www.geologicacarpathica.sk
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, DECEMBER 2009, 60, 6, 519—533 doi: 10.2478/v10096-009-0038-8
Introduction
The České středohoří Volcanic Complex (CSVC) is a classi-
cal area where volcanic rocks have been studied for at least
200 years. Nevertheless, its magmatic and eruptive history
has not been completely reconstructed yet. The post-
Variscan, intra-plate alkaline volcanism in the Bohemian
Massif dates from the Late Cretaceous to Quaternary. It rep-
resents the easternmost extension of the Central European
Volcanic Province (sensu Wilson & Downes 1991), devel-
oped in the northern foreland of the Alps. Two main volca-
nic complexes, the Doupovské hory Mts and the České
středohoří Mts, dominate the Ohře (Eger) Graben (OG) in
northwestern Bohemia (Fig. 1a), where the principal volca-
nic activity initiated in the latest Eocene and continued until
the Early Miocene. Basaltic lavas and concomitant volcani-
clastics (generated predominantly by auto- or hyaloclastesis
– Cajz 2000) represent superficial products of both volcanic
complexes. This volcanic period was followed by a major
sedimentation period, filling the Most Basin between the
České středohoří Mts and the Doupovské hory Mts volcanic
complexes (e.g. Malkovský 1987; Rajchl et al. 2008). After
the main sedimentation period (including coal deposition),
the volcanic activity was reactivated, not only in the CSVC,
with a much lower intensity.
Late Miocene volcanic activity in the České středohoří
Mountains (Ohře/Eger Graben, northern Bohemia)
VLADIMÍR CAJZ
1,2
, VLADISLAV RAPPRICH
3,4
, VOJTĚCH ERBAN
3
, ZOLTAN PÉCSKAY
5
and MIROSLAV RADOŇ
6
1
Institute of Geology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojová 269, 165 02 Prague, Czech Republic; cajz@gli.cas.cz
2
Faculty of Science, J.E. Purkyně University, České mládeže 8, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic
3
Czech Geological Survey, Klárov 3, 118 21 Prague, Czech Republic; vladislav.rapprich@geology.cz; vojtech.erban@geology.cz
4
Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 6, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic
5
Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Bem tér 18/C, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary;
pecskay@namafia.atomki.hu
6
Regional Museum Teplice, Zámecké nám. 14, 415 13 Teplice, Czech Republic; rmtep@seznam.cz
(Manuscript received April 8, 2008; accepted in revised form June 25, 2009)
Abstract: First occurrences of superficial bodies of Late Miocene volcanic activity were found in the western part of the
České středohoří Volcanic Complex (CSVC) and extended our knowledge of its volcanostratigraphy. Their K-Ar ages
(9.59, 9.61 and 11.36 Ma) correspond to the age of alkaline basaltic rocks of the youngest known Intrusive Suite of this
area. Unlike the previously known subvolcanic bodies of this system, the newly observed bodies are represented by super-
ficial products: two scoria cones with remnants of lava flows and one exclusive lava flow produced from a lava cone. The
magmas forming all three occurrences are basanitic. Their primitive chemical composition Sr (0.70347—0.70361) and Nd
(0.51279—0.51284) isotope ratios are similar to the products of the first and third volcanic formation of the CSVC. The
proved existence of superficial products of the youngest volcanic formation, together with clear superposition relations
to sedimentary formations and the chemical character of the youngest magmas in the central part of the Ohře (Eger)
Graben support the stratigraphic scheme of volcanic activity in the České středohoří Mts. The eruptive style of the
youngest formation volcanoes was purely magmatic (Strombolian) with no phreatic influence.
Key words: Upper Miocene, České středohoří, Štrbice Formation, volcanostratigraphy, geochemistry, K-Ar dating,
cinder cone, basanite.
The lithostratigraphic subdivision of superficial volcanic
products of the CSVC has been proposed by Cajz (2000).
Based on detailed fieldwork, it reflects superposition of lithos-
tratigraphic units differing in their volcanology and petrogra-
phy. This lithostratigraphic scheme is also supported by
bulk-rock geochemistry and Sr/Nd isotopic composition of la-
vas (Cajz et al. 1999; Ulrych et al. 2001). The following four
units were defined: (1) Ústí Formation, represented by olivine
foidites—basanites; (2) Děčín Formation, formed mainly by
tephrites and trachybasalts; (3) Dobrná Formation, represented
again by effusions of olivine foidites—basanites; and (4) basa-
nitic Štrbice Formation.
The Upper Miocene Štrbice Formation thus represents the
youngest lithostratigraphic unit of the CSVC. Volcanic activi-
ty was restored after a period of magmatic quiescence, and the
basaltic magmas of the Štrbice Formation penetrated Miocene
sediments of the Most Basin. The age of the Štrbice Formation
was deduced from its geological position and later supported
by K-Ar radiometric dating (Shrbený & Vokurka 1985; Cajz
et al. 1999). Despite the thorough documentation (Cajz 2000),
this formation has not been accepted by some authors (e.g.
Kukal in Šalanský 2004), as no corresponding superficial
products were known. Volcanic bodies of this late magmatic
activity are scarce and small in scale, their superficial products
have mostly been destroyed by erosion, and the pertinence of
520
CAJZ, RAPPRICH, ERBAN, PÉCSKAY and RADOŇ
Fig. 1. a – Location of the České středohoří Volcanic Complex (CSVC) in the Ohře (Eger) Graben, NW Bohemia. Volcanic complexes and
solitary bodies marked in black. b – The studied sites and their position in the CSVC: 1 – Ostrý, 2 – Hradiš ko, 3 – Úžín, 4 – Křemýž,
5 – Štrbice-Světec feeder-and-sill system.
521
LATE MIOCENE VOLCANIC ACTIVITY IN THE ČESKÉ STŘEDOHOŘÍ
MOUNTAINS (NORTHERN BOHEMIA)
the below described relics to the youngest volcanic activity of
the region has not been recognized before. Our paper has an
ambition to fill this gap because these latest volcanics are im-
portant for the late tectonomagmatic evolution of the central
part of the OG.
This study aimed at detailed description of volcanic prod-
ucts and their relations to ambient rocks, petrology, bulk-rock
(incl. trace and rare earth elements) and mineral chemistry,
isotopic composition and K-Ar radiometric dating.
Analytical methods
Bulk-rock analyses of the major oxides and selected trace
elements (Cr, Ni, Cu and Zn) were performed in the labs of the
Czech Geological Survey by combination of titration, FAAS,
photometry, coulometry and X-ray fluorescence. The larger
set of trace elements (including REE) were analysed in the Ac-
tivation Laboratories Ltd., Ancaster, Canada, using lithium
metaborate/tetraborate fusion and Inductively Coupled Plasma
Mass Spectrometer detection.
For the isotope study, samples were dissolved using a com-
bined HF-HCl-HNO
3
attack. Strontium was isolated by exchange
chromatography techniques using Sr.spec Eichrom resin, Nd
with TRU.spec and Ln.spec Eichrom resins. Isotopic analyses
were performed on a Finnigan MAT 262 Thermal Ionization
Mass Spectrometer in a dynamic mode using a double Re fila-
ment assembly. The
143
Nd/
144
Nd ratios were corrected for
mass fractionation to
146
Nd/
144
Nd = 0.7219,
87
Sr/
86
Sr ratios as-
suming
86
Sr/
88
Sr = 0.1194. External reproducibility was set by
repeated analyses of the La Jolla (
143
Nd/
144
Nd = 0.511852 ± 14
(2
σ; n=23)) and NBS 987 (
87
Sr/
86
Sr = 0.710247 ± 26 (2
σ;
n = 25)) isotopic reference materials. For further details see
Míková & Denková (2007).
The K-Ar age determinations were made on bulk-rock sam-
ples, the same powders having been used for potassium deter-
mination. Potassium was determined by flame photometry
using a CORNING 480 machine, sample solutions being
bracketed by standards. Argon was extracted by fusion under
vacuum conditions, with pure
38
Ar added as a “spike”. The
isotopic ratios were measured on a 15 cm radius magnetic sec-
tor-type mass spectrometer under static mode, built in Debre-
cen, Hungary. Details of the instruments, the applied methods
and results of calibration have been published by Balogh
(1985) and others. The atomic constants suggested by Steiger
& Jäger (1977) were used for the calculation of ages. The ana-
lytical errors are quoted for the 68% confidence level (one
standard deviation).
The analyses of rock-forming minerals were performed us-
ing a CAMECA SX-100 electron microprobe. They were car-
ried out in wavelength dispersive spectrometers with beam
diameter of 2 µm and accelerating potential of 15 kV. A beam
current of 10 nA was measured on a Faraday cup. Counting
time 10 s was used for all elements. The standards used were:
SiO
2
[Si K
α], Al
2
O
3
[Al K
α], diopside [Ca Kα], Fe
2
O
3
[Fe
K
α], barite [Ba Lα] and [S Kα], celestite [Sr Lα]. Data were
reduced using the X-PHI correction.
Geochemical calculations and visualization of analytical data
were performed using GCDkit software (Janoušek et al. 2006).
Geological setting
The youngest volcanic activity of the CSVC, postdating the
Miocene lacustrine sedimentation, was first described by Peli-
kan (1895) from a lignite mine N of Bílina. Since then, several
bodies in subvolcanic position have been discovered during
lignite exploration and exploitation (e.g. Brus & Hurník
1984).
A system of intrusions in Miocene sediments was described
by Macák (1963) from drill cores in an erosional relict of the
Most Basin near Křemýž (Fig. 1b). Unfortunately, no cores
were archived from these drillings, thus no material is avail-
able for detailed petrological and radiometric examinations.
An Upper Miocene feeder-and-sill system is known from the
wider area (about 6 km
2
) around Štrbice and Světec villages
with the central conduit at Pohradická hora Hill (13.0 ± 1.1 Ma
in Cajz et al. 1999). Several sills have been reported from
abandoned and reclaimed coal pits at Světecká výšina Hill and
in the Štrbice sandpit (12.0 Ma in Shrbený & Vokurka 1985;
9.0 Ma in Kopecký 1987—1988; neither of these ages give
analytical errors). A new detailed survey showed other sills
and a possible parasitic dyke-modified vent of Hůrka Hill
between Štrbice and Kostomlaty. Although the production of
superficial volcanics is highly probable, no lava or pyroclastic
facies of these conduits have been preserved.
All previously described Upper Miocene basalts are
present in the form of subvolcanic bodies, with no superfi-
cial products preserved. Within the present detailed geologi-
cal survey on the western margins of the CSVC, three Upper
Miocene basaltic occurrences were newly observed. The first
two are remnants of monogenic Strombolian cones with relics
of lava flows emitted; the last one is a lava flow overlying the
Miocene sediments.
Newly documented sites
Ostrý Hill (50
°29’50”N, 13°51’38”E)
The basanitic vent of Ostrý Hill (9.6±0.5 Ma) located near
the Měrunice village (Fig. 2) SE of Bílina most probably pro-
duced lavas now overlying the sands of the Most Formation
preserved on Hradiš any Hill, NNE of the vent. The 30—60
meters difference in altitude of the lava and the recent top of
the feeder (well documented in the cross-section) can be ex-
plained by different erosion of mostly loose cinder cone mate-
rial and solid tabular lava body – the altitude of the real place
of lava production from the cone should have been higher than
the recent top. Nevertheless, we suppose younger tectonic ac-
tivity which caused uplift of northern block(s) in the first tens
of meters. The lavas also reached the areas to the NW of the
vent where sand-dominated sediments are also overlain by rel-
ics of coherent basanitic bodies (Fig. 3).
Fortunately, a near-vent superficial pyroclastic rock sur-
rounding the compact conduit has been preserved, nested on
the sands of the Most Formation. It was formerly interpreted
as a diatreme facies of a maar volcano (Kopecký 1987—1988).
Pyroclastic deposits consist of irregular vesiculated scoria
fragments reaching 3 cm in size. Scoria fragments show no
522
CAJZ, RAPPRICH, ERBAN, PÉCSKAY and RADOŇ
Fig. 2. A panoramic photo of the Ostrý and Hradiš ko remnants of scoria cones. A view from the west.
Fig. 3. A schematic map of the Ostrý scoria cone, the source of the Hradiš any Hill lava. Supposed faults indicated in the cross-section are
not shown on the map because of the lack of indications of their course. Basanites of the older Ústí Formation in the cross-section also com-
prise bentonitized facies.
523
LATE MIOCENE VOLCANIC ACTIVITY IN THE ČESKÉ STŘEDOHOŘÍ
MOUNTAINS (NORTHERN BOHEMIA)
welding patterns; therefore, this deposit is interpreted as a
product of Strombolian activity. Few unique cow-dung
bombs, welded upon accumulation of non-welded scoria frag-
ments, were observed (Fig. 4). The combination of non-weld-
ed scoriae with few cow-dung bombs suggests that these
deposits represent upper-crater facies of a former cinder cone
(e.g. Rapprich et al. 2007). The position of this scoria cone
Fig. 4. A cow-dung bomb welded upon non-welded scoriae at Ostrý Hill.
Fig. 5. A schematic map of the Hradiš ko scoria cone and erosional remnants of lavas emitted to the west.
penetrating and resting upon Miocene sediments proved that
the magmatic activity constituted a volcano after the deposi-
tion of the Most Formation sediments. No evidence for previ-
ous phreatomagmatic activity was found. On the other hand, a
remnant of an older scoria cone buried by Miocene sands can
be seen in a nearby stream-gorge. Pyroclastic deposits of the
older volcano consist of strongly altered, periclinally bedded
scoriae. No further analyses or radiometric dating could be ob-
tained due to the high degree of weathering. Based on the geo-
logical setting and on analogy with the surrounding bodies,
this older scoria cone can be assigned to the preceding Dobrná
Formation.
Hradiš ko Hill (50
°28’27”N, 13°50’26”E)
The Hradiš ko Hill between the villages of Řisuty and
Měrunice (see Fig. 2) represents a multiphase coherent con-
duit. The Upper Miocene (9.6 ± 0.4 Ma) scoria cone with a
basanitic feeder overlies a remnant of Lower Miocene
(20.72 ± 0.94 Ma) picrobasalt-basanite feeder. The earlier pi-
crobasalt-basanite activity was significantly more widespread;
this event is represented by several remnants of lavas, coher-
ent and clastic conduits (Fig. 5). The age of the volcanic activ-
ity corresponds well with the age of lava excavated in a nearby
quarry on Stříbrník Hill (19.2 Ma – Lustrino & Wilson 2007;
no errors given). This lava could also be assigned to an early
Hradiš ko source-vent.
524
CAJZ, RAPPRICH, ERBAN, PÉCSKAY and RADOŇ
Younger basanitic volcanism is preserved in the form of a
scoria cone relict. Pyroclastic deposits consist of highly ve-
siculated and non-welded, undeformed solid scoria frag-
ments with significant inter-clast voids (Fig. 6). The
diameter of common scoria fragments ranges from 1 cm to
10 cm. Scarce bombs are of spindle shape. Bedding planes
are poorly visible but appear to dip outward, corresponding
to a proximal wall facies on outer volcano slopes. In a
unique sample, a small piece of silicified wood was observed
within the scoria deposit (Fig. 7).
Fig. 6. Non-welded scoria fragments at the Hradiš ko scoria cone.
Note the preserved voids among individual fragments. A 1 Euro
coin represents the scale.
Fig. 7. A silicified wood fragment in scoriae of Hradiš ko Hill.
Fig. 8. A schematized section of the volcanic and sedimentary depos-
its exposed during the construction of highway D8 at Úžín. a – alter-
nation of yellow volcaniclastic clays (each of 3 layers is ca. 80 cm in
thickness) and light grey lacustrine clays of the Miocene Most Ba-
sin (approximately 20 cm thick – two intercalations were ex-
posed); b – 1.5 m of greenish volcanogenic clays filling a
paleo-valley; c – 0.7 m of greyish-violet clay overlying the green
volcanogenic clay and filling the rest of the paleo-valley; d – 3—4 m
of greyish-yellow volcanogenic sandy clays burying the flat paleo-re-
lief; e – an olivine basalt lava flow.
Fig. 9. Columnar-jointed basanitic lava excavated during the con-
struction of highway D8. (See first author serving as a scale.)
Lava flow near Úžín (50
°41’14” N, 13°57’08” E)
The construction of a new segment of highway from Pra-
gue to Dresden (D8, Exit 74), touching the NW margin of
Ústí nad Labem, required excavations in the extreme NE part
of the Most Basin, where the basin adjoins the northern part
of the CSVC. Deposits of wasted clayey material most prob-
ably produced at the beginning of mining activities for lig-
nite were exposed during construction. The oldest geological
maps (Hibsch 1926) already document this waste deposit
and not the lava beneath. Columnar-jointed basanitic lava
(11.4 ± 0.4 Ma) overlies clayey sediments of the Most Basin
(Fig. 8). The columns are vertical, 40—80 cm in diameter and
relatively regular 5- to 6-angular. The preserved thickness of
the lava flow reaches maximum 3 m (Fig. 9). A maximum
30 cm thick layer of hyaloclastic-type breccia is present at the
bottom of the flow. Hyaloclastesis was caused by an interac-
tion of lava with the underlying water-saturated sediments.
These sediments are well-stratified clays to sandy clays of two
different colours. Greyish blue fine clay in 5—10 cm thick lay-
ers alternates with brownish red clays to sandy clays in layers
20—30 cm thick (see Fig. 8 for details). This stratified se-
quence was excavated to the depth of 2 m below the base of
the lava flow but its base was not reached. Its origin can be ex-
plained by changing source areas for the sedimentary material.
The bluish clay is typical for the Most Formation and originat-
ed from material transported over a longer distance in the ba-
525
LATE MIOCENE VOLCANIC ACTIVITY IN THE ČESKÉ STŘEDOHOŘÍ
MOUNTAINS (NORTHERN BOHEMIA)
sin. The latter material is supposed to be a product of multiple
events of re-sedimentation of hyaloclastics that belong to the
Ústí Formation (the oldest volcanism of the CSVC) and were
exposed only a few hundred meters to the SW.
The lava flow exposed near Úžín was most probably emit-
ted from the vent located on Jedlová hora Hill, some 3 km to
the NE. This elevation is now covered by basanitic lava
blocks reaching up to 1.5 m in diameter (Fig. 10), but no
outcrop can be found. No pyroclastic deposits were observed
– probably due to the activity of volatile-poor magma, pro-
ducing solely lava flows with no concomitant eruptive activ-
ity (Head & Wilson 1989). Alternatively, pyroclastic
deposits may already have been eroded. The Jedlová hora
Hill conduit partly penetrates older basaltic sequences of the
Ústí Formation. Its magmatic material, corresponding to the
Úžín lava in its petrology, ascended along the fault cutting
older volcanic products and constituting their limit against
Cretaceous sediments.
Petrography and geochemistry
Petrography and mineral chemistry
All the studied rocks are of similar petrography. They are
classified as basanites and consist (in order of decreasing
abundance) of clinopyroxene, olivine, Ti-magnetite, plagio-
clase and nepheline. The rocks are fine-grained with phenoc-
rysts reaching some 2 mm and scarcely 5 mm. The phenocrysts
are represented solely by olivine and clinopyroxene.
Olivine phenocrysts are common in the rocks of the Úžín
lava and Hradiš ko cinder cone, maximum 5 mm in diameter.
On the other hand, olivine in the conduit of Ostrý Hill is
present only in the form of small crystals in matrix. Olivine
crystals from different sites vary in their composition, reflect-
ing slight differences in bulk-rock chemistry and crystalliza-
tion history (Table 1). The most magnesian olivines are
present in the silica-poorest rock at Ostrý Hill, with forsterite
component varying from Fo
92
in the cores to Fo
85
in the rims.
More differentiated olivine crystals at Hradiš ko Hill range
from Fo
90.5
in cores to Fo
75
in rims. A slight differentiation
was documented on scarce fresh olivine crystals from the Úžín
lava. Olivine crystallization initiated with the composition of
Fo
87
in the cores and terminated with Fo
77
in the rims.
Clinopyroxene is the most abundant mineral in the studied
basanites. Its composition is relatively uniform and indepen-
dent of the sampling site. A slight increase in ferroan compo-
nent towards the rims was documented in all crystals
(Fig. 11). A large portion of the data fit within the immisci-
bility field above the 50 % wollastonite limit in the common
classification diagram recommended by IMA (Morimoto
1988 – Fig. 11a), mainly due to the presence of Ca-Tscher-
mak‘s molecules. This is in disagreement with the real chem-
ical composition of the analysed minerals, where Ca
contents range between 0.87 and 0.93 apfu (Table 2,
Fig. 11b and 11c in detail). Ca and Al (reaching 0.4 apfu)
Sampling site
Ostrý
Hradišťko Úžín
Comment
Rim
average
Rim
average
Rim
average
n
Core
Fo
min
Core
Fo
max
2
Core
Fo
min
Core
Fo
max
6
Core
Fo
min
Core
Fo
max
1
SiO
2
40.72 40.73 39.64 40.27 41.43 39.52 40.34 40.57 39.25
Al
2
O
3
0.03 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.16 0.06 0.03 0.04
Cr
2
O
3
0.01 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.02 0.05 0.00 0.00
FeO 12.91
8.66
13.64
13.91
8.71
18.65
13.35
12.03
20.37
MnO
0.10 0.14 0.24 0.27 0.15 0.39 0.20 0.33 0.43
MgO
46.78 50.85 45.67 46.08 49.88 41.44 45.73 47.25 40.77
NiO
0.27 0.36 0.33 0.31 0.39 0.15 0.23 0.40 0.17
CaO
0.20 0.05 0.20 0.29 0.06 0.35 0.30 0.06 0.43
Total
101.06
100.88
99.78
101.24
100.66
100.74
100.28
100.67
101.50
Si
1.002
0.987
0.994
0.996
1.004
1.003
1.003
1.000
0.998
Al
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.002
0.000
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.001
Fe
0.266
0.176
0.286
0.288
0.177
0.399
0.278
0.248
0.433
Mn
0.002
0.003
0.005
0.006
0.003
0.008
0.004
0.007
0.009
Mg
1.716
1.837
1.707
1.699
1.803
1.565
1.695
1.736
1.545
Cr
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
Ni
0.005
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.008
0.003
0.005
0.008
0.003
Atoms per
formula
unit
Ca
0.005
0.001
0.005
0.008
0.002
0.010
0.008
0.001
0.012
Fo
86.08 92.22 85.72 85.24 90.51 78.43 85.04 87.18 77.44
Oxides in %; atoms per formula unit Σ=3; content of forsterite component in mol %.
Table 1: Olivine composition of the studied rocks.
Fig. 10. Basanitic lava disintegrated into blocks at Jedlová hora Hill.
526
CAJZ, RAPPRICH, ERBAN, PÉCSKAY and RADOŇ
Fig. 11. Composition of clinopyroxenes: (a) Quadrilateral diagram (Morimoto 1988), (b)
Ca-Fe diagram (Rapprich 2005), (c) detail of (b).
contents, classify the clinopyroxenes as
aluminian augites (their Ca-rich edge) or
diopsides. Classification En-Fs-Wo dia-
gram was constructed on basis of nor-
malized Fe, Mg and Ca atomic
proportions according to IMA recom-
mendations (Morimoto, 1988; used e.g.
by Brady). Calculation of extended end-
member set has followed procedure pub-
lished by Rapprich (2005). Cores of
some larger diopside phenocrysts in the
coherent feeder of Ostrý Hill consist of
augite (Na
0.07
Ca
0.84
Fe
2+
0.25
Fe
3+
0.04
Mn
0.01
Mg
0.66
Ti
0.03
Al
0.23
Si
1.87
O
6
) with exsolu-
tion orthopyroxene (Ca
0.07
Fe
2+
0.7
Fe
3+
0.02
Mn
0.02
Mg
1.13
Ti
0.01
Al
0.13
Si
1.92
O
6
) lamel-
lae (Fig. 12). The lamellae form ca 10%
of the mineral. The known composition
of both phases and their ratio allow us to
calculate the original composition. The
original
augite
(Na
0.06
Ca
0.77
Fe
2+
0.29
Fe
3+
0.04
Mn
0.01
Mg
0.71
Ti
0.03
Al
0.22
Si
1.87
O
6
)
could have been entrained by the as-
cending magma from underlying mag-
matic rocks.
Sampling site
Ostrý
Hradišťko Úžín
Comment
core zone rim core rim core zone rim
n
3 4 4 4 3 4 12 5
SiO
2
48.17 48.06 42.88 48.64 43.26 48.27 49.20 46.79
TiO
2
1.76 1.84 3.55 2.00 3.87 2.03 1.76 2.79
Al
2
O
3
6.20 6.37 10.22 4.87 8.99 6.14 5.16 6.34
Cr
2
O
3
0.36 0.47 0.11 0.05 0.20 0.20 0.34 0.05
FeO
5.96 5.70 8.06 6.49 7.69 6.32 5.90 7.21
MnO
0.11 0.09 0.10 0.12 0.09 0.15 0.12 0.13
MgO
13.65 13.81 10.90 13.85 11.51 13.67 14.25 12.65
CaO
22.92 22.99 22.59 22.85 22.52 21.88 22.24 22.16
Na
2
O
0.46 0.47 0.53 0.37 0.43 0.53 0.47 0.47
Total
99.62 99.85 98.98 99.30 98.58 99.28 99.50 98.65
Si
1.785 1.775 1.618 1.813 1.640 1.797 1.824 1.765
T
Al
0.215 0.225 0.382 0.187 0.360 0.203 0.176 0.235
Al
0.055 0.052 0.073 0.027 0.041 0.067 0.050 0.047
Fe
3+
0.084 0.091 0.143 0.073 0.124 0.055 0.052 0.063
Ti
0.049 0.051 0.101 0.056 0.110 0.057 0.049 0.079
Cr
0.010 0.014 0.003 0.002 0.006 0.006 0.010 0.002
Mg
0.754 0.760 0.613 0.770 0.650 0.758 0.787 0.711
M1
Fe
2+
0.047 0.032 0.067 0.073 0.068 0.057 0.052 0.098
Fe
2+
0.054 0.053 0.044 0.057 0.051 0.084 0.079 0.066
Mn
0.004 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.005 0.004 0.004
Ca
0.910 0.910 0.913 0.913 0.914 0.873 0.883 0.895
M2
Na
0.033 0.034 0.039 0.027 0.032 0.038 0.034 0.034
Kch
1.05 1.37 0.33 0.15 0.59 0.58 0.98 0.16
Ae
2.24 2.03 3.57 2.53 2.57 3.23 2.40 3.29
Ka
0.35 0.29 0.33 0.37 0.28 0.48 0.38 0.41
CAT
5.54 5.24 7.28 2.73 4.10 6.67 4.97 4.67
CTT
4.92 5.11 10.08 5.61 11.04 5.69 4.91 7.92
Ess
6.13 7.06 10.74 4.74 9.85 2.27 2.84 3.03
Fs
5.05 4.27 5.57 6.48 5.98 7.10 6.54 8.21
En
37.52 37.85 30.48 38.30 32.37 37.67 39.17 35.36
Calculated
end-members
Wo
37.20 36.78 31.62 39.09 33.22 36.32 37.81 36.96
Oxides in %; atoms per formula unit
Σ = 4; calculated end-members Σ = 100 %. Kch – Kosmochlor, Ae – Aegirine, Ka – Kanoite, CAT –
Ca-Tschermak’s molecule, CTT – Ca-Ti-Tschermak’s molecule, Ess – Esseneite, Fs – Ferrosilite, En – Enstatite, Wo – Wollastonite.
Table 2: Average clinopyroxene compositions of the studied rocks.
527
LATE MIOCENE VOLCANIC ACTIVITY IN THE ČESKÉ STŘEDOHOŘÍ
MOUNTAINS (NORTHERN BOHEMIA)
Fig. 12. Back-scattered electron image of a clinopyroxene core with
orthopyroxene exsolution lamellae (Ostrý Hill).
Plagioclase has the form of laths, usually too small to be
analysed. Plagioclase laths from the Úžín lava correspond to
basic labradorite (An
63—65
Ab
33—36
Or
1
). The analyses of
nepheline were affected by sodium loss during electron beam-
ing. Nevertheless, the results are sufficient to document maxi-
mum 0.15 apfu K and maximum 0.6 apfu Ca.
The studied basanites, and particularly the rock of the Ostrý
Hill feeder, are relatively rich in xenocrysts. Minerals of these
xenocrysts, such as orthopyroxene, K-feldspar and quartz, re-
flect multifarious country rocks entrained during magma as-
cent. We already described extremely magnesian cores of
olivine phenocrysts which represent relics of mantle-derived
xenocrysts. The presence of exsolution lamellae of two slight-
ly different enstatites (one is slightly enriched in Al, Fe and
Cr) characterize orthopyroxene xenocryst in the basanite of
Ostrý Hill. Both enstatite phases are extremely poor in Ca
(0.01 apfu) and are equal in their volume. The orthopyroxene
was corroded by magma and is overgrown first by common
magmatic olivine and then by magmatic diopside.
The sample from the Hradiš ko conduit revealed a pseudo-
morph formed by glass and diopside. Glass composition
Fig. 13. Composition of the studied rocks compared with the older
formations in the TAS diagram (Le Bas et al. 1986).
Fig. 14. Box-and-whisker plots showing geochemical differences among lithostratigraphic units of the CSVC. Note that Cr and Ni are in
logarithmic scale.
528
CAJZ, RAPPRICH, ERBAN, PÉCSKAY and RADOŇ
Table 3:
Chemical
composition
of
basaltic
rocks
of
the
Štrbice
Formatio
n
compared
to
the
lower
lithostratigraphic
units
of
the
CSVC.
Continued
on
next
page.
Fig. 15. A spidergram of the studied rocks normalized to NMORB
(Sun & McDonough 1989).
(60—64 wt. % SiO
2
, 3.5—4 wt. % K
2
O and only 1.5—1.9 wt. %
Na
2
O) and pseudomorph shape suggest replacement of
former K-feldspar. An anomalous composition is also dis-
played in diopsides enclosed in, and flanking, the pseudo-
morph. These are poor diopsides with unusually low
concentrations of Al
2
O
3
and TiO
2
.
Bulk-rock chemistry
The studied basaltic products from Hradiš ko, Ostrý and
Úžín are rather primitive ultrabasic alkaline rocks (Table 3).
The petrographic character of the basanites is confirmed by
their chemical composition (Le Bas 1986 – Fig. 13), with
normative olivine contents above 10 % (11—20 %). The sam-
ple from Úžín falls in the basalt field, however, the SiO
2
content is only slightly above 45 % when recalculated on a
water-free basis, with rather high water content (3 %). The
samples rank between the most primitive basaltic rocks in
the CSVC, having 11—13.1 % MgO, 258—473 ppm Cr and
173—275 ppm Ni (Fig. 14). The unfractionated character of
the studied samples is further underlined by low Al
2
O
3
con-
tents. A similar picture is given by the trace element chemis-
try (Fig. 15). In addition to the above mentioned high Cr and
Ni contents, the samples rank in the lower part of the HFSE
(high field strength element) concentration range of the
CSVC basanitic rocks, whereas LILE contents are moderate.
REE contents are low compared to other CSVC samples
however, the LREE/HREE ratio is high for the Hradiš ko
and Ostrý samples, and only moderate for the Úžín sample.
The isotopic signature is in good agreement with the data pre-
viously published for the Ústí and Dobrná Formations (LF and
UMF in Cajz et al. 1999), with (
87
Sr/
86
Sr)
i
between 0.70347
and 0.70361, and (
143
Nd/
144
Nd)
i
between 0.51279—0.51284
(Table 4 and Fig. 16).
Fo
rm
at
io
n Ú
st
í
D
ěč
ín
D
obr
ná
Štr
bi
ce
Sa
m
ple
rep
re
se
nt
at
iv
e (
n =
2
0)
rep
re
se
nt
at
iv
e (
n =
8)
rep
re
se
nt
at
iv
e (
n =
4)
C
S33
C
S34
C
S35
13
53
13
72
Lo
cat
ion
av
er
m
in
m
ax
av
er
m
in
m
ax
av
er
m
in
m
ax
O
st
rý
Hrad
.
Ú
žín
PH
KV
Si
O
2
41
.59
38
.54
43
.88
46
.20
41
.29
50
.06
41
.52
39
.82
42
.77
41
.36
42
.46
43
.06
43
.95
42
.61
TiO
2
2.
86
2.
10
3.
41
2.
85
2.
14
3.
48
2.
99
2.
62
3.
39
2
.32
2.
38
2.
17
2.
34
2.
25
Al
2
O
3
13
.11
8.
26
15
.56
15
.75
14
.22
16
.82
12
.97
12
.26
13
.83
12
.69
11
.56
12
.25
13
.13
13
.21
Fe
2
O
3
5.
27
3.
04
7.
50
4.
59
3.
53
5.
44
5.
16
4.
27
6.
37
5
.51
3.
67
3.
58
3.
10
4.
98
FeO
6.
37
4.
03
7.
53
4.
70
3.
58
5.
30
6.
83
5.
60
7.
35
5
.98
7.
69
6.
67
8.
68
5.
85
MnO
0.
19
0.
16
0.
22
0.
19
0.
17
0.
25
0.
19
0.
18
0.
21
0
.23
0.
21
0.
18
0.
21
0.
21
Mg
O
10
.28
7.
26
13
.78
4.
76
3.
00
6.
73
10
.48
9.
02
12
.34
11
.08
13
.13
12
.95
1
0.
31
10
.78
Ca
O
12
.22
10
.44
15
.63
10
.25
8.
59
13
.32
11
.70
11
.44
12
.07
12
.51
11
.50
10
.53
10
.46
10
.52
Sr
O
0.
10
0.
05
0.
15
0.
12
0.
09
0.
17
0.
09
0.
08
0.
11
0
.12
0.
12
0.
08
0.
10
0.
11
BaO
0.
07
0.
04
0.
10
0.
10
0.
07
0.
17
0.
08
0.
05
0.
12
0
.08
0.
07
0.
06
0.
19
0.
07
Na
2
O
3.
06
1.
84
4.
45
3.
74
2.
66
4.
48
3.
06
2.
83
3.
20
3
.50
3.
01
2.
23
3.
39
4.
38
K
2
O
1.
01
0.
29
1.
78
2.
37
1.
25
3.
35
1.
47
0.
63
2.
28
1
.16
1.
40
1.
22
1.
43
1.
27
P
2
O
5
0.
64
0.
26
0.
91
0.
54
0.
47
0.
63
0.
61
0.
44
0.
74
0
.93
0.
77
0.
46
0.
76
0.
53
H
2
O+
1.
99
0.
77
4.
21
2.
14
1.
23
3.
05
2.
15
1.
24
3.
10
1
.67
1.
31
3.
03
1.
09
0.
78
H
2
O-
1.
14
0.
44
3.
24
1.
61
0.
38
3.
47
0.
56
0.
33
1.
01
0
.35
0.
31
0.
81
0.
32
2.
08
F
0.
03
0.
01
0.
06
0.
05
0.
04
0.
07
0.
03
0.
02
0.
04
0
.11
0.
10
0.
09
0.
02
0.
02
CO
2
0.
30
0.
02
2.
51
0.
20
0.
03
0.
68
0.
16
0.
04
0.
34
0
.08
0.
06
0.
37
0.
61
0.
77
TO
TA
L
1
00
.22
99
.12
1
00
.9
6
1
00
.16
99
.49
1
00
.82
1
00
.04
99
.71
1
00
.33
99
.66
99
.75
99
.74
1
00
.07
1
00.
43
m
g#
61
.80
53
.15
73
.11
48
.30
41
.85
54
.31
61
.77
59
.14
64
.74
64
.36
68
.05
70
.01
61
.58
65
.04
529
LATE MIOCENE VOLCANIC ACTIVITY IN THE ČESKÉ STŘEDOHOŘÍ
MOUNTAINS (NORTHERN BOHEMIA)
Table 3:
Continued.
Fo
rm
at
io
n Ú
st
í
D
ěč
ín
D
ob
rn
á
Št
rb
ice
Sa
m
ple
rep
re
se
nt
at
iv
e (
n =
2
0)
rep
re
se
nt
at
iv
e (
n =
8)
rep
re
se
nt
at
iv
e (
n =
4)
C
S33
C
S3
4
C
S35
13
53
13
72
Lo
cat
ion
av
er
m
in
m
ax
av
er
m
in
m
ax
av
er
m
in
m
ax
O
st
rý
H
ra
d.
Ú
žín
PH
K
V
Ba
767
3
87
1214
1030
82
0
1336
764
649
855
783
616
609
680
929
Co
54
4
4
62
31
19
42
55
48
62
52
56
56
53
52
Cr
290
54
857
47
12
104
262
222
322
258
344
473
281
253
Cs
1.
03
0.
27
7.
28
1.
55
1.
00
2.
12
0.
64
0
.48
0.
80
0.
80
0.
80
0.
70
2.
18
0.
65
Cu
1
06
4
2
3
89
55
31
1
14
64
53
69
61
62
63
61
55
Hf
6
4
8
9
8
10
7
6
8
5
5
5
6
7
Nb
76
3
6
97
91
73
1
14
78
72
85
93
78
65
73
91
Ni
167
31
360
12
7
29
168
110
226
173
275
251
199
217
Rb
27
7
51
63
23
97
31
12
46
41
34
25
41
14
Sc
33
2
5
55
24
14
36
30
28
35
*
*
23
24
23
Sr
978
4
84
1408
1126
86
2
1568
872
773
960
1070
1040
657
889
1032
Ta
4.
9
2.
3
6.
5
5.
7
4.
6
6.
9
5.
3
4
.7
6.
3
6.
2
5.
6
4.
9
4
.4
5.
6
Y
32
.3
2
1.
2
66
.7
41
.6
23.
6
83
.8
27
.0
25
.7
28
.8
30
.0
24
.6
20
.8
48
.0
78
.3
Zn
75
4
4
1
00
77
64
93
77
59
87
95
97
75
1
06
90
Zr
281
1
66
393
405
31
5
500
304
270
340
221
209
199
290
369
U
1.
74
0.
87
3.
20
3.
27
2.
05
7.
35
1.
56
1
.48
1.
70
2.
79
2.
24
1.
48
1.
98
3.
99
Th
6.
65
2.
49
10
.25
11
.60
9.
49
13
.89
6.
67
5
.85
7.
97
10
.20
7.
71
5.
99
8.
91
8.
22
La
77
.7
3
4.
5
1
71
.7
1
06
.8
52.
9
2
14
.2
68
.4
59
.6
79
.6
89
.9
66
.1
46
.0
1
30
.5
1
89
.0
Ce
154
.1
80
.8
329
.6
218
.6
10
8.
6
454
.6
133
.9
114
.9
144
.3
157
.0
118
.0
89
.7
256
.5
380
.7
Pr
17
.2
9.
4
34
.1
24
.2
13.
1
47
.2
15
.8
14
.3
17
.6
17
.8
13
.8
9.
5
29
.0
39
.1
Nd
67
.1
3
7.
3
1
34
.7
91
.2
49.
7
1
90
.3
59
.0
51
.6
63
.8
63
.1
50
.2
35
.5
1
05
.8
1
57
.7
Sm
11
.98
6.
87
24
.89
16
.07
9.
00
34
.57
10
.75
9
.60
11
.31
10
.40
8.
82
6.
49
19
.7
2
29
.0
3
Eu
3.
46
2.
31
7.
24
4.
16
2.
33
8.
98
3.
00
2
.86
3.
12
3.
37
2.
86
2.
26
5.
27
8.
27
Gd
10
.54
6.
41
20
.49
13
.31
7.
75
29
.76
9.
01
8
.56
9.
57
9.
11
7.
78
5.
45
17
.64
23
.8
9
Tb
2.
09
0.
89
4.
76
2.
18
1.
11
3.
71
1.
43
0
.91
1.
73
1.
22
1.
06
0.
83
1.
80
9.
01
Dy
7.
19
4.
58
14
.94
8.
72
5.
07
17
.74
6.
06
5
.81
6.
37
6.
22
5.
28
4.
38
10
.40
17
.7
1
Ho
1.
22
0.
72
2.
67
1.
59
0.
86
3.
43
1.
01
0
.90
1.
07
1.
08
0.
92
0.
75
1.
92
2.
89
Er
2.
89
1.
78
5.
54
3.
67
2.
09
7.
40
2.
33
2
.03
2.
57
2.
82
2.
33
1.
98
4.
16
6.
53
Tm
0.
65
0.
28
0.
82
0.
70
0.
41
1.
13
*
*
*
0.
38
0.
30
0.
26
0.
46
0.
89
Yb
2.
48
1.
58
5.
40
3.
64
1.
79
7.
85
2.
03
1
.62
2.
40
2.
18
1.
72
1.
59
3.
68
6.
11
Lu
0.
33
0.
21
0.
75
0.
50
0.
25
1.
03
0.
27
0
.21
0.
31
0.
30
0.
24
0.
22
0.
48
0.
84
Ag
e (M
a)
29
–36
(
n = 6)
25
–2
7
(n
= 5)
20
–25
(n
= 4)
9
9
11
13
13
.4
0.
70
344
0.
70
318
0.
70
376
0.
70
452 0.
70
433 0.
70
472
0.
70
366 0.
703
56 0.
70
374
87
Sr
/
86
Sr
(n
= 4
)
(n
= 5
)
(n
= 4
)
0.
51
285
0.
51
284
0.
51
287
0.
51
272 0.
51
270 0.
51
276
0.
51
285 0.
512
82 0.
51
286
143
Nd/
144
Nd
(n
= 4
)
(n
= 5
)
(n
= 4
)
S
ee
Ta
bl
e 4
. f
or
is
ot
op
ic
da
ta
O
xid
es
in %
; tr
ace
ele
m
en
ts
incl
ud
ing
R
EE in ppm
. Hr
ad
. — H
rad
iš
ťk
o f
eed
er
of
th
e U
pp
er
M
ioc
en
e s
co
ria
; PH
—
Pohr
adi
cká ho
ra
H
ill
; KV
—
K
eř
ový
vr
ch H
ill
. *
—
n
ot
de
te
ct
ed
or
n
ot
ana
lys
ed
. C
S33–CS
35
new
data,
ot
he
r analy
se
s f
ro
m
Ul
ry
ch e
t al
. (
2001
). K
-A
r age
e
xt
ent and
is
ot
op
ic
dat
a of
litho
str
atig
ra
phi
c u
ni
ts
re
as
se
ss
ed, co
m
pare
d to
pr
ev
io
us
pape
rs
(s
ee
te
xt
).
530
CAJZ, RAPPRICH, ERBAN, PÉCSKAY and RADOŇ
Fig. 16. Initial Sr-Nd isotopic ratios of the Štrbice Formation com-
pared with Ústí, Děčín and Dobrná Formations (Ulrych et al. 2001,
2002b, new data). The initial ratios were calculated from the age of
individual samples or formations. Mantle reservoirs after Zindler &
Hart (1986) and Cebria & Wilson (1995): DMM = depleted mantle
MORB, E-DMM = enriched-depleted mantle MORB, BSE = bulk
silicate Earth, HIMU = high µ unit, EAR = European asthenospher-
ic reservoir.
Table 4: New data on radiometric ages and Sr-Nd isotopes obtained on superficial products, and complementary analyses of
143
Nd/
144
Nd
ratio of Ústí Formation samples.
Sample
CS33 CS34 CS35 CS36 1297 1374 1363
Formation Štrbice
Štrbice
Štrbice
Dobrná Ústí Ústí Ústí
Location and
rock type
Ostrý,
basanite
Hradišťko,
basanite
Úžín,
basanite
Hradišťko,
olivine basalt
Kam. Šenov,
basanite
Taneček,
basanite
Hlinná,
basanite
K(%) / K
2
O(%)
0.96 / 1.16
1.13 / 1.40
1.00 / 0.84
0.97 / 1.26
*
*
*
40
Ar
rad
(ccSTP/g)
3.595 × 10
–7
4.224 × 10
–7
4.431 × 10
–7
7.859 × 10
–7
* * *
40
Ar
rad
(%) 27.0
47.2
46.6
33.5 * * *
K/Ar age (Ma)
9.61 ± 0.51
9.59 ± 0.36
11.36 ± 0.42
20.72 ± 0.94
*
*
*
87
Sr/
86
Sr 0.703624
0.703486
0.703615
* * * *
2SE(M) 0.000013
0.000011
0.000013
* * * *
(
87
Sr/
86
Sr)
i
0.703609
0.703473
0.703597
* * * *
143
Nd/
144
Nd 0.512799
0.512839
0.512850 * 0.512872
0.512844
0.512848
2SE(M) 0.000007
0.000009
0.000011 * 0.000013
0.000014
0.000016
(
143
Nd/
144
Nd)
i
0.512793
0.512832
0.512842
* * * *
Analytical errors for isotopic data expressed as 2 standard errors of the mean (2SE(M)). Initial ratios calculated using element concentrations report-
ed in Table 3 and decay constants suggested by Steiger & Jäger (1977). In addition to data for the three localities discussed in text, three
143
Nd/
144
Nd
values extending the dataset (Ulrych et al. 2001) of Ústí Formation are given. * — not analysed for this paper.
Discussion
Our research has shown that the scoria cones of the Štrbice
Formation SE of Bílina overlie older volcanoes of similar
composition and eruptive style or Miocene sediments devel-
oped during a prolonged recess in volcanic activity. Eruptions
of the Štrbice Formation were dominated by Strombolian
style, and no welded accumulations suggesting the presence of
Hawaiian eruptions (sensu Sumner et al. 2005) were ob-
served. A unique cow-dung bomb found on Ostrý Hill
should document only the presence of a crater facies of a
Strombolian scoria cone, where plastic bombs may also be
present (e.g. Rapprich et al. 2007 and references therein). As
we did not find any deposits enriched in xenolithic material
or characterized by a high fragmentation index, we suggest
that no initial phreatomagmatic phase (Schmincke 1977;
Risso et al. 2008) took place and the activity started directly
in Strombolian style.
All previously discovered Upper Miocene volcanic bodies
of the CSVC are located in its western part, and so are all the
newly described apparatuses. Only the Úžín lava is situated
some 10—15 km to the NE. The 9—13.5 Ma time span of volca-
nic activity of the Štrbice Formation within the CSVC is char-
acterized by olivine foidite-tephrite-trachybasalt-trachyte suite
on the western margins of the Bohemian Massif (Teplá High-
land and Cheb-Domažlice Graben – Ulrych et al. 1999; Ul-
rych et al. 2002a; Lustrino & Wilson 2007), too. This is the
interval which coincides with the K-Ar ages of three basaltic
bodies in Saxony (Pfeiffer et al. 1984; Kaiser & Pilot 1986).
Two other locations with ultramafic dykes of the same age are
known from the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin near the intersec-
tion of the Stráž Fault and Lusatian Fault (Ulrych & Pivec
1997). Their ascent is most probably linked to these fault
zones. The rest of the Bohemian Massif appeared to be calm at
that time, even including areas previously associated with am-
ple volcanism (and situated inside the OG). Unlike in western
Bohemia, no differentiated volcanic rocks of Late Miocene
activity were found in the CSVC. This suggests that the last
volcanic activity in this region resulted from tectonic remo-
bilization, allowing ascent of primitive magmas. This remo-
bilization has only partly influenced the structure of the OG,
much like that of other parts of the Bohemian Massif. Late
Miocene volcanic activity appears to be independent of the
structure of the OG.
The results of this study allow us to redefine the Štrbice For-
mation of the CSVC (sensu Cajz 2000). Its former definition
based on intrusive members only is renewed now by description
of corresponding conduits, effusive members and pyroclastic
deposits including their superpositional characteristics, and
newly available K-Ar and other geochemical data. Thus, the
recent definition of the Štrbice Formation is fully comparable
to the other formations of the CSVC.
531
LATE MIOCENE VOLCANIC ACTIVITY IN THE ČESKÉ STŘEDOHOŘÍ
MOUNTAINS (NORTHERN BOHEMIA)
Other supposed superficial products of Miocene synsedi-
mentary volcanism were reported from Mradice near Louny
by Váně (1981) and later interpreted by Kopecký (1987—1988)
as horizontally propagating clastic dykes. These outcrops
were completely destroyed in the 1980s. A support for any of
the hypotheses is therefore very complicated. Nevertheless,
we can point to the following facts: i) no responsible vent has
been found yet, ii) the reported thickness reaches 30 m and
significantly exceeds the thickness of sedimentary cover
(Váně 1981), and iii) hydroclastic intrusion in a shallow depth
in unconsolidated wet sediments would rather propagate verti-
cally. We therefore believe that the local volcaniclastic (epi-
clastic) material most probably represents deposits of
polymict gravity flows generated from older volcanic forma-
tions and basement of the CSVC, deposited into tectonic “mi-
cro grabens” along the Ohře/Eger Fault Zone (Hradecký
1977). A similar feature is well known from the central part of
the CSVC (Cajz 1992).
A general geochemical description of the CSVC superficial
products was given by Cajz et al. (1999). New field and ana-
lytical data are available since than, slightly changing our un-
derstanding of volcanic complex development. Accordingly,
we have refined the original dataset to comply with new ob-
servations (Table 3). Three samples formerly assigned to the
Ústí Formation were rearranged into the Dobrná Formation as
follows: i) 1373 (Měrunice) with respect to radiometric data of
Lustrino & Wilson (2007); ii) 1378 (Prackovice) was assigned
to the Dobrná Formation already by Cajz (2000); iii) 1380
(Ž árek) was reinterpreted as a younger intrusion into the Ústí
Formation lavas. For two samples lacking Nd-isotopic ratios
in the original dataset we have added these data (1297 Kame-
nický Šenov and 1374 Taneček – Table 4). The Nd-isotopic
ratio of the sample 1363 (Hlinná), the sample with most pro-
nounced HIMU-like component influence documented by Ul-
rych et al. (2002b), was re-analysed (see Table 4). The newly
obtained
143
Nd/
144
Nd value is significantly higher and the
sample plots into the mantle array, in line with the rest of the
CSVC samples. Therefore, the presence of HIMU (high-µ
unit) component in the České středohoří Mts lavas remains
questionable. If compared with the reference dataset (Table 3,
Fig. 14), the composition of the presented Štrbice Formation
products is virtually undistinguishable from the Ústí and Do-
brná Formations products. Nevertheless, the Štrbice Forma-
tion lavas with their high mg-values and Cr and Nd contents
rank among the most primitive CSVC rocks. Although scarce,
partly resorbed crust-derived mineral grains were observed in
thin section, bulk-rock geochemistry of the basanites shows
no signs of a significant crustal contamination.
The source of the Cenozoic basaltic magmas in anorogenic
settings in Europe was widely discussed and reviewed recent-
ly (e.g. Wilson & Downes 2006; Lustrino & Wilson 2007).
Based on trace element and isotopic indications, the most
probable common source is plume-related asthenospheric
mantle, termed EAR (European Astenospheric Reservoir –
Cebria & Wilson 1995; Wilson 1997), or LVC (Low Velocity
Component – Hoernle et al. 1995), with a number of small-
er domains with variable degree of enrichment. The resulting
image in the Sr-Nd isotopic space is a linear array between
EAR and Bulk Silicate Earth composition. All the analysed
samples of the Štrbice Formation, together with other isoto-
pic data for the CSVC basalts (see Lustrino & Wilson 2007)
fit well within this model. There is no significant offset in
the Sr-Nd isotopic data from the mantle array towards the
HIMU component, suggesting no or negligible influence of
this component during generation of the Štrbice Formation
lavas (see Fig. 16). However, its presence cannot be definitely
ruled out without Pb isotopic data.
Moderate to low Y and HREE contents, together with low
Zr/Nb ratio and moderate to high LREE/HREE ratio, indicate
mixing of low degree partial melts of both spinel and garnet
lherzolite (model of Harangi 2001).
The extreme magnesian composition of olivine cores sug-
gests the presence of relics of xenocrysts derived from the
upper mantle. Presence of such xenocrysts may support an
idea of rapid ascent not allowing mantle-derived olivines to
lag and to fall through the melt to deeper positions. Some xe-
nocrysts, such as augites, were most probably derived from
older magmatic bodies (Cenozoic or even older) forming
part of the crustal basement. Finally, one group of xenoc-
rysts (K-feldspar, orthopyroxene and quartz) could have
been entrained from granulites or charnockites described
among xenoliths from the central part of the České středohoří
Mts (e.g. Opletal & Vrána 1989).
Conclusions
The Late Miocene volcanic activity in the western part of
the České středohoří Volcanic Complex is characterized by
scattered Strombolian eruptions forming monogenic cinder
cones with basanitic lava flows. No conjunction with either
the course, or the tectonic activity of the entire structure of the
Ohře (Eger) Graben can be observed. This is most probably
caused by low or no tectonic remobilization of the formerly
active graben(s) – the differentiated volcanics in western
Bohemia are situated outside the grabens (Ohře/Eger and
Cheb-Domažlice ones), as well as other volcanic bodies of
this age (in Saxony and in the Bohemian Cretaceous Basin).
The Late Miocene volcanic activity took place upon older
volcanic edifices of equal composition and similar eruptive
style (especially the Dobrná Formation).
The primitive basanitic lavas of the youngest volcanism
(the Štrbice Formation) geochemically resemble the lavas of
the preceding volcanism (the Ústí and Dobrná Formations)
and document a rapid magma ascent.
Similarly to other intra-plate lavas in continental Europe,
the Upper Miocene products of the CSVC are derived from a
slightly enriched asthenospheric source.
Rapidly ascending magma entrained mineral grains from
crustal rocks, but did not assimilate enough material to modify
the bulk-rock composition significantly.
Volcanic bodies of the Štrbice Formation (9—13.5 Ma)
represent superficial products with explicit relations to the
underlying Miocene sediments. Superposition of the young-
est basalts overlying the Miocene sediments allows us to
complete the definition of the Štrbice Formation, which now
fulfils the same criteria as the other lithostratigraphic units of
the CSVC.
532
CAJZ, RAPPRICH, ERBAN, PÉCSKAY and RADOŇ
Acknowledgments: This study was supported by Project
IAA300130612 “Combined magnetostratigraphic studies of
Cenozoic volcanics, Bohemian Massif” of the Grant Agency
of the Czech Academy of Sciences, and falls within the Aca-
demic Research Plan AV0Z 30130516. The part of the re-
search pursued at the Czech Geological Survey was carried
out within the Research Plan MZP0002579801. Special
thanks are due to A. Langrová who operated the microporobe
at the Institute of Geology AS CR and to lab-analysts of the
Czech Geological Survey. M. Rajchl and P. Kycl (both Czech
Geological Survey) are acknowledged for field cooperation
and thoughtful discussions of the paleoenvironment and sedi-
mentary features. The authors wish to thank P. Hradecký
(Czech Geological Survey) for consultation on the origin of
epiclastic material in the Louny area.
References
Balogh K. 1985: K/Ar dating of Neogene volcanic activity in Hun-
gary: Experimental technique, experiences and methods of
chronologic studies. ATOMKI Rep. D/1, 277—288.
Brady J.: Mineral formulae recalculation: Clinopyroxene formula
spreadsheet. http://serc.carleton.edu/files/research_education/
equilibria/cpx_formula.v2.xls , Visited June 8
th
, 2009.
Brus Z. & Hurník S. 1984: Explosive volcanic structures in the
North-Bohemian brown-coal basin. Čas. Mineral. Geol. 29, 3,
255—269 (in Czech with English abstract).
Cajz V. 1992: Divoká rokle Gorge in Ústí nad Labem, reconstruc-
tion of volcanic development. Ústecké Muzejní Sešity 4, 5—14
(in Czech with German abstract).
Cajz V. 2000: Proposal of lithostratigraphy for the České středohoří
Mts. volcanics. Bull. Czech Geol. Surv. 75, 1, 7—16.
Cajz V., Vokurka K., Balogh K., Lang M. & Ulrych J. 1999: The
České středohoří Mts.: volcanostratigraphy and geochemistry.
Geolines 9, 21—28.
Cebria J.M. & Wilson M. 1995: Cenozoic mafic magmatism in
Western/Central Europe; a common European asthenospheric
reservoir? In: European Union of Geosciences 8. Terra Nova
Abstr. Suppl. 7, 1, 162.
Harangi S. 2001: Neogene magmatism in the Alpine-Pannonian
Transition Zone – a model for melt generation in a complex
geodynamic setting. Acta Vulcanol. 13, 25—39.
Head J.W. & Wilson L. 1989: Basaltic pyroclastic eruptions: influ-
ence of gas-release patterns and volume fluxes on fountain
structure, and the formation of cinder cones, spatter cones,
rootless flows, lava ponds, and lava flows. J. Volcanol. Geo-
therm. Res. 37, 261—271.
Hibsch J.E. 1926: Erläuterungen zur geologischen Übersichtskarte
des Böhmischen Mittelgebirges und der unmittelbar angren-
zenden Gebiete zugleich in allgemein verständlicher geologis-
chen Führer. Freier Lehrerverein, Tetschen a.d. Elbe, 1—143.
Hoernle K., Zhang Y.-S. & Graham D. 1995: Seismic and geochem-
ical evidence for large-scale mantle upwelling beneath the
eastern Atlantic and Western and Central Europe. Nature 374
(6517), 34—39.
Hradecký P. 1977: The central part of the Ohře fault zone: Tectonic
and sedimentary development. Věst. Ústř. Úst. Geol. 52, 5,
285—292 (in Czech with English abstract).
Janoušek V., Farrow C.M. & Erban V. 2006: Interpretation of
whole-rock geochemical data in igneous geochemistry: Intro-
ducing Geochemical Data Toolkit (GCDkit). J. Petrology 47,
6, 1255—1259.
Kaiser G. & Pilot J. 1986: Weitere K-Ar Datierungen an jungen
Vulkaniten. Z. Geol. Wiss. 14, 1, 121—124.
Kopecký L. 1987—1988: Young volcanism of the Bohemian massif.
Geol. Hydrometal. Uranu 11, 3, 30—67; 11, 4, 3—44; 12, 1, 3—40;
12, 2, 3—56; 12, 3, 3—40; 12, 4, 3—40 (in Czech).
Le Bas M.J., Le Maitre R.W., Streckeisen A. & Zanettin B. 1986: A
chemical classification of volcanic rocks based on the total al-
kali-silica diagram. J. Petrology 27, 745—750.
Lustrino M. & Wilson M. 2007: The circum-Mediterranean anoro-
genic Cenozoic igneous province. Earth Sci. Rev. 81, 1—2, 1—65.
Macák F. (Ed.) 1963: Basic geological map 1 : 50,000 sheet M-33-
52-B Teplice. Final report. Unpublished report, Czech Geol.
Surv., Prague, 1—80 (in Czech).
Malkovský M. 1987: The Mesozoic and Tertiary basins of the Bo-
hemian Massif and their evolution. Tectonophysics 137, 31—42.
Míková J. & Denková P. 2007: Modified chromatographic separa-
tion scheme for Sr and Nd isotope analysis in geological sili-
cate samples. J. Geosci. 52, 3—4, 221—226.
Morimoto N. 1988: Nomenclature of pyroxenes. Mineral. Mag. 52,
535—550.
Opletal M. & Vrána S. 1989: Xenoliths of charnockitic rocks in vol-
canic rocks of the České středohoří Mts. Sbor. Geol. Věd,
Geol. 44, 51—78.
Pelikan A. 1895: Über ein Ganggestein aus dem Biliner Braun-
kohlenreviere und die durch dasselbe hervorgerufenen Con-
tacterscheinungen. Jb. K.-kön. Geol. Reichsanst. 45, 255—264.
Pfeiffer L., Kaiser G. & Pilot J. 1984: K-Ar-Datierung von jungen
Vulkaniten im Süden der DDR. Freiberg. Forsch.-H., R.C.
389, 93—97.
Rajchl M., Uličný D. & Mach K. 2008: Interplay between tectonics
and compaction in a rift-margin, lacustrine delta system: Mio-
cene of the Eger Graben, Czech Republic. Sedimentology 55,
1419—1447.
Rapprich V. 2005: Compositional variation of clinopyroxenes of
basaltic, essexitic and tephriphonolitic rocks from the
Doupovské hory Volcanic Complex, NW Bohemia. J. Czech
Geol. Soc. 50, 3—4, 119—132.
Rapprich V., Cajz V., Koš ák M., Pécskay Z., Řídkošil T., Raška P.
& Radoň M. 2007: Reconstruction of eroded monogenic
Strombolian cones of Miocene age: A case study on character
of volcanic activity of the Jičín Volcanic Field (NE Bohemia)
and subsequent erosional rates estimation. J. Geosci. 52, 3—4,
169—180.
Risso C., Németh K., Combina A.M., Nullo F. & Drosina M. 2008:
The role of phreatomagmatism in a Plio-Pleistocene high-den-
sity scoria cone field: Llancanelo Volcanic Field (Mendoza),
Argentina. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 169, 61—86.
Schmincke H.U. 1977: Phreatomagmatische Phasen in quartären
Vulkanen der Osteifel. Geol. Jb. 39, 3—45.
Shrbený O. & Vokurka K. 1985: Current state of the geochronolog-
ic and isotopic research of Bohemian Massif neovolcanites and
their nodules. Unpublished report, Czech Geol. Surv., Prague,
1—31 (in Czech).
Steiger R.H. & Jäger E. 1977: Subcommission on geochronology:
Convention on the use of decay constants in geo- and cosmo-
chronology. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 36, 359—362.
Sumner J.M., Blake S., Matela R.J. & Wolff J.A. 2005: Spatter. J.
Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 142, 49—65.
Sun S.S. & McDonough W.F. 1989: Chemical and isotopic systemat-
ics of oceanic basalts; implications for mantle composition and
processes. In: Saunders A.D. & Norry M.J. (Eds.): Magmatism
in the Ocean Basins. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 42, 313—345.
Šalanský K. 2004: Neovolcanites of the Czech Republic and their
geophysical display. Czech Geol. Surv. Spec. Pap. 17, 1—174
(in Czech with English abstract).
Ulrych J. & Pivec E. 1997: Age-related contrasting alkaline volcanic
533
LATE MIOCENE VOLCANIC ACTIVITY IN THE ČESKÉ STŘEDOHOŘÍ
MOUNTAINS (NORTHERN BOHEMIA)
series in North Bohemia. Chem. Erde 57, 311—336.
Ulrych J., Pivec E., Lang M., Balogh K. & Kropáček V. 1999:
Cenozoic intraplate volcanic rock series of the Bohemian Mas-
sif: a review. Geolines 9, 123—129.
Ulrych J., Cajz V., Balogh K. & Erban V. 2001: Geochemistry of
the stratified volcanosedimentary complex in the central part
of the České středohoří Mts., north Bohemia. Krystalinikum
27, 27—49.
Ulrych J., Balogh K., Cajz V., Novák J.K. & Frána J. 2002a: Cenozoic
alkaline volcanic series in western Ohře (Eger) Rift: Age relations
and geochemical constraints. Acta Montana A, 21, 55—76.
Ulrych J., Svobodová J. & Balogh K. 2002b: The source of Cenozo-
ic volcanism in the České středohoří Mts., Bohemian Massif.
Neu. Jb. Mineral. Abh. 177, 2, 133—162.
Váně M. 1981: Synsedimentary Tertiary volcanism at Skupice and
Mradice in the Louny area. Čas. Mineral. Geol. 26, 4, 403—416
(in Czech with English summary).
Wilson M. 1997: Tertiary-Quaternary magmatism within Europe;
the role of mantle plumes. In: Novák M., Janoušek V. & Koš-
ler J. (Eds.): Challenges to chemical geology. J. Czech Geol.
Soc. 42, 3, 19.
Wilson M. & Downes H. 1991: Tertiary-Quaternary extension-re-
lated alkaline magmatism in Western and Central Europe. J.
Petrology 32, 4, 811—849.
Wilson M. & Downes H. 2006: Tertiary-Quaternary intra-plate
magmatism in Europe and its relationship to mantle dynamics.
In: Gee D.G. & Stephenson R.A. (Eds.): European lithospheric
dynamics. Geol. Soc. London, Mem. 32, 147—166.
Zindler A. & Hart S.R. 1986: Chemical geodynamics. Ann. Rev.
Earth Planet. Sci. 14, 493—571.