www.geologicacarpathica.sk
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, DECEMBER 2009, 60, 6, 439—448 doi: 10.2478/v10096-009-0032-1
Permian single crystal U-Pb zircon age of the Rožňava
Formation volcanites (Southern Gemeric Unit, Western
Carpathians, Slovakia)
ANNA VOZÁROVÁ
1
, MILOŠ ŠMELKO
1
and
ILYA PADERIN
2
1
Comenius University Bratislava, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Petrology and Mineralogy, Mlynská dolina G,
842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic; vozarova@fns.uniba.sk
2
All-Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI), Sredny prospect 74, 199 106 St.- Petersburg, Russia
(Manuscript received April 29, 2009; accepted in revised form October 2, 2009)
Abstract: Zircon populations from the Rožňava Formation volcanic rock complex have been analysed. Euhedral zir-
cons from the 1
st
volcanogenic horizon with fine oscillatory growth zoning, typical of magmatic origin, gave the aver-
age concordia age of 273.3 ± 2.8 Ma, with Th/U ratios in the range of 0.44—0.73. The Permian ages ranging from 266 to
284 Ma were identified in the wider, zoned or unzoned, central zircon parts, as well as in their fine-zoned oscillatory
rims. The average concordia age of 275.3 ± 2.9 was obtained from the euhedral zircon population of the 2
nd
volcanogenic
horizon of the Rožňava Formation. The analyses were performed on zoned magmatic zircons in the age interval from
267 to 287 Ma, with Th/U ratios in the range of 0.39—0.75. In the later zircon population two inherited zircon grains
were dated giving the age of 842 ± 12 Ma (Neoproterozoic) and 456 ± 7 Ma (Late Ordovician). The magmatic zircon ages
document the Kungurian age of Permian volcanic activity and contemporaneous establishment of the south-Gemeric
basin. The time span of volcanic activity corresponds to the collapse of the Western Carpathian Variscan foreland which
expanded southward.
Key words: Permian, Kungurian, post-Variscan rifting, synsedimentary volcanism, U-Pb magmatic zircon ages, inherited
grains.
Introduction
An extensive rift system developed gradually within the fore-
land of the Western Carpathian part of the Variscan orogenic
belt during the Carboniferous—Permian. These extensional
events post-dated the main Late Devonian—Carboniferous and
Serpukhovian-Bashkirian orogenic events (Vozárová 1998).
Post-orogenic rifting also propagated across the entire
Variscan orogen and its retro-arc continental basement part.
Following the main phases of Variscan compression, thermal
crust relaxation occurred in Late Pennsylvanian—Cisuralian
times. This created rifts and grabens that allowed accumula-
tion of the first stage of post-orogenic sedimentation. Within
the post-orogenic basins mainly coarse-grained continental
sedimentary formations were formed, associated with wide-
spread calc-alkaline, bimodal and/or continental tholeiitic vol-
canism. The fragments of Upper Pennsylvanian-Permian
sedimentary basin filling are preserved as part of the main
Western Carpathian Alpine crustal-scale superunits (from
the N to S: Tatricum, Northern and Southern Veporicum and
Northern and Southern Gemericum) and several cover nappe
systems (Fatric, Hronic, Turnaic and Bôrka Nappe;
Vozárová & Vozár 1988).
Generally, the stratigraphic position as well as the correla-
tion of these coarse-grained continental sedimentary forma-
tions is not easy to prove, due to lack of relevant faunal and
plant remains. One of the best ways to resolve this problem is
dating of the associated volcanic rocks, as they form good
correlational horizons throughout widespread regional areas
(McCann et al. 2008; Vozárová et al. 2009a). Thus, the post-
tectonic coarse-grained volcano-sedimentary sequence of the
Southern Gemeric Unit is no exception. The Permian age of
this sequence is documented only by scarce biostratigraphic
data. The problem studied here is focused on zircon single
grain age determinations of the acid volcanic and volcani-
clastic rocks. Such study enables dating of a principal stage
of the Variscan post-tectonic extensional movements in the
area of the Inner Western Carpathians as well as to specify
the stratigraphic position of the associated Gočaltovo Group
sediments.
Geological setting
Within the Southern Gemeric Unit, the post-orogenic over-
step sequences are represented by the Permian continental to
near-shore, lagoonal-sabkha formations of the Gočaltovo
Group (Fig. 1). They unconformably overlap their basement,
the Early Paleozoic Gelnica Terrane, consisting of the pre-Per-
mian low-graded rock complexes of the Gelnica Group and
Štós Formation (Vozárová & Vozár 1996). Generally, the sed-
iments of the Gočaltovo Group represent the relic of rift-relat-
ed sedimentary basin fillings, which originated with the initial
stage of the post-Variscan extension and crustal relaxation.
The whole sequence is subdivided into two lithostratigraphic
units: the basal Rožňava Formation and the upper Štítnik For-
mation (Bajaník et al. 1981; Fig. 2). The studied volcanites are
an integral part of the basal Rožňava Formation.
440
VOZÁROVÁ, ŠMELKO and PADERIN
The characteristic lithological feature of the Rožňava For-
mation is the high content of mature detritus, represented by
the presence of the oligomictic quartzose conglomerates and
sandstones, with indistinct stratification. The whole Rožňava
sequence is vertically subdivided into two regional wide-
spread larger cycles, with conglomerate strata at the base of
each cycle and a shaly-sandstone member among them. Sedi-
mentary structures supporting stream channel deposits are
dominant, with a distinct unimodal transport system. Both
conglomerate horizons were associated with the calc-alkaline
rhyolite-dacite subaerial volcanism. Their relics are recently
indicated as the 1
st
and 2
nd
volcanogenic horizons (Fig. 2).
The Cisuralian age of the Rožňava Formation is assumed on
the basis of the poor microfloral assemblage, with the predom-
inant species from the genera Potonieisporites, Striatodisac-
cites, Vittatina sp. and mainly the form Triquitrites additus
Wilson et Hoffmeister, Potonieisporites novicus Bharadwaj,
Vittatina costabilis Wilson, Reticulatisporites reticulocingu-
lum (Planderová 1980).
Detailed petrological and geochemical investigations of the
Rožňava Formation volcanites have not been done systemati-
cally up till now. All previous analytical data have been sum-
marized by Vozárová (in Marsina et al. 1999 and references
therein). According to this, the volcanites were classified as
calc-alkaline rhyolites/rhyolite-dacites and they are markedly
enriched in B, Zr and Rb and only slightly enriched in La and
Y and depleted in Ba, Sr and V. Results based on zircon typol-
ogy indicate the A-type high-temperature alkaline magma
(Broska et al. 1993).
The Cisuralian age of the magmatic event at 276 ± 25 Ma
has been, for the first time, determined for the Rožňava For-
mation volcanites by monazite dating (Vozárová et al.
2008). Isolated relics of Silurian age, 421 and 431 Ma, found
within the Permian monazite cores were interpreted as the
inherited relics from the source rocks, extracted from the
Lower Paleozoic protolith.
Method of investigation
Zircon populations from two samples of the 1
st
and 2
nd
vol-
canogenic horizons of the Rožňava Formation rock complex
Fig. 1. Geological scheme of the Štítnik—Jelšava area with localization of samples (modified after Bajaník et al. 1984 and Mello et al. 1996).
441
PERMIAN SINGLE CRYSTAL U-Pb ZIRCON AGE OF THE VOLCANITES (WESTERN CARPATHIANS)
Fig. 2. Gočaltovo Group lithostratigraphic scheme (modified after Vozárová &
Vozár 1988). Explanation: 1 – metaconglomerate; 2 – metasandstone; 3 – shale;
4 – crystalline dolomitic limestone; 5 – albitolite; 6 – phosphatic metasand-
stone; 7 – tuffaceous/sedimentary mixed rocks; 8 – rhyolite-dacite volcaniclas-
tics; 9 – rhyolite-dacite.
have been analysed. The zircons have been separated from
rocks by standard grinding, heavy liquid and magnetic separa-
tion analytical procedures. The internal zoning structures and
shapes of the half-sectioned zircon crystals mounted in epoxy
resin puck with chips of the TEMORA (Middledale Gabbroic
Diorite, New South Wales, Australia) and 91500 (Geostan-
dard zircon) reference zircons, were first imaged by BSE and
CL, in order to reveal surface features for analytical spots po-
sitioning. In situ U-Pb analyses were performed on a
SHRIMP-II in the Center for Isotopic Research (CIR) at
VSEGEI in St.-Petersburg, Russia.
Each analysis consisted of 5 scans through the mass range,
the diameter of each spot was about 25 µm, and primary beam
intensity was about 6 nA. The data have been reduced in a
manner similar to that described by Williams (1998, and refer-
ences therein), using the SQUID Excel Macro of Ludwig
(2000). The Pb/U ratios have been normalized relative to a
value of 0.0668 for the
206
Pb/
238
U ratio of the TEMORA ref-
erence zircons, equivalent to an age of 416.75 Ma (Black &
Kamo 2003). Uncertainties given for individual analyses (ra-
tios and ages) are at the 1
σ level; but the uncertainties in cal-
culated concordia ages are reported at 2
σ levels. The
Ahrens-Wetherill (1956) concordia plot has been prepared us-
ing ISOPLOT/EX (Ludwig 1999).
Petrography and geochemistry of
volcanites
Rhyolites of the 1
st
volcanogenic horizon are
composed of the light coloured silicate, mainly
potassium feldspars and less present sodium
reach plagioclases. In texture they are classified
as a fine-grained, primary aphanitic to micro-
crystalline in the matrix, with the evidence of
small phenocrysts of
β-quartz and alkali feld-
spars, mainly represented by soda-poor micro-
cline or microcline-perthite (matrix/phenocrysts
ratio = 1 : 3). A sanidine type of the alkali feldspar
shape is evident in some samples. Occasionally,
they contain besides alkali feldspars also phe-
nocrysts of sodium rich plagioclases (An
5—15
)
and frequently associated with scarce biotite.
These porphyritic textures indicate that crystalli-
zation of phenocrysts began prior to extrusion,
when magma was deeper situated. Zircon, mona-
zite, xenotime, apatite, rutile and Fe-Ti oxide are
present as accessory minerals.
The 1
st
volcanogenic horizon acid volcanites
are associated with volcaniclastics, frequently
with textures indicating ignimbrite or welded
tuffs, flattened lithic and glassy pumice mixed with
vitric material, with relics of deformed “fiam
”.
The 2
nd
volcanogenic horizon acid volcanites
have very fine-grained primary texture of vitric/or
glassy appearance, which contains only small
amounts of phenocrysts (maximum 5 % of the
whole rock), consisting mainly of
β-quartz. They
frequently contain voids and recrystallized glassy
fragments, as the evidence of having been formed
in a surface environment with rapid cooling. Only
pyroclastic ash-falls are associated with the 2
nd
volcanogenic
horizon rhyolites. They have primary very fine-grained vitro-
clastic textures and are commonly interbedded and mixed with
siliciclastic sediments, mostly conglomerates and sandstones.
Permian sequences of the Southern Gemeric Unit are de-
formed and recrystallized, within metamorphic grade attaining
P-T conditions from anchizone to the low-temperature part of
the greenschist facies (Šucha & Eberl 1992; Vozárová 1996;
Vozárová & Rojkovič 2000). The newly formed metamorphic
mineral assemblage is represented by the fine-grained aggre-
gate of quartz + phengite + chlorite ± albite and/or microcline,
associated with scarce biotite in some places. The multistage
tectonothermal events in the south-Gemeric Permian metarhy-
olites, from the Late Jurassic—Early Cretaceous (167 ± 12 and
136 ± 10 Ma), were deduced from the electron microprobe
monazite dating (Vozárová et al. 2008).
Six samples were selected for representative chemical anal-
yses, three from the 1
st
volcanogenic horizon and three from
the 2
nd
volcanogenic horizon. All samples were analysed for
major and trace elements content including REE. Their chemi-
cal composition was determined by ICP/ICP SM Acme Labo-
ratories Ltd. in Canada.
As they are only slight petrographic differences, the chemi-
cal composition of the Rožňava acid volcanites from the two
è
442
VOZÁROVÁ, ŠMELKO and PADERIN
volcanogenic horizons is practically identical. The representa-
tive chemical analyses of the studied samples are given in Ta-
ble 1. As a consequence of metamorphic alteration that
presumably modified their chemistry, particularly the content
of fluid mobile elements such as K, Na, Si, Rb and Cs, the use
of classification based on mobile elements (TAS) has been
considered unreliable. Therefore, a diagram based on relative-
ly immobile elements Nb/Y vs. Zr/TiO
2
(Winchester & Floyd
1977 modified according to Pearce 1996) was preferred for
classification purposes (Fig. 3a). The two groups of volcanites
are calc-alkaline and rhyolitic in character, with SiO
2
contents
ranging from 68.03 to 76.77 wt. %, and fall into peraluminous
suite (A/CNK = 1.35—2.64; A/NK = 1.33—2.45). Very high
K
2
O/Na
2
O ratio is a result of secondary alteration processes.
Volcanic rocks are generally characterized by extremely low
CaO (0.01—0.03 wt. %), MgO (from 0.39 to 0.66 wt. %) and
relative low Fe
2
O
3t
(from 0.73 to 2.46 wt. %) contents. The
chondrite-normalized trace-elements variation diagram for the
studied samples (Fig. 3b) reflects strong negative anomalies of
Ba, Nb, Sr and Ti, and enrichment in Rb, Th, K, La, Ce, Nd,
Hf and Y. These broadly indicate their A-type affinity. Simi-
larly, based on the chondrite-normalized REE distribution
(normalizing values after Taylor & McLennan 1985; Fig. 3c)
the rhyolites are enriched in light REE, and have relatively un-
fractionated heavy REE with
Σ(La/Yb)
n
= 3.5 and
Σ(Gd/
Lu)
n
= 1.6. These features, together with the distinct negative
Eu-anomaly (Eu/Eu* = 0.48) are typical for A-type magma-
tites. Based on Y/Nb ratio, which ranges from 2.3 to 2.6 in all
studied samples, the Rožňava rhyolites correspond to non-oro-
genic A
2
-subtype, which could indicate the post-collisional
magmatic environment (Eby 1992). According to Eby’s inter-
pretation this magmatic subtype consists of granites emplaced
in a variety of tectonic environments, including post-collision-
al, post-orogenic and anorogenic settings. Negative Nb anom-
alies are a common feature of igneous rocks formed in
destructive margin settings and derived from arc crust
1
st
volcanogenic horizon
2
nd
volcanogenic horizon
Locality Hrádok
Hrádok
Hrádok Šebeková Šebeková Šebeková
Sample
04-SM
06-SM
08-SM
01-SM
02-SM
05-SM
wt. (%)
wt. (%)
wt. (%)
wt. (%)
wt. (%)
wt. (%)
SiO
2
74.38
74.53
76.77
74.82
74.83
68.03
Al
2
O
3
13.47
12.86
12.95
14.25
14.47
17.49
Fe
2
O
3
2.46
0.73
2.00
2.32
0.84
1.61
MgO
0.58
0.23
0.47
0.66
0.39
0.56
CaO
0.01
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.02
Na
2
O
0.09
0.16
0.05
0.04
0.13
0.11
K
2
O
7.08
8.68
4.64
5.41
7.71
8.31
TiO
2
0.23
0.18
0.17
0.19
0.19
0.28
P
2
O
5
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.02
MnO
0.03
<0.01
<0.01
0.01
0.01
<0.01
Cr
2
O
3
0.00
<0.002 <0.002 0.00
0.00
<0.002
LOI
1.80
2.50
2.90
2.40
1.60
3.60
Total
100.16
99.93
100.00
100.15
100.21
100.03
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
ppm
Hf
10.1
9.2
9.1
9.9
9.5
13.1
Nb
20.5
18.5
19.6
21.2
21.6
31
Rb
150.4
99.8
111
108.7
112.5
128.8
Sn
4
4
4
5
5
7
Sr
9
7.9
1.5
2.3
5.8
4.6
Ta
1.7
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
Th
21.6
24.3
23.8
20.7
20.1
28.9
U
4.7
6
6.3
4.1
3.7
5.7
V
14
<8
<8
5
5
<8
W
3.2
3.4
2.7
3.2
2.7
4.2
Zr
323.6
323
268
310.4
306.9
446.6
Y
49.9
48.6
54.1
55.1
50.8
41.4
La
62.5
51.5
58.4
52.7
53.9
53.9
Ce
136.7
105.3
114.7
109.3
104
113.4
Pr
16.23
13.11
14.07
13.77
13.52
15.49
Nd
61.5
48.7
50.8
52.9
50.3
59.1
Sm
11.3
9.21
9.16
9.8
9.2
11.01
Eu
0.78
0.76
0.6
0.71
0.66
1.08
Gd
9.89
8.33
8.34
8.97
8.44
8.93
Tb
1.39
1.43
1.39
Dy
8.92
7.84
8.59
9.3
8.89
7.53
Ho
1.7
1.67
1.84
1.77
1.69
1.47
Er
5.02
4.82
5.32
5.29
5.29
4.3
Tm
0.8
0.75
0.86
0.79
0.78
0.72
Yb
4.76
4.54
5.07
5.04
4.93
4.55
Lu
0.7
0.72
0.76
0.71
0.71
0.69
Table 1: Rock chemical analyses of the Rožňava Formation 1
st
and 2
nd
volca-
nogenic horizons acid metavolcanites.
(Whalen et al. 1996). The origin of magma of the
Rožňava felsic volcanites was probably connected
with crustal melting associated with regional post-
Variscan extension and thermal relaxation. Its com-
position presumably reflects source characteristics –
the metasediments and metavolcanites of the Lower
Paleozoic Gelnica Group. A non-orogenic geotecton-
ic interpretation may also be derived from the Nb /Y
(Fig. 3d) and Rb/(Yb + Ta) ratios and Rb/10:Hf:Tax3
referred to Pearce et al. (1984) and Harris et al.
(1986) discrimination diagrams. The relative enrich-
ment of Ce, Zr and Y is indicative for their compati-
bility with crustal components in the melt. Negative
Ti, Sr, Ba and Eu indicate retention of plagioclases
and accessory minerals during partial melting (Col-
lins et al. 1982; Pearce et al. 1984; Whalen et al.
1996).
Zircon characteristics
Zircon characteristics are supplemented by electron
microprobe analyses, in addition to U-Th-Pb ion mi-
croprobe analyses performed on a SHRIMP-II in the
Center for Isotopic Research (CIR) at VSEGEI in
St.-Petersburg, Russia. CAMECA SX-100 electron
microprobe at Slovak Geological Survey, Bratislava
was used for element concentration analyses. Si and
Zr together with elements such as Hf, Y, U, Th, P and
REE have been analysed (Table 2). La was below the
detection limits. The operating conditions were as
follows: 15 kV accelerating voltage, 40 nA beam cur-
rent, beam diameter 1—5 µm; standards – zircon (Zr,
Si), HfO
2
(Hf), apatite (P), YbPO
4
(Yb), wollastonite
(Ca), CePO
4
(Ce), ThO
2
(Th), YPO
4
(Y), Gd
2
O
3
(Gd); connecting period at 30 s (Si, Zr), 50 s (Hf),
110 s (Y) and 140 s (U, Th).
The analysed zircons exhibit composition zonation
trends of increasing HfO
2
and (UO
2
+ ThO
2
) concen-
trations and decreasing ZrO
2
/HfO
2
ratios from the
core to the rim of the crystals (Table 2). The HfO
2
443
PERMIAN SINGLE CRYSTAL U-Pb ZIRCON AGE OF THE VOLCANITES (WESTERN CARPATHIANS)
1
st
vol
ca
no
ge
ni
c h
or
izo
n
2
nd
vo
lca
nog
en
ic
h
ori
zo
n
Sa
m
pl
e
4-
SM
4-
SM
4-
SM
4-
SM
4-
SM
4-
SM
4-
SM
4-
SM
4-
SM
4-
SM
4-
SM
2-
SM
2-
SM
2-
SM
2-
SM
2-
SM
2-
SM
A
nal
ys
es
ana
1
an
a2
ana
3
ana
4
ana
5
ana
6
ana
7
an
a9
ana
10
ana
11
ana
12
ana
4
ana
5
ana
6
ana
7
ana
8
ana
9
zi
rc
on
1
zi
rc
on
2
zi
rc
on
2
zi
rc
on
3
zi
rc
on
3
zi
rc
on
4
zi
rc
on
4
zi
rc
on
5
zi
rc
on
6
zi
rc
on
7
zi
rc
on
7
zi
rc
on
3
zi
rc
on
3
zi
rc
on
4
zi
rc
on
4
zi
rc
on
5
zi
rc
on
5
Co
m
m
en
t
br
ig
ht
zo
ne
dar
k z
one
br
ight
c
ore
dar
k r
im
br
ight
c
ore
dar
k r
im
co
re
ri
m
br
ight
c
ore
dar
k r
im
dar
k r
im
br
ight
c
ore
mi
dd
le
ri
m
(w
t. %
)
(wt
. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(wt
. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
(w
t. %
)
Si
O
2
3
2.
81
3
2.
80
3
2.
73
3
2.
88
3
2.
81
3
2.
81
3
3.
02
3
2.
95
3
3.
05
3
2.
28
3
2.
93
3
2.
47
3
2.
90
3
2.
43
3
2.
31
3
2.
39
3
2.
29
Zr
O
2
6
6.
00
6
6.
01
6
6.
29
6
6.
81
6
7.
14
6
5.
57
6
6.
48
6
6.
55
6
5.
60
6
3.
45
6
5.
87
6
3.
33
6
4.
98
6
4.
72
6
3.
47
6
5.
68
6
5.
80
Y
2
O
3
0.
46
0.
20
0.
71
0.
08
0.
46
0.
30
0.
12
0.
30
1.
89
0.
15
0.
79
0.
21
0.
36
0.
55
0.
15
0.
15
UO
2
0.
03
0.
03
0.
15
0.
04
0.
01
0.
20
0.
03
0.
17
0.
39
Th
O
2
0.
04
0.
06
0.
02
0.
06
0.
15
0.
02
0.
04
0.
03
0.
24
0.
01
0.
29
0.
04
0.
21
0.
01
P
2
O
5
0.
21
0.
16
0.
22
0.
14
0.
10
0.
24
0.
15
0.
17
0.
10
0.
38
0.
09
0.
42
0.
13
0.
32
0.
36
0.
19
0.
13
Ca
O
0.
01
0.
00
0.
00
0.
00
0.
00
0.
00
0.
01
0.
01
0.
01
0.
01
0.
01
Hf
O
2
1.
09
1.
45
1.
43
0.
77
0.
85
1.
43
1.
46
0.
82
1.
45
1.
17
1.
54
1.
12
1.
20
1.
41
2.
04
1.
33
1.
31
Ce
2
O
3
0.
01
0.
07
0.
07
0.
05
0.
01
0.
07
0.
03
0.
01
0.
01
Gd
2
O
3
0.
01
0.
07
0.
03
0.
08
0.
09
0.
10
0.
14
0.
07
0.
00
0.
00
0.
13
0.
13
0.
02
Tb
2
O
3
0.
10
0.
02
0.
04
0.
02
0.
02
0.
08
0.
08
0.
04
0.
03
0.
01
0.
01
0.
06
0.
02
Dy
2
O
3
0.
11
0.
08
0.
03
0.
19
0.
13
0.
16
0.
19
0.
07
0.
14
0.
06
0.
05
0.
05
Ho
2
O
3
0.
37
0.
03
0.
05
0.
09
0.
02
0.
19
0.
36
0.
02
0.
13
0.
17
0.
34
0.
10
0.
05
Er
2
O
3
0.
25
0.
23
0.
25
0.
06
0.
08
0.
10
0.
15
0.
55
0.
07
0.
22
Tm
2
O
3
0.
01
0.
02
0.
01
0.
00
0.
04
0.
13
0.
06
0.
04
0.
04
0.
14
0.
02
Yb
2
O
3
0.
30
0.
23
0.
11
0.
23
0.
27
0.
04
0.
02
0.
09
0.
13
0.
32
0.
08
0.
25
0.
40
0.
29
Lu
2
O
3
0.
00
0.
02
0.
40
0.
40
0.
28
0.
52
0.
18
0.
21
0.
02
Tot
al
10
1.
72
101
.5
5
10
1.
13
10
2.
27
10
1.
56
10
1.
47
10
2.
77
101.
15
10
1.
08
10
0.
25
10
1.
58
99
.37
10
0.
41
99
.91
10
0.
09
10
0.
48
99
.84
Fig. 3. Rožnava Formation acid volcanite characteristics based on the
chemical composition. a – Zr/TiO
2
(wt. %) vs. Nb/Y (ppm) dia-
gram after Winchester & Floyd (1977) modified by Pearce (1996).
b – Chondrite normalized (Thompson 1982) trace elements abun-
dances. c – Chondrite normalized REE patterns. Normalizing val-
ues are after Taylor & McLennan (1985). d – Variation Nb (ppm) vs.
Y (ppm) with indication of tectonic settings after Pearce et al. (1984).
Table 2:
Representative
magmatic
zircon
analyses
of
the
Rožňava
Formati
on
metarhyolites.
444
VOZÁROVÁ, ŠMELKO and PADERIN
abundance of these zircons range from 0.77 to
2.03 wt. % and the mean of 1.29 wt. % falls in
the field of Hf (wt. %) variation in the zircon
associations of acid magmatic rocks (Wark &
Miller 1993; Hoskin & Ireland 2000; Hoskin &
Schaltegger 2003 and references therein). The
variation of the ZrO
2
/HfO
2
ratios in the zircon
assemblage ranges from 86 to 57 in the core and
from 78 to 42 in the rim. The Th/U ratios are
high, ranging from 0.42 to 0.89, typical for mag-
matic rocks. Based on chemical composition of
studied zircons, the dominant substitution was
probably the simple mechanism (Hf
4+
= Zr
4+
)
combined with coupled substitution “xenotime”
mechanism [(Y, REE)
3+
+P
5+
= Zr
4+
+Si
4+
] (Speer
1982), which is reflected in variations of Y con-
tents (from 0.1 to 0.8 wt. %) and
ΣREE abun-
dance (0.15—1.31 wt. %).
SHRIMP ages
Samples 8-SM and 2-SM from the 1
st
and the
2
nd
volcanogenic horizons were dated from the
Rožňava Formation volcanic rock suite.
Sample 8-SM: Loc.: West of Štítnik town, for-
est road 550 m SW from the Hrádok Hill (810 m
Fig. 4. Selected CL zircon images from the Rožňava Formation 1
st
horizon
metavolcanites (sample no. 8-SM) and age data based on
206
Pb/
238
U ratios with
indication of measurement points.
altitude). Coordinates: N 48°92’020”, E 20°48’165”; 750 m
above sea level.
A typical feature of the majority of the studied 8-SM zircon
population is the presence of well developed growth zoning. It
is quite commonly observed that regular growth zoning is in-
terrupted by textural discontinuities along which the original
zoning is resorbed and succeeded by the growth of a newly-
zoned zircon. These resorption events probably reflect inter-
ference periods of Zr undersaturation in the magma. Some
zircon crystals with bipyramidal sector zoning occur. The de-
velopment of sector zoning has been attributed to kinetic fac-
tors and changes in the magmatic environment during crystal
growth (Paterson & Stephens 1992) or to the relation between
growth rates and lattice diffusivity (Watson & Liang 1995).
Vavra et al. (1996) referred sector zoning to rapidly fluctuating
and unequal growth rates related to the roughness of the growth
surface and degree of saturation of the growth medium.
Euhedral zircons with fine oscillatory zoning, typical of
magmatic origin (Fig. 4), gave an average concordia age of
273.3 ± 2.8 Ma (Probability of concordance = 0.90; MSWD of
concordance = 0.016; n = 10; Fig. 5), with Th/U ratios within
the range of 0.44—0.73 (Table 3). The Permian ages ranging
from 266 to 284 Ma were determined in the wider zoned or
unzoned central parts of the zircon crystals, as well as in their
fine growth oscillation zoned rims.
Sample 2-SM: Loc.: West of Gočaltovo village, 50 m N of the
Šebeková Hill (643 m altitude). Coordinates: N 48°92’180”,
E 20°48’020”; 630 m above sea level.
Zircon population from the sample 2-SM contains crystals
with fine oscillatory growth zoning and less with sector zon-
ing (Fig. 6). A special case is local modification of magmatic
zircon by the magmatic phenomena, which tend to disrupt
the concentric oscillatory zoning and to develop irregular do-
mains in zircon, thus cutting discordantly growth zoned do-
mains.
The occurrence of xenocrystic zircons is a common feature
in sample 2-SM. Zircon xenocrysts occur as cores mantled by
newly grown magmatic zircons (Fig. 6). Xenocrystic cores are
recognized from their rims by geometrically irregular surfac-
es, which truncate internal zoning or separate sub-rounded un-
zoned or chaotically zoned cores.
The average concordia age of 275.3±2.9 (Probability of
concordance = 0.85; MSWD of concordance = 0.035; n = 10)
was obtained from the euhedral zircon population of the sam-
ple 2-SM (Fig. 7). The analyses were performed from oscilla-
tory zoned magmatic zircons in the age interval from 267 to
287 Ma, with Th/U ratios within the range of 0.39—0.75
(Table 3).
From the studied zircon population, two inherited zircon
grains were dated, which gave 842 ± 12 Ma (Neoproterozoic)
and 456 ± 7 Ma (Late Ordovician) age (Table 3). They could be
either supracrustal and/or magmatic in origin. Presumably
they were incorporated in the Permian magmatic event from
the underlying south-Gemeric basement, in which the Upper
Ordovician metavolcanites of the Bystrý potok Formation (the
Gelnica Group) contain Neoproterozoic inherited zircon cores
(Vozárová et al. 2009b).
Discussion and conclusions
The obtained in situ U-Pb (SHRIMP) zircon ages clearly
document the timing of post-Variscan extensional rifting in
the internal zone of the Variscan Western Carpathians. The
445
PERMIAN SINGLE CRYSTAL U-Pb ZIRCON AGE OF THE VOLCANITES (WESTERN CARPATHIANS)
Fig. 5. Rožňava Formation 1
st
horizon metavolcanites concordia di-
agram of zircon age data (sample no. 8-SM).
Table 3: Rožňava Formation metavolcanites ion microprobe zircon data.
Gemeric Unit
Gočaltovo Group
Rožňava Formation
%
206
Pb
c
ppm
U
ppm
Th
232
Th/
238
U
ppm
206
Pb*
206
Pb/
238
U
Age (Ma)
±
207
Pb/
206
Pb
Age (Ma)
±
%
Discor-
dant
8-SM_1.1(core)
0.03
614
310
0.52 23
274.6
±4.2
287
±37
4
8-SM_2.1(rim)
0.00
135
57
0.44 5
272.6
±5
288
±76
5
8-SM_3.1(rim)
0.23
541
245
0.47 20.1
272.9
±4.1
269
±57
–1
8-SM_4.1(rim)
0.42
253
178
0.73 9.69
280.2
±4.5
271
±87
–3
8-SM_5.1(core)
0.11
151
89
0.61 5.17
250.9
±4.5
250
±83
0
8-SM_6.1(core)
0.16
710
341
0.50 26.5
273.1
±4.2
262
±68
–4
8-SM_7.1(core)
0.00
33
14
0.44 1.21
265.8
±6.5
292
±150
10
8-SM_8.1(core)
0.26
741
375
0.52 26.8
265.5
±4
255
±49
–4
8-SM_9.1(core)
0.21
463
310
0.69 16.9
268
±4.1
265
±61
–1
8-SM_10.1(core)
0.17
379
256
0.70 14.3
275.7
±4.3
252
±76
–9
8-SM_11.1(core)
0.25
204
123
0.62 7.92
284.1
±4.7
264
±95
–7
2-SM_1.1(rim)
--
140
64
0.47 5.36
281.1
±4.8
350
±110
25
2-SM_2.1(rim)
--
164
82
0.52 6.26
280.8
±4.9
290
±68
3
2-SM_3.1(rim)
0.06
40
15
0.39 1.51
279.1
±6.4
219
±150
–22
2-SM_4.1(rim)
--
169
81
0.50 6.24
272.1
±4.6
344
±77
26
2-SM_5.1(core)
0.16
447
398
0.92 16.8
275.9
±4.2
228
±62
–17
2-SM_6.1(core)
0.10
445
505
1.17 53.4
842
±12
835
±23
–1
2-SM_6.2(rim)
--
174
92
0.54 6.68
281.9
±4.7
300
±68
6
2-SM_7.1(core)
0.03
170
75
0.46 10.7
455.9
±7.2
422
±68
–7
2-SM_7.2(rim)
0.09
368
190
0.54 13.7
272.8
±4.2
284
±50
4
2-SM_8.1(rim)
0.10
251
183
0.75 9.01
263.4
±4.4
239
±68
–9
2-SM_9.1(rim)
0.18
289
209
0.75 10.5
267.2
±4.2
225
±66
–16
2-SM_10.1(rim)
0.46
188
117
0.64 7.37
286.9
±4.8
282
±120
–2
average concordia ages of 273 ± 2.8 or 275 ± 2.9 Ma corre-
spond to the Kungurian (the latest Cisuralian according to the
International Stratigraphic Chart, Gradstein et al. 2004). This
magmatism coincided with evolution of the Cisuralian rift
system, post-dating the Devonian-Mississippian accretion of
the Neoproterozoic/Early Paleozoic peri-Gondwana derived
microplates (Gotic Terrane – Stampfli et al. 2001a; Hun Ter-
rane – Stampfli et al. 2002; Galatian Terrane – von Raumer
& Stampfli 2008), with polyphase colliding into the southern
margin of Laurussia. The Western Carpathian Variscides, as
an easterly continuation of the Austro-Alpine Domain of the
Alps, were a part of this geodynamic system. The final stage
of the Variscan collision shifted crustal blocks of the Central
Western Carpathian Crystalline Zone on to the terranes of the
Northern Gemeric Zone, where tectonically squeezed out rel-
ics of island arc and oceanic crustal fragments were preserved,
on the Cambrian-Ordovician Gelnica Terrane margin
(Vozárová 1998).
The change of regional stress patterns was coincident with
termination of orogenic activity in the Variscan orogenic belt
and was followed by major dextral translation between
Gondwana and Laurussia (Ziegler 1990; Ziegler & Cloe-
tingh 2004). The Variscan orogenic belt of the Western Car-
pathians during the post-Variscan evolution was deeply
truncated with its superimposed system of the Pennsylva-
nian-Permian wrench-induced troughs. The Pennsylvanian-
Cisuralian collapse of the Western Carpathian Variscan
internides, of which relics are preserved in the Alpine tecton-
ic superunits: Tatricum, Veporicum, Zemplinicum and
Hronicum, is documented to have expanded southward over
time (Vozárová 1996, 1998). The Cisuralian collapse of the
southern foreland is reflected within the Permian sequence
of the Southern Gemeric Unit.
Rifting, after rapid sedimentation of coarse-grained mature
sediments, was associated with synsedimentary magmatic
activity. It is well documented in the lithostratigraphic se-
quence of the Gočaltovo Group (Fig. 2). Polystage regional
uplift coincided with regional cyclic sedimentation, as well
as with the polyphase volcanic activity in the context of the
1
st
and 2
nd
volcanogenic horizons (Vozárová 1977). This up-
lift was probably induced by a complex combination of
wrench-related lithospheric deformation and magmatic infla-
tion of the lithosphere.
Permian Basin-and-Range basin type rifting was postulated
for the Central Western Carpathians by Dostal et al. (2003)
446
VOZÁROVÁ, ŠMELKO and PADERIN
Fig. 6. Selected CL zircon images from the Rožňava Formation 2
nd
horizon (sample
no. 2-SM) metavolcanites and age data based on
206
Pb/
238
U ratios with indication of
measurement points.
Fig. 7. Concordia diagrams of zircon age data from the Rožňava
Formation 2
nd
horizon metavolcanites (sample no. 2-SM).
in the Hronic Unit. According to their interpre-
tation this rifting followed the collision of the
Paleo-Tethys ridge with the trench bordering the
southern margin of Laurussia (in the sense of
tectonic model of Stampfli 2001a,b). The south-
Gemeric Rožňava Formation acid metavolcanites
do not appear to be directly related to the mafic
rocks. They were connected with crustal melting,
but is not excluded that the melting was triggered
by an elevated temperature gradient caused by
ascending basaltic magma, as is supposed by
Dostal et al. (2003).
The approximately equal zircon ages of the
two volcanogenic horizons remain an open ques-
tion, since it could be presupposed that in the
case of normal lithostratigraphic sequence, the
2
nd
horizon volcanites might be younger then the
1
st
ones. The presented SHRIMP zircon ages
show reverse trend, that means 273 ± 2.8 Ma con-
cordia age for the 1
st
horizon volcanites and
275 ± 2.9 Ma zircon age for the 2
nd
one. Both cor-
respond to the Kungurian age and the age differ-
ence is within the calculated standard deviation
and standard analytical error.
Considering these age data, the Permian development of the
south-Gemeric sedimentary basin was rapidly pulsating in ex-
tensional stages, following cyclicity in sedimentation and
synsedimentary volcanic activity. The Rožňava Formation
sedimentary sequence could have been formed in a relatively
short lived transtensional event, within the Kungurian time
span, not more than five and half million years long. A rapid
subsidence coincides with the pulsating stage of extensional
movements and was associated with synsedimentary volcanic
activity. Referring to recent thickness of the Rožňava Forma-
tion rock sequence with calculation its diminishing due to dia-
genetic and metamorphic changes, the presumed sedimentation
rate was relatively high, between 7 and 10 cm/yr. After the ini-
tial rapid sedimentation and synsedimentary tectonic activity,
the Permian (Guadalupian-Lopingian) sedimentary evolution
of the south-Gemeric basin had significantly less dynamic
conditions. This is reflected in the absence of volcanic activity
and coarse-grained sediments within the sedimentary se-
quence of the Štítnik Formation.
Two inherited grains were dated within the cores of the
magmatic zircons from the sample 2-SM (Fig. 6). Both were
presumably derived from the melted south-Gemeric basement
rocks. The age of the Neoproterozoic inherited grain
(842 ± 12 Ma) fully corresponds to the dominant detrital zir-
con ages coming from the Gelnica Group metasediments (un-
published results). Similarly, the majority of the inherited
grains within the magmatic zircon cores of the Cambrian/Or-
dovician Gelnica Group metavolcanites confirm the same age
(Vozárová et al. 2009b). The second inherited grain of the
Middle/Late Ordovician age (456 ± 7 Ma) corresponds well to
the youngest in situ U-Pb zircon ages of the metavolcanites of
the Gelnica Group (Vozárová et al. 2009b).
Acknowledgments: The financial support of the Slovak Re-
search and Development Support Agency (Project ID: APVV-
447
PERMIAN SINGLE CRYSTAL U-Pb ZIRCON AGE OF THE VOLCANITES (WESTERN CARPATHIANS)
0438-06) and of the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry
of Education of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy
of Sciences (Project ID: VEGA 2/0072/08) is gratefully ac-
knowledged. The authors would like to thank I. Broska, I.
Petrík and the unknown reviewer, who constructively enabled
significant improvement of the manuscript.
References
Bajaník Š., Vozárová A. & Reichwalder P. 1981: Lithostratigraphic
classification of Rakovec Group and Late Paleozoic sediments
in the Spišsko-gemerské rudohorie Mts. Geol. Práce, Spr. 75,
27—56 (in Slovak).
Bajaník Š., Ivanička J., Mello J., Pristaš J., Reichwalder P., Snopko
L., Vozár J. & Vozárová A. 1984: Geological map of the Slo-
venské rudohorie Mts. – eastern part 1 : 50,000. D. Štúr Inst.
Geol., Bratislava.
Black L.P. & Kamo S.L. 2003: TEMORA 1: a new zircon standard
for U-Pb geochronology. Chem. Geol. 200, 155—170.
Broska I., Vozár J., Uher P. & Jakabská K. 1993: Zircon typology
from the Permian rhyolite-dacite and their volcaniclastics
(Western Carpathians). In: Rakús M. & Vozár J. (Eds.): Geody-
namic evolution and deep structure of the Western Carpathians.
D. Štúr Inst. Geol., Bratislava, 151—158 (in Slovak).
Collins W.J., Beams S.D., White A.J.R. & Chappel B.W. 1982: Na-
ture and origin of A-type granites with particular reference to
southeastern Australia. Contr. Mineral. Petrology 80, 189—200.
Dostal J., Vozár J., Keppie J.D. & Hovorka D. 2003: Permian volcan-
ism in the Central Western Carpathians (Slovakia): Basin-and-
Range type rifting in the southern Laurussian margin. Int. J. Earth
Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.) 92, 27—35. doi: 0.1007/s00531-002-0307-6.
Eby N.G. 1992: Chemical subdivision of the granitoids. Petrogene-
sis and tectonic implication. Geology 20641—644.
Gradstein F.M., Ogg J.G., Smith A.G., Bleeker W. & Lourens L.J.
2004: A new geological time scale with special reference to Pre-
cambrian and Neogene. Episodes 27, 2, 83—100.
Harris N.B.W., Pearce J.A. & Tindle A.G. 1986: Geochemical char-
acteristics of collision-zone magmatism. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ.
19, 67—81.
Hoskin P.W.O. & Ireland T.R. 2000: Rare Earth chemistry of zircon
and its use as a provenance indicator. Geology 28, 627—630.
Hoskin P.W.O. & Schaltegger U. 2003: The composition of zircon
and igneous and metamorphic petrogenesis. Rev. Mineral.
Geochem. 53, 27—62. doi: 10.2113/0530027.
Ludwig K.R. 1999: User’s manual for Isoploths/Ex, Version 2.10. A
geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geo-
chronology Center, Spec. Publ. No. 1a, 2455 Ridge Road, Ber-
keley CA 94709, USA.
Ludwig K.R. 2000: SQUID 1.00, A User’s Manual. Berkeley Geo-
chronology Center, Spec. Publ. No. 2, 2455 Ridge Road, Berke-
ley, CA 94709, USA.
Marsina K., Bodiš D., Havrila M., Janák M., Káčer Š., Kohút M.,
Lexa J., Rapant S. & Vozárová A. 1999: Geochemical atlas of
Slovak Republic. Part III: Rocks. Geol. Surv. Slovak Republic —
Ministry of Environment of Slovak Republic, Bratislava, 1—135.
McCann T., Kiersnowski, Krainer K., Vozárová A., Peryt T., Opluštil
S., Stollhofen H., Schneider J., Wetzel A., Boulvain F., Dusar
M., Török Á., Haas J., Tait J. & Körner F. 2008: Permian. In:
McCann T. (Ed.): The geology of Central Europe. Volume 1:
Precambrian and Palaeozoic. Geol. Soc. London, 531—598.
Mello J., Elečko M., Pristaš J., Reichwalder P., Snopko L., Vass D. &
Vozárová A. 1996: Geological map of the Slovak Karst
1:50,000. Geol. Surv. Slovak Republic, Bratislava.
Paterson B.A. & Stephens W.E. 1992: Kinetically induced composi-
tional zoning in titanite: Implication for accessory-phase/melt
partitioning of trace elements. Contr. Mineral. Petrology 109,
373—385.
Pearce J. 1996: Sources and settings of granitic rocks. Episodes 19,
120—125.
Pearce J.A., Harris N.B.W. & Tindle A.G. 1984: Trace element dis-
crimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic
rocks. Geol. Soc., Spec. Publ. 7, 14—24.
Planderová E. 1980: New result about age of “Rožňava Železník”
Group. Geol. Práce Spr. 60, 143—168 (in Slovak).
Speer J.A. 1982: Zircon. Rev. in Mineralogy 5 (2
nd
ed.), 67—112.
Stampfli G.M., Borel G.D., Cavazza W., Mosar J. & Ziegler P.A.
2001a: Palaeotectonic and palaeographic evolution of the west-
ern Tethys and Peri-Tethyan domain. Episodes 24, 222—228.
Stampfli G.M., Mosar J., Favre P., Pillevuit A. & Vannay J.C. 2001b:
Permo-Mesozoic evolution of the western Tethyan realm: the
Neotethys/East Mediterranean connection. In: Ziegler P.A.,
Cavazza W., Robertson A.H.F. & Crasquin-Soleau S. (Eds.):
Peri-Tethys memoir 6: Peritethyan rift/wrench basins and passive
margins, IGCP 369, Paris. Mém. Mus. Nat. Hist. 186, 51/108.
Stampfli G.M., von Raumer J. & Borel G.D. 2002: The Paleozoic
evolution of pre-Variscan terranes: From Gondwana to the
Variscan collision. In: Martinez-Catalan J.R., Hatcher R.D. Jr.,
Arenas R. & Diaz-Garcia F. (Eds.): Variscan-Appalachians dy-
namics: The building of the Late Paleozoic basement. Geol. Soc.
Amer., Spec. Pap. 364, 263—280.
Šucha V. & Eberl D.D. 1992: Postsedimentary alteration of the Per-
mian sediments in the northern Gemericum and Hronicum of the
Western Carpathians. Miner. Slovaca 24, 399—405 (in Slovak).
Taylor S.R. & McLennan S.M. 1985: The continental crust: its com-
position and evolution. Blackwell, Oxford, 1—312.
Thompson R.N. 1982: British Tertiary volcanic province. Scot. J.
Geol. 18, 49/107.
Vavra G., Gebauer D., Schmidt R. & Compston W. 1996: Multiple
zircon growth and recrystallization during polyphase Late Car-
boniferous to Triassic metamorphism in granulites of the Ivrea
zone (Southern Alps): An ion microprobe (SHRIMP) study.
Contr. Mineral. Petrology 122, 337—358.
von Raumer J.F. & Stampfli G.M. 2008: The birth of Rheic Ocean –
Early Paleozoic subsidence patterns and subsequent tectonic
plate scenarios. Tectonophysics 461, 9—20.
doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.04.012
Vozárová A. 1977: Petrography of Late Paleozoic sediments of the
SE part of the Spišsko-gemerské rudohorie Mts. Západ. Karpaty,
Ser. Min., Petr., Geoch., Metal. 3, 147—174.
Vozárová A. 1996: Tectono-sedimentary evolution of Late Paleozoic
basins based on interpretation of lithostratigraphic data (Western
Carpathians, Slovakia). Slovak Geol. Mag. 3—4, 251—271.
Vozárová A. 1998: Late Carboniferous to Early Permian time interval
in the Western Carpathians: Northern Tethys Margin. Geodiver-
sitas 20, 4, 621—641.
Vozárová A. & Rojkovič I. 2000: Permian lacustrine phosphatic
sandstone in the Southern Gemeric Unit, Western Carpathians,
Slovakia. Geol. Carpathica 51, 265—278.
Vozárová A. & Vozár J. 1988: Late Paleozoic in West Carpathians.
Monogr., D. Š. Inst. Geol., Bratislava, 1—314.
Vozárová A. & Vozár J. 1996: Terranes of West Carpathians –
North Pannonian Domain. Slovak Geol. Mag. 1, 61—83.
Vozárová A., Konečný P., Vozár J. & Šmelko M. 2008: Upper Juras-
sic—Lower Cretaceous tectonothermal events in the Southern
Gemeric Permian rocks deduced from electron microprobe dating
of monazite (Western Carpathians, Slovakia). Geol. Carpathica
59, 2, 89—102.
Vozárová A., Ebner F., Kovács S., Kräutner H.-G., Szederkenyi T.,
Krstić B., Sremac J., Aljinovic D., Novak M. & Skaberne D.
2009a: Late Variscan (Carboniferous to Permian) environments in
448
VOZÁROVÁ, ŠMELKO and PADERIN
the Circum Pannonian Region. Geol. Carpathica 60, 1, 71—104.
doi: 10.2478/v10096-009-0002-7.
Vozárová A., Šarinová K., Larionov A., Presnyakov S. & Sergeev S.
2009b: Late Cambrian/Ordovician magmatic arc type volcanism
in the Southern Gemericum basement, Western Carpathians,
Slovakia: U-Pb (SHRIMP) data from zircons. Int. J. Earth Sci.
doi: 10.1007/s 00531-009-0454-0 (in print).
Watson E.B. & Liang Y. 1995: A simple model for section zoning in
slowly grown crystals: Implication for growth rate and lattice
diffusion with emphasis on accessory minerals in crustal rocks.
Amer. Mineralogist 80, 1179—1187.
Wetherill G.W. 1956: Discordant uranium-lead ages. Trans. Amer.
Geophys. Union 37, 320—326.
Whalen J.B., Jenner G.A., Longstaffe F.J., Robert E. & Gari
py C.
1996: Geochemical and isotopic (O, Nd, Pb and Sr) constraints
on A-type granite petrogenesis based on the Topsails igneous
suite, Newfoundland Appalachians. J. Petrology 37, 1463—1489.
Williams I.S. 1998: U-Th-Pb geochronology by ion microprobe. In:
McKibben M.A., Shanks III W.C. & Ridley W.I. (Eds.): Appli-
cations of microanalytical techniques to understanding mineral-
izing processes. Rev. Econ. Geol. 7, 1—35.
Winchester J.A. & Floyd P.A. 1977: Geochemical discrimination of
different magma series and differentiation products using immo-
bile elements. Chem. Geol. 20, 325—343.
Ziegler A.M. 1990: Phytogeographic patterns and continental config-
urations during the Permian Period. In: McKerrow W.S. &
Scotese C.R. (Eds.): Palaeozoic palaeogeography and biogeog-
raphy. Geol. Soc. London, Mem. 12, 263—379.
Ziegler A.M. & Cloetingh S. 2004: Dynamic processes controlling
rifted basins. Earth Sci. Rev. 64, 1—2, 1—50.
è