered by a pavement, sample
TOR2. 2 – a – Equatorial section of a specimen of Colominella (SEM-BSE image, sample TOR2) showing the typical internal subdivision
into alcoves. Note that canaliculi are limited to the upper portion of alcoves towards the external surface and are missing on the secondary
septa. b – Enlargement of “a”: note that the wall is crossed by canaliculi that are externally covered by a pavement; note also that the larger
grains are arranged close to the external edge forming the pavement. c – Detail of “b” showing the wall microstructure formed by coarse-
grained particles that are embedded by numerous small detrital granules, cemented by calcite that appears as cloudy grey areas among the
grains. 3 – Detail of the wall crossed by canaliculi in a specimen of Colominella sample TOR3. a – Note that canaliculi are mostly straight
and radial internally but become branching in the outer portion of the wall. b – Transverse section of Colominella (SEM-BSE image) showing
the grain arrangement and the occurrence of canaliculi. 4 – a – Equatorial section of a specimen of Colominella (SEM-BSE image, sample
TOR3). b—c – Details of “a” showing the grains selected in size and disposition with the largest ones located near the external margin while
the smallest grains are in the inside. Also in this case canaliculi mostly occur towards the external margin of the alcove.
Results
Shell architecture
The studied Colominella has a quite large, elongate to
fusiform, free test, usually characterized by a circular outline
in equatorial section; the average test dimensions span from
2.5 to 3 mm in length and 1.4 to 1.8 mm in width. The test
shows a mostly biserial chamber arrangement, reported as
triserial in the early stage. The aperture face is formed by the
penultimate and ultimate chamber; the aperture is an internal
marginal slit at the base of the last chamber (Fig. 2.1a—b).
Chambers are partitioned into alcoves, which occur from
the beginning of the shell and continue to the last stage, mak-
ing a typical internal labyrinthine structure (Fig. 2.2—7). Al-
coves, ovoidal or trapezoidal, are formed by the interposition
of vertical (y) and horizontal (x) plates (Fig. 2.8—9). In the
early stages of the test, alcoves are mostly constituted by the
interposition of vertical plates that form 5 to 6 “chamberlets”,
whereas the interposition of horizontal plates, which increases
the compartmentalization of chambers, occurs later during test
construction (Fig. 2.2,3,5). Nevertheless, the number of al-
coves formed by the interposition of vertical plates increases
throughout the test, reaching the number of 7 to 8 for each
496
MANCIN, BASSO, PIRINI and KAMINSKI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
chamber in the last growing stages (Fig. 2.5,6). All these fea-
tures are masked from the outside by the rough test surface.
Wall microstructure
The test wall is crossed by canaliculi (“parapores” of Hot-
tinger et al. 1990, 1993) whose presence, just below the surface,
is revealed only in broken tests or where the wall has been
partly abraded (e.g. Fig. 2.1b,7; Fig. 3.1,3a). Canaliculi are
straight and radial in the inner portion of the wall but become
branching in the outer part (Fig. 3.1,2b,3a). Moreover, they are
present mostly in the upper portion of alcoves towards the ex-
ternal margin and are missing on the secondary septa (Fig. 2.9b;
Fig. 3.1,2a—b). Canaliculi do not open onto the outer wall sur-
face, because this surface is covered by an external pavement
of agglutinated grains (Fig. 3.2b,3b,4c); however, their open
entrances are clearly visible in the inner surface (Fig. 3.1).
The agglutinated grains are strongly selected in terms of
size and distribution. The largest ones (about 30—50 µm in
diameter) are arranged close to the external surface forming
a pavement, while the smallest grains are set in the inner part
of the wall (Fig. 3.2b,4b—c). Moreover, the coarse-grained
particles are embedded in an aggregate of very small detrital
granules, 3 to 5 µm in size, cemented by a calcite cement
that appears as cloudy light grey areas among the detrital
grains (Fig. 3.2c). The grain selectivity seems to persist
through the whole test.
Chemical-mineralogical characterization
The agglutinated grains are strongly selected not only in
terms of size and distribution, but also on the basis of their
mineralogical composition (Fig. 4). The external particles are
mainly composed of quartz grains (Qz), whereas the internal
ones are made of dolomite (Dol) and a minor amount of cal-
cite (Cc), as indicated by the EDX spectra (Fig. 4a,b,f). In rare
individuals the last chamber is almost totally formed by cal-
cite grains (Fig. 4g,h). All the granules are sub-angular to an-
gular in shape, and the size of quartz and carbonate grains do
not exceed 30 and 50 µm, respectively.
Elemental maps of some major elements were obtained
from a representative portion of the test, in order to observe
their distribution from the outer to inner part of the wall. Sili-
con (Si) and Magnesium (Mg) maps, the discriminating ele-
ments of quartz and dolomite respectively, provide further
evidence for the placement of different mineral grains in dif-
ferent parts of the test wall. It clearly appears that Si is con-
centrated only in the external portion of the shell, forming a
thin pavement that covers the canaliculi (Fig. 4d,l). On the
other hand, Mg is concentrated towards the inner part of the
wall (Fig. 4e,m). These features are stable during test growth,
occurring from the beginning of the shell to the last chamber.
Characteristics of foraminiferal assemblage composition
Foraminiferal assemblages are abundant, diverse, and well
preserved. They occur together with frequent remains of mol-
luscs, echinoids, bryozoans, ostracods, fish teeth and otoliths.
Toward the top of the studied section in the coarse-grained
Monte Villa Conglomerate, crushed and abraded specimens
increase in number. Foraminiferal associations are very simi-
lar in the first three samples (TOR1 to TOR3, Fig. 1) where
they are strongly dominated by benthic taxa; the plankton per-
centages range from 10 to 15 % (Fig. 5a). Toward the top of
the section (samples TOR4 to TOR6) planktonic foraminifera
slightly increase in abundance reaching values of ca. 25—30 %.
Globigerinoides (G. obliquus, G. trilobus, G. sacculifer, G.
gomitolus) is the most common planktonic genus with average
percentages of ca. 50 % in the planktonic assemblages, fol-
lowed by Globigerina (particularly G. decoraperta and G.
bulloides) and by the species Orbulina universa and Globoro-
talia puncticulata (Fig. 5i, Table 2a).
Benthic assemblages are mostly composed of calcareous
taxa, while agglutinated species usually do not exceed 10—15 %
(Fig. 5h, Table 2b); the latter slightly decrease in abundance
from bottom to top. The most frequent agglutinated species
are: Lagenammina sp., Textularia pseudorugosa, Dorothia
gibbosa and Spiroplectammina wrighti. Colominella is
present in very low abundances in samples TOR1 to TOR4,
with a maximum abundance in sample TOR3 (Table 2b).
Calcareous benthic foraminifera are particularly abundant
and well diversified throughout the entire succession, with
over 80 species recognized (Table 2b). In particular, phytal
and epifaunal taxa (Fig. 5f—g) strongly dominated the benthic
assemblages recording an Epifaunal/Infaunal ratio always
> 2, with peaks of 4 and 6 in sample TOR3, respectively for
the 425—180 and > 425 µm fractions (Fig. 5c). Shallow in-
faunal species (particularly Melonis) are frequent (Fig. 5e),
while deep-infaunal taxa (mostly Bolivina and Brizalina
genera) usually do not exceed 12 % throughout the succession
(Fig. 5d). The most abundant benthic specimens belong to the
shallow-water genera Ammonia (A. beccarii and A. inflata),
Elphidium (E. crispum, E. macellum), large Quinqueloculina
with an ornamentation composed by longitudinal costae (Q.
mediterranensis and Q. vulgaris and less abundant Q. colomi,
Q. lamarkiana, Q. disparilis) and to the species Cibicides
lobatulus, Cibicides refulgens, Asterigerinata planorbis and
Neoeponides screibersi (Fig. 5l—q, Table 2b). Other impor-
tant components of the benthic assemblage are: Lenticulina
(mostly L. calcar), Heterolepa bellincionii, Melonis affinis
and Melonis soldanii. Deep-water species (indicative of water
depths deeper than 200—400 m; Table 1), such as Cibicidoides
pseudoungerianus, Gyroidinoides neosoldanii, Oridorsalis
umbonatus and Trifarina spp., also occur but in very low
abundances (e.g. < 10 %); they slightly increase in abundance
toward the top of the section (Fig. 5b).
Discussion
The genus Colominella developed an agglutinated test that
is structurally and compositionally very complex. This
prompts the following questions: 1) what is the functional
significance of the complex structural and compositional
features of the Colominella test and 2) what kind of environ-
mental drivers are they associated with?
In the following discussion we address these questions
even if in some cases further investigations will be needed.
497
COMPOSITION, MORPHOLOGY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF COLOMINELLA POPESCU, 1998 (LIGURIA, ITALY)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
Functional morphologies
Most of the morphological features characterizing the test
of Colominella could be interpreted as a direct expression of
a strong relationship with the environment. These are: the
large free test; its aperture face, chambers internally parti-
tioned by secondary septa forming alcoves, the caniculate
test wall; the complex wall microstructure with grains selected
Fig. 4. SEM images of equatorial sections of Colominella and EDX spectra of the agglutinated grains. a—c – BSE images at different mag-
nifications; d—e – elemental maps showing the distribution of Si and Mg respectively in the portion of the Colominella test recorded in
image c; f – EDX spectra of quartz, calcite and dolomite grains; g—i – BSE images of another Colominella individual; h – EDX spec-
trum of a calcite grain; l—m – elemental maps showing the distribution of Si and Mg respectively in the portion of the Colominella test
corresponding to image l.
498
MANCIN, BASSO, PIRINI and KAMINSKI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
Fig. 5.
Characteristics
of
the
foraminiferal
assemblage
composition
rec
orded
in
the
Pliocene
Rio
Torsero
succession.
See
the
text
for
further
explanations.
499
COMPOSITION, MORPHOLOGY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF COLOMINELLA POPESCU, 1998 (LIGURIA, ITALY)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
in terms of size, distribution and composition with an exter-
nal pavement mostly made of quartz.
The large size of Colominella (ca. 3 mm in length and ca.
1.5 mm in width) could represent the first important morpho-
logical evidence of its interaction with the life environment.
Larger individuals can be considered as distinctive expression
of an environmental selection applied for longer times, as in
the case of environments characterized by stable ecological
conditions and by k-strategist relationships. Hottinger (2000)
maintained that the larger an organism, the longer its exposure
to the environment during its life time, the more important are
the functions guiding permanent morphologies that become
necessary for the individual’s survival. Moreover its aperture
face is characterized by a smoothed surface that is not a plane,
but it shows a difference of level between the penultimate and
ultimate chamber. We think that Colominella could live at-
tached to a substrate by its apertural end extruding its pseudo-
pods from the gap between the substrate and its penultimate
chamber (Fig. 2.1a). According to Hottinger (2006) as well,
this feature is indicative of an adaptation to a sessile or poorly
motile life-style, as documented by the occurrence of this kind
of aperture face in some modern textulariids that live attached
to firm substrates in the Red Sea.
Another important piece of morphological evidence is the
internal chamber subdivision into alcoves (Fig. 2). These
spaces within the test are usually utilized to compart the proto-
plasm producing marginal or lateral “quiet zones” in the proto-
plasm itself (Hottinger 2000). It is noteworthy that in numerous
modern calcareous foraminifera, similar compartments usu-
ally host algal photo-symbionts (green-house structures), even
though similar structural elements also occur in deep-sea spe-
cies (e.g. Cyclammina) living at too great a depth to host algal
symbionts. In the latter case, alcoves and alveoles have been
interpreted as functional to better facilitate gas exchange with
the exterior (Hottinger et al. 1990; Hottinger 2000). However,
in the deep-water species Cyclammina apenninica, the test
wall is never crossed by canaliculi (Plate 1: fig. 1b in Mancin
2001), on the contrary a caniculate test wall is well developed
in the studied specimens of Colominella (Fig. 3).
Agglutinated foraminiferal canaliculi (parapores) have been
compared with the test-wall pores in hyaline foraminifera
probably because they serve the same function (Murray 1994).
At present, their function is not so clear, but agglutinated
canaliculi and hyaline pores may be functional for enhancing
gas exchange, for taking and distributing organic matter inside
the test, and/or for accumulating food items in the cytoplasm
(Hottinger 2000). In hyaline foraminifera, gas exchange be-
comes very useful when they enter into endosymbiosis with
algal cells; in this case pores are also used to irradiate sym-
bionts by sunlight. For further details on endosymbiosis in
foraminifera see Lee et al. (2010 and references therein).
Canaliculi could serve for the internal diffusion of nutrients,
since modern agglutinated foraminifera lack photo-symbionts
and therefore have no requirement for the uptake of carbon di-
oxide or sunlight irradiation (Hottinger et al. 1990).
The studied specimens of Colominella also show a very
complex wall microstructure with the agglutinated grains se-
lected in terms of size and mineralogical composition. Mancin
(2001) documented in Paleogene deep-sea species of Vulvulina
and Karreriella a similar grain arrangement and a marked se-
lectivity in grain composition (e.g. albite in Vulvulina). How-
ever, those deep-sea species did not develop a caniculate test
wall, with canaliculi covered by a distinct pavement made of
quartz (Plate 3: fig. 3c in Mancin 2001). In Colominella the
test wall is mostly composed of dolomite and a minor amount
of calcite and quartz (Fig. 4). The choice of these minerals
could be simply related to their presence and/or abundance in
the sea floor. The substratum on which the Pliocene succes-
sion deposited is a dolomitic breccia, interbedded with mica-
ceous-quartzitic sandstones (Fig. 1). We believe that the grain
selection cannot be merely a matter of chance or related to the
mineral availability and abundance. Using large quartz grains
to build the external pavement, Colominella could improve its
test robustness with an increase in protective function, an ad-
aptation that would be very useful in a high energy environ-
ment or in an area with heavy predatory pressure. Because
quartz is transparent, sunlight would be transmitted across the
pavement and via canaliculi to irradiate the alcoves, above all
in shallow water where the light intensity is higher. Other
studies documented preferential grain selection in modern and
fossil agglutinated foraminifera and a strong relationship with
the environment (e.g. Heron-Allen & Earland 1909; Allen et
al. 1998; Tuckwell et al. 1999; Tyszka & Thies 2001; Armynot
du Chatelet et al. 2008; Thomsen & Rasmussen 2008; Makled
& Langer 2010; Gooday et al. 2010). However, Colominella
shows a grain selectivity in terms of arrangement within the
test wall as well as the choice of particular minerals to build
the shell, that appears to be stable during its test growth, sup-
porting the idea of genetic control on grain selection.
In the studied Pliocene specimens of Colominella, different
functional adaptations co-exist. They are the expression of
adaptive responses to persisting environmental selection, as
in the case for hosting photo-symbionts, superimposed on a
genetic basis. At least one modern agglutinated foraminiferal
genus (Reophax) is reported to perform chloroplast seque-
stration, also known as kleptoplastidy (Bernhard & Bowser
1999); that is the ability of heterotrophic organisms to pre-
serve photosynthetically active chloroplasts of algal prey
they eat and partially digest (Lee et al. 1988; Stoeker et al.
2009; Pillet et al. 2010). We hypothesize that the Pliocene
Mediterranean Colominella could have performed klepto-
plastidy or engaged in some other kind of photosymbiotic re-
lationship. To check this possibility, the paleoecological
parameters that probably affected the benthic foraminiferal
distribution in the studied succession and also influenced the
test morphology of Colominella are discussed below.
Paleoenvironmental limiting factors
The characteristics of the foraminiferal assemblages previ-
ously described (Fig. 5), enable us to gain some insight into
the paleoenvironmental conditions in the Rio Torsero area
during the Early Pliocene. These are:
1) Oligotrophic warm surface waters: these conditions
can be hypothesized considering the strong abundance in the
planktonic assemblages of the warm-water, surface dwelling
Globigerinoides, O. universa, and G. puncticulata (Hemleben
et al. 1989, 1991) throughout the entire succession. These
500
MANCIN, BASSO, PIRINI and KAMINSKI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
surface conditions seem to persist for the whole studied in-
terval. Warm surface stable conditions are also consistent
with literature data that report a warm stable climate for the
Early Pliocene Mediterranean, the so called “Pliocene cli-
mate optimum”, till about ca. 3.2 Myr (Thunnel 1979); a
time-span characterized by the development of faunas and
floras with subtropical affinities (e.g. Monegatti & Raffi
2001; Triantaphyllou et al. 2009; Marques da Silva et al.
2010; Bertini 2010; Por 2010).
2) Outer shelf environment: the strong abundance of free
and fixed mostly epiphytal taxa such as large Quinqueloculina
with longitudinal costae (Q. mediterranensis and Q. vulgaris),
E. crispum and E. macellum, A. planorbis and the fixed epi-
faunal species C. lobatulus and C. refulgens in association
with other shallow-water indexes (A. beccarii and A. inflata)
is indicative of upper neritic bathymetries as in the vegetated
inner shelf environment (Posidonia oceanica seagrass; Ta-
ble 1). However, the co-occurrence of deep-water species
(Cibicidoides pseudoungerianus, Gyroidinoides neosoldanii,
Lenticulina calcar, Oridorsalis umbonatus and Planulina
ariminens), even if with quite low abundances (Fig. 5b), is
probably indicative of a deeper bathymetry (lower neritic to
uppermost portion of the upper bathyal, ca. 100—300 m), con-
sistent with an outer continental shelf environment. The
marked abundance of upper neritic taxa is therefore interpreted
as due to their transport from shallower environments. Higher
in the studied section an increase of water depth, probably to-
ward the upper slope (below 200—300 m), is hypothesized.
An increase in both the P % and the relative abundance of
deep-water indexes is recorded in sample TOR4 (Fig. 5a—b).
Contemporaneously, a marked decrease or disappearance of
some inner-shelf indexes, as Quinqueloculina (mostly Q.
mediterranensis), A. planorbis, C. lobatulus, C. refulgens and
the large-size agglutinated foraminifera (Textularia ponde-
rosa, T. pseudorugosa, Dorothia gibbosa, Reophax spp. and
Colominella), occurred together with an increase of crushed
and abraded specimens, above all in those with the largest
sizes (Table 2b – available in the data repository). These
data indicate a rapid deepening within the upper part of the
section (Monte Villa Conglomerate). Similar paleoenviron-
mental conditions have been previously proposed by Violanti
(1987) and Bernasconi & Robba (1994 and references therein)
on the basis of both foraminifera and gastropod faunas.
3) Mainly mesotrophic conditions on the sea floor: benthic
assemblages are characterized by a very high E/I ratio and a
low percentage of deep infaunal taxa (Fig. 5c—d). Both these
proxies are commonly used as indicative of low food supplies
to the sea floor, typical of mesotrophic environments and
well-oxygenated conditions (e.g. Murray 2006; Jorissen et al.
2007). This interpretation is supported by the low abundance
in the studied samples of opportunistic benthic species, such
as buliminids and uvigerinids (Table 2b), that proliferate when
abundant organic flux reaches the sea floor (Jorissen et al.
1992, 1995) and also by the absence of typical oligotrophic
larger foraminifera (Amphistegina). These are common in oli-
gotrophic conditions of coeval shallow-water successions in
the Mediterranean area and still persist today in the Aegean
Sea and Levantine Basin (Checconi et al. 2007; Mancin et al.
2009; Triantaphyllou et al. 2009).
4) Substrate with a high terrigenous content, vegetated in
the neighbouring inner-shelf portions
: these features are sup-
ported by the high occurrence of the species Quinqueloculina
mediterranensis, Elphidium crispum and E. macellum that
usually lived in the vegetated zone and, by other shallow-wa-
ter indexes that preferred muddy to sandy substrates, such as
Ammonia and textulariids, and by the high percentage of shal-
low infaunal species, which need soft substrates (Table 1). To-
wards the top of the section, an increase of terrigenous input
could be hypothesized mostly on the basis of facies varia-
tions and also by the rapid turnover in foraminiferal assem-
blages, recording a progressive deepening toward upper slope
environments. The overlying deposits belonging to the Monte
Villa Conglomerate are characterized by redeposited sedi-
ments mostly composed of coarse-grained sediments with
abundant bioclastics intercalated with pelitic levels.
The mode of life of Colominella
The depositional environment reconstructed for the
Pliocene Rio Torsero section probably comprised the most
external portion of a warm-water continental outer shelf,
where downslope currents transported shallow-water detritus
(mostly biogenic remains and benthic foraminifera) from the
shallower inner portions. The strong abundance of transported
sediment with well preserved biogenic remains that are not
size-selected implies that the coast line was not far away, in-
dicating a narrow continental shelf similar to the present-day
shelf around the Ligurian coast. The innermost shelf was
probably vegetated, hosting a large variety of epiphytal taxa,
such as in the modern Mediterranean Posidonia sea-grass
communities (Murray 2006), but also characterized by a high
terrigenous content. In the studied assemblages, epifaunal taxa
that lived attached or encrusted to firm substrates are quite
rare, while free-living epiphytal and shallow infaunal taxa
are very abundant.
Nutrient supplies were probably low, typical of an oligo-
mesotrophic environment. This ecological parameter, together
with the occurrence of substrates with high terrigenous con-
tent and the lack of widely extended hard surfaces, probably
limited the development of Amphistegina assemblages that
frequently occurred in open oligotrophic carbonate environ-
ments in coeval Mediterranean successions (e.g. Checconi et
al. 2007).
We can conclude that Colominella was an upper neritic spe-
cies, living in the vegetated parts of the inner shelf and that it
could live attached to macrofaunal remains. It was a minor
constituent of the foraminiferal associations that usually de-
velop in environments with stable conditions (Jorissen et al.
1992; Murray 2006; Lee et al. 2010). We also speculate that it
could perform kleptoplastidy. Its attached life habitat within
the photic zone and association with epiphytal forms in an en-
vironment with mostly oligo-mesotrophic conditions to the
sea floor further implies that Colominella could have housed
functional internal symbionts within its chamber alcoves. By
analogy with Early Jurassic larger agglutinated foraminifera
from Tethyan carbonate platforms which are believed to have
harboured photosymbionts (BouDagher-Fadel 2008; p. 204),
the alcoves of Colominella could have been used for such a pur-
501
COMPOSITION, MORPHOLOGY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF COLOMINELLA POPESCU, 1998 (LIGURIA, ITALY)
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
pose. Its transparent quartz outer pavement would have allowed
sunlight to be transmitted via the canaliculi to irradiate the al-
coves, especially in shallow waters with high light intensity.
Final remarks
Pliocene specimens of Colominella develop an agglutinated
test that is more complex in comparison to those described
by Popescu et al. (1998) from the Middle Miocene of Transyl-
vania. The complexity of the agglutinated test, in terms of
both internal shape and wall microstructure and composi-
tion, is interpreted as an adaptative response to ecological lim-
iting factors that persisted for a long time, as probably
occurred during the warm Early Pliocene interval in the Medi-
terranean basin. In particular the co-occurrence of different
functional morphologies, such as: the large size, the sessile
style-life, the compartmentalized shell with a caniculate wall
and a transparent test surface, are here interpreted as adapta-
tions to perform kleptoplastidy and/or to harbour symbionts
in order to establish k-strategist relationships that usually de-
velop in stable environments such as in shallow warm waters
with a scarce food supply.
In many lineages of larger agglutinated foraminifera, the de-
velopment of complex inner structure is accompanied by a
phylogenetic size increase. The supposed ancestor of Colomi-
nella was Matanzia, which was a deep-water form that be-
came larger once it evolved a canaliculated wall structure.
The Middle Miocene type species of Colominella from Tran-
sylvania probably inhabited a deep neritic to upper bathyal
environment. If indeed our Pliocene Colominella housed
kleptoplasts, then this behavior represents a modification of
pre-existing structures.
Acknowledgments: We are grateful to Prof. L. Hottinger for
the helpful suggestions on the functional morphologies of
the studied agglutinated specimens. Prof. A. Gooday
(Southampton) and Prof J. Tyszka (Krakow) reviewed the
manuscript and are thanked for their helpful comments. This
work was presented at the International Symposium on Fora-
minifera-FORAMS 2010 (September 5—10, 2010 – Bonn)
and was financially supported by the University of Pavia
funds (FAR, or Prof. M. Cobianchi).
References
Agip S.p.a. 1982: Tertiary and Quaternary Foraminifera from the Po
Plain successions: iconographic atlas and stratigraphic distribu-
tion. AGIP MINERARIA, San Donato Milanese, Italy; 52 plates.
Allen K., Roberts S. & Murray J.W. 1998: Fractal grain distribution
in agglutinated foraminifera. Paleobiology 24, 349—358.
Andri E., Tagliamacco A., Testa M. & Marchini A. 2005: Le Malaco-
faune fossili del Rio Torsero. Nuova Editrice Genovese, Genova,
1—286.
Armynot du Chatelet E., Recourt P. & Chopin V. 2008: Mineralogy of
agglutinated benthic foraminifera; implications for paleo-environ-
mental reconstructions. Bull. Soc. Géol. France 179, 6, 583—592.
Banner F.T., Simmons M.D. & Whittaker J.E. 1991: The Mesozoic
Chrysalinidae (Foraminifera, Textulariacea) of the Middle East:
the Redmond (Aramco) taxa and their relatives. Bull. British
Mus. (Nat. Hist.), Geol. Ser. 42, 2, 101—152.
Bartholdy J., Leipe T., Frenzel P., Tauber F. & Bahlo R. 2005: High
resolution single particle analysis by scanning electron micros-
copy: a new tool to investigate the mineral composition of ag-
glutinated foraminifers. Stud. Geol. Pol. 124, 53—65.
Bernasconi M.P. & Robba E. 1984: The Pliocene Turridae from
western Liguria. I. Clavinae, Turrinae, Turriculinae, Crassispiri-
nae, Borsoniinae, Clathurellinae. Boll. Mus. Reg. Sci. Nat. Torino
2, 257—358.
Bernasconi M.P. & Robba E. 1994: Notes on some Pliocene Gastro-
pods from Rio Torsero, western Liguria, Italy. Riv. Ital. Paleont.
Stratigr. 100, 1, 71—102.
Bernhard J.M. & Bowser S.S. 1999: Benthic foraminifera of dysoxic
sediments: chloroplast sequestration and functional morphology.
Earth Sci. Rev. 46, 149—165.
Bertini A. 2010: Pliocene to Pleistocene palynoflora and vegetation
in Italy: state of the art. Quart. Int. 225, 5—24.
Bertram M.A. & Cowen J.P. 1998: Biomineralization in agglutinat-
ing foraminifera: an analytical SEM investigation of external
wall composition in three small test forms. Aquatic Geochem. 4,
455—468.
Brönnimann P. & Whittaker J.E. 1990: Revision of the Trochaminacea
and Remaneicacea of the Plymouth District, SW England, de-
scribed by Heron-Allen and Earland (1930). In: Hemleben C.,
Kaminski M.A., Kuhnt W. & Scott D.B. (Eds.): Paleoecology,
biostratigraphy, paleoceanography and taxonomy of agglutinated
foraminifera. NATO ASI Ser. C 327, 105—137.
BouDagher-Fadel M. 2008: Evolution and geographical significance
of larger benthic foraminifera. Developments in Paleontology
and Stratigraphy, 21. Elsevier, 1—540.
Checconi A., Bassi D., Passeri L. & Rettori R. 2007: Coralline red al-
gal assemblage from the Middle Pliocene shallow-water tem-
perate carbonates of the Monte Cetona (Northern Apennines,
Italy). Facies 53, 57—66.
Cimerman F. & Langer M.R. 1991: Mediterranean Foraminifera.
Slovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti, Ljubljana, 1—118,
93 pls.
Cushman J.A. 1936: New genera and species of the families Ver-
neuilinidae and Valvulinidae and of the subfamily Virgulininae.
Spec. Publ. Cushman Laboratory for Foraminiferal Res. 6, 1—71.
Dallagiovanna G. & Seno S. 1986: Geological map of the southern
sector of the Arnasco-Castelbianco Tectonic Unit (Alpi Marit-
time). Mem. Soc. Geol. Ital. 28, 441—445 (in Italian).
de Rijk S., Troelstra S.R. & Rohling E.J. 1999: Benthic foraminiferal
distribution in the Mediterranean sea. J. Foram. Res. 29, 2, 93—103.
de Stigter H.C., Jorissen F.J. & van der Zwaan G.J. 1998: Bathymetric
distribution and microhabitat partitioning of live (rose bengal
stained) benthic foraminifera along a shelf to bathyal transect in
the Southern Adriatic Sea. J. Foram. Res. 28, 1, 40—65.
Desai D. & Banner F.T. 1987: The evolution of Early Cretaceous
Dorothiinae (Foraminiferida). J. Micropaleont. 6, 13—27.
Donnici S. & Serandrei Barbero R. 2002: The benthic foraminiferal
communities of the northern Adriatic continental shelf. Mar.
Micropaleont. 44, 93—123.
Gooday A.J., Aranda da Silva A., Koho K.A., Lecroq B. & Pearce R.B.
2010: The “mica sandwich”: a remarkable new genus of Fora-
minifera (Protista, Rhizaria) from the Nazaré Canyon (Portuguese
margin, NE Atlatic). Micropaleontology 56, 3—4, 345—357.
Harzhauser M. & Kronenberg G.C. 2008: A note on Strombus coro-
natus Defrance, 1827 and Strombus coronatus Röding, 1798
(Mollusca: Gastropoda). The Veliger 50, 2, 1—9.
Hemleben C.H., Spindler M. & Anderson O.R. 1989: Modern plank-
tonic foraminifera. Springer Verlag, New York, 1—393.
Hemleben C.H., Muhlen D., Olsson R.K. & Berggren W.A. 1991:
Surface texture and first occurrence of spines in planktonic fora-
minifera from the early Tertiary. Geol. Jb. 128, 127—146.
502
MANCIN, BASSO, PIRINI and KAMINSKI
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, 2012, 63, 6, 491—502; Electronic Table 2 Edition, i
Heron-Allen E. & Earland A. 1909: On a new species of Technitella
from the North Sea, with some observations upon selective
power as exercised by certain species of arenaceous foramin-
ifera. J. Queckett Microscopical Club, Ser. 2 10, 64, 402—412.
Hottinger L. 2000: Functional morphology of benthic foraminiferal
shells, envelops of cells beyond measure. Micropaleontology
46, 1, 57—86.
Hottinger L. 2006: The “face” of benthic foraminifera. Boll. Soc. Pa-
leont. Ital. 45, 1, 75—89.
Hottinger L., Halicz E. & Reiss Z. 1990: Partitions and fistulose
chamberlets in Textulariina. In: Hemleben C., Kaminski M.A.,
Kuhnt W. & Scott D.B. (Eds.): Paleoecology, biostratigraphy,
paleoceanography and taxonomy of agglutinated foraminifera.
NATO ASI Ser. C 327, 37—49.
Hottinger L., Halicz E. & Reiss Z. 1993: Recent Foraminiferida from
the Gulf of Aquaba, Red Sea. Slovenian Academy Sciences and
Arts, Ljubljana 1—179, 230 pls.
Jorissen F.J., Barmawidjaja D.M., Puskaric S. & Van der Zwaan G.J.
1992: Vertical distribution of benthic foraminifera in the North-
ern Adriatic Sea: the relation with the organic flux. Mar. Micro-
paleont. 19, 131—146.
Jorissen F.J., de Stigter H.C. & Widmark J.G.V. 1995: A conceptual
model explaining benthic foraminiferal microhabitats. Mar. Mi-
cropaleont. 26, 3—15.
Jorissen F.J., Fontanier C. & Thomas E. 2007: Paleoceanographical
proxies based on deep-sea benthic foraminiferal assemblage
characteristics. In: Marcel C.H. & de Verna A. (Eds.): Proxies
in Late Cenozoic Paleoceanography. Volume 1 (Developments
in Marine Geology). Elsevier, 263—326.
Kaminski M.A. 2004a: The Year 2000 classification of agglutinated
foraminifera. In: Bubík M. & Kaminski M.A. (Eds.) 2004: Pro-
ceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Agglutinated
Foraminifera. Grzybowski Found. Spec. Publ. 8, 237—255.
Kaminski M.A. 2004b: The new and reinstated genera of Agglutinated
Foraminifera published between 1996 and 2000. In: Bubík M.
& Kaminski M.A. (Eds.) 2004: Proceedings of the Sixth Inter-
national Workshop on Agglutinated Foraminifera. Grzybowski
Found. Spec. Publ. 8, 257—271.
Kaminski M.A. & Cetean C.G. 2011: The systematic position of
the foraminiferal genus Cubanina Palmer, 1936 and its rela-
tionship to Colominella Popescu, 1998. Acta Paleont. Romaniae
7, 231—234.
Lee J.J., Lanners E. & Ter Kuile B. 1988: The retention of chloroplast
by the foraminifer Elphidium crispum. Symbiosis 5, 45—60.
Lee J.J., Cervasco M.H., Morales J., Billik M., Fine M. & Levy O.
2010: Symbiosis drove cellular evolution. In: Lee J.J. (Ed.): Fu-
eled by symbiosis, Foraminifera have evolved to be giant com-
plex Protists. Symbiosis
51, 13—25.
Loeblich A.R. & Tappan H. 1987: Foraminiferal Genera and their
classification. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1—970, 847 pls.
Loeblich A.R. & Tappan H. 1989: Implication of wall composition
and structure in Agglutinated Foraminifera. J. Paleontology 36,
769—777.
Makled W.A. & Langer M.R. 2010: Preferential selection of titanium-
bearing minerals in Agglutinated Foraminifera: ilmenite (FeTiO
3
)
in Textularia hauerii d’Orbigny from the Bazaruto Archipelago,
Mozambique. Rev. Micropaléont. 53, 3, 163—173.
Mancin N. 2001: Agglutinated foraminifera from the Epiligurian
Succession (middle Eocene—lower Miocene, Northern Apen-
nine, Italy): scanning electron microscopic characterization and
paleoenvironmental implications. J. Foram. Res. 31, 4, 294—308.
Mancin N., Di Giulio A. & Cobianchi M. 2009: Tectonic vs. climate
forcing in the Cenozoic sedimentary evolution of a foreland basin
(Eastern South Alpine system, Italy). Basin Res. 21, 799—823.
Marques da Silva C., Landau B., Dom
e
nech R. & Martinell J. 2010:
Pliocene Atlantic molluscan assemblages from the Mondego
Basin (portugal): age and paleoceanographic implications.
Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 285, 248—254.
Mikhalevich V. 2004: On the heterogeneity of the former Textulariina
(Foraminifera). In: Bubík M. & Kaminski M.A. (Eds.) 2004:
Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Agglutinated
Foraminifera. Grzybowski Found. Spec. Publ. 8, 317—349.
Monegatti P. & Raffi S. 2001: Taxonomic diversity and stratigraphic
distribution of Mediterranean Pliocene bivalves. Palaeogeogr.
Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 165, 171—193.
Murray J.W. 1994: The structure and functional significance of the
wall of Textularia crenata Cheng & Zheng 1978 (Foraminiferida,
Textulariina). Micropaleontology 40, 3, 267—273.
Murray J.W. 2006: Ecology and applications of benthic foraminifera.
Cambridge University Press, 1—440.
Pillet L., de Vargas C. & Pawlowski J. 2011: Molecular identification
of sequestered diatom chloroplasts and kleptoplastidy in Fora-
minifera. Protist 162, 3, 394—404.
Popescu G., Cicha I. & Rögl F. 1998: Systematic notes. In: Cicha I.,
Rögl F., Rupp C. & Čtyroká J. (Eds.): Oligocene-Miocene Fora-
minifera of the Central Paratethys. Abh. Senckenberg. Naturforsch.
Gesell. 549, 69—325.
Por F.D. 2010: Climate optimum rejuvenates the Mediterranean ma-
rine world. Integrative Zoology 5, 112—121.
Schmiedl G., de Bovée F., Buscail R., Charri
e
re B., Hemleben C.,
Medernach L. & Picon P. 2000: Trophic control of benthic fora-
miniferal abundance and microhabitat in the bathyal Gulf of Ly-
ons, western Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Micropaleont. 40, 167—188.
Solsona M. 1999: Systematics and description of the Families Ton-
nidae, Ficidae and Cassidae (Tonnoidea, Gastropoda) from the
Pliocene north-western Mediterranean. Butll. Inst. Cat. Hist. Nat.
67, 69—90 (in Spanish).
Solsona M. & Martinell J. 1999: Protoconch as a taxonomic tool in
Gastropoda systematics. Application in the Pliocene Mediterra-
nean Naticidae. Geobios 32, 3, 409—419.
Sprovieri R. 1992: Mediterranean Pliocene biochronology: an high
resolution record based on quantitative planktonic foraminiferal
distribution. Riv. Ital. Paleont. Stratigr. 98, 1, 61—100.
Stoeker D., Johnson M., Devergas C. & Not F. 2009: Acquired pho-
totrophy in aquatic protists. Aquatic Microbial Ecology 57,
279—310.
Thomsen E. & Rasmussen T.L. 2008: Coccolith-agglutinating fora-
minifera from the early Cretaceous and how they constructed
their tests. J. Foram. Res. 38, 39, 193—214.
Thunnel R.C. 1979: Climatic evolution of the Mediterranean Sea
during the last 5.0 million years. Sed. Geol. 23, 1—4, 67—79.
Triantaphyllou M.V., Koukousioura O. & Dimiza M.D. 2009: The
presence of the Indo-Pacific symbiont-bearing foraminifer Am-
phistegina lobifera in Greek coastal ecosystems (Aegean Sea,
Eastern Mediterranean). Mediterranean Mar. Sci. 10, 2, 73—85.
Tuckwell G.W., Allen K., Roberts S. & Murray J.W. 1999: Simple
models of agglutinated foraminifera test construction. J. Eu-
karyotic Microbiology 46, 3, 248—253.
Tyszka J. & Thies A. 2001: Spiroplectinata, key benthic foramin-
ifera genus for palaeoceanographic reconstruction of the Albian
lower Saxony basin. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol.
174, 199—220.
van Hinsbergen D.J., Kouwenhoven T.J. & van der Zwaan G.J. 2005:
Paleobathymetry in the backstripping procedure: correction for
oxygenation effects in depth estimates. Palaeogeogr. Palaeocli-
matol. Palaeoecol. 221, 245—265.
van Morkhoven F.P.M.C., Berggren W.A. & Edwards A.S. 1986: Cen-
ozoic cosmopolitan deep-water benthic foraminifera. Bull. Centr.
Rech. Expl. Prod. Elf-Aquitaine (Pau, France). Mem. 11, 421.
Violanti D. 1987: Paleoenvironmental and taxonomic analyses of for-
aminiferal assemblages from the Ligurian Pliocene (Rio Torsero).
Boll. Mus. Reg. Sci. Nat. Torino 5, 1, 239—293 (in Italian).
è
è
180 mm
P
la
n
k
to
n
ic
s
G
lo
b
ig
er
in
a
sp
p
.
G
lo
b
ig
er
in
a
d
ec
o
ra
p
er
ta
G
lo
b
ig
er
in
o
id
es
sp
p
.
G
lo
b
o
q
u
a
d
ri
n
a
a
lt
is
p
ir
a
G
lo
b
o
ro
ta
li
a
m
a
rg
a
ri
ta
e
G
lo
b
o
ro
ta
li
a
p
u
n
ct
ic
u
la
ta
N
eo
g
lo
b
o
q
u
a
d
ri
n
a
a
co
st
a
en
si
s
O
rb
u
li
n
a
su
tu
ra
li
s
O
rb
u
li
n
a
u
n
iv
er
sa
to
ta
l
co
u
n
t
P
%=
1
0
0
x
P
/(
P
+
B
)
SAMPLES
TOR 6
8 12 41 0 0 13 0 1
3 78
25.7
TOR 5
16 15 53 0 0 10 1 0
3 98
30.7
TOR 4
11
6 24 1 1
5 2 0
0 50
16.7
TOR 3
10
4 32 0 1
3 1 0
0 51
17
TOR 2
12
2 16 1 0
3 0 0
0 34
11.3
TOR 1
7 13 23 0 2
2 0 0
1 48
15.9
63 mm
G
lo
b
ig
er
in
a
sp
p
.
G
lo
b
ig
er
in
o
id
es
sp
p
.
G
lo
b
o
ro
ta
li
a
m
a
rg
a
ri
ta
e
G
lo
b
o
ro
ta
li
a
p
u
n
ct
ic
u
la
ta
G
lo
b
o
ro
ta
li
a
sc
it
u
la
N
eo
g
lo
b
o
q
u
a
d
ri
n
a
a
co
st
a
en
si
s
S
p
h
a
er
o
id
in
el
lo
p
si
s
sp
.
to
ta
l
co
u
n
t
P
%=
1
0
0
x
P
/(
P
+
B
)
63 2 0
6 5 13 0 89
30
55 4 0
4 4
3 0 70
23.1
31 2 1
1
1 0 36
12
28 2 1
2 1
4 0 38
12.6
36 0 0
1 3
0 0 40
13.3
29 2 2
1 2
2 1 39
13
180 mm
C
A
L
C
A
R
E
O
U
S
A
m
m
o
n
ia
b
ec
ca
ri
i
A
m
m
o
n
ia
in
fl
a
ta
A
n
o
m
a
li
n
o
id
es
h
el
ic
in
u
s
A
st
er
ig
er
in
a
ta
p
la
n
o
rb
is
B
a
g
g
in
a
g
ib
b
a
B
o
li
vi
n
a
a
p
en
n
in
ic
a
B
o
li
vi
n
a
p
u
n
ct
a
ta
B
u
li
m
in
a
co
st
a
ta
B
u
li
m
in
a
la
p
p
a
C
a
n
cr
is
a
u
ri
cu
lu
s
C
a
n
cr
is
o
b
lo
n
g
u
s
C
a
ss
id
u
li
n
a
n
eo
ca
ri
n
a
ta
C
ib
ic
id
es
lo
b
a
tu
lu
s
C
ib
ic
id
es
re
fu
lg
en
s
C
ib
ic
id
o
id
es
p
se
u
d
o
u
n
g
er
ia
n
u
s
C
ib
ic
id
o
id
es
w
u
el
le
st
o
rf
i
C
ib
ic
id
o
id
es
u
n
g
er
ia
n
u
s
C
ri
b
ro
el
p
h
id
iu
m
se
m
is
tr
ia
tu
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
a
cu
le
a
tu
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
a
d
ve
n
u
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
co
m
p
la
n
a
tu
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
cr
is
p
u
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
m
a
ce
ll
u
m
F
lo
ri
lu
s
b
o
u
ea
n
u
m
G
lo
b
o
ca
ss
id
u
li
n
a
su
b
g
lo
b
o
sa
G
lo
b
o
b
u
li
m
in
a
p
yr
u
la
G
yr
o
id
in
o
id
es
la
ev
ig
a
tu
s
G
yr
o
id
in
o
id
es
n
eo
so
ld
a
n
ii
G
u
tt
u
li
n
a
co
m
m
u
n
is
H
et
er
o
le
p
a
b
el
li
n
ci
o
n
ii
H
et
er
o
le
p
a
d
er
to
n
en
si
s
S
p
h
a
er
o
id
in
a
b
u
ll
o
id
es
TOR 6
26 22 0
5 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 4
6 13
2 0 2 3
2 0 4 22
7 12 0 3 1 2 1 15 0 1
TOR 5
30 29 0
6 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 13
3 10 1 0 0
1 0 1
7 24 18 0 0 0 5 0
8 3 1
TOR 4
6 10 0 12 1 3 1 1 3 0 0 5 26 56
0 0 0 0
8 5 0
0 26
3 2 0 0 1 0
4 0 1
TOR 3
0 24 1 17 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 40 33
0 0 0 1 13 2 2
8 13
0 0 0 0 3 0
4 0 0
TOR 2
1
9 0 13 1 3 0 0 3 0 0 4 23 66
2 0 0 3
6 0 0
0
9
0 4 0 0 6 0
6 0 2
TOR 1
2 17 0 10 6 7 0 0 0 2 0 1 23 37
3 0 0 0 11 1 2
0
9
1 0 0 0 6 0
7 1 3
H
et
er
o
le
p
a
fl
o
ri
d
a
n
a
H
o
eg
lu
n
d
in
a
el
eg
a
n
s
H
o
p
ki
n
si
n
a
b
o
n
o
n
ie
n
si
s
L
a
m
a
rk
in
a
sc
a
b
ra
L
en
ti
cu
li
n
a
in
o
rn
a
ta
L
en
ti
cu
li
n
a
ro
tu
la
ta
L
en
ti
cu
li
n
a
vo
rt
ex
M
a
rg
in
u
li
n
a
co
st
a
ta
M
el
o
n
is
a
ff
in
is
M
el
o
n
is
so
ld
a
n
ii
M
il
io
li
n
el
la
sp
p
.
N
eo
ep
o
n
id
es
sc
re
ib
er
si
O
ri
d
o
rs
a
li
s
u
m
b
o
n
a
tu
s
O
rt
h
o
m
o
rp
h
in
a
te
n
u
ic
o
st
a
ta
P
a
n
d
a
g
la
n
d
u
li
n
a
d
in
a
p
o
li
P
a
ra
ro
ta
li
a
p
a
d
a
n
a
P
la
n
u
li
n
a
a
ri
m
in
en
si
s
P
la
n
o
rb
u
li
n
a
m
ed
it
er
ra
n
en
si
s
P
le
u
ro
st
o
m
el
la
sp
.
P
ra
eg
lo
b
o
b
u
li
m
in
a
o
va
ta
P
u
ll
en
ia
b
u
ll
o
id
es
P
yr
g
o
sp
p
.
Q
u
in
q
u
el
o
cu
li
n
a
sp
p
.
R
eu
se
ll
a
sp
p
.
R
o
sa
li
n
a
g
lo
b
u
la
ri
s
S
ig
m
o
il
o
p
si
s
ce
la
ta
S
ig
m
o
il
o
p
si
s
sc
h
lu
m
b
er
g
er
i
S
ip
h
o
n
in
a
p
la
n
o
co
n
ve
xa
S
p
h
a
er
o
id
in
a
b
u
ll
o
id
es
S
p
h
a
er
o
id
in
a
d
ep
re
ss
a
S
p
ir
o
lo
cu
li
n
a
ex
ca
v
at
a
S
p
ir
o
lo
cu
li
n
a
co
m
p
la
n
at
a
S
ti
lo
st
o
m
el
la
m
o
n
il
is
T
ri
fa
ri
n
a
sp
p
.
U
v
ig
er
in
a
p
er
eg
ri
n
a
U
v
ig
er
in
a
p
y
g
m
ae
a
V
al
v
u
li
n
er
ia
co
m
p
la
n
at
a
V
al
v
u
li
n
er
ia
b
ra
d
y
an
a
V
ag
in
u
li
n
o
p
si
s
su
lc
at
a
T
o
ta
l
co
u
n
t
A
G
G
L
U
T
IN
A
T
E
D
B
ig
er
in
a
n
o
d
o
sa
ri
a
D
o
ro
th
ia
g
ib
b
o
sa
L
ag
en
am
m
in
a
sp
.
M
ar
ti
n
o
tt
ie
ll
a
co
m
m
u
n
is
S
p
ir
o
p
le
ct
am
m
in
a
w
ri
g
h
ti
T
ex
tu
la
ri
a
p
se
u
d
o
ru
g
o
sa
T
o
ta
l
co
u
n
t
C
al
.+
A
g
g
l
0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1
5
6 0 2 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 4 0
0 1 2 0
4
3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 204
3 7
4 1 0 6 21
225
0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0
1
3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 0
0 2 1 0
4
1 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0
2 1 194
1 5
2 0 9 2 19
213
0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0
7 17 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 10 2 5 2
0
1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
2 0 234
0 5
4 0 3 3 15
249
1 0 0 4 0 0 0 0
9 10 0 0 1 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 1 0 13 0 4 0
1
4 0 3 0 1 0 5 0 0 0
8 0 237
1 1
3 0 3 4 12
249
1 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 15 12 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
5 5 1 0
1
0 2 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0
9 0 224
1 5 34 0 2 1 43
267
0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 16 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 0
5 1 1 0 15 11 3 0 2 0 1 0 3 3 2
3 0 232
7 3
3 1 1 6 21
253
SAMPLES
425 mm
C
A
L
C
A
R
E
O
U
S
A
m
m
o
n
ia
b
ec
ca
ri
i
A
m
m
o
n
ia
in
fl
a
ta
A
n
o
m
a
li
n
o
id
es
o
rn
a
tu
s
A
st
er
ig
er
in
a
ta
p
la
n
o
rb
is
B
a
g
g
in
a
g
ib
b
a
C
a
n
cr
is
a
u
ri
cu
lu
s
C
ib
ic
id
es
lo
b
a
tu
lu
s
C
ib
ic
id
es
re
fu
lg
en
s
C
ib
ic
id
o
id
es
p
se
u
d
o
u
n
g
er
ia
n
u
s
C
ib
ic
id
o
id
es
sp
.
D
en
ta
li
n
a
le
g
u
m
in
if
o
rm
is
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
a
d
ve
n
u
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
cr
is
p
u
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
m
a
ce
ll
u
m
F
lo
ri
lu
s
b
o
u
ea
n
u
m
G
u
tt
u
li
n
a
co
m
m
u
n
is
H
et
er
o
le
p
a
b
el
li
n
ci
o
n
ii
H
et
er
o
le
p
a
d
er
to
n
en
si
s
H
et
er
o
le
p
a
fl
o
ri
d
a
n
a
H
o
eg
lu
n
d
in
a
el
eg
a
n
s
L
a
m
a
rk
in
a
sc
a
b
ra
L
en
ti
cu
li
n
a
ca
lc
a
r
L
en
ti
cu
li
n
a
cu
lt
ra
ta
L
en
ti
cu
li
n
a
o
rb
ic
u
la
ri
s
L
en
ti
cu
li
n
a
ro
tu
la
ta
M
a
rg
in
u
li
n
a
co
st
a
ta
M
el
o
n
is
so
ld
a
n
ii
M
il
io
li
n
el
la
sp
p
.
N
eo
ep
o
n
id
es
sc
re
ib
er
si
P
a
n
d
a
g
la
n
d
u
li
n
a
d
in
a
p
o
li
P
la
n
u
li
n
a
a
ri
m
in
en
si
s
P
ra
eg
lo
b
o
b
u
li
m
in
a
o
va
ta
P
yr
g
o
sp
p
.
Q
u
in
q
u
el
o
cu
li
n
a
sp
p
.
S
a
ra
ce
n
a
ri
a
it
a
li
ca
S
ig
m
o
il
o
p
si
s
ce
la
ta
S
ig
m
o
il
o
p
si
s
sc
h
lu
m
b
er
g
er
i
S
p
ir
o
lo
cu
li
n
a
d
ep
re
ss
a
S
p
ir
o
lo
cu
li
n
a
es
ca
va
ta
T
ri
fa
ri
n
a
b
ra
d
y
T
ri
lo
cu
li
n
a
sp
p
.
V
a
g
in
u
li
n
a
st
ri
a
ti
ss
im
a
V
a
lv
u
li
n
er
ia
b
ra
d
ya
n
a
T
o
ta
l
co
u
n
t
A
G
G
L
U
T
IN
A
T
E
D
B
ig
er
in
a
n
o
d
o
sa
ri
a
C
o
lo
m
in
el
la
sp
.
D
o
ro
th
ia
g
ib
b
o
sa
D
o
ro
th
ia
sp
.
L
a
g
en
a
m
m
in
a
sp
.
R
eo
p
h
a
x
sp
p
.
S
p
ir
o
p
le
ct
a
m
m
in
a
w
ri
g
h
ti
T
ex
tu
la
ri
a
p
o
n
d
er
o
sa
T
ex
tu
la
ri
a
p
se
u
d
o
ru
g
o
sa
T
ex
tu
la
ri
a
ro
b
u
st
a
T
o
ta
l
co
u
n
t
C
al
.+
A
g
g
l.
SAMPLES
TOR 6
26 43
3
1
2
0 13
0
0
0
2
0 123
3
3
1
7
0
0
0
2 23
0
0
6
1
1
0 12
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
199
0
0
2
0
1 1
0
0
2 0
6
205
TOR 5
31 38
0
0
1
0 12
0
0
0
0
0
97
2
2
1
6
0
0
1
1 29
1
0
8
0
0
0
9
1 10
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
259
0
0
7
0
0 1
1
0
1 1 11
270
TOR 4
2 56
1
1
3
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
79
0
0
1
7
0
0
0
1
9
0
1
4
3
2
1 13
1
5
1
1 48
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
253
0
0
6
0 16 4
0
0
1 2 29 282
TOR 3
2 39
1
1
2
0 11
1
0
0
0
1
88
1
0
2
2
1
0
0
1
4
1
0
2
1
1
2
9
2
2
0
0 72
0
1
0
2
0
0
4
0
1
257
0
2
3
0
1 4
0
0 12 4 26 283
TOR 2
4 68
5
0
2
0 13
0
0
0
0
0
57
2
0
2 10
1
0
1
1
9
2
0
7
5
1
2 24
0
4
0
0 37
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
263
0
1
1
0 14 6
0
0
2 6 30 293
TOR 1
2 54
7
0
2
2
5
0
1
2
0
0
4
2
0
0
6
0
1
0
5 13
0
0
6
7
0
1 22
0 15
0
3 70
2
4
3
3
2
0 11
0
0
255
1
3
6
1
8 5
0
4
3 0 31 286
63 mm
C
A
L
C
A
R
E
O
U
S
A
m
m
o
n
ia
in
fl
a
ta
A
m
p
h
yc
o
ri
n
a
sc
a
la
ri
s
A
n
o
m
a
li
n
o
id
es
h
el
ic
in
u
s
A
st
er
ig
er
in
a
ta
p
la
n
o
rb
is
B
a
g
g
in
a
g
ib
b
a
B
o
li
vi
n
a
a
p
en
n
in
ic
a
B
o
li
vi
n
a
ci
st
in
a
B
o
li
vi
n
a
d
il
a
ta
ta
B
o
li
vi
n
a
it
a
li
ca
B
o
li
vi
n
a
le
o
n
a
rd
i
B
o
li
vi
n
a
p
u
n
ct
a
ta
B
u
li
m
in
a
ex
il
is
B
u
li
m
in
a
la
p
p
a
C
a
ss
id
u
li
n
a
n
eo
ca
ri
n
a
ta
C
ib
ic
id
es
lo
b
a
tu
lu
s
C
ib
ic
id
es
re
fu
lg
en
s
C
ib
ic
id
o
id
es
p
se
u
d
o
u
n
g
er
ia
n
u
s
C
ri
b
ro
el
p
h
id
iu
m
se
m
is
tr
ia
tu
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
a
cu
le
a
tu
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
a
d
ve
n
u
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
co
m
p
la
n
a
tu
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
cr
is
p
u
m
E
lp
h
id
iu
m
m
a
ce
ll
u
m
F
is
su
ri
n
a
p
ir
if
o
rm
is
F
is
su
ri
n
a
sp
.
F
lo
ri
lu
s
b
o
u
ea
n
u
m
G
lo
b
o
ca
ss
id
u
li
n
a
su
b
g
lo
b
o
sa
G
yr
o
id
in
o
id
es
n
eo
so
ld
a
n
ii
H
et
er
o
le
p
a
b
el
li
n
ci
o
n
ii
L
a
g
en
a
st
ri
a
ta
L
en
ti
cu
li
n
a
sp
.
M
el
o
n
is
a
ff
in
is
M
el
o
n
is
so
ld
a
n
ii
O
o
li
n
a
sq
u
a
m
o
sa
O
ri
d
o
rs
a
li
s
u
m
b
o
n
a
tu
s
Q
u
in
q
u
el
o
cu
li
n
a
sp
.
P
le
u
ro
st
o
m
el
la
sp
.
P
u
ll
en
ia
b
u
ll
o
id
es
P
u
ll
en
ia
q
u
in
q
u
el
o
b
a
R
eu
se
ll
a
sp
p
.
R
o
sa
li
n
a
g
lo
b
u
la
ri
s
S
ig
m
o
il
o
p
si
s
sc
h
lu
m
b
er
g
er
i
S
ip
h
o
n
in
a
p
la
n
o
co
n
ve
xa
S
p
h
a
er
o
id
in
a
b
u
ll
o
id
es
T
ri
fa
ri
n
a
sp
.
U
vi
g
er
in
a
p
er
eg
ri
n
a
V
a
lv
u
li
n
er
ia
b
ra
d
ya
n
a
T
o
ta
l
co
u
n
t
A
G
G
L
U
T
IN
A
T
E
D
D
o
ro
th
ia
g
ib
b
o
sa
L
a
g
en
a
m
m
in
a
sp
.
S
p
ir
o
p
le
ct
a
m
m
in
a
w
ri
g
h
ti
T
ex
tu
la
ri
a
p
se
u
d
o
ru
g
o
sa
T
o
ta
l
co
u
n
t
C
al
.+
A
g
g
l.
TOR 6
16 1 0 23 0 6
5 0 4 0 0 0 11
4 2
48 0
7 13 0 2 0 16 0 0 5 11 2 0 2 1
3 1 0 4 0 2 0 1 10
1 0 0 0 0 0 5 206
0 0 1 0 1
207
TOR 5
33 1 0 38 0 4
5 0 0 0 2 0
3
7 9
48 3
6
6 5 0 0
7 0 0 7
6 5 2 0 0
4 1 1 5 0 0 1 0
2
7 1 0 0 4 0 5 228
0 0 0 4 4
232
TOR 4
7 0 0
9 0 5 20 0 0 0 5 9
8
3 0
93 0 11
8 0 1 0
5 2 0 2
9 3 1 0 1
7 5 0 3 5 0 0 0 13 10 1 0 2 0 0 6 254
0 0 1 8 9
263
TOR 3
6 1 0 20 1 4 13 1 0 0 0 0
6
7 9 105 0
0
9 0 0 0
3 0 0 0 19 3 0 0 0 24 2 0 1 3 0 1 0
5 10 2 0 0 1 0 3 259
0 0 0 3 3
262
TOR 2
9 0 1 15 0 8 14 1 0 0 2 0
7
1 2 119 0
4
9 0 0 0
7 0 0 2 10 4 1 0 0
5 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 13
2 0 0 0 5 0 7 252
1 5 0 2 8
260
TOR 1
2 0 0
8 0 5 22 0 1 2 0 0 12 12 5 118 0
2 10 0 1 0
2 0 1 1 16 0 1 0 0
8 7 1 4 0 0 0 0
2
0 2 1 0 1 2 7 256
0 0 0 5 5
261
SAMPLES
a
b
Table 2:
a
b
Numerical database reporting the abundances and distributions of the foraminiferal species detected in the Rio Torsero section.
— Planktonic species;
— Benthic species.
Electronic Edition of Table
—
:
2a,b
MANCINI et al. PALEOECOLOGY OF
POPESCU, 1998 (LIGURIA, ITALY)
COLOMINELLA
P
la
n
k
to
n
ic
s
SAMPLES
TOR 6
TOR 5
TOR 4
TOR 3
TOR 2
TOR 1
i