GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, DECEMBER 2006, 57, 6, 427—432
Two Permian sphinctozoan sponges from the
Shotori Mountains (eastern Iran)
, KOOROSH RASHIDI
and ALI HAMEDANI
Institute of Paleontology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Loewenichstr. 28, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
University of Esfahan, Faculty of Sciences, Esfahan, Iran; Hamedani_ali@hotmail.com; email@example.com
(Manuscript received November 7, 2005; accepted in revised form March 16, 2006)
Abstract: Two sphinctozoan sponge taxa, Shotorithalamia tubulara nov. gen., nov. sp. and Amblysiphonella cf. A.
vesiculosa vesiculosa (de Koninck), are described from the Permian deposits of the Jamal Formation, exposed in Bagh-e
Vang Mountain, and from a locality near the town of Deh-e Mohammad, both in the Shotori Mountains, north of Tabas,
eastern Iran. The new genus Shotorithalamia is characterized by having ring-chambers – like Amblysiphonella – and
also by possession of multibranched tubes that extended from the imperforate exo- and endowalls into the chamber
interiors. The validity of families Amphorithalamiidae Senowbari-Daryan & Rigby and Girtyocoeliidae Finks & Rigby
Key words: Permian, Iran, Shotori Mountains, Bagh-e Vang, Taxonomy, Porifera, Sphinctozoa.
The Permian deposits, called the Jamal Formation, crop
out in several localities in the Shotori Mountains, in east-
ern, and also in central Iran (Stöckline et al. 1965). The
section of the Jamal Formation crops out on the western
flank of the Kuh-e Bagh-e Vang, located about 45 km NW
of Tabas, approximately 5 km south of the town of Shir-
gesht (geol. map Shirgest, 1 : 100,000 by Ruttner et al.
1968, see Fig. 1). Here the Jamal Formation reaches thick-
nesses of 193 m (Ruttner et al. 1968) to 300 m (Leven &
Vaziri Moghaddam 2004). The lower part (about 60 m
thick) of the section is composed of differently coloured
limestones and marls, with some olistoliths (up to 3 m in
diameter). This part was identified as an independent for-
mation by Partoazar (1995), who named it the Bagh-e
Vang Member, of Bolorian age (for more information see
Leven & Vaziri Moghaddam 2004; Senowbari-Daryan et
Sponges, described by Senowbari-Daryan et al. (2005)
from the Bagh-e Vang locality, were collected mainly
from reefal beds of the Bagh-e Vang Member. The fol-
lowing taxa have been described by the authors:
Amblysiphonella rigbyi Senowbari-Daryan,
Rashidi & Hamedani, Baghevangia minima Senowbari-
Daryan, Rashidi & Hamedani, Shotorispongia permica
Senowbari-Daryan, Rashidi & Hamedani, Shotorispon-
gia biserialis Senowbari-Daryan, Rashidi & Hamedani,
Thaumastocoelia? cf. Th. irregularis Weidlich & Se-
nowbari-Daryan, Sollasia ostiolata Steinmann, Sollasia
cylindrica Senowbari-Daryan, Rashidi & Hamedani, Gir-
tyocoelia beedei (Girty), and Lemonea cylindrica (Girty).
Preperonidella recta grossa (Wu), Bicoelia spi-
nosa Senowbari-Daryan, Rashidi & Hamedani, Hep-
tatubispongia symmetrica Rigby & Senowbari-Daryan,
Maeandrostia kansasensis Girty, Maeandrostia radiata Se-
nowbari-Daryan, Rashidi & Hamedani, and Solutosspongia
tabasensis Senowbari-Daryan, Rashidi & Hamedani.
Shotorithalamia tubulara nov. gen., nov. sp., de-
scribed in this paper, was also collected from reefal beds
of the Bagh-e Vang Member (Fig. 1, locality 1) by one of
the authors (K. Rashidi).
Amblysiphonella cf. A. vesiculosa vesiculosa was
found in an outcop (33º 59´ 46.6´´ N and 57º 01´ 46´´ E)
located about 4 km northeast of the town of Deh-e Mo-
hammad, approximately 68 km north of Tabas, and
23 km from the Bagh-e Vang locality (Fig. 1, locality 2).
The age of the section, exposed in this locality corre-
sponds to the Bagh-e Vang section (Lower Permian,
Bolorian). The systematic classification, proposed by
Finks & Rigby (in Finks et al. 2004) is used in this paper.
Phyllum: Porifera Grant, 1872
Class: Demospongea Sollas, 1875
Subclass: Ceractinomorpha Levi, 1973
Order: Agelasida Verrill, 1907
Family: Sebargasiidae Laubenfels, 1955
Subfamily: Sebargasiinae Senowbari-Daryan, 1990
Genus: Amblysiphonella Steinmann, 1882
Amblysiphonella cf. vesiculosa vesiculosa (de Koninck)
*1863 Orthoceras vesiculosum n. sp. – de Koninck, p. 15
1887 Amblysiphonella vesiculosa (de Koninck) – Waagen &
Wentzel, p. 973—974, pl. CXXII, fig. 1
?1970 Amblysiphonella vesiculosa – Zhuravleva, fig. 3a—3b
SENOWBARI-DARYAN, RASHIDI and HAMEDANI
M a t e r i a l :
Only one specimen from the Lower Permian
(Bolorian) Jamal Formation of Deh-e Mohammad locality
O c c u r r e n c e :
D e s c r i p t i o n :
The available part of the broken
sponge has a length of 50 mm. Its true length cannot be
given, because only a portion is preserved. The sponge
was cut in several pieces and later glued together. It has an
outer diameter of 50 mm and is composed of several cres-
cent-like ring-chambers. Because of the overlap of periph-
eral parts of preceding chambers by the younger chamber
walls, outer segmentation is not recognizable from the ex-
terior view, but internal chambered construction is clearly
evident in sections of the specimen. The chambers reach
heights of about 6—8 mm. The exowalls are doubled lay-
ered, reaching thicknesses of up to 3 mm, and the inter-
walls are about 1 mm thick. An axial spongocoel of
retrosiphonate type is 10 mm in diameter. Chamber walls
are pierced by numerous pores 0.3—0.4 mm in diameter.
Chamber interiors are filled by vesiculae, which appear
circular in longitudinal and tangential sections.
R e m a r k s :
Amblysiphonella is a long-lasting genus
occurring from the Ordovician and Carboniferous to the
Late Triassic. To date, the genus has not been reported
from the Silurian and Devonian. More than 60 species are
known (Senowbari-Daryan & Garcia-Bellido 2002). The
majority of these have been described from Permian de-
According to the sponge diameter, the Iranian species is
comparable with A. vesiculosa vesiculosa, erroneously de-
scribed as a cephalopod Orthoceras vesiculosum by de
Koninck (1863), and later redescribed by Waagen &
Wentzel (1887) as a sponge from the Permian of the Salt
Range (Pakistan). Later, the species was described by
Zhuravleva (1970) from the former Soviet Union without
giving the exact stratigraphic level and locality of the oc-
currence. The Iranian specimen differs from other known
specimens described by de Koninck and by Zhuravleva
(diameter smaller than 30 mm) by having a larger diameter
(50 mm) and by different shapes of the chambers. Cham-
bers of the Iranian specimen, however, have almost the
same height as in A. vesiculosa minima described by
Zhang (1983), and Fan & Zhang (1985) from the Late Per-
mian of Lichuan, West Hubei, China. We are not sure
about the assignment of the Iranian specimen to the spe-
cies from Pakistan or from China, and have thus described
it as A. cf. vesiculosa vesiculosa (de Koninck).
Amblysiphonella is an abundant sponge genus in Per-
mian deposits in eastern and central Iran. The species A.
iranica was described from the Permian at a locality near
the La Kaftari Mountain (south of Bagher-Abad, north of
Esfahan by Senowbari-Daryan & Hamedani 2002). Other
sponges from this locality were reported by Rigby, Senow-
bari-Daryan & Hamedani (2005).
A. rigbyi Senowbari-Daryan, Rashidi & Hamedani (2005)
is the most abundant sphinctozoan sponge in the Permian
Jamal Formation of the Bagh-e Vang locality. A. cf. vesicu-
losa vesiculosa, described in this paper, is the third species
of the genus Amblysiphonella occurring in Permian depos-
its in Iran, along with A. iranica and A. rigbyi.
Discussion about the validity of the families
Amphorithalamiidae and Girtyocoeliidae
Finks & Rigby (in Finks et al. 2004: p. 658) established
the new family Girtyocoeliidae designating Girtyocoelia as
the type genus of the family. Additional genera, including
Amphorithalamia Senowbari-Daryan & Rigby (1988), Ca-
lymenospongia Elliott (1963), Enoplocoelia Steinmann
(1882), Henricellum Wilckens (1937), Phraethalamia Se-
nowbari-Daryan & Ingavat-Helmcke (1994), Polyedra Ter-
mier & Termier (1955), Sollasia Steinmann (1882), and
finally, with question-mark Solenocoelia Cuif (1973), were
attributed to the Girtyocoeliidae. Later, an additional Or-
dovician genus, Girtyocoeliana Rigby, Karl, Blodgett &
Baichtal (2005) was added to this family.
Amphorithalamia was designated as the type genus of
the family Amphorithalamiidae by Senowbari-Daryan &
Rigby (1988). According to the “International Code of
Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN)”, published in its Ger-
man version by Kraus (2000), it is incorrect to move Am-
phorithalamia to another family established later than the
first establishment of its family (“Priority Principle”). Am-
phorithalamiidae has priority. It would be correct to leave
Fig. 1. Geographical position of the Kuh-e Bagh-e Vang (1) and
Deh-e Mohammad (2) localities in eastern Iran.
TWO PERMIAN SPHINCTOZOAN SPONGES (SHOTORI MOUNTAINS, EASTERN IRAN)
Amphorithalamia within the originally established family
of Amphorithalamiidae. The same is also true for the ge-
nus Polyedra, which was attributed to the family Poly-
edridae Termier & Termier (in Termier et al. 1977).
Finks & Rigby (in Finks et al. 2004) have attributed to
the family Girtyocoeliidae genera with totally different
diagnostic characteristics. For example, the genera Girtyo-
coelia, Enoplocoelia, Phraethalamia or Polyedra are char-
acterized by possession of one or more axial canals, but
Sollasia or Henricellum are asiphonate genera. The “interi-
or of each chamber” of Amphorithalamia (an asiphonate
sponge) is “filled with a fine, meandriform, trabecular net
that outlines anostomosing, tubular spaces” (Finks & Rig-
by: in Finks et al. 2004: p. 658). The filling skeleton, ve-
siculae excepted, is lacking in all other mentioned genera.
Because of the rule of priority (ICZN), the family names
Amphorithalamiidae and Polyedridae cannot be replaced
by Girtyocoeliidae, or any other new family.
Calymenospongia kudistanensis, a minor chambered
fossil described from the Kolosh Formation (Paleocene) of
northern Iraq by Elliott (1963), is another genus, attribut-
ed to the Family Girtyocoeliidae by Finks & Rigby (in
Finks et al. 2004). The construction of this microfossil is
similar to Sollasia, as noted by Elliott. However, the very
small dimensions, which according to Elliott are: maxi-
mum diameter of 0.72 mm, chamber heights of 0.42 mm,
and a wall thickness of the chambers of 0.03 mm, differs
from all other sphinctozoan sponges. The wall structure is
also different from other sphinctozoan sponges. The sys-
tematic position of Calymenospongia is uncertain, and an
attribution to foraminifers is not be excluded.
Cuif (1973) described the genera Solenocoelia and Retic-
ulocoelia without placing them in a higher taxonomic cate-
gory. He illustrated both genera only by tangential sections,
which unfortunately do not show the sphinctozoan con-
struction. Also the species name “cylindrica“ does not re-
flect the sphinctozoan construction of this sponge.
Solenocoelia, attributed, althought with some doubt, to the
family Girtyocoeliidae by Finks & Rigby (in Finks et al.
2004), shows a wall with well-preserved spherulitic micro-
structure, without pores or ostia (Cuif, pl. 9, figs. 3—4, pl. 10,
fig. 4). The systematic position of this fossil as either a seg-
mented sphinctozoan or an unsegmented inozoa is uncer-
tain. Also the systematic position of Reticulocoelia
arborescens Cuif (1973), attributed to the Virgulidae – a
family of inozoid sponges – by Finks & Rigby (2004:
p. 598), is uncertain.
In our opinion establishment of a new family Girtyocoeli-
idae, and separation of the genera included there from the
rest of the genera of the family Thaumastocoeliidae seems
superfluous and not necessary. We use in this paper the
“classic” classification (Senowbari-Daryan 1990, Senow-
bari-Daryan & Garcia-Bellido 2002) of the sphinctozoan
sponges to classify the new genus Shotorithalamia.
Concerning the above problem, J.K. Rigby (Provo, Utah)
concurs with our opinion and states (pers. com. Rigby, 11
February 2005): “You are right, as you have interpreted the
International Rules of Nomenclature. I think that the Am-
phorithalamiidae should be separated out, like we did (Se-
nowbari-Daryan & Rigby 1988). I would encourage you to
publish basically what you have written to me, that the Am-
phorithalamiidae is a valid and useful family, separate from the
Girtyocoeliidae, and that it ought to be maintained because of
differences, but also because of the rules and priority”.
Family: Thaumastocoeliidae Ott, 1967
Subfamily: Enoplocoeliinae Senowbari-Daryan, 1990
Shotorithalamia nov. gen.
D e r i v a t i o n o m i n i s :
From the Shotori Mountains,
and thalamos (Greek) = chamber.
D i a g n o n i s :
Aporate sphinctozoan sponge with ring-
chambers arranged around an axial spongocoel of ambisi-
phonate type. The exo- and endowalls are pierced by ostia
extended inwards by multibranched tubes with perforated
walls. The openings of exowall are rimmed. Vesiculae and
other internal structures are lacking.
T y p e s p e c i e s :
Shotorithalamia tubulara nov. sp.
D i s c u s s i o n :
Because of its imperforate chamber walls,
Shotorithalamia nov. gen. is attributed to the family Thau-
mastocoeliidae Ott. Further placement of the genus within
the sphinctozoan sponges is discussed above.
In general, Shotorithalamia is similar to the genus Gir-
tyocoelia Cossmann (1909), an abundant sponge in Car-
boniferous and Permian deposits, but differs from it by
having tubes extended from the exo- and endowalls into
the chamber interior. In Girtyocoelia the tubes may extend
from the exowalls to the outside (see Senowbari-Daryan
1990, pl. 45, figs. 5—6, text-fig. 48, reillustrated in Finks et
al. 2004: fig. 434/1d—1e) but not into the chamber interi-
ors, where the chamber interiors are hollow. The structure
of the spongocoel (Girtyocoelia is also prosiphonate,
while Shotorithalamia is ambisiphonate) and the perfora-
tion types of both genera are totally different.
Because of the tubes within the chamber interiors, Shoto-
rithalamia resembles Praethalamia described by Senow-
bari-Daryan & Ingavat-Helmcke (1994) from Upper Permian
strata of Phrae province, Thailand. Shotorithalamia, howev-
er, differs from Phraethalamia by having only one spongo-
coel and the latter genus by having two or more axial
spongocoels. In addition, tubes in Phaerethalamia extend
only from the endowall into the chamber interiors. Tubes
like these, extending from the exowall into the chamber in-
teriors, as in Shotorithalamia, are absent in Phraethalamia.
Tubes that extend from the endowall into the chamber
interiors are also developed in the Permian genus
Pseudoamblysiphonella (Demospongea?) described by
Senowbari-Daryan & Rigby (1988) from Upper Permian
reefs of Djebel Tebaga of southern Tunisia and they also
occur in the species Barroisia lehmani (Calcispongea), de-
scribed by Hillmer & Senowbari-Daryan (1986) from the
Cretaceous strata of northern Germany. Tubes that extend
from the exowall into the chamber interior, as developed
in Shotorithalamia, are absent in both of the foremen-
tioned genera. In addition, Pseudoamblysiphonella and
Barroisia have perforated chamber walls and are attribut-
ed to the group of Porata of Seilacher (1962).
SENOWBARI-DARYAN, RASHIDI and HAMEDANI
Fig. 2. 1—3 – Shotorithalamia tubulara nov. gen., nov. sp. 1 – Holotype. Marginal axial longitudinal section show the ring-chambers,
spongocoel and the rimmed ostia on the exowalls. In the third chamber from the bottom the tubes extended from the exo- and endowalls
appear as circles. 2 – Magnification from Fig. 1 exhibits one rimmed ostium of the exowall. 3 – Magnification from Fig. 1 shows two
chambers with a rimmed ostium of the exowall and the tubes extended from the ostia into the chamber interiors. 4—5 – Amblysiphonel-
la cf. vesiculosa vesiculosa de Koninck. 4 – Transverse oblique section shows the axial spongocoel and a few chambers filled with ve-
siculae. 5 – Longitudinal oblique section shows the crescent-like chamber filled with vesicular skeleton.
TWO PERMIAN SPHINCTOZOAN SPONGES (SHOTORI MOUNTAINS, EASTERN IRAN)
Shotorithlamia nov. gen. differs from Girytyocoeliana, an-
other genus of the family, described by Rigby, Karl, Blodgett
& Baichtal (2005) by possessing of the internal tubes and by
the lack of “rimmed to tubular interpores in irregular rings
around central tube” (Rigby et al. 2005: p. 867).
Multiple tubes, as tubular filling skeleton, fills chamber
interiors of representatives attributed to the family Polytho-
losiidae Seilacher (1962). The kind of filling skeleton and
the perforated chamber walls distinguish Shotorithalamia
from the taxa attributed to the family Polytholosiidae. No
other sphinctozoan genera are comparable with Shoto-
rithalamia nov. gen.
Shotorithalamia tubulara nov. sp.
(Figs. 2.1—3, 3, 4)
D e r i v a t i o n o m i n i s :
Named from the occurrence of
the tubes extending from the endo- and exowalls into the
H o l o t y p e :
Fig. 2.1 (magnifications of holotype are il-
lustrated in Figs. 2.2—3).
L o c u s t y p i c u s :
Kuh-e Bagh-e Vang, about 45 km
NW of Tabas (see Fig. 1, locality 1).
S t r a t u m t y p i c u m :
Lower Permian, most probably
D i a g n o s i s :
See diagnosis of the genus.
M a t e r i a l :
One specimen (holotype) only.
D e p o s i t o r y :
The material is filled together with
sponge material described by Senowbari-Daryan et al.
(2005) in the collection of the Institute of Paleontology,
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (Material: Senowbari-
Daryan, Permian, Bagh-e Vang, thin section BVA/1 and a
rock piece with the other half of the sponge).
D e s c r i p t i o n :
Because there is only one available
specimen of the species the description of holotype corre-
sponds to the description of the species.
The 50 mm long sponge with a diameter of 18 mm is
composed of 9 spherical to rectangular ring-like chambers
arranged around an axial spongocoel (Fig. 2.1). The last
two chambers are incompletely developed or broken.
Chamber height varies between 5 and 7 mm. The chamber
walls (exo-, inter- and endowalls) have the same thickness
of 0.8—1.0 mm. Because of the thickening of chamber
roofs by doubling of the walls (especially at the peripheral
part) these may appear thicker than 1 mm. An axial spon-
gocoel of ambisiphonate type, 4 mm in diameter, passes
through the whole sponge length. The exowalls are
pierced by rimmed ostia of about 0.6 mm (Figs. 2.2—3).
The most characteristic features of the sponge are the
branched tubes extended from the ostia and those from the
endowall into the chamber interiors (Figs. 2.3, 3—4). The
tubes are multibranched and pierced by numerous pores
connecting the tubes interior with the chambers (Fig. 3).
The tubes from exowalls and those from endowalls are not
connected with others. Tubes in oblique sections through
the chambers appear as circles (Fig. 2.1, in lower cham-
bers, compare with Fig. 3). The openings of the endowall
and the tubes have the same diameter as the ostia on the
exowalls. Skeletal mineralogy, microstructure and spi-
Fig. 3. Shotorithalamia tubulara nov. gen., nov. sp. (holotype,
counterpart to Fig. 2.1). Drawn from thin section. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Fig. 4. Reconstruction of Shotorithalamia tubulara nov. gen.,
nov. sp., showing the ring-like chambers around the axial spon-
gocoel, tubes within the chamber interiors, and the rimmed ostia
within the exowalls. Schematic (not to scale).
SENOWBARI-DARYAN, RASHIDI and HAMEDANI
cules are unknown. A reconstruction of Shotorithalamia
tubulara showing the chambers, tubes within the interior
of the chambers and the rimmed ostia is given in Fig. 4.
A total number of 12 sponge genera and 15 species, in-
cluding sphinctozoans (7 genera and 9 species) and inozoid
(5 genera and 6 species), were described by Senowbari-
Daryan et al. (2005) from the reefal limestone of the Permi-
an Jamal Formation exposed in Kuh-e Bahg-e Vang. With
documentation of Shotorithalamia tubulara the number of
sponge taxa in this locality is raised to 13 genera and 17
spieces, including Amblysiphonella cf. vesiculosa. The reefal
limestones of the Jamal Formation exposed in Kuh-e Bagh-e
Vang should be classified as sponge-Tubiphytes-Archaeolo-
thoporella-boundstones (Senowbari-Daryan et al. 2005).
As discussed by Senowbari-Daryan et al. (2005), the
sponge association of the Permian Jamal Formation in
Kuh-e Bagh-e Vang shows considerable similarity to the
sponge association known from the Lower Permian reef
boulders imbedded within the Lercara Formation, western
Sicily (Senowbari-Daryan & Di Stefano 1988).
The investigations were carried out
within the framework of Project Se 416/11, supported by
the Deutsch Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). The authors
thank the University of Esfahan for logistic support of our
field work. Our special thanks are addressed to Prof. Dr. J.
Keith Rigby (Provo, Utah) for the improvement of the first
draft of the manuscript. The authors express their gratitude
to Diego C. Garcia-Bellido (Madrid), Jozef Michalík (Bra-
tislava), and Oliver Weidlich (Berlin) for their fair and
constructive comments as reviewers.
Cossmann M. 1909: Rectification de nomenclature. Rev. Crit. Pale-
ozool. 13, 67—68.
Cuif J.-P. 1973: Histologie de quelques sphinctozoaires (Porif
Triassiques. Geobios 6, 2, 115—125.
Elliott G.F. de 1963: Problematical microfossils from the Creta-
ceous and Palaeocene of the Middle East. Palaeontology 6, 2,
Fan J. & Zhang W. 1985: Sphinctozoans from Late Permian reefs
of Lichuan, West Hubei, China. Facies 13, 1—44.
Finks R.M., Reid R.E.H. & Rigby J.K. 2004: In: Kaseler R.L. (Ed.):
Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part E, Porifera, Vol. 3
(revised). Geol. Soc. Amer. Univ. Kansas 1—872.
Hilmer G. & Senowbari-Daryan B. 1986: Sphinctozoa aus dem
Cenoman von Mühlheim-Broich, SW-Westfalen. Mitt. Geol.-
Paläont. Inst. Univ. Hamburg 61, 161—187.
Koninck L.G. de 1863: Description of some fossils from India.
Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London 19, 1—19.
Kraus O. 2000: Internationale Regeln für die zoologische Nomenkla-
tur. Abh. Naturwiss. Verein Hamburg, NF. 34, 1—232 (Goecke
& Evers), Hamburg.
Laubenfels M.W. de 1955: Archaeocyatha and Porifera. In: Moore
R.C. (Ed.): Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Part E.
Geol. Soc. Amer. Univ. Kansas 1—122.
Leven E. J. & Vaziri Moghaddam H. 2004: Carboniferous-Permian
stratigraphy and fusulinids of eastern Iran. The Permian in the
Bag-e Vang section (Shirgesht area). Riv. Ital. Paleont., Strati-
gr. 110, 2, 441—465.
Partoazar H. 1995: Permian deposits in Iran. Treatise on the geolo-
gy of Iran. Geol. Surv. Iran 22, 1—340 (in Persian with En-
Rigby J.K., Karl S.M., Blodgett R.B. & Baichtal J.F. 2005: Ordovi-
cian “Sphinctozoan” sponges from Prince of Wales Island,
southeastern Alaska. J. Paleont. 79, 5, 862—870.
Rigby J.K., Senowbari-Daryan B. & Hamedani A. 2005: First re-
ported occurrence of wewokellid sponges (Calcarea, Heter-
actinida) from the Permian of central Iran. Facies 51,
Ruttner A., Nabavi M.H. & Hajian J. 1968: Geology of the Shirgesht
Area (Tabas area, east Iran). Geol. Surv. Iran, Rep. Tehran 4,
Seilacher A. 1962: Die Sphinctozoa, eine Gruppe fossiler Kalk-
schwämme. Akad. Wiss. Lit., Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 1961, 10,
Senowbari-Daryan B. 1990: Die systematische Stellung der thala-
miden Schwämme und ihre Bedeutung in der Erdgeschichte.
Müncher Geowiss. Abh., A 21, 1—326.
Senowbari-Daryan B. & Di Stefano P. 1988: Microfacies and
sphinctozoan assemblage of some Lower Permian breccias
from the Lercara Formation (western Sicily). Riv. Ital. Pale-
ont. Stratigr. 94, 1, 3—34.
Senowbari-Daryan B. & Garcia-Bellido D.C. 2002: “Sphinctozoa”
or chambered sponges (polyphyletic). In: Hooper J.N.A. &
Van Soest R.W.M. (Eds.): System Porifera. A guide to the
classification of sponges. Kluwer Academic, Plenum Press,
New York, 2, 1511—1538.
Senowbari-Daryan B. & Hamedani A. 2002: First report of the oc-
currence of Amblysiphonella (thalamid sponge) in Permian of
Iran and description of A. iranica nov. sp. from central Iran.
Rev. Paléobiol. Gen
ève 21, 2, 795—801.
Senowbari-Daryan B. & Ingavat-Helmke R. 1994: Sponge assem-
blage of some Upper Permian reef limestones from Phrae
province (Northern Thailand). Geologija 36, 5—59.
Senowbari-Daryan B. & Rigby J.K. 1988: Upper Permian segment-
ed sponges from Djebel Tebaga, Tunisia. Facies 19, 171—250.
Senowbari-Daryan B., Rashidi K. & Hamedani A. 2005: Sponge
asemblage from the Permian reefal limestones of Kuh-e Bagh-e
Vang, Shotori Mountains (eastern Iran). Geol. Carpathica 56,
Steinmann G. 1882: Pharetronen-Studien. Neu. Jb. Mineral. etc. II,
Stöcklin J., Eftekhar-Nezhad J. & Hushmand-Zadeh A. 1965: Ge-
ology of the Shotori Range (Tabas area, East Iran). Geol.
Surv. Iran, Rep. Tehran 3, 1—69.
Termier H. & Termier G. 1955: Contribution
à L’étude des Spon-
giaires Permiens du Djebel Tebaga (Extreme Sud Tunisien).
Bull. Soc. France 6, 5, 613—630.
Termier H., Termier G. & Vachard D. 1977: Monographie Paléon-
tologique des affleurements Permiens du Djebel Tebaga (Sud
Tunisien). Palaeontographica, Abt. A, 156, 1—3, 1—109.
Waagen W. & Wentzel J. 1887: Salt-Range Fossils. I. Productus-
Limestone Fossils. 7. Coelentrata—Amorphozoa—Protozoa. Mem.
Geol. Surv. India, Paleont. Indica 1, 4, 5, 925—998.
Wilckens O. 1937: Korallen und Kalkschwämme aus dem obertria-
dischen Pharetronenkalk von Seran (Molukken). Neu. Jb.
Mineral. etc., Beil. Bd. 77/B, 171—211.
Zhang W. 1983: Study on the Sphinctozoans of upper Permian
Changxing Formation from Lichuan area, West Hubei, China.
In: A collection of theses for master’s degree (1981). Inst.
Geol., Acad. Sinica 1—11 (in Chinese with English abstract).
Zhuravleva I.T. 1970: Porifera, Sphinctozoa, Archaeocyathi –
their connection. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 25, 41—59.