www.geologicacarpathica.sk
GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, OCTOBER 2009, 60, 5, 397—417 doi: 10.2478/v10096-009-0029-9
Eocene-Oligocene sedimentation in the external areas of the
Moldavide Basin (Marginal Folds Nappe, Eastern
Carpathians, Romania): sedimentological, paleontological
and petrographic approaches
CRINA MICLĂU
1
, FRANCESCO LOIACONO
2
, DIEGO PUGLISI
3
and DORIN SORIN BACIU
1
1
Department of Geology, “Al. I. Cuza” University of Ia i, Carol I Boulevard 20A, 700505 Ia i, Romania; crina_miclaus@yahoo.co.uk;
dsbaciu@clicknet.ro
2
Dipartimento di Geologia e Geofisica, University of Bari, Via E. Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy; loiacono@geo.uniba.it
3
Dipartimento di Scienze Geologiche, University of Catania, Corso Italia 55, 95129 Catania, Italy; dpuglisi@unict.it
(Manuscript received July 18, 2008; accepted in revised form March 26, 2009)
Abstract: The Marginal Folds Nappe is one of the most external tectonic units of the Moldavide Nappe System (East-
ern Carpathians), formed by Cretaceous to Tertiary flysch and molasse deposits, piled up during the Miocene closure of
the East Carpathian Flysch basin, cropping out in several tectonic half-windows, the Bistri a half-window being one of
them. The deposits of this tectonic unit were accumulated in anoxic-oxic-anoxic conditions, in a forebulge depozone
(sensu DeCelles & Giles 1996), and consist of a pelitic background sporadically interrupted by coarse-grained events.
During the Late Eocene the sedimentation registered a transition from calcareous (Doamna Limestones) to pelitic
(Bisericani Beds) grading to Globigerina Marls at the Eocene-Oligocene boundary, and upward during the Oligocene in
deposits rich in organic matter (Lower Menilites, Bituminous Marls, Lower and Upper Dysodilic Shales) with coarse-
grained interlayers. Seven facies associations were recognized, and interpreted as depositional systems of shallow to
deeper water on a ramp-type margin. Two mixed depositional systems of turbidite-like facies association separated by
a thick pelitic interval (Bituminous Marls) have been recognized. They were supplied by a “green schists” source area
of Central Dobrogea type. The petrography of the sandstone beds shows an excellent compositional uniformity
(quartzarenite-like rocks), probably representing a first cycle detritus derived from low rank metamorphic sources,
connected with the forebulge relief developed on such a basement. The sedimentation was controlled mainly by differ-
ent subsidence of blocks created by extensional tectonic affecting the ramp-type margin of the forebulge depozone.
Key words: Eocene—Oligocene, Eastern Carpathians, Romania, Moldavide Basin, Marginal Folds Nappe, paleogeography,
petrography, sedimentology.
Introduction and objectives
In Central Europe, the Carpathian Mountains join the Alps
with the Balkan and Rhodopean Chains, including remnants
of Tethyan oceanic crust and of its continental margins,
namely the internal Austro-Bihorean and the external Euro-
pean ones. Both were strongly deformed by Cretaceous and
Miocene tectonic events (Săndulescu 1988).
Two important sectors can be recognized in the Eastern
Carpathians according to their compressional periods: the
Dacides (Median and External, respectively) deformed in
Cretaceous tectogeneses, and the Moldavide Nappe System
deformed in Miocene tectogeneses (Săndulescu 1984, 1988).
The Median Dacides are formed by crystalline basement
nappes with their Mesozoic sedimentary cover, whereas the
External Dacides are formed by nappes originating from a
marginal trough within European margin, and mainly con-
sisting of Jurassic to Cretaceous flysch deposits with some
basic and ultrabasic volcanic rocks (Săndulescu 1975, 1980,
1984). These latter rocks prove that the External Dacides
represent the second ophiolitic suture of Carpathians of in-
traplate type, besides the main Tethyan suture known in the
Romanian Carpathians as the Transylvanides (Săndulescu
1980, 1984).
The Moldavide Nappe System mainly consists of Creta-
ceous to Tertiary flysch and molasse nappes (Bancilă 1958;
Ionesi 1971; Săndulescu 1975, 1980, 1984; tefănescu et al.
1979; Debelmas et al. 1980; Grasu et al. 1988).
As a consequence of tectonic loading related to Early-Late
Cretaceous shortenings of the Median Dacides and the internal
part of the External Dacides, a first forebulge, the so-called
Perimoldavian Cordillera, was developed (Bădescu 2005).
The Moldavidian Realm was located in the backbulge depo-
zone of the foreland basin system. By the end of the Creta-
ceous the External Dacides were completely deformed, their
nappes being overthrusted over the Moldavidian Realm inter-
nal margin (Bădescu 2005). Consequently, the entire East Car-
pathian foreland basin systems migrated outward. This stage
of development was called by Grasu et al. (1999) “the old
foreland basin” of the Eastern Carpathians. The Moldavide
Nappe System is linked to the Miocene tectogeneses and to
the closure of the Moldavide Basin when the East Carpathian
foreland basin systems achieved their present configuration,
called by Grasu et al. (1999) “the new foreland basin”.
398
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
In the Eastern Carpathians, the Moldavide Nappe System
includes an inner group of units represented by the Convo-
lute Flysch (or Teleajen) Nappe, Macla and Audia Nappes
consisting mainly of Cretaceous flysch (Săndulescu 1975,
1984; Grasu et al. 1988). The outer group is represented by
the Tarcău Nappe and the Marginal Folds Nappe (or Vrancea
Nappe), consisting of Cretaceous to earliest Miocene flysch
deposits, and the Subcarpathian Nappe, comprising Paleo-
Fig. 1. Geological sketch map of the Bistri a half-window with the location of the studied logs and lithostratigraphic column of the Marginal Folds
Nappe between the Bistri a and Tazlău Rivers (based on Micu 1976, 1983, and Grasu et al. 1988): S – Sărata Beds; L – Lep a Beds; PU – Pi-
atra Uscată Beds; JM – Jgheabu Mare Beds; D – Doamna Limestones; B – Bisericani Beds (where rgs = red and green shales, ggm = green-
ish-grey mudstones, and gm+L = Globigerina Marls and Lucăce ti Sandstones); LM – Lower Menilites (Lm+F+cm = Lingure ti Marls,
Fierăstrău Sandstones and compact Menilites); BM – Bituminous Marls; LDS – Lower Dysodiles; GK – Kliwa Sandstones; UDSM – Upper
Dysodiles and Menilites; GS – Gura oimului Beds; f – faults.
gene flysch but mainly Early to Middle Miocene molasse
successions (Săndulescu 1975, 1984, 1994; Grasu et al.
1988).
The Marginal Folds Nappe, object of this study, is struc-
turally interposed between the Tarcău and Subcarpathian
Nappes which are placed inward and outward, respectively.
The sedimentary succession of this tectonic unit at the
Eocene-Oligocene boundary is mainly characterized by a
399
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
thick pelitic succession (Bisericani Beds), grading upward
into deposits known in the Romanian geological literature as
the Lower Menilites and Bituminous Marls, followed by Low-
er Dysodiles (Dumitrescu 1952; Băncilă 1958; Ionesi 1971;
Grasu et al. 1988; Săndulescu & Micu 1989; Grasu et al.
2007), locally interlayered with arenaceous beds (Lucăce ti,
Fierăstrău and Kliwa Sandstones; Fig. 1).
The stratigraphic succession sampled and logged in the
Bistri a half-window (sensu Băncilă 1958), near the town of
Piatra Neam (Fig. 1), shows the entire sedimentary succes-
sion of the Marginal Folds Nappe with an excellent exposure
of the middle to upper portions, where it is possible to ob-
serve the transition to the Lower Menilites.
Above these “menilite facies”, the section shows a mainly
pelitic interval (Bituminous Marls) evolving into the Lower
Dysodilic Shales. These include the Kliwa Sandstones which
due to their small thickness, less than 15 m, cannot be distin-
guished as a formation like in the Tarcău Nappe, where they
reach hundreds of meters. At the top, the Upper Dysodilic
Shales and the Upper Menilites close the flysch sedimenta-
tion, while the Gura oimului Beds seem to mark the begin-
ning of the molassic deposition.
Equivalent successions have recently been studied in the
more internal Tarcău Nappe from the sedimentological and
petrographic points of view (Gigliuto et al. 2004; Puglisi et
al. 2006; Miclău et al. 2007) in order to determine the pa-
leogeographic context of the deposition of the arenaceous
turbidites mainly associated with the Lower Oligocene Low-
er Menilite Formation and the overlying Bituminous Marls.
Thus, the aim of this paper is to collect new interdiscipli-
nary stratigraphic and petrographic data in a more external
sector of the Moldavide Basin (Marginal Folds Nappe) in or-
der to (1) characterize the sedimentary facies and the clastic
provenance and (2) to hypothesize a paleogeographic scenario
for this portion of the basin, also supported by the compari-
son with the more internal successions.
Finally, accordingly to previous authors (Săndulescu
1972, 1984, 1988), the Paleocene-Oligocene flysch deposits
have been compared within the Ukrainian and Romanian
Carpathians, emphasizing a close similarity among the Ski-
ba/Boryslav-Pokuttya Nappes (Ukraine) and the Tarcău/
Marginal Folds Nappes (Romania).
So, the results of this study might also improve the knowl-
edge of the external areas of the Moldavide Basin and they
can probably also provide useful information for a more ex-
tensive paleogeographic reconstruction.
Stratigraphic setting
The Nechit River 1, 2 and oimu Sections were logged in
the Bistri a half-window, belonging to the Marginal Folds
Nappe, the outermost tectonic flysch unit of the Moldavide
Nappe System. The deposits which crop out in this area are
mainly Eocene—Early Miocene in age and correspond, from
the bottom to the top, to the following formations, according
to the Romanian geological literature: Jgheabu Mare Beds,
Doamna Limestone, Bisericani Beds, Globigerina Marls,
Lower Menilites, Bituminous Marls, Lower Dysodilic Shales
and Kliwa Sandstones, Upper Dysodilic Shales and Meni-
lites, Gura oimului Beds (Fig. 1).
The flysch deposits involved in Moldavide units were ac-
cumulated in a foreland-type basin system (sensu DeCelles
& Giles 1996). The Marginal Folds Nappe sedimentation
area was located on the cratonic side of this basin, probably
on the internal part of the forebulge depozone.
The physiography of such a basin margin is usually of
ramp type, without significant change in water depth from
shallow to much deeper water (Van Wagoner et al. 1990).
Local fault-controlled uplifts and depocentres, rather than a
smooth flexural profile, might develop on the forebulge in
foreland basin systems. Extensional fault systems are com-
mon on potential forebulge uplifting area, both related to
tensional stresses caused by forebulge migration, and to old-
er structure reactivation (references in DeCelles & Giles
1996). The forebulge of the foreland basin system might be
both an important source area of sediment, and a site of sedi-
ment accumulation.
Our paper concerns the deposits extending from the Biser-
icani Beds to the Upper Dysodilic Shales and Menilites.
Facies analysis
Facies analyses have been carried out in the field, collect-
ing data on lithology, grain size, sedimentary structures,
sand : mud ratio, bed thickness, fining and thinning upward
(FThU) and coarsening and thickening upward (CTkU) cy-
cles in three different sections (Figs. 2, 4, 5). Seven facies
associations (FA) have been distinguished and interpreted in
terms of sedimentary environments, parts of depositional
systems, according to criteria and models proposed by Mutti
& Ricci Lucchi (1972, 1975), Pickering et al. (1989), Mutti
(1992), Mutti et al. (1996, 2000, 2003, 2007).
1. Greenish-grey pelites with slumps facies association
of mud-rich slope apron system corresponds, according to
Ionesi (1971), to the middle part of the Bisericani Beds, and
consists of around 300 m of greenish-grey mudstones, main-
ly unstructured, with sporadic thin- to medium-bedded sand-
stones (10 to 40 cm thick), locally strongly deformed in
antiforms (10 m high) or flat lying folds (Fig. 3b) and cut by
sandstone injections (Fig. 3a). Some pebbly mudstones and
block-bearing mud flows can be also found. Some bioturbat-
ed levels (Chondrites) were also noticed, especially in the
oimu Section.
The lithologic uniformity and the absence of sedimentary
structures can be considered a result of the high frequency of
slumps, enhanced by some folded sandstone interlayers as
can be noticed in the Nechit River 1 Section. These, mainly
derived by rotational slumps, can be related to the F
2.1
facies
of Pickering et al. (1989) and their abundance might testify
the slope instability.
The significant thickness of this facies association (about
300 m) might prove that these deposits were sedimented on
upper slope where the influence of sediment plumes carried
by hypo- and mesopycnal currents is usually considered very
important (Galloway 1998) and induces slope active progra-
dation and aggradation (Fig. 4).
400
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
Fig. 2. Nechit River 1 Section: facies associations and environmental interpretation (Late Eocene—Early Miocene). The legend shown is also
the legend for Figs. 4, and 5. I – sedimentary structures; II – Bouma sequences; III – ThU and TkU sequences; IV – sandstone bed thick-
nesses; V – Pickering et al. (1989) facies. 1 – plan parallel lamination; 2 – cross-lamination; 3 – undulated lamination; 4 – normal
grading; 5 – lenticular bedding; 6 – convolute lamination; 7 – flute and tool casts; 8 – load casts; 9 – mud intraclasts; 10 – thinning up-
ward sequences; 11 – thickening upward sequences; 12 – bioturbation; 13 – debrites; 14 – Kliwa + Kliwa-type sandstones; 15 – bitumi-
nous marls; 16 – brown marls; 17 – black shales (dysodilic shales); 18 – greenish-grey mudstone; 19 – whitish marls; 20 – black cherts
and shales; E—O b – Eocene-Oligocene boundary; O – Oligocene.
401
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
Fig. 3. Sand injections (a) and flat-lying folds (b) in greenish-grey mudstone of the Bisericani Beds ( oimu River Section and Nechit Riv-
er 1 Section, respectively). Menilite intraclasts within the Bituminous Marls in the Nechit River 2 (c) and 1 (d) Sections.
Greenish-grey pelites with slump facies association in-
cluding Facies D
1.2
; D
2.2
; D
2.3
; F
2.1
in Pickering et al. (1989)
terminology, are attributed to distal turbidites and hemipe-
lagites in an underfed system of mud rich slope apron envi-
ronment (on the basis of the sand : pelite ratio and vertical
trend). The mud rich slope apron environment is also indicat-
ed by very frequent slump deposits. In the uppermost part of
the FA a progradational trend indicated by CTkU cycles can
be noticed. It is important to underline that this slope had to be
rather a local feature of the bed topography controlled by the
extensional faults associated with the forebulge depozone.
2. Black shales with bedded cherts and sandstones fa-
cies association of shallow channels, corresponding to
Lower Menilites, consists of alternating quartz-rich sand-
stones (about 40 % in the association column), black shales,
brown marls and siltstones, greenish-grey pelites and thin-
bedded menilite s.s. (black cherts; 15—16 % in the column).
Sandstones, usually thick-bedded and/or amalgamated,
(0.02—0.6 m), with flute/tool or load casts on sole, wavy tops
and internal structures such as plane-parallel and cross-lami-
nations, are organized in two fining- and thinning-upward
sequences (ThU) in the Nechit River 1 Section. The same se-
quences can be recognized in the oimu River Section,
where the sandstone beds (Fierăstrău Sandstone) are up to
2 m thick, and in the Nechit River 2 Section (Fig. 5).
The menilite s.s. beds are mm—cm thick, very finely lami-
nated and, locally, inter-bedded with brown marls and grey
pelites. This facies association, very diversified in lithology,
characterizes only the Nechit River 1 and 2 Sections but is
absent in the oimu River Section, and corresponds to the
Lower Menilites.
The facies association is referred to C, D, E (channel, in-
ter-channel or levee) and to G (pelagites, organic and
chemogenic sediments) facies of Pickering et al. (1989).
This FA suggests an increase of clastic input due to a progra-
dational trend (such as that noticed in all three logs), contem-
poraneous to a significant supply of pelagic sediments
(mainly Nechit River 1 and 2 Sections).
The fining- and thinning-upward sequences (FU/ThU), are
frequently interpreted as channel deposits, but in this specif-
ic case, due to their small thickness, seem to be linked to
some distal and shallow channels.
402
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
Fig. 4. oimu River Section: facies associations and environmental interpretation (Late Eocene—Oligocene). The same key as for Fig. 2.
403
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
3. Bituminous marls facies association of anoxic shelf,
ranges in thickness from about 10 m (Nechit River 1 and
oimu Sections) to 50 m (Nechit River 2 Section, Tazlău Riv-
er, near the homonymous village, and Văleni village on the
Bistri a River; Fig. 1), and consists of very fine laminated limy
clays and marls, rich in organic matter (TOC = 3.54—10.04 %
after Grasu et al. 1988), with cross-laminated thin interlayers
(mm to dm; Figs. 6b, 7a, and 7b) of sandstones. At the bot-
tom, large intraclasts of menilite s.s. lying parallel to the
stratification can be noticed (Figs. 3c,d, and 6a).
In this facies association, sedimentary structures very sim-
ilar to swaley and hummocky cross-stratification (SCS and
HCS; Fig. 8a), together with parallel and low angle cross-
bedding, and wavy (Fig. 7a) and lenticular (Fig. 6b) bedding
are recognized. Some sandy injections as dykes, sills and
ptygmatic structures of decimetric dimensions are sporadi-
cally present (Nechit River 2 Section; Fig. 8b).
This facies association, which corresponds to the Bituminous
Marls, is deposited from two different processes: fallout from
suspension, as their fine lamination proves, and on this back-
ground, cyclical deposition of coarse material. The fine sand-
stone interlayers (like those in Tazlău or Nechit 2 Section;
Figs. 1, 7) can be attributed to storms or floods which devel-
oped hyperpycnal flows or turbidite currents moving downslope.
The HCS-like structures (Fig. 8a), which seems to be of
scour-drape type, together with swaley cross-stratification
are usually interpreted as indicating storm conditions in shelf
environment above the storm wave base (Cheel & Leckie
1993). Anyway such hummocky morphology can also be de-
veloped by hyperpycnal flows as “flood-generated delta
front lobes” (Mutti et al. 2000). At the Tazlău observation
point (Figs. 1, 7) within the Bituminous Marls, centimetric
interlayers of sandstones showing wave ripple cross-lamina-
tion, have also been noticed (Fig. 7b).
The bituminous marls facies association shows the fea-
tures of a distal shelf, either fed during storms or fed by hy-
perpycnal flows from shoreline sources during possible
floods. The shallow sedimentation conditions are also
proved by the existence of very well preserved flatfish like
Scophthalmus which will be described later in the paper.
4. Sandstone and conglomerate facies association of
channels with levee, mainly consists of sandstones, matrix-
and clast-supported conglomerates, and, subordinately, of
bituminous pelites of dysodilic shale-type. It corresponds
more or less to the coarser lower part of the Lower Dysodilic
Shales with Kliwa Sandstones.
Clast-supported thick-bedded conglomerates (up to 4 m
thick; Fig. 9a), mainly composed of “green schist” clasts (up to
0.8 m in diameter), subrounded and rounded white limestone,
and intraclasts of dysodilic shales (Fig. 9b), show a large scale
(meters to tens of meters wide) lenticular geometry with erosive
bases, locally with large sole casts. These conglomerates are fre-
quently associated with slided blocks, consisting of dysodilic
shales and thin-bedded Kliwa-type sandstones.
The matrix-supported conglomerates show finer “green
schist” clasts (3—5 cm diameter) floating in a Kliwa-type aren-
aceous sandstone matrix or sandy dysodilic shale matrix.
Sandstones of this association show different characteris-
tics: (a) thick and composite beds (up to 4 m thick), crudely
Fig. 5. Nechit River 2 Section: facies associations and environmental
interpretation (Late Eocene—Oligocene). The same key as for Fig. 2.
1 – hummocky and swaley like cross-stratification; 2 – sandstones
(Kliwa and Kliwa like); 3 – debrite with mud intraclastst and/or
green schist clasts; 4 – dark grey pelite; 5 – sand injections;
MRSA – mud-rich slope apron; Pb – Priabonian.
404
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
Fig. 6. a – Contact between menilites and Bituminous Marls (Nechit River 2 Section). b – Cross-laminated sandstones with load casts
and flame (mm to cm thick) interlayered in Bituminous Marls, proving the rapid influx of coarse materials.
Fig. 7. a – Sandstones with wavy and lenticular bedding interlayered within the Bituminous Marls at Tazlău. b – Detail of the internal
structure of sandstone beds (wave ripple cross-lamination) in white rectangle.
Fig. 8. a – Hummocky- and swaley-like cross-stratification (HCS and SCS, respectively) in bituminous marls at the Nechit River 2 Sec-
tion. b – Dyke (d), sill (s) and ptygmatic structures (p) within the Bituminous Marls in the Nechit River 2 Section.
405
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
graded, with large undulated amalgamation surfaces, some-
times with thin plane-parallel stratified and cross-laminated
tops, locally associated with conglomerates with “green
schist” clasts (Fig. 9e); (b) simple centimetre- to decimetre-
sized beds, parallel flat-based or slightly undulated with tool
casts, wavy tops with parallel to low angle cross-laminations
(Fig. 9d); (c) simple, very thin-bedded and lenticular strata;
(d) thick-bedded, laminated sandstones with water escape
structures (Fig. 9c); and (e) thick sandstone beds crudely
horizontal laminated with small floating clasts (Fig. 9c) rest-
ing on sandstone with convolute laminae.
This facies association re-groups all Walker’s (1992) “facies”
belonging to the turbidite family (i.e. massive sandstones, clas-
sical turbidites, pebbly sandstones and conglomerates). Accord-
ing to Pickering et al. (1989) the F
2.1
, C
2.1
, C
2.2
, C
2.4
, A
1.4
and
A
2.7
facies can be distinguished. FThU sequences are also fre-
Fig. 9. Clast-supported conglomerates and thick-bedded sandstones (a), locally with “green schist” and limestone clasts (b) cut in dysodilic
shales in the Nechit River 1 Section. (c) Sharp contact between parallel laminated sandstones with water escape structures and massive
sandstones
(Nechit River 1 Section), (d, f) simple flat base and wavy top sandstone beds interlayers in the Dysodilic Shales (Nechit River 1
and 2 Sections), and (e) thick and composite sandstone beds (Nechit River 1 Section).
406
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
quent and this may justify the interpretation of these deposits as
channel fills. This facies association indicates the proximal part
of a turbiditic system (facies A, B, C and intercalated D) com-
posed of coarse bodies, up to 10 m thick, organized in FThU se-
quences, attributed to debris or sandy cyclic flows more or less
channelized (Nechit River 1 Section).
The thick, composite sandstone beds might also be inter-
preted as type-A mixed system of Mutti et al. (2003). As the
latter authors showed, the mixed systems might be difficult
to distinguish from the basinal turbidites if the sediments are
not framed in their stratigraphic and structural setting.
The source area of the above described coarse deposits
was a “green schist” basement and its sedimentary cover of
limestone probably of platform type containing nummulites.
Such “exotic” clasts were described by many authors in Cre-
taceous to Late Miocene flysch and molasse deposits of ex-
ternal nappes of Moldavides since the early years of 20
th
century (Zuber 1902; Simionescu 1909; Mrazec 1910; Mur-
goci 1929; Băncilă 1958; and later by Ionesi 1971; Anastasiu
1984, 1986; Săndulescu 1984; Grasu et al. 1988, 1999, 2002,
2007). Their source area is considered to be Central Dobro-
gea although there are not many papers concerning the petro-
graphic-mineralogical comparison of source area rocks and
the resedimented “green schist” clasts except Simionescu
(1908) and Anastasiu (1984, 1986). Central Dobrogea is an
uplifted block of East Moesia located in south-east Romania.
The dominance of FThU sequences may indicate a deep-
ening basin which also explains the episodic character of the
gravity flows deriving from an unstable margin of the basin.
This is a clue for the subsident trend of the basin, the main
extensional tectonics (normal faults, growth faults) of the ba-
sin margin, and collapsing processes. A very important proof
of extensional tectonics is the presence of a large bituminous
marl olistolith (in Nechit River 1 Section; Fig. 2) in the fa-
cies association column. The active tectonic subsidence be-
gan, in fact earlier, since the bituminous marl sedimentation.
This is proved by important differences of thicknesses from
proximal (around 50 m thick in Nechit River 2 Section, and
Tazlău or Văleni observation points) to distal (15—20 m thick
in the Nechit 1, and oimu Sections) studied sections. In or-
der to explain this, we can suppose a marginal block delimit-
ed by normal faults producing adjacent areas with active
syn-sedimentary uplift or subsidence.
5. Arenaceous-pelitic facies association of depositional
lobes partly corresponds to the upper part of the Lower Dys-
odilic Shales with Kliwa Sandstones (Figs. 10a,b) and partly
to the Upper Dysodilic Shales. Sandstone beds show irregular
scoured bases (Fig. 10a), locally with sole casts and wavy tops
Fig. 10. a – Sandstones with irregular base and wavy top with black shale interlayers. b – Arenaceous-pelitic facies association (deposi-
tional lobe) within the Upper Dysodilic Shales (bituminous pelitic facies association) in the oimu River Section. c – Deformed deposits
(slump) of bituminous pelitic facies association in the Nechit River 1 Section. d – Thin intelayers of bentonitic shale in bituminous pelitic
facies association (Nechit River 1 Section).
407
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
with decimeter-sized current ripple. Parallel- and cross-lami-
nations, normal grading and weakly undulated amalgamation
surfaces are the most frequent internal structures. This facies
association always follows channel fill deposits (sandstone
and conglomerate facies association). It consists of T
ac
, T
bc
turbidites or C
2.2
facies of Pickering et al. (1989).
Facies belonging to this association can be interpreted as
depositional lobes due to the absence of significant erosive
surfaces at the base of sandstone layers. The sand : mud ratio
≈ 1 might suggest that this facies association can be referred
to the intermediate part of a turbiditic system.
6. Bituminous pelites with slumps and debrites facies as-
sociation of fringe fans, corresponds with the upper part of the
Upper Dysodilic Shales, and mainly consists of decimeter- to
meter-thick pelites of dysodilic shale-type, very rich in organic
matter. These deposits, frequently deformed (Nechit River 1
Section; Fig. 10c), are associated with paraconglomerates with
“green schist” clasts and, locally, to thin beds of bentonitic
Fig. 11. a – Bioturbated sandstones (Thalassinoides) of whitish marl with debrite facies association in oimu River. b – Highly bioturbated pel-
itic interlayers replaced by burrow fills (Thalassinoides) in whitish marl with debrite facies association in the oimu River. c – Debrite with
brown marl intraclasts and green schist clasts in Globigerina Marls s.s. in oimu River. d – Thick lamination in Globigerina Marls s.s. in the
oimu River.
408
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
shales (up to 1 cm; Fig. 10d) and to thin-bedded sandstones
with planar to weakly erosive bases (with sole casts). The thin
sandstone layers show wavy tops, plane-parallel and cross-
laminations. They might have sheet or lenticular (0.5—1 m
wide) geometry, and tend to disappear upward in succession.
The facies belonging to this association may represent a
distal turbiditic system, and show a deepening upwards trend
of the whole facies succession. They were sedimented into a
subsident basin. Sandstone beds show the characteristics of
T
bd
and T
cd
or of C
2.3
facies. The small amount of sandstones
upwards in the column might be the result either of supply-
ing channel avulsion, or of a decreasing supply of coarse ma-
terial. The deformed deposits are slump type which involves
a slope of the basin floor. Based on these facts we can sup-
pose that the deposits were sedimented on the distal turbidit-
ic system but located at the base of a local slope.
7. Whitish marl with debrite facies association of oxic
shelf, recognized in oimu River, Nechit River 2, and Ne-
chit 1 River Sections. In this facies association the well
known Globigerina Marls are included.
It consists of (1) decimetric, highly bioturbated sandstone
beds (Fig. 11a), intelayered with pelites almost entirely replaced
by horizontal to sub-horizontal anastomosed sandy filled bur-
rows of Thalassinoides (Fig. 11b); (2) whitish, thick-laminated
and also bioturbated (e.g. Chondrites) Globigerina Marls s.s.
(representing the upper part of the Bisericani Beds according to
Ionesi 1971; Figs. 11c,d, 12a), showing sub-vertical and hori-
zontal sand-filled burrows (possible Skolithos); (3) debrites
( > 1 m thick; Figs. 11d, 12c) with brown mud intraclasts and
“green schist” clasts; (4) thick-bedded Kliwa-type quartzareni-
tes (i.e. Lucăce ti Sandstones) with sharp bases and thin parallel
laminated tops; (5) grey quartzarenites; and (6) brown marls.
Some differences can be noticed in the Nechit River 1 Sec-
tion, where this facies association consists mainly of whitish
mudstone thin (1—5 cm) or lenticular bedded, with plane-par-
allel lamination enhanced by an alternation of light and
brown laminae. The feature difference might be the result of
proximal (Nechit River 2 Section) to distal (Nechit River 1
Section) facies variation.
The prevalence of horizontal—sub-horizontal burrows indi-
cate intervals of low energy levels associated with pelites
sedimentation, well oxygenated basin bottom and abundance
of deposited food (MacEarchen et al. 2007). The sandstone
interlayers are also intensely bioturbated by postdepositional
animal activities proving their periodic sedimentation on a
background of low energy conditions. Upwards in facies as-
sociation column, the sedimentation becomes muddier, and
characterized mainly by whitish marls with Chondrites
Fig. 12. Horizontal (a) and vertical (b) burrow fills (Skolithos?) in Globigerina Marls s.s. in the Nechit River 2 Section; sharp contact be-
tween debrite with brown marl intraclasts and whitish marls (Globigerina Marl s.s.) in the Nechit River 2 Section (c); debrite with brown
marl intraclasts and green schist clasts in muddy matrix in the Nechit River 2 Section (d).
409
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
which might announce a decrease of oxygenation levels be-
fore the establishment of anoxia condition.
The above described characteristics seem to indicate shal-
low-water conditions, where the proximal debrites (Nechit 2
Section) can prove the instability of sediment sources. The
highly bioturbated sandstones possibly supplied by a sandy
coast system might also indicate a proximal offshore above
the storm wave base.
Depositional systems and sedimentary evolution
The study of the logs (Figs. 2, 4, and 5) based on the sedi-
mentary facies analysis, points out the vertical organization
of the FA and the lateral correlations in the context of an area
belonging to the external flysch basin of the Eastern Car-
pathians, during the Eocene—Oligocene time. Based on
above described and interpreted facies association we recog-
nized 5 depositional systems.
1. Mud rich slope apron – Both in the Nechit River 1
and oimu Sections the very thick greenish-grey mudstones
(corresponding to Bisericani Beds) suggest a mud-rich slope
apron system, characterized by hemipelagites and thin tur-
bidite sandstones of facies D. This slope apron might be
rather a local feature of the forebulge depozone (Fig. 13b).
The frequent slump deposits indicate an unstable slope most
likely controlled by the extensional marginal faults and the
consequent subsidence trend in the adjacent sub-basins. Fa-
cies characters suggest a mud dominated sedimentation. Up-
Fig. 13. A rough 3D paleogeographic interpretation of the Late Eocene-Oligocene depositional systems of studied sections within the Bistri a
half-window (Marginal Folds Nappe – Eastern Carpathians). a – The position of the studied area in the foreland basin systems (the italics
indicate the depositional systems defined by Mutti et al. (2003) for foreland basins; the underlined italics are their equivalents on forebulge de-
pozone). b – The position of Late Eocene facies associations in a sub-basin of the forebulge depozone. c – The position of Oligocene facies
associations in a subsident sub-basin of the forebulge depozone; 1 – deposits of foreland basin systems; 2 – deposits older than Late Eocene.
wards in the visible stratigraphic intervals (between 0—19 m,
145—170 m, and 315—330 m in the Nechit River 2, Nechit
River, and oimu Sections, respectively) an enrichment in
sand can be noticed, together with significant changes in grain
size, and increasing of the sand : mud ratio. All these charac-
ters suggest a more proximal sandy system proved also by the
observed ichnofauna of the whitish marl with debrite facies
association ( oimu and Nechit River 2 Sections; Figs. 4, 5).
2. Oxic shelf depositional system – The upward increase of
sands in the column, which is better manifested in the oimu
Section, suggests a shallowing upward trend of the system. As
we have shown above, the features of whitish marl with debrite
facies association (corresponding to Globigerina Marls and
Lucăce ti Sandstone) indicate a shallow-water depositional sys-
tem (Fig. 13a), while the sharp contact between greenish-grey
mudstone and the bioturbated sandstones, visible especially in
the oimu Section, seem to prove a regression.
3. Lower turbiditic system – In all three analysed logs,
an important change of the sedimentation background is reg-
istered, from pelite deposited in oxic conditions (greenish-
grey pelite and whitish marls) to pelite deposited in anoxic
conditions (black-shale like deposits such as dysodilic
shales, black cherts, brown and bituminous marls). On this
background, an increasing sand input also occurred (black
shale with bedded cherts and sandstone facies association).
Some authors (Ionesi 1971, 1981; Dicea & Dicea 1980; Io-
nesi & Florea 1981, 1982; Ionesi & Meszaros 1989) consider
that the Eocene-Oligocene boundary is placed in this strati-
graphic interval, based on NP21—NP22 taxa, while others
410
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
(Martini & Lebenzon 1971; Lebenzon 1973; Dicea & Dicea
1976; Micu & Ghe a 1986) consider that it is inside the well-
known Globigerina Marls belonging to what we have called
whitish marl with debrite facies association. According to
Belayouni et al. (2009) some levels in Lucăce ti Sandstones
contain latest Rupelian foraminifers belonging to N1/P20
Zone of Blow (1969). The anoxia may be a result of increas-
ing sediment supply which consequently increased the pres-
ervation of organic matter. Anoxic conditions may also have
been favoured by increasing biological productivity linked
to changes in the physical and chemical conditions of the sea
water (C-organic and CO
2
content). This event, in turn, may
be explained by controls such as: 1) the geographical isola-
tion of the Paratethys basin from the Mediterranean one after
the collision between Africa and Eurasia plates during the
Oligocene (Rögl 1999); 2) the global climatic changes which
began in the Middle Eocene (Pomerol & Premoli-Silva
1986; Soták et al. 2002); 3) the relative sea-level fluctuations
of different amplitude, tectonically controlled. Channelized
sandy deposits occurring in the studied sections (black shale
with bedded cherts and sandstone facies association) might
be related to a rich sand shoreface and/or deltaic system
drowned because of tectonic controlled sub-basin subsidence
(Fig. 13b).
4. Anoxic shelf depositional system – corresponds to an
important stratigraphic marker recognized in all the studied
sections – the Bituminous Marls. Its lower boundary is
sharp and erosional in the sections where it is exposed (Ne-
chit River 1, and Nechit River 2 Sections). The correspond-
ing deposits are much thicker ( > 50 m) in proximal section
(Nechit River 2 Section) than in distal one (around 10 m in
the Nechit River 1 Section). This different thicknesses might
be the result of sedimentation on different blocks, some sup-
porting active subsidence controlled by gravitational faults
(such is Nechit River 2 Section; Fig. 13c), others being up-
lifted (Nechit River 1, and oimu Sections; Fig. 13c). Such a
vicinity of subsiding and uplifting blocks caused the instabil-
ity of unconsolidated deposits proved by menilite intraclasts
inside the bituminous marls or the shear plane at the base of
the bituminous marl facies association (Fig. 3c,d).
These sedimentary features indicate a basin margin affect-
ed by tectonic deformations and consequent gravitational
collapses, which may have produced a source of coarse ma-
terial, which sometimes supplied the muddy shelf system via
storm induced hyperpycnal flows or turbiditic currents in-
duced by floods or storms. The shallow sedimentation condi-
tions are also suggested by the existence of the extremely well
preserved flatfish as we have shown above. The sandy dykes
present in the marls may prove both the fast mud deposition
and the mobility of quicksands during bottom shocks.
5. Upper turbiditic system – The contact of FA 4 with
FA 3 is sharp in the Nechit River 1 Section, the only section
where it is exposed. The facies associations 4, 5 and 6 indi-
cate a deepening trend in the basin evolution in the Nechit
River 1 Section. A gradual deepening and distal characters
of the turbidite system can also be noticed in the oimu Sec-
tion, and this is testified by the vertical succession of sand-
stone lobes, fringe fan, and black shale deposits referred to
basin plain although the proximal part of this system is not
exposed. This deepening might be tectonically controlled by
the local subsidence of the block which hosted the analysed
area (Fig. 13b). An important proof of this is the presence of
the bituminous marl (identical with FA 3 of anoxic shelf)
olistolith re-sedimented within deposits of upper turbiditic
system. In Săndulescu & Micu’s (1989) opinion the Lower
Dysodilic Shales and Kliwa Sandstones (our FA 4, and 5) to-
gether with the Bituminous Marls were sedimented in deep
water conditions, while the Upper Dysodilic Shale (our FA 6)
were sedimented on a shelf (Dysodilic Marginal Shelf) by-
passed by submarine channels which fed the Tarcău Realm
with coarse materials (Upper Kliwa Sandstones).
According to Mutti et al. (1996, 2000, 2003), such a coarse
type of turbidites, usually associated with debrites, may be the
products of hyperpycnal flows formed in delta systems during
catastrophic flood events, and able to carry sand or gravel over
tens of kilometers, depositing them as marginal turbidites.
These authors have introduced the concept of “mixed deposi-
tional systems” made up of turbidite-like facies and facies as-
sociations formed at relatively shallow depths (seaward edges
of flood-dominated deltaic systems), but it is still difficult to
identify processes, environment and water depth (Mutti et al.
2003) based only on limited exposures such are those analy-
sed here. A possible argument for the relatively shallow-water
condition of the upper turbiditic system is the presence of ich-
nofauna of Thalassinoides in the lobes of the oimu Section
(Fig. 5). The instability of the channels in this system is
proved by their recurrence in the sedimentary successions
(FA 4) in alternation with the lobes (FA 5) occurring in the
proximal part. Upwards in the succession of the upper turbid-
itic system the sand : mud ratio decreases, proving the deepen-
ing of the basin. Such a deepening was possibly controlled by
extensional tectonics affecting the forebulge depozone which
was retreating.
Mutti et al. (2003) recognized the “mixed depositional
systems” in wedge-top basins, actively fed by deltaic sys-
tems. We consider that such systems may also develop on
forebulge depozone of foreland basin systems especially
during their underfilled stage of development (Crampton &
Allen 1995) when the forebulge may have a prominent relief
drained by rivers. This had to be the case of the Moldavidian
Basin forebulge if we take into consideration the continuous
supply of “exotic” clasts from the Early Cretaceous to the
Early Miocene climax. For the Early Miocene Grasu et al.
(1999) described a fan-delta characterized by very coarse to
coarse deposits (Alma u Conglomerates and Sandstones on
Cuejdiu River northward of Piatra Neam ), consisting mainly
of “green schist”, white limestone, and even some pegmatite,
which prograded in shallow-waters. The clasts can have
meters in diameter suggesting a short transport from their
source area. Their main sedimentation processes were non-
cohesive and cohesive debris flows and high-density turbid-
itic currents. Such fan-deltaic systems could also have fed
the forebulge marginal basin during the Eocene—Oligocene.
All these elements suggest a ramp-type basin margin char-
acterized by collapsed or uplifted blocks controlled by nor-
mal faults where both source area and depocentres with rapid
basinward transition to deeper water system (subsident re-
gime) evolved (Fig. 13).
411
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
Petrography and provenance
Petrographic study of the Eocene-Oligocene arena-
ceous samples associated with the Lower Menilites in
the oimu River Section is focused on recognizing
the gross composition of the sandstones, the textural
characters of the grains and detecting the provenance
of the detrital supply.
This study has been carried out by means of modal
point counting in thin section, performed according to
the criteria suggested by Gazzi (1966), Dickinson
(1970) and by Gazzi et al. (1973), in order to minimize
the dependence of the rock composition on grain size.
The detrital framework of the analysed rocks is
characterized by a dominant non-carbonate extrabasi-
nal fraction, made up of abundant quartz, low per-
centages of feldspars and traces of lithic fragments,
mixed with a conspicuous presence of a non-carbon-
ate intrabasinal fraction, mainly represented by glauc-
onite grains (14.5 % maximum) and by a very low
content of opaque minerals.
Quartz is undoubtedly the most abundant mineral in
all the analysed sandstones. According to the Basu’s
et al. (1975) criteria, modified by Basu (1985), the de-
trital quartz has been distinguished into monocrystal-
line and polycrystalline quartz grains, each of them
subdivided into two populations: monocrystalline
quartz grains of low and high undulosity (
≤5° or >5°
1
The analysed sandstones are usually medium- to fine-grained, thus respecting the conventional criteria to collect the data concerning the undula-
tory extinction and the polycrystallinity of the detrital quartz grains mainly from the medium sand-size fraction (0.25—0.50 mm; Basu et al. 1975;
Young 1976).
Fig. 14. Quartz-Feldspars-Lithic Fragments ternary plot showing the com-
position of the Lucăce ti and Fierăstrău Sandstones and other arenites asso-
ciated with the Lower Menilite Formation.
apparent angle of extinction, measured with a flat-stage) and
polycrystalline quartz grains with few or many subgrains (
≤4
or > 4, number of crystal units contained within each grain)
1
.
Monocrystalline quartz grains are more abundant than the
polycrystalline varieties and, in particular, the monocrystal-
line grains with high undulosity and the polycrystalline
quartz grains with many subgrains (Qm’’ and Qp’’ in Ta-
ble 1, respectively) are the more representative varieties.
These kinds of quartz (Qm’’ and Qp’’) are indicative of
low-grade metamorphic sources and, usually, they show a
very low stability pointing to selective destruction by me-
chanical agencies during prolonged transport and, of course,
during successive sedimentary cycles (Blatt & Christie 1963;
Basu 1985).
Thus, the abundance of Qm’’ and Qp’’ and the scarcity of
feldspar grains should be indicative of sediment sources pre-
dominantly composed of low-grade metamorphic rocks and,
in any case, they point to exclusion of conspicuous contribu-
tions from plutonic and/or high grade metamorphic source
(Fig. 14).
The presence of locally abundant epimetamorphic clasts in
several stratigraphic horizons of the analysed Eocene—Oli-
gocene sedimentary succession (Lucăce ti and Fierăstrău
Sandstones, Bituminous Marls, Lower Dysodilic Shales with
Kliwa Sandstones interlayered), mixed with predominant
subangular-to-subrounded quartz grains, seems to support
this type of provenance (Fig. 15a).
In addition, this hypothesis of provenance seems to be in
agreement with Suttner’s et al. (1981) model, which suggests
that such kind of rocks are the only sources able to produce high
amounts of quartz grains as first cycle detritus under “a unique
combination of extreme conditions of climate, relief and sedi-
mentation”. Such conditions of climate, in particular, seem to
be realized during Oligocene times, just after the Eocene—Oli-
gocene transition global cooling, as documented by the values
of paleotemperature and precipitation which point to a subtropi-
cal- and paratropical-like climate recorded at the Rupelian/
Chattian boundary (mean annual temperature/precipitation
ranging between 13—20 °C and 1.353—2.760 mm, respectively;
Givulescu 1997). Anastasiu (1986) also suggested a rather
chemical weathered material as source for the quartzarenites of
Kliwa Sandstone and not an eolian deposit from the cratonic
area as Săndulescu & Micu (1989).
Finally, the presence of glauconite as the most representa-
tive mineral of a locally abundant non-carbonate intrabasinal
fraction must be noticed (Fig. 15b).
This mineral is usually supposed to be authigenic in origin
and formed in marine environments under reducing to slightly
oxidizing conditions on the continental shelf (Folk 1974; Pet-
tijhon 1975; Odin 1985; Kelly & Webb 1999; Hesselbo &
Huggett 2001). In the analysed rocks, it shows good round-
ness and grain size very similar to other detrital clasts. Round-
ness is an important textural characteristic indicative of highly
turbulent environments or also of prolonged transports and, in
412
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
Table 1:
Modal
point
counts
of
the
oimu
River
Section
sandstones
compa
red
with
the
Kliwa
Formation
and
the
“Moldovia
lithofacies”
qu
artzarenite-like
sandstones
of
the
Tarcău
Nappe.
≤
Sym
bo
ls
o
f
th
e pa
ra
m
et
er
s a
do
pt
ed
f
or
th
e
m
odal
a
n
al
ys
is
Q = Q
m
+ Q
p
, w
her
e:
Q
=
to
ta
l qua
rt
zos
e gra
in
s in
cl
ud
in
g
Q
m
=
m
ono
cr
ys
ta
lli
ne
qu
ar
tz
os
e g
rains
s
ub
di
vi
de
d i
nto
Q
m
’ = o
f l
ow
und
ul
os
ity
(
5°
) an
d
Q
m
’’
=
of h
igh und
ul
os
it
y (>
5
°) a
nd
Q
r
=
qu
ar
tz
in
c
oa
rse
-gra
in
ed
ro
ck
fra
gm
en
ts
(i.
e.
>
0.
06
m
m
),
Q
p
=
po
ly
cr
ys
tal
li
ne
quar
tz
os
e g
rains
(
incl
udi
ng
Ch
=
ch
ert
) w
hi
ch ha
ve b
een
s
ubd
iv
id
ed
in
to
Q
p
’
= w
it
h f
ew
s
ubg
ra
in
s (
4
cr
ys
tal
li
ne
un
its
per
g
rai
n)
a
nd
Q
p
’’
= w
it
h m
any
s
ub
gr
ains
(
>
4 cr
ys
tal
li
ne
u
nits
pe
r g
rain)
. Q
m
’,
Q
m
’’,
Q
p
’
an
d
Q
p
’’
ha
ve b
een
det
erm
in
ed
ac
co
rdi
ng
to
th
e c
rit
eri
a s
ugges
ted
b
y B
as
u et a
l. (
1975
) an
d Ba
su
(198
5)
;
F = P
+ K
, w
her
e:
F
= to
tal
f
el
ds
par
g
rains
, P
an
d
K
=
pl
ag
io
cl
as
e an
d
po
ta
ss
ium
f
el
ds
par
s
ing
le
g
rains
(
Ps
an
d
Ks
) or i
n c
oa
rse
-gra
in
ed
roc
k fra
gm
en
ts
(e
xc
lu
si
ve
ly
Pr
);
L =
Lv
+
Lc +
Lm
, w
her
e:
L
=
u
ns
ta
bl
e fi
ne
-gra
in
ed
roc
k fra
gm
en
ts
(<
0.
06
m
m
, in
cl
ud
in
g:
Lv
= v
ol
can
ic
, Ls
=
s
edim
ent
ar
y,
Lc
= ca
rb
ona
te
, Lm
=
ep
im
eta
m
or
ph
ic
li
th
ic
f
ra
gm
en
ts
and
Fo
=
f
os
sil
s)
;
Lt
=
L +
Q
p
, w
he
re
: Lt
=
to
ta
l li
thi
c f
ra
gm
en
ts
(b
ot
h un
st
ab
le an
d qu
ar
tz
os
e);
M =
m
ic
as
an
d/
or ch
lori
te
s,
in
s
in
gle gra
in
s (
Ms
);
Gl
=
glau
coni
te
gra
in
s,
Al
= o
the
r m
ine
ra
l g
rains
, Mt
= s
ilic
ic
la
st
ic
ma
tr
ix
; Cm
= car
bo
na
te
ce
me
nt
; Sp
= s
po
rad
ic o
ccur
re
nce
, tr
= t
rac
es
.
≤
RO 6
RO 7
RO 8
RO 11
RO 19
RO
22
RO
24
RO
23
RO
25
RO
28
RO
26
RO
27
x
σ x’
σ’
K
li
w
a
Sa
nd
st
on
es
*
Q
m
’
1
2.
7
1
1.
9
1
1.
3
2
0.
1
1
3.
7
1
9.
6
1
5.
7
2
3.
8
2
1.
8
2
4.
9
2
4.
7
1
5.
8
1
8.
0
5.
10
1
0.
3
3.
04
Q
m
’’
4
7.
9
4
8.
4
5
3.
3
5
9.
7
5
2.
4
4
7.
9
5
3.
1
5
5.
5
6
0.
8
5
5.
1
5
2.
2
5
4.
2
5
3.
4
4.
16
3
0.
0
6.
62
Q
p
’
1.
9
1.
8
2.
9
1.
3
1.
3
0.
9
1.
0
1.
9
1.
6
0.
9
3.
4
1.
1
1.
7
0.
82
1
2.
1
4.
31
Q
p
’’
1.
9
2.
8
3.
4
4.
2
5.
3
9.
8
3.
0
6.
8
5.
2
3.
4
6.
2
1.
8
4.
7
2.
72
1
9.
3
5.
45
Qr
–
–
–
– – – – – – – –
–
–
0.
1
0.
30
Ch
0.
5
0.
7
0.
7
0.
3
0.
9
0.
5
0.
4
0.
2
–
–
–
–
0.
4
0.
32
0.
8
1.
29
Q
80
÷9
0
Ps
2.
4
2.
2
0.
8
0.
6
2.
9
1.
4
1.
1
1.
1
1.
2
1.
2
1.
2
2.
0
1.
5
0.
70
1.
7
0.
80
Pr
–
–
–
– – – – – – – –
–
–
0.
1
0.
11
Ks
0.
6
0.
7
0.
3
–
0.
3
0.
5
0.
4
0.
6
–
–
0.
8
0.
7
0.
4
0.
31
1.
2
0.
48
F
5÷
10
Lv
–
–
–
– – – – – – – –
–
–
0.
4
0.
59
Lc
–
–
–
– – – – – – – –
–
–
0.
7
0.
77
Ls
0.
2
0.
2
–
0.
3
0.
3
–
0.
3
0.
5
0.
3
–
0.
5
0.
2
0.
2
0.
20
–
Lm
0.
3
0.
2
–
0.
6
0.
2
–
0.
1
–
–
–
–
–
0.
1
0.
21
1.
2
0.
50
Fo
–
–
–
–
0.
6
– – – – – –
–
tr
1.
3
1.
89
L
–
Ms
3.
7
2.
8
1.
3
1.
9
0.
6
1.
9
1.
7
0.
3
0.
9
1.
0
0.
7
0.
8
1.
7
1.
11
5.
8
2.
43
Gl
3÷
10
Gl
1
3.
4
1
3.
1
1
4.
5
6.
3
1
1.
6
1
0.
6
1
0.
7
3.
0
3.
9
3.
0
4.
3
0.
9
7.
9
4
.8
7.
5
3.
41
Op
1.
9
2.
1
1.
5
0.
9
–
1.
5
1.
4
0.
3
–
0.
7
0.
5
1.
0
1.
1
0
.7
0.
3
0.
42
Al
0.
9
1.
7
0.
3
0.
2
–
1.
4
0.
7
1.
1
0.
5
0.
3
1.
3
0.
7
0.
9
0.
53
0.
6
0.
58
M + Al
Sp
Mt
2.
8
2.
7
1.
9
0.
7
1.
7
3.
5
1.
5
4.
9
3.
4
9.
5
4.
2
9.
2
3.
8
2.
81
3.
2
19
6
Cm
8.
9
8.
7
7.
8
2.
9
8.
2
0.
5
8.
9
–
0.
4
–
–
2.
6
4.
2
4.
02
2.
4
1.
21
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
* M
ea
n fra
me
w
ork
mod
es from G
ra
su
e
t
al
. (
198
8)
Q
9
4.
9
9
5.
3
9
8.
4
9
8.
3
9
4.
5
9
7.
6
9
7.
5
9
7.
5
9
8.
4
9
8.
6
9
7.
2
9
6.
6
9
7.
1
1.
44
9
1.
8
4.
99
F
4.
4
4.
2
1.
6
0.
7
4.
1
2.
4
2.
0
1.
9
1.
3
1.
4
2.
2
3.
2
2.
4
1.
24
3.
7
1.
83
L
0.
7
0.
5
–
1.
0
1.
4
–
0.
5
0.
6
0.
3
–
0.
6
0.
2
0.
5
0.
43
4.
5
3.
32
x an
d
σ
= av
er
ag
e an
d s
ta
nd
ar
d
de
vi
at
io
n of
th
e an
al
ys
ed
s
am
ples
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
Q
m
8
8.
6
8
7.
5
8
8.
8
9
7.
9
8
4.
9
8
3.
6
9
1.
6
8
7.
7
9
0.
9
9
3.
6
8
6.
5
9
3.
1
8
9.
6
4.
05
5
1.
7
7.
52
F
4.
4
4.
2
1.
6
0.
7
4.
1
2.
4
2.
0
1.
9
1.
3
1.
4
2.
2
3.
2
2.
4
1.
24
3.
7
1.
83
L
t
7.
0
8.
3
9.
6
1.
4
1
1.
0
1
4.
0
6.
4
1
0.
4
7.
8
5.
0
1
1.
3
3.
7
8.
0
3.
55
4
4.
6
8.
00
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0 10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
10
0.
0
x’
an
d
σ’
=
av
er
ag
e and
s
tan
dar
d
de
vi
at
io
n of
th
e “M
old
ovi
ţa L
itho
fac
ie
s”
qu
ar
tz
ar
en
it
es
f
ro
m
G
ig
liuto
e
t al
. (
20
04)
;
Pu
gl
is
i e
t al
. (
20
06)
413
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
this case, on the basis of the above mentioned sedimentologi-
cal conjuncture, it appears to be closely related to the high hy-
drodynamism of a shallow marine-like environment.
The source area of these lithic fragments might be the
same type as the “green schist” clasts re-sedimented in all
the external deposits of the former Moldavide Basin begin-
ning with Early Cretaceous, as we have shown above. Zuber
(1902) imagined this source area as an extension of the Cen-
tral Dobrogea chain to the Przemyśl region (Poland) which
apart the Flysch Basin from Podolian Continent (East Euro-
pean Platform). Since then most geologists referred the
source area of “exotic” clasts to Central Dobrogea. Accord-
ing to Oaie et al. (2005) they were supplied by an external
cratonic source area considered to be a belt of Neoproterozo-
ic—Lower Cambrian turbidites lying on the western margin
of the East European Craton which is now almost completely
covered by East Carpathian nappes (Oaie et al. 2005). The
only places where these turbidites outcrop are in Central Do-
brogea, an uplifted block of the Moesian Platform, and the
Malopolska Massif (in Poland). Anyway as we have shown
above, the “exotic” clasts supplied by the “green schists”
source area (Fig. 13) also include metamorphics and pegma-
tites, proving its rather complex constitution from the petro-
graphic point of view (Anastasiu 1984, 1986; Grasu et al.
1999). Mirău ă (1964) showed that the “green elements” re-
sedimented within flysch and molasses deposits are character-
ized by higher metamorphic rank than the rocks considered
Fig. 15. Thin sedimentary laminae mainly made up of subrounded quartzose grains (qz lamina), rare opaque minerals and occasional glauc-
onite (gl) within the Bituminous Marls (a, and b). Green schist clast (g—s clast) in the Fierăstrău Sandstone (c) and typical quartzarenites-
like products characterizing the Lucăce ti Sandstones (d).
their source area from Central Dobrogea. A possible explana-
tion for the petrographic variety of the “exotic” clasts would
be a deeper erosion of Central Dobrogea along the segment
which played the role of forebulge for the Moldavide Basin.
Paleontology and paleoecological implications
Fish, as fossils, are almost exclusively autochthonous and
thus best suited as direct indicators of aquatic vertebrate life
and vertebrate biodiversity in the past.
A significant Oligocene fish fauna has been collected from
the Piatra Neam area, located in the Bistri a half-window.
Most of the type specimens as well as numerous additional
materials from this area have been collected from the Lower
Dysodilic Shales and are nowadays deposited in the pale-
ontological collection of the Natural Sciences Museum of
Piatra Neam .
These fish are well preserved and the Lower Oligocene
collections contain specimens of more than 50 species repre-
senting about 20 families. The most important species in-
clude sardinas (Clupeidae), bristlemouth (Gonostomatidae),
hachetfish (Sternoptychidae), lightfish (Photichthyidae),
lanternfish (Myctophidae), codlets (Bregmacerotidae), squir-
relfish (Holocentridae), dories (Zeidae), boarfishes (Cap-
roidae), shrimpfish (Centriscidae), bigeyes (Priacanthidae),
sharksuckers (Echeneidae), jaks and pomparos (Carangidae),
414
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
pomfrets (Bramidae), snake mackerels (Gempylidae), cutlass-
fish (Trichiuridae), mackerels and tunas (Scombridae), drift-
fish (Nomeidae), lefteye fluoders (Bothidae), triplespines
(Triacanthidae).
During geological investigations in 2005—2006 an outcrop
was discovered on Pietricica Mountain, Piatra Neam , situated
in the second level of the Bituminous Marls, considered by Io-
nesi & Grasu (1993) to be an olistolith. Some interesting fish
fossils specimens, listed and described below, were collected
from Bituminous Marls cropping out near Piatra Neam al
Văleni (Fig. 1), and also from the above mentioned olistolith.
Order: Myctophiformes
Family: Myctophidae
Genus: Oligophus Ružena Gregorová, 1997
Oligophus moravicus (Paucă, 1931)
The most abundant fossil specimens from Bituminous
Marls (more than 10 very well preserved specimens,
Fig. 16a) belong to Oligophus moravicus (Paucă, 1931).
Typically, the recent species of myctophids are pelagic
fish of the open ocean. Most species are found in the upper
1000 m of the water column (mesopelagic). A few species
live deeper than 1000 m (bathypelagic). Some species are as-
sociated with continental and island slopes (pseudoceanic).
Daily vertical migrations from about 400 to 1000 m during
the day into the upper 200 m at night are common; some
species reach the surface (Craddock & Hartel 2002).
Order: Gadiformes
Family: Merluccidae
Genus: Palaeogadus Rath, 1859
Palaeogadus sp.
In the olistolith of Bituminous Marls only one specimen,
incomplete of Palaeogadus sp. (Fig. 16b) has been discov-
ered. The recent species of the family Merluccidae are ben-
thopelagic fish living on the shelf and upper continental
slope, from shallow coastal waters to more than 1000 m;
most species, if not all, migrate vertically at night to feed;
seasonal onshore-offshore migrations have also been docu-
mented (Iwamoto & Cohen 2002).
Order: Pleuronectiformes
Family: Scophthalmidae
Genus: Scophthalmus Rafinesque, 1810
Scophthalmus stamatini (Paucă, 1931)
Flatfish fossils are very rarely discovered. Baciu & Chanet
(2002) described the oldest known scophthalmid, Scophthal-
mus stamatini (Paucă, 1931), from the Bituminous Marls
(Lower Oligocene, Pietricica Mountain near Văleni; point V
on Fig. 1). Five specimens from the Bituminous Marls and
one from the olistolith of the Bituminous Marls resediment-
ed in Lower Dysodilic Shales in Pietricica Mountain expo-
sures, very well preserved, complete and undistorted of
Fig. 16. a – Oligophus moravicus (Paucă, 1931). b – Palaeoga-
dus sp. c – Scophthalmus stamatini (Paucă, 1931).
Scophthalmus stamatini (Paucă, 1931), has been discovered
(Fig. 16c).
In the recent fauna, this family is represented by five gen-
era with about 18 species, distributed in the northern Atlan-
tic, Mediterranean and Black seas (Nelson 1994). Generally
these species inhabit sand to sand/silt or mud sediments in
relatively shallow-waters (less than 110 m); most abundant
from 1—2 m to, usually, less than 56 m (Munroe 2002).
Most of the fish fossil specimens from the Bituminous
Marls are undistorted and complete, proving the absence of
415
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
transport of the specimens over long distances. Gaudant
(1979) considers that it is possible to interpolate the ecologi-
cal characters between recent and fossil fish fauna until the
level of the family, so the presence of merluccids and scoph-
thalmids indicate that the depth of marine basin, at the level
of the Bituminous Marls had to be about 100 to 200 m.
Conclusions
The flysch deposits involved in the Moldavide units were
accumulated in a foreland-type basin system (Fig. 13a). The
Marginal Folds Nappe sedimentation area was located on the
internal part of the forebulge depozone.
The forebulge resulted after the tectonic loading of the cra-
tonic margin, possible of Moesian type as the “exotic” clasts
would indicate, as a consequence of the Late Cretaceous clo-
sure of the External Dacide trough, and overthrusting of its
nappes. Its outward migration could cause reactivation of
older faults and/or tensional stresses which, in turn, could
determine a fragmentation of the basin margin in uplifted
and subsident blocks, hosting sub-basins. The forebulge was
partly emerged during the Oligocene and later when increas-
ing quantities of “green schists” clasts (meters in diameter)
were supplied into the marginal basin (Grasu et al. 1999).
A small area of the Marginal Folds Nappe exposed in the
Bistri a half-window (Eastern Carpathians) was analysed
based on three successions logged on the Nechit River 1, Ne-
chit River 2, and oimu River Sections. Seven facies associa-
tions were recognized in Upper Eocene-Oligocene deposits
(Bisericani Beds, Globigerina Marls, Lucăce ti Sandstone,
Lower Menilites with Fierăstrău Sandstone, Bituminous
Marls, Lower Dysodilic Shales with Kliwa Sandstone, Upper
Dysodilic Shales) based on lithology, sedimentary structures,
and paleontological content. They were interpreted as repre-
senting – mud-rich slope deposits, oxic shelf, shallow chan-
nels, anoxic shelf, channel-levee, depositional lobes, and
fringe fans (Fig. 13b,c) belonging to five depositional sys-
tems: 1) mud-rich slope apron, 2) oxic shelf, 3) lower turbidit-
ic system, 4) anoxic shelf, and 5) upper turbiditic system.
The different behaviour of these blocks might be the result
of the observed shallowing or deepening upward sedimenta-
ry trends. The sedimentation in shallow-water is proved first-
ly by the coarseness of turbidites which are interpreted as
“mixed depositional system” according to Mutti et al. (2003)
terminology. We have shown that these mixed depositional
systems may appear not only on the active margin of the
foreland basin system, but also on its forebulge, when this
represents an important source of coarse material, on one
hand, and is affected by deformations and collapses, which
define local sub-basins connected to coarse material source,
probably of fan-delta type, on the other.
The presence of the two shelf depositional systems, one
oxic, and other anoxic, with highly bioturbated sandstones
and flatfish (Scophthalmus stamatini Paucă, 1931) prove
again the sedimentation rather in shallow-water conditions.
The source area was located entirely on the cratonic side of
the foreland basin as is proved by very frequent “green schists”
clasts, and by quartzarenite-type of sandstones (Lucăce ti, Fi-
erăstrău, and Kliwa Sandstones). The source area for “green
schists” clasts is considered to be a Central Dobrogea-type base-
ment, and its sedimentary cover, which played the forebulge
role. The quartzarenite petrographic characteristics prove a
provenance from low-grade metamorphic rocks as green
schists. Their high maturity might be a result of deep chemical
weathering in a subtropical- and paratropical-like climate as
was the case during the Oligocene time in the studied area.
Acknowledgments: Financial support for this research was
provided by the Ministry of Education, Research and Youth
of Romania and by the “Al. I. Cuza” University and Re-
search Ministry of Italy as grants to C. Miclău and to D.
Puglisi, respectively. The authors wish to thank professors
Eugen Grădinaru, Doru Bădescu (University of Bucharest,
Romania), and Sergio Longhitano (University of Potenza, It-
aly) as well as an anonymous Referee, whose suggestions
strongly improved the manuscript.
References
Anastasiu N. 1984: What are the green clasts of the Carpathian Flysch
– a petrographic reconsideration. Rev. Geol., Acad. Română
28, 51—60.
Anastasiu N. 1986: Comparative petrology concept and flysch for-
mations. Stud. Cerc. Geolog. Acad. Româna 31, 89—100 (in
Romanian).
Anastasiu N., Popa M. & Roban D.R. 2007: Depositional systems.
Sequential analyses in Carpathians and Dobrogea. Editura
Acad. Române, Bucuresti, 1—606 (in Romanian).
Baciu D.S. & Chanet B. 2002: Les Poissons Plats Fossiles (Teleo-
stei: Pleuronectiformes) de L’Oligocene de Piatra Neam
(Roumanie). Oryctos 4, 17—38.
Basu A. 1985: Reading provenance from detrital quartz. In: Zuffa
G.G. (Ed.): Provenance of arenites. Reidel, Dordrecht, 231—247.
Basu A., Young S.W., Suttner L.J., James W.C. & Mack G.K.
1975: Re-evaluation of the use of undulatory extinction and
polycrystallinity in detrital quartz for provenance interpreta-
tion. J. Sed. Petrology 45, 873—882.
Bădescu D. 1998: Geology of the East Carpathians – an overview.
Reports on Geodesy 7 (37), 49—69.
Bădescu D. 2005: The tectonic and stratigraphic evolution of the
East Carpathians during Mesozoic and Neozoic. Editura Eco-
nomică, Bucure ti, 1—312 (in Romanian).
Băncilă I. 1958: The geology of East Carpathians. Editura
tiin ifică, Bucure ti, 1—368 (in Romanian).
Belayouni H., Di Staso A., Guerrera F., Martín-Martín M., Miclău
C. & Tramontana M. 2009: Stratigraphic and geochemical
study of the organic-rich black shales in the Tarcău Nappe of
the Moldavidian Domain (Carpathian Chain, Romania). Int. J.
Earth Sci. (Geol. Rundsch.) 98, 157—176.
Blatt H. & Christie J.M. 1963: Undulatory extinction in quartz of ig-
neous and metamorphic rocks and its significance in provenance
studies of sedimentary rocks. J. Sed. Petrology 33, 559—579.
Blow W.H. 1969: Late Middle Eocene to Recent planktonic fora-
miniferal biostratigraphy. Proceedings of the first internation-
al conference on Planktonic Microfossils (Geneva 1967),
199—422.
Cheel R.J. & Leckie D.A. 1993: Hummocky cross-stratification. In:
Wright V.P. (Ed.): Sedimentological Review, 1. Blackwell, Ox-
ford, 103—121.
Craddock J.E. & Hartel K.E. 2002: Myctophidae. T. In: Carpenter
416
MICLĂU , LOIACONO, PUGLISI and BACIU
K.C. (Ed.): The living marine resources of the Western Central
Atlantic. Vol. 2. FAO of the United Nations, Rome, 944—951.
Crampton S.L. & Allen P.A. 1995: Recognition of forebulge uncon-
formities associated with early stage foreland basin develop-
ment; example from the North Alpine foreland basin. AAPG
Bull. 79, 10, 1495—1514.
Debelmas J., Oberhauser R., Săndulescu M. & Trumpy R. 1980:
L’arc alpino-carpathique. Colloque C5: Geologie des châines
alpines issues de la Tethys-Th
č
me 2, 26
č
me
Congr. Géol. Inter.,
Paris. Mém. Bur. Rech. Géol. Min. 115, 86—96.
DeCelles P.G. & Giles K.N. 1996: Foreland basin systems. Basin
Res. 8, 105—123.
Dicea O. & Dicea M. 1980: Stratigraphic correlations on nannoplank-
ton basis in the external flysch of the East Carpathians. D.S. Inst.
Geol. Geofiz. (Bucure ti) LXV/4 (1977—1978), 111—126.
Dickinson W.R. 1970: Interpreting detrital modes of graywacke and
arkose. J. Sed. Petrology 40, 2, 695—707.
Dumitrescu I. 1952: Etude géologique de la région comprise entre
l’Oituz et la Coza. An. Com. Geol. (Bucure ti) XXIV, 195—270.
Folk R.L. 1974: Petrology of sedimentary rocks. Hemphill’s, Aus-
tin, Texas, 1—182.
Galloway W.E. 1998: Siliciclastic slope and base-of-slope deposi-
tional systems: component facies, stratigraphic architecture and
classification. AAPG Bull. 82, 4, 569—595.
Gaudant J. 1979: Principes et methodes d’une paleoichthyologie
bathimetrique. Paleogeogr. Paleoclimatol. Paleoecol. 28,
263—278.
Gazzi P. 1966: The upper Cretaceous Flysch sandstones (Modena
Apennine); comparison with the Monghidoro Flysch. Mineral.
Petrogr. Acta 12, 69—97 (in Italian).
Gazzi P., Zuffa G.G., Gandolfi G. & Paganelli L. 1973: Provenance
and dispersal of the sands along the Adriatic littoral between
the Isonzo and Foglia rivers: regional framework. Mem. Soc.
Geol. Ital. 12, 1—37 (in Italian).
Gigliuto L.G., Grasu C., Loiacono F., Miclău C., Moretti E., Pugli-
si D. & Raffaelli G. 2004: Provenance changes and sedimen-
tology of the Eocene—Oligocene “Moldovi a Lithofacies” of
the Tarcău Nappe (Eastern Carpathians, Romania). Geol. Car-
pathica 55, 4, 299—309.
Givulescu R. 1997: The history of the Tertiary fossil forests from
Transylvania, Banat, Cri ana and Maramure (Romania). Edit-
ura Carpatica, Cluj-Napoca, 1—173 (in Romanian).
Grasu C., Catană C. & Grinea D. 1988: Carpathian flysch: petrography
and economic evaluations. Editura Tehnica, Bucure ti, 1—208 (in
Romanian).
Grasu C., Catană C., Miclău C. & Bobo I. 1999: The Eastern Car-
pathian Molasse. Petrography and sedimentogenesis. Editura
Tehnic, Bucure ti, 1—227 (in Romanian).
Grasu C., Miclău C., Brânzilă M. & Bobo I. 2002: The Sarmatian
from the foreland basin systems of the Eastern Carpathians.
Editura Tehnic, Bucure ti, 1—407 (in Romanian).
Grasu C., Miclău C., Florea F. & aramet M. 2007: The geology
and the economic potential of the bituminous rocks from Ro-
mania. Editura Universită ii “Al. I. Cuza”, Ia i, 1—253 (in Ro-
manian).
Gregorová R. 1997: Evolution of the fish and shark faunistic assem-
blage in the Oligocene of the Carpathian Flysh Zone in Mora-
via and their significance for palaeoecology, palaeobathymetry
and stratigraphy. MS Grantový projekt GAČR 205/95/1211,
29—35.
Hesselbo S.P. & Huggett J.M. 2001: Glaucony in ocean-margin se-
quence stratigraphy (Oligocene—Pliocene offshore New Jersey
U.S.A., ODP Leg 174a). J. Sed. Res. 71, 599—607.
Ionesi L. 1971: Paleogene flysch from the Moldova River Drainage
Basin. Editura Academiei Române, Bucure ti, 1—250 (in Ro-
manian).
Ionesi L. & Florea F. 1981: La nannoplancton de Gres de Lucăce ti
et les menilites inférieurs et sa signification biostratigraphique.
Analele tiin ifice ale Universită ii “Al. I. Cuza”, Geologie t
XXVII, Ia i, 15—20.
Ionesi L. & Grasu C. 1993: Tectonic and sedimentary significance
of the bituminous marls within lower dyssodilic shales. Stud.
Cerc. Geol. 38, 29—40 (in Romanian).
Ionesi L. & Meszaros N. 1989: Le nannoplancton de la Formation
d’Ardelu a et sa signification biostratigraphique. In: Ghergari
L. et al. (Eds.): The Oligocene from the Transylvanian Basin.
Cluj-Napoca, 146—156.
Iwamoto T. & Cohen D.M. 2002: Merluciidae. Merluciid hakes. In:
Carpenter K.C. (Ed.): The living marine resources of the West-
ern Central Atlantic. Vol. 2. FAO of the United Nations, Rome,
1017—1021.
Kelly J.C. & Webb J.A. 1999: The genesis of glaucony in the Oli-
go-Miocene Torquay Group Southeastern Australia: petro-
graphic and geochemical evidence. Sed. Geol. 125, 99—114.
Lebenzon C. 1973: Calcareous nannoplankton of Oligocene and
Early Miocene deposits from the Tarcău Upper Drainage Basin
(Tărcu a and Răchiti Creeks). D.S. Inst. Geol. Geofiz.
(Bucure ti) LIX/4 (1972), 101—102 (in Romanian).
MacEarchen J.A., Pemberton S.G., Gingras M.K. & Bann K.L.
2007: The Ichnofacies paradigm: a fifty-year retrospective. In:
Miller W. III (Ed.): Trace fossils. Concepts, problems, pros-
pects. Elsevier, 52—77.
Martini E. & Lebenzon C. 1971: Nannoplankton Untersuchungen in
oberen Tal des Tarcau (Ostkarpathen, Rumänien) und stratig-
raphische Ergebnisse. Neu. Jb. Geol. Paläont. 9, 552—565.
Miclău C., Loiacono F., Moretti E., Puglisi D. & Koltun Y.V. 2007:
A petro-sedimentary record of Eocene-Oligocene palaeogeo-
graphic changes connected with the separation of the central
Paratethys (Romanian and Ukrainian Carpathians). Bulletin of
the Tethys Geological Society Vol. 2, 117—126.
Micu M. 1976: Geological map of Romania, scale 1 : 50,000, sheet
48b Piatra Neam . Institutul de Geologie i Geofizică, Bucure ti.
Micu M. 1983: Geological map of Romania, scale 1 : 50,000, sheet
48d Tazlău. Institutul de Geologie i Geofizică, Bucure ti.
Micu M. & Ghe a N. 1986: Eocene—Oligocene boundary in Roma-
nia on calcareous nannoplankton. D.S. Inst. Geol. Geofiz.
(Bucure ti) 70—71/4, (1983—1984), 289—307.
Mirău ă O. 1964: The Green Schists from Doroban u-Măgurele area
(Central Dobrogea). D.S. Inst. Geol. (Bucure ti) L/2 (1962—
1963), Bucure ti, 259—272 (in Romanian).
Mrazec L. 1910: Sur le roches vertes des conglomérats tertiaires des
Carpathes et des Subcarpathes de la Roumanie. Comptes-Ren-
dus des Seánces Tome II, Institut Geologique de Roumanie,
Bucure ti 29—44.
Munroe T.A. 2002: Family Scophtalmidae. In: Carpenter K.C.
(Ed.): The living marine resources of the Western Central At-
lantic. FAO of the United Nations. Vol. 3, Rome, 1896—1897.
Mutti E. 1992: Turbidite sandstones. San Donato Milanese. AGIP-
Istituto di Geologia, Universit
a
di Parma, 1—275.
Mutti E. & Ricci Lucchi F. 1972: Le torbiditi dell’Appennino Set-
tentrionale: introduzione all’analisi di facies. Mem. Soc. Geol.
Ital. 11, 161—199.
Mutti E. & Ricci Lucchi F. 1975: Turbidite facies and facies asso-
ciations. In: Mutti E., Parea G.C., Ricci Lucchi F., Sagri M.,
Zanzucchi G., Ghibaudo G. & Iaccarino S. (Eds.): Examples of
turbidite facies associations from selected formations of North
Apennines. IX International Congress I.A.S., Nice, France,
Field Trip, All. 21—36.
Mutti E., Davoli G., Tinterri R. & Zavala C. 1996: The importance
of fluvio-deltaic systems dominated by catastrophic flooding
in tectonically active basins. Mem. Sci. Geol. 48, 233—291.
Mutti E., Tinterri R., Di Biase D., Fava L., Mavilla N., Angella S.
è
è
à
417
EOCENE-OLIGOCENE SEDIMENTATION OF THE MARGINAL FOLDS NAPPE (E CARPATHIANS, ROMANIA)
& Calabrese L. 2000: Delta-front facies associations of ancient
flood dominated fluvio-deltaic systems. Rev. Soc. Geol. Espa-
n
a 13, 165—190.
Mutti E., Tinterri R., Benevelli G., Di Biase D. & Cavanna G. 2003:
Deltaic, mixed and turbidite sedimentation of ancient foreland
basins. Mar. Petrol. Geol. 20, 733—755.
Mutti E., Tinterri R., Magalhaes P.M. & Basta G. 2007: Deep-water
turbidites and their equally important shallower water cousins.
Search and Discovery Article.
Nelson J.S. 1994: Fishes from the world. 3
rd
edition. John Wiley
and Sons Inc., New York, 1—465.
Oaie Gh., Seghedi A., Rădan S. & Vaida M. 2005: Sedimentology
and source area composition for the Neopreoterozoic-Eocam-
brian turbidites from East Moesia. Geol. Belgica 8, 4, 78—105.
Odin G.S. 1985: Significance of green particles (glaucony, ber-
thierine, chlorite) in arenites. In: Zuffa G.G. (Ed.): Provenance
of arenites. Reidel, Dordrecht, 279—307.
Paucă M. 1931: Die fossile fauna und flora aus dem Oligozan von
Suslanesti-Muscel in Rumanien. An. Inst. Geol. României
(Bucure ti) 16, 577—663.
Pettijohn E.J. 1975: Sedimentary rocks. Harper International Edi-
tion, Harper & Row Publishers Inc., New York, 1—628.
Pickering K.T., Hiscott R.N. & Hein F.J. 1989: Deep-marine envi-
ronments: clastic sedimentation and tectonics. Unwin Hyman,
London, 1—352.
Pomerol Ch. & Premoli-Silva I. 1986: The Eocene-Oligocene tran-
sition: events and boundary. In: Pomerol Ch. & Premoli-Silva
I. (Eds.): Terminal Eocene events: developments in paleontol-
ogy and stratigraphy. Vol. 9. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1—24.
Puglisi D., Bădescu D., Carbone S., Corso S., Franchi R., Gigliuto
L.G., Loiacono F., Miclău C. & Moretti E. 2006: Stratigra-
phy, petrography and palaeogeographic significance of the
Early Oligocene “menilite facies” of the Tarcău Nappe (East-
ern Carpathians, Romania). Acta Geol. Pol. 56, 1, 105—120.
Rögl F. 1999: Mediterranean and Paratethys. Facts and hypotheses
of an Oligocene to Miocene paleogeography (short overview).
Geol. Carpathica 50, 4, 339—349.
Săndulescu M. 1972: Considérations sur les possibilités de corréla-
tion de la structure des Carpates Orientales et Occidentales.
D.S. Inst. Geol. (Bucure ti) 58, 5, 125—150 (in Romanian, with
French Summary).
Săndulescu M. 1975: Essai de synth
e
se structurale des Carpathes.
Bull. Soc. Géol. France XVII, 3, 299—358.
Săndulescu M. 1980: Analyse géotectonique dec chaînes alpines
situées autour de la Mer Noire Occidentale. An. Inst. Geol.
Geofiz. 66, 5—54.
Săndulescu M. 1984: Geotectonica Romaniei. Editura Tehnică,
Bucure ti, 1—336.
Săndulescu M. 1988: Cenozoic tectonic history of the Carpathians. In:
Royden L. & Horváth F. (Eds.): The Pannonian Basin: A study in
basin evolution. AAPG Mem. 45, 17—25.
Săndulescu M. & Micu M. 1989: Oligocene paleogeography of the
East Carpathians. In: Ghergari L. et al. (Eds.): The Oligocene
from the Transylvanian Basin. Cluj-Napoca, 79—86.
Simionescu I. 1909: Sur l’origine des conglomérats verts du Ter-
tiare carpathique. Ann. Sci. Univ. Jassy VI/1, 310—312.
Soták J., Starek D., Andrejeva-Grigorovič A., Banská M., Botková O.,
Chalupová B. & Hudecová M. 2002: Climatic changes across the
Eocene—Oligocene boundary: Palaeoenvironmental proxies from
Central-Carpathian Paleogene Basin. Geol. Carpathica Spec. Is-
sue. Vol. 53. Proceedings of the XVII Congress of Carpathian—
Balkan geological Association, Bratislava, 1—4 September 2002.
Suttner L.J., Basu A. & Mack G.H. 1981: Climate and the origin of
quartz arenites. J. Sed. Petrology 51, 4, 1235—1246.
tefănescu M., Săndulescu M. & Micu M. 1979: Flysch deposits in
the Eastern Carpathians. Geol. Inst. Romania, Bucure ti, 1—58.
Walker R.G. 1992: Turbidites and submarine fans. In: Walker R.G.
& Noel N.P. (Eds.): Facies models: Response to sea level
change. Geol. Assoc. Canada, 239—263.
Van Wagoner J.C., Mitchum R.M., Campion K.M. & Rahmanian
V.D. 1990: Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs,
cores, and outcrops. AAPG, Methods in Exploration, Series 7,
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 1—55.
Young S.W. 1976: Petrographic textures of detrital polycrystalline
quartz as an aid to interpreting crystalline source rocks. J. Sed.
Petrology 46, 595—603.
Zuber R. 1902: Neue Karpathenstudien. Jb. K.-Kön. Geol. Reichs-
anst. 52, 245—258.
ñ
è