www.geologicacarpathica.sk
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, APRIL 2010, 61, 2, 121—128 doi: 10.2478/v10096-010-0005-4
Organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts as a tool to recognize
carbonate concretions: an example from Oligocene flysch
deposits of the Western Carpathians
MARCIN BARSKI and MACIEJ BOJANOWSKI
University of Warsaw, Institute of Geology, Al. Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland; marbar@uw.edu.pl; mcbojan@uw.edu.pl
(Manuscript received March 25, 2009; accepted in revised form December 11, 2009)
Abstract: Carbonate concretions found within the Krosno shales (Polish Outer Carpathians) have formerly been inter-
preted as limestone exotics. Both the concretions and the host shales yield well preserved organic-walled dinoflagellate
cysts. The dinoflagellate cyst assemblages provide valuable age-diagnostic information: they indicate a mid-Oligocene
age and prove the concretionary origin of the carbonates. Detailed analysis of relative abundance, biodiversity and
paleoecology of the dinoflagellates from concretions provides additional information on the sedimentary environment
and the model of concretion formation.
Key words: Oligocene, Western Carpathians, biostratigraphy, concretions, organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts.
Introduction
The shaly Krosno Formation of the Outer Carpathians is
abundant in carbonate rocks of various origins. Most of them
undoubtedly represent exotics (e.g. Dżułyński & Ślączka
1958; Ślączka 1961; Ślączka & Wieser 1962; Mochnacka &
Tokarski 1972; Burtan et al. 1984), especially those which
contain fauna stratigraphically different from the host rock.
Besides exotics, pelagic coccolith limestones (e.g. Haczewski
1989) and concretions (e.g. Narębski 1956; Bojanowski
2001) have been noted; these in turn should contain bios-
tratigraphic assemblages of the same age as the host rocks.
Carbonate concretions are usually rounded bodies, which
may resemble reworked limestone blocks. These two geneti-
cally distant rocks types, carbonate concretions and lime-
stone exotics, may be easily mixed up if clear diagnostic
sedimentological features are absent.
This was the case of carbonate rocks from the Krosno
shales from the Świątkowa Wielka tectonic window (Polish
Outer Carpathians) (Fig. 1). These carbonates have been re-
ported by many authors (Kozikowski 1956; Jurkiewicz &
Karnkowski 1959; Koszarski 1985; Kopciowski et al. 1997)
and regarded as limestone exotics or tectonically detached
blocks. Kopciowski et al. (1997) determined the age of the
host shales (latest Early Oligocene) on the basis of nanno-
plankton assemblages, but did not analyse the age of the car-
bonates themselves. Recently, the carbonates have been
thoroughly examined by Bojanowski (2001), who showed
that they are authigenic rocks formed by intensive methane-
induced calcite precipitation.
This paper shows that intergrated biostratigraphic and pet-
rographic analysis is an appropriate tool for distinguishing
carbonate concretions formerly regarded as limestone exot-
ics. This approach was applied to authigenic carbonates from
the Krosno Formation from Świątkowa Wielka and the re-
sults are presented here.
Fig. 1. Location of the study area (after Mastella & Rubinkiewicz
1998).
122
BARSKI and BOJANOWSKI
The microfossil assemblages examined are dominated by
organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts. Previous palynological
studies in the Outer Carpathians (Van Couvering et al. 1981;
Gedl 1999) showed a significant impoverishment of the Oli-
gocene dinoflagellate assemblages in the region. This is espe-
cially the case in the Menilite Formation, which is the
facies-isochronic equivalent of the Krosno Formation. The
few records of organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts from the
Krosno Formation (Gedl 1999) show poorly diversified as-
semblages, dominated by Deflandrea sp. Therefore, this work
was also focused on contributing to the record of organic-
walled dinoflagellate cyst assemblages from the Paleogene
rocks and on the verification of their applicability for biostrati-
graphic dating in the Outer Carpathians. Well-preserved as-
semblages were expected to be found within the concretions.
The results of the detailed analysis of the organic-walled di-
noflagellate cyst assemblages allowed not only the age deter-
mination of the succession, but also showed the characteristics
of the diagenetic conditions of concretion formation.
Geological setting
The rocks examined consist of shales of the Krosno Forma-
tion which contain various authigenic carbonates. They occur
in the Grybów Unit that crops out from beneath the Magura
Nappe in the Świątkowa Wielka tectonic window of the Outer
Western Carpathians (Fig. 1). The succession examined crops
out along Krokowy stream (Fig. 1). The thickness of the suc-
cession is difficult to determine precisely due to tectonic de-
formations. It is estimated to be between 80 and 110 m.
The Krosno shales are represented by grey to black calcare-
ous mudstones composed of two types of laminae: turbiditic
and hemipelagic. The laminated limestone is a 20-cm-thick
bed deposited mainly due to increased pelagic deposition of
coccoliths. It is composed of a series of brown and grey thin
laminae containing fish remains. The concretions are regular,
rounded bodies with diverse morphologies, but never spheri-
cal (Bojanowski 2001). The carbonate fraction of the concre-
tions constitutes 75—90 weight %, and is represented almost
exclusively by concretionary cements. Detrital material en-
closed within them is analogous to the mineralogical composi-
tion of the surrounding shales. Three types of carbonate
concretions have been distinguished:
Dolomite concretions: beige-coloured laminated concre-
tions that may coalesce to form nodular layers. The detrital
material enclosed within them is generally silt and the scarce
lamination is sometimes cut by burrows. They occur in the
lower part of the section.
Calcite concretions type A: blueish-grey concretions with
brown rims and hollow septarian cracks. The cemented detri-
tal material is predominantly silty quartz, while clay minerals
occur less frequently. These concretions occur in the middle
part of the section.
Calcite concretions type B: laminated concretions, with
brown and grey laminae. The grey laminae are similar in min-
eralogical composition to that of calcite concretions type A.
The brown laminae contain mainly clay minerals with minor
additions of clayey quartz, as well as planktonic foraminifers,
coccoliths and kerogen, whereas the grey laminae contain
more quartz than clay minerals and are devoid of bioclasts.
The lamination is parallel and only rarely shows slight deflec-
tion in the outermost parts of the concretions. Well-preserved
trace-fossils, represented by burrows filled with reworked ma-
terial from both kinds of laminae, are not uncommon. Individ-
ual concretions reveal septarian cracks which may be filled
with brown blocky calcite. These concretions occur in the up-
per part of the section.
Material and methods
The analysis is based on ten palynological samples because
of a limited number of reliable exposures within the stream
banks. Seven samples were collected directly in the outcrops
and they can be ordered in the following stratigraphic se-
quence: 1 and 2 3 and 4 5 6 7 (Fig. 2). The three
remaining samples (8, 9, 10 – calcite concretions type B)
were collected from stream rubble. These three samples most
probably come from the upper part of the section above calcite
concretions found in-situ (Fig. 2) and they could represent the
youngest deposits of the succession. Samples number 6, 8, 9
and 10 come from calcite concretions type B, sample 3 from a
calcite concretion type A, sample 1 from a dolomite concre-
tion, samples 2, 4 and 7 from the shales, and sample 5 from
the coccolith limestone bed.
Palynological samples were prepared according to the stan-
dard techniques following Poulsen et al. (1990), involving
HCl and HF treatment, sieving through a 20-µm sieve and
heavy liquid separation (ZnCl
2
). Glycerine jelly was used as a
mounting medium. Microphotographs were taken using a
Fig. 2. Geological section with samples distribution.
123
ORGANIC DINOCYSTS FROM CARBONATE CONCRETIONS (OLIGOCENE FLYSCH OF W CARPATHIANS)
Zeiss Axioskop microscope with an interference-contrast fa-
cility. England Finder coordinates are provided for all the
specimens illustrated.
All the samples yielded organic-walled dinoflagellate
cysts. As a restricted amount of samples from different rocks
types was available for palynological analysis, the di-
noflagellate cyst range chart is provided for qualitative pur-
poses only. In some cases less than 100 specimens per slide
were recovered, therefore this might have led to anomalous
quantitative values.
Generally the dinocysts have not been affected by thermal
maturation, oxidation or biological degradation. A total of 56
taxa have been recorded in this study (Figs. 3, 4; Table 1). The
earlier Paleogene species, Adnatosphaeridium multispinosum,
and Glaphyrocysta ordinata, as well as the Late Cretaceous
Chatangiella sp. and the Jurassic Tubotuberella sp. have been
reworked. A minor quantity of other palynomorphs such as
spores, pollen, acritarchs, prasinophytes and microforamini-
feral linings are present in the studied slides.
A dinoflagellate cyst zonal scheme has not yet been estab-
lished for the Paleogene succession of the Polish Outer Car-
pathians. Therefore, biostratigraphical diagnosis in the present
work had to be based on published dinocyst taxa ranges (Haq
et al. 1987; Kothe 1990; Powell 1992; Brinkhuis & Biffi
1993; Wilpshaar et al. 1996; Gedl 2000; Gradstein et al. 2004;
Williams et al. 2004). Determination of the ages of the assem-
blages recovered (Fig. 5) has been based on the co-occurrenc-
es of ranges of well-known taxa, and on comparison to
dinocyst zones (Powell 1992; Gradstein et al. 2004; Williams
et al. 2004).
Dinocyst assemblages and age assignment
Sample 1 comes from a dolomite concretion collected from
the lowermost part of the section. The dinocyst assemblage re-
covered consists of 18 species. The stratigraphically most sig-
nificant species include Deflandrea phosphoritica, Wetzeliella
gochtii and Memhranophoridium aspinatum.
Age: According to Williams et al. (2004) and Gradstein et
al. (2004), the presence of Wetzeliella gochtii indicates a range
from the lowermost Rupelian to the mid part of the Chattian
– lower part of subzone C of Zone D15 (Gradstein et al.
2004). Following Powell (1992), the first occurrence datum
(FOD) of Wetzeliella gochtii marks the base of dinocyst bio-
zone Wgo (lower Rupelian), which corresponds to the base of
the calcareous nannofossil biozone NP22. The upper bound-
ary of the assemblage depends on the interpretation of the
ranges of Deflandrea phosphoritica and Wetzeliella gochtii.
According to Powell (1992), the top of the stratigraphical
range of Wetzeliella gochtii correlates with the top of the Pcr
Zone, which corresponds to the Rupelian/Chattian boundary.
The LOD (last occurrence datum) of Deflandrea phosphoriti-
ca lies within the Hfl Zone, and coincides with the boundary
between the NP24 and NP25 nannoplankton Zones (lower
Chattian).
Sample 2 comes from the shales present in the lowermost
part of the section close to sample 1. In total, 23 species were
recognized in the sample. The following species are of strati-
graphical importance: Chiropteridium lobospinosum, Deflan-
drea phosphoritica, Chiropteridium galea, Wetzeliella
gochtii, Wetzeliella symmetrica and Thallasiphora pelagica.
Age: Considering the occurrence of Chiropteridium lobos-
pinosum, Wetzeliella symmetrica and Thallasiphora pelagica,
the stratigraphic range of the sample embraces the lower Ru-
pelian – upper part of subzone A of Zone D14 to the lower-
most Chattian – mid part of subzone B of Zone D15
(Gradstein et al. 2004).
Folloving Powell (1992), the stratigraphical range of this as-
semblage is determined by the FOD of Chiropteridium lobos-
pinosum and the LOD of Wetzeliella gochtii, which limit the
range of the assemblage to the Pcr dinoflagellate Zone, corre-
sponding to the upper Rupelian.
Sample 3 was taken from the calcite concretion type A and
yielded a very poor, low-diversity dinocyst assemblage. Only
sixteen specimens, represented by Homotriblium sp. and Thal-
lasiphora pelagica, were found.
Age: According to Gradstein et al. (2004), the LOD of the
latter species is not later than the earliest Chattian within the
upper part of subzone B of Zone D15.
Sample 4. The assemblage from this sample consists of 18
species. The biostratigraphically most significant species in-
clude Wetzeliella symmetrica, Chiropteridium lobospinosum
and Thallasiphora pelagica.
Age: The FOD of Chiropteridium lobospinosum marks the
upper part of subzone A of zone D14 within the Rupelian,
whereas the two other species terminate their occurrence with-
in the lowermost Chattian in subzone B of Zone D15 (Grad-
stein et al. 2004). According to Powell (1992), the FOD of
Chiropteridium lobospinosum defines the lower boundary of
the Pcr Zone and the LOD of Wetzeliella symmetrica corre-
lates with the base of the Hfl Biozone, which is considered to
be coeval with the top of the nannoplankton Zone NP24. This
means that the age of the sample embraces a range from the
upper part of the Rupelian to the lower part of the Chattian.
Sample 5 from the coccolith limestone yielded a poor,
low-diversity assemblage composed of Systematophora pla-
cacantha (20 specimens) and Chiropteridium lobospinosum
(5 specimens).
Age: The presence of the latter species limits the range of
the assemblage to subzone A of Zone D14 within the Rupe-
lian and to subzone C of Zone D15 of the Chattian (Gradstein
et al. 2004). According to Powell (1992), the same species
marks the Pcr, Lxa and the lower Hfl dinoflagellate biozones.
In both cases the biozones correspond to the upper Rupelian
up to the lower Chattian.
Sample 6. The assemblage recognized in sample 6 from
calcite concretion type B is composed of 9 species (54 speci-
mens). Chatangiella sp. (Late Cretaceous) is reworked.
Age: The stratigraphical range of the assemblage is deter-
mined by Chiropteridium lobospinosum, and is similar to the
range stated for sample 5.
Sample 7 was collected from the uppermost part of the sec-
tion. Only 5 taxa were recognized: Homotryblium aculeatum,
Homotryblium sp., Phelodinium sp., Rhombodinium draco,
and Wetzeliella sp. A.
Age: Rhombodinium draco marks the top of Zone D14
which corresponds to the mid part of the Rupelian (Will-
124
BARSKI and BOJANOWSKI
Fig. 3. Photographs of the selected dinoflagellate specimens from the studied samples. Sample number and English finder coordinates are giv-
en in brackets. Scale bar equivalents are presented below plates. 1 – Lingulodinium machaerophorum (Deflandre & Cookson, 1955) Wall
1967 (Sample 8/W55.1). 2 – Membranophoridium aspinatum Gerlach, 1961 (Sample 1/Y54.4). 3 – Wetzeliella gochtii Costa & Downie,
1976 (Sample 2/G28.0). 4 – Deflandrea phosphoritica Eisenack, 1938 (Sample 1/A32.4). 5 – Homotryblium abbreviatum Eaton, 1976
(Sample 4/U47.2). 6 – Adnatsphaeridium multispinosum Williams & Downie, 1966 (Sample 2/J39.4). 7 – Spiniferites pseudofurcatus
(Klumpp, 1953) Sarjeant, 1970 (Sample 4/O21.1). 8 – Chiropteridium galea (Maier, 1959) Sarjeant, 1983 (Sample 2/E33.1). 9 – Cor-
dosphaeridium cantharellus (Brosius, 1963) Gocht, 1969 (Sample 8/D42.2). 10 – Wetzeliella symmetrica Weiler, 1956 (Sample 4/H69.0).
11 – Homotryblium aculeatum Williams, 1978 (Sample 9/F67.0). 12 – Lejeunecysta sp. Artzner & Dörhöfer, 1978, (Sample 2/F18.4).
13 – Palaeocystodinium golzowense Alberti, 1961 (Sample 2/U41.4). 14 – Tasmanites sp. (Newton, 1875) Wilson & Bentall, 1944 (Sam-
ple 8/J49.0). 15 – Rhombodinium sp. B of Gedl (2000) (Sample 1/W51.4). 16 – Areoligera senonensis Lejeune-Carpentier, 1938 (Sam-
ple 1/V20.2). 17 – Distatodinium paradoxum (Brosius, 1963) Eaton, 1976 (Sample 8/C53.4). 18 – Cordosphaeridium inodes (10/D27.1).
19 – Hystrichokolpoma rigaudiae (10/B47.4). 20 – Dapsilidinium pseudocolligerum (Stover, 1977) Bujak et al., 1980 (Sample 4/P59.3).
21 – Wetzeliella sp. B of Gedl (2000) (10/J54.1). 22 – Cribroperidinium sp. Neale & Sarjeant, 1962 (Sample 8/W49.1). 23 – Distatodinium
ellipticum (Cookson, 1965) Eaton, 1976 (Sample 10/F38.0). 24 – Glaphyrocysta exuberans (Deflandre & Cookson, 1955) Stover & Evitt,
1978 (Sample 1/U18.2). 25 – Cleistosphaeridium placacanthum (Deflandre & Cookson, 1955) Eaton et al., 2001 (Sample 2/T17.3).
125
ORGANIC DINOCYSTS FROM CARBONATE CONCRETIONS (OLIGOCENE FLYSCH OF W CARPATHIANS)
iams et al. 2004; Gradstein et al.
2004).
Samples 8, 9 and 10 representing
calcite concretion type B were col-
lected from stream rubble.
Sample 8 yielded a rich, high-di-
versity assemblage. A total of 20 spe-
cies were recognized, with all but one
characteristic of the Oligocene; only
Adnatsphaeridium multispinosum is a
reworked Late Eocene species.
Age: The most precise stratigraphic
interval represented by the sample is
based on the occurrence of two spe-
cies: Chiropteridium galea and Chi-
ropteridium lobospinosum. According
to Gradstein et al. (2004), the latter
species indicates a stratigraphic inter-
val in the range between subzone A of
Zone D14 within the Rupelian and
subzone C of Zone D15 of the Chatti-
an. Chiropteridium galea confirms
this interval, although this species fi-
nally disappears within the uppermost
Chattian.
Sample 9 yielded the highest di-
versity assemblage, with 27 species
recognized. However, only a few of
them have biostratigraphical impor-
tance: Chiropteridium lobospinosum,
Deflandrea phosphoritica, Chiropte-
ridium galea, Thallasiphora pelagica,
and Memhranophoridium aspinatum.
Age: Considering the presence of
Chiropteridium lobospinosum and
Thallasiphora pelagica, the narrowest
stratigraphic range of the sample em-
braces the lower Rupelian – upper
part of subzone A of Zone D14 to the
lowermost Chattian – mid part of
subzone B of Zone D15 (Gradstein et
al. 2004). Other species listed above
more or less confirm this interval.
Sample 10. Among the 11 species
of sample 10, only a few have strati-
graphical significance. They include
Chiropteridium galea, Chiropteridi-
um lobospinosum, Deflandrea phos-
phoritica, and Memhranophoridium
aspinatum.
Age: As in sample 9, the occur-
rence of Chiropteridium lobospino-
sum and Thallasiphora pelagica
suggest a stratigraphic range between
the lower Rupelian – upper part of
subzone A of Zone D14 and the low-
ermost Chattian – mid part of
subzone B of Zone D15 (Gradstein et
al. 2004).
SAMPLE NR
TAXON
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Apectodinium sp.
0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Areoligera senonensis
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
Areoligera sentosa
7 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
11 0
Caligodinium sp. A of Gedl (2000)
0 0 0 7 0 4 0 0 5 0
Charlesdowniea sp.
0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chiropteridium galea
0
20 0 0 0 0 0
15
12
26
Chiropteridium lobospinosum
0
10 0 5 5 6 0
14
14
22
Cleistosphaeridium placacanthum
0
21 0 0
20 0 0
25
23 5
Cordosphaeridium cantharellus
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 6 0
Cordosphaeridium inodes
5 0 0 6 0 0 0
14 0 0
Cribroperidinium sp.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
Dapsilidinium pseudocolligerum
0 0 0
14 0 0 0
10 0 0
Dapsilidinium sp.
0
15 0 0 0 0 0
10 0 0
Deflandrea phosphoritica
30
21 0
20 0 0 0 5
110
19
Distatodinium ellipticum
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0
Distatodinium paradoxum
0 6 0 0 0 5 0
41 7 5
Dracodinium laszczynskii
0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Enneadocysta pectiniformis
0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0
Glaphyrocysta exuberans
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
11 0
Glaphyrocysta pastielsi
0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0
Glaphyrocysta sp.
0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0
Homotryblium abbreviatum
0 5 0
11 0 0 0 0 6 0
Homotryblium aculeatum
0
11 0 0 0 0 5 0
36 6
Homotryblium sp.
5
11 6 5 0 0 4 0 0 0
Homotryblium tenuispinosum
12 0 0 5 0 5 0 0
21 0
Hystrichokolpoma rigaudiae
0 5 0 0 0 0 0
20 7 0
Impletosphaeridium sp.
4
25 0
10 0 3 0
14
15
15
Lejeunecysta sp.
6
24 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0
Lejeunecysta sp. A of Gedl (2000)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Lingulodinium machaerophorum
5 0 0 0 0 0 0
25
11
65
Membranophoridium aspinatum
18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5
Nematosphaeropsis lativittata
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Nematosphaeropsis labyrinthus
0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0
Operculodinium sp.
0
30 0 5 0 0 0 5 5 0
Operculodinium uncinispinosum
0
11 0
14 0 0 0 0 0 0
Paleocystodinium golzowense
0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Phelodinium sp.
0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0
Polysphaeridium sp.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
20 0 0
Polysphaeridium subtile
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Reticulatosphaera actinocoronata
0 5 0 0 0 6 0 0 4 0
Rhombodinium draco
0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0
Rhombodinium sp. B of Gedl (2000)
6 0 0 0 0
11 0 0 0 0
Spiniferites pseudofurcatus
0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0
Spiniferites ramosus
5
45 0 5 0 0 0
115
36
33
Systematophora sp.
5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thallasiphora pelagica
0 5
10
22 0 0 0 0
11 0
Vozzhennikovia sp.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Wetzeliella gochtii
5
17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wetzeliella sp. A of Gedl (2000)
0 0 0 0 0 0 7 5 0 0
Wetzeliella sp. B of Gedl (2000)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 0 0
Wetzeliella symmetrica
0 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ynezidinium cf. brevisulcatum
6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dinocyst sp. A
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adnatsphaeridium multispinosum*
0 4 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
Chatangiella* sp.
0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0
Glaphyrocysta ordinata*
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tubotuberalla sp. (J)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0
Foraminiferal
test
linings
0
12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tasmanites sp.
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 0
12
TOTAL/SPECIMEN
139 327 16 154 25 52 27 395 398 217
DIVERSITY
17 23 2 18 2 9 5 20 27 11
Table 1: Semi-quantitative distribution of the dinoflagellate cysts in studied samples.
126
BARSKI and BOJANOWSKI
Fig. 4. Photographs of the selected dinoflagellate specimens from the studied samples. Sample number and English finder coordinates are giv-
en in brackets. Scale bar equivalents are presented below plates. 1 – Spiniferites ramosus (Ehrenberg, 1838) Mantell, 1854 (Sample 8/U36.0).
2 – Lejeunecysta sp. A of Gedl (2000) (Sample 9/F18.4). 3 – Polysphaeridium subtile (7/Y29.4). 4 – Rhombodinium draco Gocht, 1955
(Sample 7/G59.0). 5 – Phelodinium sp. (3/K26.0). 6 – Thallasiphora pelagica (7/O51.1). 7 – Glaphyrocysta pastielsii (Deflandre &
Cookson, 1955) Stover & Evitt, 1978 (Sample 2/G37.2). 8 – Nematosphaeropsis lativittata Wrenn, 1988 (Sample 9/M15.4). 9 – Nemato-
sphaeropsis labyrinthus (Ostenfeld, 1903) Reid, 1974 (Sample 2/U45.0). 10 – Vozzhennikovia sp. Lentin & Williams, 1976 (Sample
9/M26.0). 11 – Caligodinium sp. A of Gedl (2000) (7/M40.0). 12 – Reticulatosphaera actinocoronata (Benedek, 1972) Bujak & Matsuoka,
1986 (Sample 6/B50.4). 13 – Areoligera sentosa Eaton, 1976 (Sample 9/C47.1). 14 – Chiropteridium lobospinosum Gocht, 1960 (Sample
8/P26.0). 15 – Foraminiferal test linings (5/54.4). 16 – Wetzeliella sp. A of Gedl (2000) (10/K55.3). 17 – Operculodinium uncinispinosum
(de Coninck, 1969) Islam, 1983 (Sample 4/U18.0). 18 – Impletosphaeridium sp. Morgenroth, 1966 (Sample 2/E46.0). 19 – Ynezidinium cf.
brevisulcatum Michoux, 1985 (Sample 1/D64.0). 20 – Homotryblium tenuispinosum Davey & Williams, 1966 (Sample 9/N23.1). 21 – Dino-
cyst sp. A (Sample 1/U47.0). 22 – Charlesdowniea sp. Lentin & Vozzhennikova, 1989 (Sample 4/E51.3). 23 – Apectodinium sp. (Costa &
Downie, 1976) Lentin & Williams, 1977 (Sample 2/T24.4).
127
ORGANIC DINOCYSTS FROM CARBONATE CONCRETIONS (OLIGOCENE FLYSCH OF W CARPATHIANS)
On the basis of the FOD Chiropteridium lobospinosum and
LOD of Deflandrea phosphoritica, the assemblage ranges be-
tween the base of the Pcr Biozone and the lower part of the Hfl
Biozone, corresponding to the top of Nannoplankton Biozone
NP24 (Powell 1992).
Considering the superposition of samples 1 to 7 collected
from the section, further detailed age assignment may be sug-
gested as shown by the grey block on the range chart (Fig. 5).
The stratigraphic position of the uppermost sample 7 compris-
ing the index species Rhombodinium draco delimits the upper
rages of all samples to the mid part of the Rupelian – top of
Zone D14 (Gradstein et al. 2004). Sample 2 delimits all lower
ranges of the samples to the uppermost part of subzone A of
Zone D14. The stratigraphic range of the lowermost sample
begins within the mid part of subzone A of Zone D14. The
ages of the samples collected from stream boulders must be
assigned individually (Fig. 5).
Sedimentary environment and concretion formation
All the samples contain mixed dinoflagellate cyst assem-
blages comprising off-shore and near-shore taxa. They contain
near-shore derived genera such as Deflandrea and Homotribli-
um, as well as off-shore genera represented by Spiniferites,
Systematophora, Nematosphaeropsis and Hystrichokolpoma
(Köthe 1990; Brinkhuis 1994; Pross & Brinkhuis 2005; Sluijs
et al. 2005). The recognized mixing suggests the redeposition-
al character of the studied deposits, probably executed by tur-
bidity flows widely described from this area (Dżułyński &
Ślączka 1958; Ślączka 1961; Ślączka & Wieser 1962; Moch-
nacka & Tokarski 1972). Redeposition events are also con-
firmed by the striking predominance of Deflandrea
phosphoritica in sample 9 confirming an influx of proximal
sediments into the deeper part of the basin as well as by the re-
worked dinocysts present in samples 1, 2, 6, 8 comprising Ju-
rassic and Early Eocene taxa (Table 1).
The striking preservation of the dinoflagellate cysts in the
concretions, in contrast to their significant flattening in the
surrounding shales, implies that the concretions grew during
early diagenesis, before significant compaction took place.
Fast lithification of the concretionary carbonate cements led to
the formation of a compaction-resistant framework which act-
ed as a shelter for the microfossils.
It seems that the great impoverishment of dinoflagellate cyst
assemblages and absence of other microfossils in calcite con-
cretions of type A stems from the fact that they contain much
coarser detrital material than the other carbonate concretions.
This suggests that the microfossils are more abundant within
the finer material, which is of hemipelagic origin, and in the
upper parts of turbiditic laminae. Therefore, it is concluded
that all the calcite concretions formed in a similar way, but
within different intervals of the section: precipitation of authi-
genic calcite within turbiditic material led to the formation of
“pure” concretions (type A), whereas laminated concretions
(type B) originated in places where the turbiditic material was
intercalated with hemipelagic laminae rich in microfossils.
The brown laminae from type B calcite concretions represent
the hemipelagic material cemented by authigenic calcite.
Systematic notes
Dinocyst sp. A (Fig. 4.21)
Material: Three specimens of this species were found in
sample 1 (Table 1).
Description: Height of elongated central body is about
100 µm, and width does not exceed 60 µm. Short processes
are solid, foliating towards the ends. Archeopyle type is apical
with adnate operculum. Paratabulation formula is not evident
besides archeopyle suture.
Occurrence in the studied material: Described species
was noted from the lowermost sample (Sample 1) of the stud-
ied section. According to ranges of co-occurring species its
stratigraphical distribution is from the lower Rupelian to the
lower Chattian.
Conclusions
Biostratigraphic analysis of the dinoflagellate cysts from
the studied carbonate rocks and the Krosno shales of the Gry-
Fig. 5. Stratigraphic ranges of the samples in stratigraphic order
from the lowermost (sample 1) to the uppermost in the section
(sample 7). Dinoflagellate biozones from Powell (1992).
128
BARSKI and BOJANOWSKI
bów Unit, which crop out from beneath the Magura Nappe in
the Świątkowa Wielka tectonic window of the Outer Western
Carpathians, precludes an exotic origin of the carbonate bod-
ies. They are concretions which formed in situ within the sedi-
ment by authigenic precipitation of carbonate cements during
early diagenesis (Bojanowski 2001, 2004). This conclusion is
supported here by the preservation state and compression ratio
of the organic cyst bodies.
The dinoflagellate cyst assemblages from both the host
shales and the concretions indicate an Oligocene age.
The dinoflagellate cysts appear to be more abundant with-
in the finer material, which is of hemipelagic origin, and in the
upper parts of turbiditic laminae. This is the reason for the im-
poverishment of dinoflagellates and other microfossils ob-
served in “pure” calcite concretions (type A) when compared
to their great abundance in the laminated calcite concretions
(type B). This suggests that type A calcite concretions were
formed by cementation of turbiditic material, whereas type B
calcite concretions grew within turbiditic material intercalated
by hemipelagic laminae.
References
Bojanowski M. 2001: Growth mechanism and burial conditions of
calcite concretions from the Krosno shales, Polish Outer Car-
pathians: structural observations. Mineral. Soc. Pol. Spec. Pap.
18, 15—24.
Brinkhuis H. & Biffi U. 1993: Dinofagellate cyst stratigraphy of the
Eocene/Oligocene transition in central Italy. Mar. Micropaleon-
tology 22, 131—183.
Brinkhuis H. 1994: Late Eocene to Early Oligocene dinoflagellate
cysts from the Priabonian type-area (Northeast Italy); biostratig-
raphy and palaeoenvironmental interpretation. Palaeogeogr.
Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 107, 121—163.
Burtan J., Chowaniec J. & Golonka J. 1984: Preliminary results of
studies on exotic carbonate rocks in the western part of the Pol-
ish flysch Carpathians. Biul. Inst. Geol. 346, 146—159 (in Polish,
summary in English).
Dżułyński S. & Ślączka A. 1958: Depositional structures and sedimen-
tation of the Krosno Beds. Ann. Soc. Geol. Pol. 28, 205—260.
Gedl P. 1999: Palynology of the Eocene-Oligocene boundary in the
Polish Flysch Carpathians. Geol. Rev. 47, 394—399.
Gedl P. 2000: Biostratigraphy and palaeoenvironment of the Podhale
Palaeogene (Inner Carpathians, Poland) in the light of palyno-
logical studies. Stud. Geol. Pol. 117, 69—154.
Gradstein F.M., Ogg J.G. & Smith A.G. 2004: Geologic time scale
(Neogene—Late Oligocene). Cambridge University Press, 1—589.
Haczewski G. 1989: Coccolith limestone horizons in the Menilite-
Krosno Series (Oligocene, Carpathians): identification, correla-
tion, and origin. Ann. Soc. Geol. Pol. 59, 3—4, 435—523 (in Polish).
Haq B.U., Hardenbol J. & Vail P.R. 1987: Chronology of fluctuating
sea levels since the Triassic. Science 235, 1156—1167.
Jurkiewicz H. & Karnkowski P. 1959: Age of Inoceramus beds in the
Magura nappe in the viccinity of Gorlice. Acta Geol. Pol. 9, 1,
17—54 (in Polish, summary in English).
Kopciowski R., Zimnal Z. & Jankowski L. 1997: Explanations to De-
tailed Geological Map of Poland, scale 1 : 50,000; Osiek Sheet.
Centr. Geol. Arch. of Pol. Geol. Inst., Warsaw (in Polish).
Koszarski L. 1985: Geology of the middle Carpathians and the Car-
pathian Foredeep. In: Carpatho-Balkan Geological Association
XIII Congress. Guide to Exc. 3, Cracow, Poland, 16—39.
Köthe A. 1990: Paleogene dinoflagellates from Northwest Germany:
biostratigraphy and paleoenvironment. Geol. Jb., Reihe A 118,
1—111.
Kozikowski H. 1956: Ropa-Pisarzowa unit, a new tectonic unit of the
Polish flysch Carpathians. Biul. Inst. Geol. 110, 1, 1—12 (in Pol-
ish, summary in English).
Mastella L. & Rubinkiewicz J. 1998: Duplex structures within the
Świątkowa Wielka tectonic window (Beskid Niski Mts., West-
ern Carpathians, Poland): structural analysis and photointerpre-
tation. Geol. Quart. 42, 173—182.
Mochnacka K. & Tokarski A. 1972: A new occurrence of exotic
blocks in the Krosno Beds near Ustrzyki Górne (Bieszczady
Range, Polish Eastern Carpathians). Ann. Soc. Geol. Pol. 42,
229—238 (in Polish, summary in English).
Narębski W. 1956: About ferrous dolomites of Polish Flysh Car-
pathians. Ann.Soc. Geol. Pol. 26, 1, 29-50 (in Polish).
Poulsen N.E., Gudmundsson L., Hansen J.M. & Husfeldt Y. 1990: Pa-
lynological preparation techniques, a new macerationtank-method
and other modifications. Geol. Surv. Denmark Ser. 10, 1—22.
Powell A.J. 1992: Dinoflagellate cysts of the Tertiary System. In:
Powell A.J. (Ed.): A stratigraphic index of Dinoflagellate Cysts.
Chapman & Hall, London, 155—252.
Pross J. & Brinkhuis H. 2005: Organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts as
paleoenvironmental indicators in the Paleogene; a synopsis of
concepts. Paläont. Z. 79, 1, 53—59.
Ślączka A. 1961: Exotic-bearing shale from Bukowiec (Polish East-
ern Carpathians). Ann. Soc. Geol. Pol. 31, 1, 129—143 (in Polish,
summary in English).
Ślaczka A. & Wieser T. 1962: Shales with exotics in the Krosno
Beds of the Baligród region. Geol. Quart. 6, 4, 662—678 (in
Polish).
Sluijsa A., Pross J. & Brinkhuis H. 2005: From greenhouse to ice-
house; organic-walled dinoflagellate cysts as paleoenvironmen-
tal indicators in the Paleogene. Earth Sci. Rev. 68, 281—315.
Van Couvering J.A., Aubry M.P., Berggren W.A., Bujak J.P., Naeser
C.W. & Wiese T. 1981: The terminal Eocene event and Polish
connection. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 36,
321—362.
Williams G.L., Brinkhuis H., Pearce M.A., Fensome R.A. & Wee-
gink J.W. 2004: Southern Ocean and global dinoflagellate cyst
events compared: Index events for the Late Cretaceous—Neo-
gene. In: Exon N.F., Kennett J.P. & Malone M.J. (Eds.): Pro-
ceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results, 189,
Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, TX, 1—98.
Wilpshaar M., Santarelli A., Brinkhuis H. & Visscher H. 1996: Di-
noflagellate cysts and Mid Oligocene chronostratigraphy in the
central Mediterranean region. J. Geol. Soc. London 153, 553—561.